Prostaglandins for first-trimester termination

Early medical abortion with self-administered low-dose mifepristone in combination with misoprostol

AIM

The aim of the present study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of low-dose mifepristone combined with self-administered misoprostol for termination of early pregnancy.

METHODS

A total of 533 women seeking medical abortion in early pregnancy (≤49 days since the last menstrual period) were divided randomly into hospital- (H-Mis, 250) and self- (S-Mis, 283) administered misoprostol groups. Women in two groups took 100 mg of oral mifepristone in hospital followed by 200 μg of sublingual misoprostol 24 h later in hospital or home. The primary outcome parameter was complete abortion without surgical intervention. Secondary outcomes were uterine bleeding, return of regular menses, side effects and patient acceptability.

RESULTS

High rates of complete abortion were observed for both the H-Mis group (243/250; 94.8%) and the S-Mis group (266/283; 94.0%). No significant differences in outcomes (complete abortion/failure rates) or side effects were observed between the two groups. General satisfaction rates were similar for the two groups (H-Mis, 231/250, 92.4%; S-Mis, 263/283, 92.9%; P > 0.05). Higher convenience of administration (H-Mis, 211/250, 84.4%; S-Mis, 270/283, 95.4%; P < 0.05) and privacy protection (H-Mis, 214/250, 85.6%; S-Mis, 267/283, 94.3%; P < 0.05) satisfaction rates were obtained for the S-Mis group than for the H-Mis group.

CONCLUSION

Self-administered sublingual misoprostol is as safe and effective as hospital-administered misoprostol following low-dose mifepristone to terminate early pregnancy (≤49 days of amenorrhoea) with fewer side effects.

Two cervical preparation regimens prior to surgical abortion at 10-14 weeks of gestation: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to determine whether same-day cervical preparation with an osmotic dilator and misoprostol was as effective and safe as overnight cervical preparation for surgical abortions at 10-14 weeks.

METHODS

Seventy women seeking surgical abortion at 10-14 weeks were allocated to receive one osmotic dilator 16-17 h or 6-7 h prior to an abortion. All women received misoprostol 400 μg orally 2 h before the abortion.

RESULTS

The abortion time of the same-day group was 7.42 ± 1.73 min, and that of the overnight group was 8.00 ± 2.19 min (p = 0.23). The blood loss volume of the same-day group was 20.6 ± 10.6 mL, and that of the overnight group was 16.3 ± 7.0 mL (p = 0.55). The degree of cervical dilation for the same-day group was inferior to the overnight group (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Same-day cervical preparation with misoprostol and an osmotic dilator shortens the hospitalization days, suggesting same-day cervical preparation is safe, effective, and feasible for surgical abortion at 10-14 weeks of gestation.

Cervical dilation before first-trimester surgical abortion (<14 weeks' gestation)

First-trimester surgical abortion is a common, safe procedure with a major complication rate of less than 1%. Cervical dilation before suction abortion is usually accomplished using tapered mechanical dilators. Risk factors for major complications in the first trimester include increasing gestational age and provider inexperience. Cervical priming before first-trimester surgical abortion has been studied using osmotic dilators and pharmacologic agents, most commonly misoprostol. Extensive data demonstrate that a variety of agents are safe and effective at causing preoperative cervical softening and dilation; however, given the small absolute risk of complications, the benefit of routine use of misoprostol or osmotic dilators in first-trimester surgical abortion is unclear. Although cervical priming results in reduced abortion time and improved provider ease, it requires a delay of at least 1 to 3 h and may confer side effects. The Society of Family Planning does not recommend routine cervical priming for first-trimester suction abortion but recommends limiting consideration of cervical priming for women at increased risk of complications from cervical dilation, including those late in the first trimester, adolescents and women in whom cervical dilation is expected to be challenging.

Oral misoprostol is an effective and acceptable alternative to vaginal administration for cervical priming before first trimester pregnancy termination

BACKGROUND

Cervical priming agents mainly prostaglandins in different doses and routes are used during first trimester vaccum aspiration to prevent cervical injury and shorten the abortion procedure. This study was carried out to assess women's acceptability, the efficacy and side effects of oral versus vaginal administration of misoprostol in facilitating cervical dilatation prior to first trimester vaccum aspiration.

METHODS

A randomised control study where 120 women were divided in oral (51) and vaginal (69) group. Each group received 400 mcg of misoprostol either orally or vaginally 04 h prior to first trimester pregnancy termination. Baseline cervical dilatation, women's acceptability and side effects and complications were noted in both the groups.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the oral and vaginal misoprostol groups with respect to mean cervical dilatation (5.53 mm vs 5.43 mm; p > 0.05). A total of 88% of women in the oral group expressed satisfaction with the route of misoprostol administration as compared to 74% in the vaginal route. The women in the vaginal group were experienced more preoperative vaginal bleeding (43% vs 25%).

CONCLUSION

Oral administration of misoprostol is an effective alternative to vaginal administration in preinduction cervical ripening prior to first trimester pregnancy termination.

