Urban–Rural Patterns of Increasing Antidepressant Use Among Nursing Facility Residents

Use of antidepressant medications among older adults in European long-term care facilities: a cross-sectional analysis from the SHELTER study

Background

Late-life depression is common among older adults living in nursing homes (NHs). Over the last 30 years there has been an increase in the rates of prescription of antidepressant medications across all ages, with the largest rise reported in older adults. This study aimed to describe the pattern of antidepressant medication use among NH residents from 7 European countries and Israel and to examine patient and facilities characteristics that may account for it.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of data from the SHELTER study, an observational longitudinal cohort study that collected comprehensive resident data using the interRAI Long-Term Care Facility instrument in 7 European Countries and Israel.

Descriptive statistics were used to examine sample characteristics. Potential correlates of antidepressant medication use were identified using multiple logistic regression modeling.

Results

Among 4023 residents entering the study, 32% had depressive symptoms and nearly half of these individuals used antidepressants. Antidepressant medication use varied by country, with a prevalence in the overall sample of 35.6% (n = 1431). Among antidepressant users, 59.9% were receiving selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI). The strongest correlates of antidepressant use included reported diagnosis of anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder, pain, falls and high level of social engagement. Age over 85 years, living in facilities located in rural areas and a diagnosis of schizophrenia reduced the likelihood of being prescribed with an antidepressant.

Conclusions

A large proportion of residents in European long-term care facilities receive antidepressant medications. The decision to prescribe antidepressants to NH residents seems to be influenced by both patient and facility characteristics. Future longitudinal studies should evaluate the efficacy and safety of antidepressant use in NHs thus providing evidence for recommendations for clinical practice.

Comparison of antidepressant use between adult populations living in urban and rural communities in Israel

BACKGROUND

Depression and anxiety are among the most prevalent disorders in primary care. City dwelling is commonly cited as a risk factor for mental disorders, but epidemiological evidence for this relationship is inconclusive.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the prevalence of antidepressant use, as a proxy for the level of depressive disorders, between patients in Israeli urban and rural communities.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study, based on data drawn from the registry of the largest health maintenance organization in Israel. The prevalence of antidepressant purchase during 2014 was evaluated for 581291 patients living in urban and rural communities. Data were also collected for potential confounding variables: age, gender, comorbidity, socioeconomic status and being a holocaust survivor.

RESULTS

Results showed higher rates of antidepressant use among patients living in urban (11.8%) compared with rural communities (8.1%; <0.001). A particularly high rate of antidepressant use was found on kibbutz (15.9%), a collective rural community in Israel, compared with both urban and other rural communities. Kibbutz compared with other rural communities: odds ratio (OR) = 1.73, P < 0.001; urban communities compared with non-kibbutz rural communities: OR = 1.21, P < 0.001. A significantly lower rate of antidepressant use was found in urban and rural Arab-majority communities (3.9% and 3.8%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Antidepressant use varies significantly between different communities in Israel. The highest rate of antidepressant use in our study was found on kibbutz, followed by that in urban communities, with the lowest rates in non-kibbutz rural communities. This difference may derive from different depression rates, stigma of mental illness and awareness of mental disorders.

Quality of mental health care for nursing home residents: a literature review

Because of the high proportion of nursing home residents with a mental illness other than dementia, the quality of mental health care in nursing homes is a major clinical and policy issue. The authors apply Donabedian's framework for assessing quality of care based on the triad of structure, process, and outcome-based measures in reviewing the literature on the quality of mental health care in nursing homes. Quality measures used within the literature include mental health consultations and hospitalizations, inappropriate use of medications, and mental health survey deficiencies. Factors related to the resident's welfare (nurse staffing), provider norms (locality), and financial factors (payer mix) were associated with the quality of mental health care. Although future research is necessary, the extant literature suggests that persons with mental illness are frequently admitted to nursing homes and their care is often of poor quality and related to a series of resident and facility factors.

Sociodemographic correlates of antidepressant utilisation in Australia

OBJECTIVE

To investigate sociodemographic variation in antidepressant utilisation.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Cross-sectional analysis of antidepressant prescription under the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in Australia, 2003-2005.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Antidepressant utilisation (defined daily dose/1000/day) by sex, age, socioeconomic status (SES) and geographical area.

RESULTS

Total antidepressant utilisation increased with age. Among those aged > or = 15 years, female utilisation was about double that of males. About half of antidepressant utilisation was accounted for by sertraline, venlafaxine, citalopram, and paroxetine. SES differentials in antidepressant utilisation changed across age groups for males and females: among those aged < or = 19 years, total antidepressant utilisation was significantly less in lower SES groups (P < 0.001); there was no relationship to SES among 20-29-year-olds; and among those aged > or = 30 years, antidepressant utilisation was significantly higher in lower SES groups (P < 0.001). SES differences were attenuated after adjusting for urban or rural residence, but remained statistically significant. Antidepressant utilisation rates were highest in regional centres.

CONCLUSION

Antidepressant utilisation in Australia partially reflects sociodemographic differences in the prevalence of affective disorder. Discrepancies between treatment provision and treatment need suggest that not all social strata in Australia have equal access to these treatments.

Early implementation of medicare part D in urban and rural nursing facilities

OBJECTIVE

To determine if differences occurred in the early implementation of Medicare Part D (prescription drug program) between urban and rural nursing facilities.

DESIGN

Nursing facility demographic data, obtained from the Nursing Facility Compare Medicare Web site, were used to create matched pairs of rural and urban facilities. On-site interviews were conducted in June and July 2006 with one designated representative from each nursing facility. Details for each prescription drug plan (PDP), identified by the facility representatives, were obtained from the PDP's Web site.

SETTING

A prospective pilot field study of rural and urban nursing facilities was created from among 40 facilities in the 26-county Texas Panhandle. Five rural/urban nursing facilities of identical ownership and of similar perceived quality (number of cited deficiencies) and staffing (total nursing staff time per resident) were used for the pilot study.

PARTICIPANTS

Nursing facility employees charged with overseeing Part D implementation and trained interviewers.

INTERVENTION

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Number of PDPs per nursing facility and distribution of persons providing enrollment decision support.

RESULTS

Rural facilities used more PDPs (7.4 +/- 3.9) than did urban facilities (4.6 +/- 3.8, NSS). Independent samples Student's t-test determined that there was a significant difference in the average number of drugs per resident. Rural residents received fewer medications (8.2 +/- 1.9) than urban residents (11.2 +/- 2.2; P = 0.049, t = 2.32).

CONCLUSIONS

These early findings suggest that rural nursing facilities interact with more PDPs than urban facilities and that Medicare Part D enrollment decisions are more likely to be aided by family members in rural facilities than in urban nursing facilities.