Concurrent hyperfractionated radiotherapy and chemotherapy for patients with limited small-cell lung cancer. Results from a single institution

Evaluation of short-term and long-term efficacy of surgical and non-surgical treatment in patients with early-stage small cell lung cancer: A comparative study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to compare surgery with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus non-surgical treatments for patients with early-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) based on the short-term and long-term efficacy.

METHODS

SCLC patients who underwent a pulmonary lobectomy with post-surgical radiotherapy or chemotherapy were assigned to the surgical group. SCLC patients who received radiotherapy or chemotherapy alone were classified into the non-surgical group. The clinical efficacy was evaluated as complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD). The total effectiveness rate was calculated as CR + PR. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

Compared with the non-surgical group, the CR rate and the total effectiveness rate were higher in the surgical group, and the total effectiveness rate for male patients and patients without a smoking history were also higher in the surgical group. Distant metastasis and local recurrence concurrent with distant metastasis in the surgical group were both lower in the surgical group than in the non-surgical group. Compared with the non-surgical group, the local recurrence in male patients was lower in the surgical group, and patients in the surgical group had lower distant metastasis at TNM stage IIb. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were higher in the surgical group than in the non-surgical group.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that for patients with early-stage SCLC, better scores in effectiveness rate, disease progression, and 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were observed in patients who underwent surgery followed by adjuvant chemoradiotherapy when compared with patients without surgical treatment.

Prophylactic cranial irradiation in small cell lung cancer: A single institution experience

AIM

To compare patient demographics, prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) utilization and overall survival (OS) of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) referred to a large tertiary center with those reported in large clinical trials.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of consecutive patients with limited stage (LS) and extensive stage (ES) SCLC diagnosed at the Princess Alexandra Hospital between January 2008 and December 2013.

RESULTS

Two hundred and three patients with a mean age of 65.4 (±10.7) years were followed for a median duration of 7.6 months (range 0.5-76.5). At diagnosis, 129 (64%) patients had ES-SCLC, including 39 (19.2%) with cerebral metastases. Median OS in LS-SCLC patients receiving PCI was 18.8 months (0.9-69.4), compared with 8.2 months (0.1-34.4) in patients who did not receive PCI (P < 0.001). Median OS in the ES-SCLC cohort receiving PCI was 13.6 months (5.2-37.5) compared to 5.6 months (0.1-73.6) in patients who did not receive the therapy (P < 0.001). There was a significant improvement in intracranial disease-free survival of 7.1 months in patients with ES-SCLC who received PCI. Forty-two LS-SCLC patients (57%) did not receive PCI due to patient suitability.

CONCLUSIONS

In our SCLC cohort, median OS following PCI in LS-SCLC and ES-SCLC is comparable to published data. PCI use at our institution was lower than utilization rates in large meta-analyses, predominately due to poor chemotherapy tolerance and patient suitability. This may be more representative of patients treated in clinical practice rather than those recruited into large phase III trials.