Home use of two doses of misoprostol after mifepristone for medical abortion: A pilot study in Sweden and France

OBJECTIVE

To test the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of home use of two doses of misoprostol for medical abortion (MA) in European settings.

METHODS

One hundred thirty women (100 in Sweden, 30 in France) presenting for first-trimester MA were administered oral mifepristone in the clinic and sent home with two 400 microg doses of misoprostol, along with instructions to take the misoprostol at 24 h intervals. Women were also asked to complete a daily symptom diary. Outcomes of interest included effectiveness, side-effects, and adherence to and acceptability of the home-use regimen.

RESULTS

Three women (all in France) were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 127 women, 124 (98%) had a successful MA. All women adhered successfully to the home-use regimen, and satisfaction with home use was high (98%). Most women experienced noticeable, if transitory, side effects after both the first and second doses of misoprostol (97% and 94%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Misoprostol may successfully and satisfactorily be used at home as part of a MA regimen in European settings as it has been for years in the US. Further research to determine if two doses of misoprostol are more effective than a single dose would be useful.

A Randomized Trial of Oral Misoprostol in Premenopausal Women Before Hysteroscopy

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the use of oral misoprostol in premenopausal women undergoing diagnostic hysteroscopy produces a clinically important difference in pre-procedural cervical dilatation.

METHODS

At a tertiary care hospital, premenopausal women undergoing diagnostic hysteroscopy were randomized to receive either 400 microg of misoprostol or a vitamin B6 placebo orally 12 hours before the procedure. Patients were stratified on the basis of parity. The primary outcome was the pre-procedural dilatation of the cervix. Secondary outcomes included the need to further dilate the cervix, the time required to further dilate the cervix, and side effects.

RESULTS

Sixty-four women (11 nulliparous and 53 parous) undergoing diagnostic hysteroscopy consented to participate in the study. Thirty-three women received misoprostol and 31 received placebo. Baseline demographics showed no difference in age and parity between the two groups. There were no significant differences in pre-procedural dilatation (5.0 mm vs. 4.7 mm, P = 0.52), need to further dilate the cervix (56.7% vs. 63.0%, P = 0.63), and time required to further dilate the cervix (12.7 seconds vs. 25.7 seconds, P = 0.27). Significantly more women in the misoprostol group experienced menstrual-like cramping (24.2% vs. 3.3%, P = 0.03) and vaginal spotting (21.2% vs. 3.3%, P = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In premenopausal women, there is no improvement in pre-procedural cervical dilatation with administration of oral misoprostol 12 hours before diagnostic hysteroscopy. Further research is required in both nulliparous and parous premenopausal women to determine whether oral misoprostol improves cervical dilatation and, if so, the ideal dose, route and timing.

Cervical dilation before first-trimester surgical abortion (<14 weeks' gestation). SFP Guideline 20071

First-trimester surgical abortion is a common, safe procedure with a major complication rate of less than 1%. Cervical dilation before suction aspiration is usually accomplished using tapered mechanical dilators. Risk factors for major complications in the first trimester are increasing gestational age and provider inexperience. Use of laminaria for cervical priming reduces the risk of cervical laceration and, to a lesser extent, uterine perforation. While pharmacological priming agents may potentially have the same effects, no published studies to date have been large enough to assess these outcomes. Given an experienced provider, the risk of these injuries during suction aspiration is very small. Cervical priming can be achieved with osmotic dilators or pharmacological agents. The advantages of osmotic dilators such as laminaria, Dilapan-S and Lamicel are their ability to produce wide cervical dilation, and for the synthetic types, their advantages include predictable effects and rapid onset of action. A disadvantage of osmotic dilators is that they require a speculum examination and a trained clinician to perform the insertion. When cervical priming is performed, misoprostol is the prostaglandin analogue most commonly used worldwide. Compared to laminaria, vaginal misoprostol requires a shorter period of time to achieve the same dilatation, is associated with less discomfort and is preferred by women. The sublingual route appears as effective as vaginal administration and requires less time for priming (2 h), but it is associated with more side effects. Oral administration can produce equivalent dilation to vaginal or sublingual administration, but higher doses and longer treatment periods (8 to 12 h) are required. Buccal administration of misoprostol appears to have a pharmacokinetic and physiologic profile similar to vaginal administration; however, there are no published studies of buccal misoprostol prior to first-trimester suction abortion. While extensive data demonstrate that a variety of agents are safe and effective at causing cervical softening and dilation preoperatively, there are not enough data to conclude that routine cervical priming is necessary to reduce complications of first-trimester surgical abortion. Cervical priming increases preoperative cervical dilation, making the procedure easier and quicker for the physician. However, in order to preoperatively dilate the cervix, the woman must receive the agent at least 3 to 4 h prior to her procedure. Besides the additional waiting, the woman might experience bleeding and cramping prior to the procedure. There are insufficient data evaluating how cervical priming affects women's quality of life in relation to abortion. Based on existing evidence, the Society of Family Planning does not recommend routine cervical priming for suction aspiration procedures. The Society of Family Planning further recommends that providers consider cervical priming only for women who may be at increased risk of complications from cervical dilation, including those late in the first trimester, adolescents and women in whom cervical dilation is expected to be difficult due to either patient factors or provider experience.

