Function, diversity, and evolution of signal transduction in prokaryotes

Allostery and protein plasticity: the keystones for bacterial signaling and regulation

Bacteria sense intracellular and environmental signals using an array of proteins as antennas. The information is transmitted from such sensory modules to other protein domains that act as output effectors. Sensor and effector can be part of the same polypeptide or instead be separate diffusible proteins that interact specifically. The output effector modules regulate physiologic responses, allowing the cells to adapt to the varying conditions. These biological machineries are known as signal transduction systems (STSs). Despite the captivating architectural diversity exhibited by STS proteins, a universal feature is their allosteric regulation: signal binding at one site modifies the activity at a physically distant site. Allostery requires protein plasticity, precisely encoded within their 3D structures, and implicating programmed molecular motions. This review summarizes how STS proteins connect stimuli to specific responses by exploiting allostery and protein plasticity. Illustrative examples spanning a wide variety of protein folds will focus on one- and two-component systems (TCSs). The former encompass the entire transmission route within a single polypeptide, whereas TCSs have evolved as separate diffusible proteins that interact specifically, sometimes including additional intermediary proteins in the pathway. Irrespective of their structural diversity, STS proteins are able to modulate their own molecular motions, which can be relatively slow, rigid-body movements, all the way to fast fluctuations in the form of macromolecular flexibility, thus spanning a continuous protein dynamics spectrum. In sum, STSs rely on allostery to steer information transmission, going from simple two-state switching to rich multi-state conformational order/disorder transitions.

Adjustment in tumbling rates improves bacterial chemotaxis on obstacle-laden terrains

The mechanisms of bacterial chemotaxis have been extensively studied for several decades, but how the physical environment influences the collective migration of bacterial cells remains less understood. Previous models of bacterial chemotaxis have suggested that the movement of migrating bacteria across obstacle-laden terrains may be slower compared with terrains without them. Here, we show experimentally that the size or density of evenly spaced obstacles do not alter the average exit rate of Escherichia coli cells from microchambers in response to external attractants, a function that is dependent on intact cell-cell communication. We also show, both by analyzing a revised theoretical model and by experimentally following single cells, that the reduced exit time in the presence of obstacles is a consequence of reduced tumbling frequency that is adjusted by the E. coli cells in response to the topology of their environment. These findings imply operational short-term memory of bacteria while moving through complex environments in response to chemotactic stimuli and motivate improved algorithms for self-autonomous robotic swarms.

The two faces of Janus: virulence gene regulation by CovR/S in group A streptococci

The group A streptococcus (GAS) causes a variety of human diseases, including toxic shock syndrome and necrotizing fasciitis, which are both associated with significant mortality. Even the superficial self-limiting diseases caused by GAS, such as pharyngitis, impose a significant economic burden on society. GAS can cause a wide spectrum of diseases because it elaborates virulence factors that enable it to spread and survive in different environmental niches within the human host. The production of many of these virulence factors is directly controlled by the activity of the CovR/S two-component regulatory system. CovS acts in one direction as a kinase primarily to activate the response regulator CovR and repress the expression of major virulence factors and in the other direction as a phosphatase to permit gene expression in response to environmental changes that mimic conditions found during human infection. This Janus-like behaviour of the CovR/S system is recapitulated in the binding of CovR to the promoters that it directly regulates. Interactions between different faces of the CovR DNA binding domain appear to depend upon DNA sequence, leading to the potential for differential regulation of virulence gene expression.

Control of Streptococcus pyogenes virulence: modeling of the CovR/S signal transduction system

The CovR/S system in Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A Streptococcus, or GAS), a two-component signal transduction/transcription regulation system, controls the expression of major virulence factors. The presence of a negative feedback loop distinguishes the CovR/S system from the majority of bacterial two-component systems. We developed a deterministic model of the CovR/S system consisting of eight delay differential equations. Computational experiments showed that the system possessed a unique stable steady state. The dynamical behavior of the system showed a tendency for oscillations becoming more pronounced for longer but still biochemically realistic delays resulting from reductions in the rates of translation elongation. We have devised an efficient procedure for computing the system's steady state. Further, we have shown that the signal-response curves are hyperbolic for the default parameter values. However, in experiments with randomized parameters we demonstrated that sigmoidality of signal-response curves, implying a response threshold, is not only possible, but seems to be rather typical for CovR/S-like systems even when binding of the CovR response regulator protein to a promoter is non-cooperative. We used sensitivity analysis to simplify the model in order to make it analytically tractable. The existence and uniqueness of the steady state and hyperbolicity of signal-response curves for the majority of the variables was proved for the simplified model. Also, we found that provided CovS was active, the system was insensitive to changes in the concentration of any other phosphoryl donor such as acetyl phosphate.

Bacterial motility on a surface: many ways to a common goal

When free-living bacteria colonize biotic or abiotic surfaces, the resultant changes in physiology and morphology have important consequences on their growth, development, and survival. Surface motility, biofilm formation, fruiting body development, and host invasion are some of the manifestations of functional responses to surface colonization. Bacteria may sense the growth surface either directly through physical contact or indirectly by sensing the proximity of fellow bacteria. Extracellular signals that elicit new gene expression include autoinducers, amino acids, peptides, proteins, and carbohydrates. This review focuses mainly on surface motility and makes comparisons to features shared by other surface phenomenon.