Adequacy and safety of buccal misoprostol for cervical preparation prior to termination of second-trimester pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this retrospective, descriptive study is to assess the adequacy and safety of buccal misoprostol with and without laminaria for cervical preparation prior to second-trimester abortion.

METHODS

We analyzed Planned Parenthood Federation of America data from 2,218 elective dilation and evacuation (D&E) procedures conducted on women at 12 to 23 6/7 weeks of gestation from April 2002 to March 2003. Each woman received 400, 600 or 800 microg of buccal misoprostol with or without laminaria for preprocedural cervical preparation.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 62% received 400 mug, 32% received 600 microg and 6% received 800 microg of buccal misoprostol; 42.8% had laminaria inserted for phased cervical preparation. The adequacy of cervical dilation was 88.7%. The D&E procedure was completed during a single surgical procedure for 99.8%. The overall adverse event rate was 19.39 per 1,000 women, with a rate of 4.51 per 1,000 women for serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

This descriptive study suggests that use of buccal misoprostol with or without laminaria is effective and safe. If buccal misoprostol eliminates or reduces the need for phased, multiday laminaria 1-3 days prior to the surgical procedure, then its use may offer service advantages such as reduced number of clinic visits and fewer pelvic examinations per woman.

A randomised controlled trial of mifepristone in combination with misoprostol administered sublingually or vaginally for medical abortion up to 13 weeks of gestation

OBJECTIVE

To assess women's acceptability, the efficacy and side effects of sublingual versus vaginal administration of misoprostol in combination with mifepristone for medical abortion up to 13 weeks of gestation.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Aberdeen Royal Infirmary.

POPULATION

Women undergoing medical abortion under the terms of the 1967 Abortion Act.

METHODS

Mifepristone (200 mg) was given orally followed 36-48 hours later by misoprostol administration (sublingual: 600 microg; vaginal: 800 microg). A second dose of misoprostol 400 microg was given 3 hours later (sublingually or vaginally). Women between 9 and 13 weeks of gestation received a further (third) dose of misoprostol 400 microg (sublingually or vaginally), 3 hours later if abortion had not occurred.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Women's acceptability, efficacy of the regimen and side effects experienced.

RESULTS

A total of 340 women were recruited (171 sublingual and 169 vaginal). A total of 70% of women in the sublingual group expressed satisfaction with the route of misoprostol administration; 18% answered 'Don't know' while 12% were dissatisfied, compared with 68%, 28% and 4%, respectively, in the vaginal group (P= 0.02). There was no significant difference in the need for surgical evacuation for women in the sublingual (3/158, 1.9%) and vaginal groups (4/156, 2.6%) (P= 0.70). Women receiving misoprostol sublingually were more likely to experience diarrhoea (P < 0.01), shivering (P < 0.01) and unpleasant mouth taste (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Sublingual administration of misoprostol is an effective alternative to vaginal administration for medical abortion up to 13 weeks of gestation. The prevalence of prostaglandin-related side effects, however, was higher with this route of administration.

A randomized trial of laminaria tents versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening in first trimester surgical abortion

OBJECTIVE

To compare the use of laminaria tents with misoprostol for cervical ripening prior to first trimester surgical abortion.

METHOD

In a prospective, open-label, randomized trial, 70 women were assigned to have either insertion of a 3 mm intracervical laminaria tent or vaginal misoprostol 200 microg on the day prior to suction dilatation and curettage (D and C). Cervical dilatation and operating time were measured at the time of D and C; the surgeon subjectively rated the ease of dilatation. The women were interviewed just prior to the D and C with regard to pain, vaginal bleeding, and dilator preference.

RESULTS

Laminaria produced significantly (P < 0.001) greater pre-abortion dilatation of the cervix (34.8 Pratt +/- 6.2) than did misoprostol (28.4 Pratt +/- 5.8). There was no demonstrable difference in ease of dilatation or operating time. Women randomized to use of laminaria reported significantly more pain on insertion than did those who received misoprostol (P < 0.001). Conversely, misoprostol was associated with more vaginal bleeding (P < 0.01). Pain following insertion was similar in each group. Two patients aborted completely after misoprostol alone. Overall, the stated patient preference for cervical dilator was more likely to be misoprostol (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Laminaria tents are more effective cervical dilators than vaginal misoprostol when inserted the day prior to suction D and C. Vaginal misoprostol insertion is more comfortable, although it is associated with an increased risk of vaginal bleeding and may abort the pregnancy. Patient preference favours misoprostol. In patient-centred care, both laminaria and misoprostol are suitable options for cervical preparation prior to suction D and C.