Pulsed–dose rate brachytherapy with concomitant chemotherapy and interstitial hyperthermia in patients with recurrent head-and-neck cancer

Combined Hyperthermia and Re-Irradiation in Non-Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

This systematic literature review summarizes clinical studies and trials involving combined non-ablative hyperthermia and re-irradiation in locoregionally recurrent cancer except breast cancer.

METHODS

One database and one registry, MEDLINE and clinicaltrials.gov, respectively, were searched for studies on combined non-ablative hyperthermia and re-irradiation in non-breast cancer patients. Extracted study characteristics included treatment modalities and re-irradiation dose concepts. Outcomes of interest were tumor response, survival measures, toxicity data and palliation. Within-study bias assessment included the identification of conflict of interest (COI). The final search was performed on 29 August 2022.

RESULTS

Twenty-three articles were included in the final analysis, reporting on 603 patients with eight major tumor types. Twelve articles (52%) were retrospective studies. Only one randomized trial was identified. No COI statement was declared in 11 studies. Four of the remaining twelve studies exhibited significant COI. Low study and patient numbers, high heterogeneity in treatment modalities and endpoints, as well as significant within- and across-study bias impeded the synthesis of results.

CONCLUSION

Outside of locoregionally recurrent breast cancer, the role of combined moderate hyperthermia and re-irradiation can so far not be established. This review underscores the necessity for more clinical trials to generate higher levels of clinical evidence for combined re-irradiation and hyperthermia.

American Brachytherapy Society Task Group Report: Combined external beam irradiation and interstitial brachytherapy for base of tongue tumors and other head and neck sites in the era of new technologies

Irradiation plays an important role in the treatment of cancers of the head and neck providing a high locoregional tumor control and preservation of organ functions. External beam irradiation (EBI) results in unnecessary radiation exposure of the surrounding normal tissues increasing the incidence of side effects (xerostomy, osteoradionecrosis, and so forth). Brachytherapy (BT) seems to be the best choice for dose escalation over a short treatment period and for minimizing radiation-related normal tissue damage due to the rapid dose falloff around the source. Low-dose-rate BT is being increasingly replaced by pulsed-dose-rate and high-dose-rate BT because the stepping source technology offers the advantage of optimizing dose distribution by varying dwell times. Pulsed-dose and high-dose rates appear to yield local control and complication rates equivalent to those of low-dose rate. BT may be applied alone; but in case of high risk of nodal metastases, it is used together with EBI. This review presents the results and the indications of combined BT and EBI in carcinoma of the base of tongue and other sites of the head and neck region, as well as the role BT plays among other-normal tissue protecting-modern radiotherapy modalities (intensity-modulated radiotherapy, stereotactic radiotherapy) applied in these localizations.

Second-line treatment of recurrent HNSCC: tumor debulking in combination with high-dose-rate brachytherapy and a simultaneous cetuximab-paclitaxel protocol

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

After the failure of first-line treatment, the clinical prognosis in head and neck cancer (HNSCC) deteriorates. Effective therapeutic strategies are limited due to the toxicity of previous treatments and the diminished tolerance of surrounding normal tissue. This study demonstrates a promising second-line regimen, with function preserving surgical tumor debulking, followed by a combination of postoperative interstitial brachytherapy and a simultaneous protocol of cetuximab and taxol.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2006 to May 2013, 197 patients with HNSCC were treated with brachytherapy at the University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, including 94 patients due to recurrent cancer. Within these, 18 patients were referred to our clinic because of early progressive disease following first- or second-line treatment failure. They received the new palliative regimen. A matched-pair analysis including recurrent tumor stage, status of resection margins, tissue invasion and previous therapy was performed to evaluate this treatment retrospectively. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), functional outcome and treatment toxicity was analyzed on the basis of medical records and follow-up data.

RESULTS

DFS and OS of the study group were 8.7 and 14.8 months. Whereas, DFS and OS of the control group, treated only by function preserving tumor debulking and brachytherapy, was 3.9 and 6.1 months respectively. This demonstrates a positive trend through the additional use of the cetuximab-taxane protocol. Furthermore, no increase of therapy induced toxicities was displayed.

CONCLUSION

Pre-treated patients with a further relapse benefit from the 'cetuximab-taxane recurrency scheme'. It seems to be a valuable complement to interdisciplinary and multimodal tumor therapy, which improves OS and results in acceptable toxicity.

A review of the clinical experience in pulsed dose rate brachytherapy

Pulsed dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy is a treatment modality that combines physical advantages of high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy with the radiobiological advantages of low dose rate brachytherapy. The aim of this review was to describe the effective clinical use of PDR brachytherapy worldwide in different tumour locations. We found 66 articles reporting on clinical PDR brachytherapy including the treatment procedure and outcome. Moreover, PDR brachytherapy has been applied in almost all tumour sites for which brachytherapy is indicated and with good local control and low toxicity. The main advantage of PDR is, because of the small pulse sizes used, the ability to spare normal tissue. In certain cases, HDR resembles PDR brachytherapy by the use of multifractionated low-fraction dose.

Modern head and neck brachytherapy: from radium towards intensity modulated interventional brachytherapy

Intensity modulated brachytherapy (IMBT) is a modern development of classical interventional radiation therapy (brachytherapy), which allows the application of a high radiation dose sparing severe adverse events, thereby further improving the treatment outcome. Classical indications in head and neck (H&N) cancers are the face, the oral cavity, the naso- and oropharynx, the paranasal sinuses including base of skull, incomplete resections on important structures, and palliation. The application type can be curative, adjuvant or perioperative, as a boost to external beam radiation as well as without external beam radiation and with palliative intention. Due to the frequently used perioperative application method (intraoperative implantation of inactive applicators and postoperative performance of radiation), close interdisciplinary cooperation between surgical specialists (ENT-, dento-maxillary-facial-, neuro- and orbital surgeons), as well interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) experts are obligatory. Published results encourage the integration of IMBT into H&N therapy, thereby improving the prognosis and quality of life of patients.

An investigation of 125I seed permanent implantation for recurrent carcinoma in the head and neck after surgery and external beam radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

A preliminary assessment was conducted of the feasibility, efficacy, and morbidity of 125I seed implantation for recurrent head and neck carcinoma after surgery and external beam radiotherapy.

METHODS

Nineteen patients with recurrent head and neck carcinomas underwent 125I seed implantation under ultrasound or computed tomography guidance. The actuarial D90 of 125I seed implantation ranged from 90 to 160 Gy (median, 131 Gy). The follow-up period ranged from 3 to 44 months (median, 11 months).

RESULTS

The median local control was 24 months (95% confidence interval, 10.2 to 37.8). The one- year, two-year and three-year local controls were 73.3%, 27.5% and 27.5%, respectively, whereas the one-year, two-year and three-year survival rates were 53.0%, 18.2% and 18.2%, respectively, and the median survival was 13 months (95% confidence interval, 6.6 to 19.4). A total of 26.3% of patients (5/19) died of local recurrence and 21.1% of patients (4/19) died of metastases. One suffered from a grade 1 skin reaction.

CONCLUSIONS

125I seed implantation is feasible and safe as a salvage treatment for patients with recurrent head and neck cancers. The high local control results and low morbidity merits further investigation.

Present and future technology for simultaneous superficial thermoradiotherapy of breast cancer

This paper reviews systems and techniques to deliver simultaneous thermoradiotherapy of breast cancer. It first covers the clinical implementation of simultaneous delivery of superficial (microwave or ultrasound) hyperthermia and external photon beam radiotherapy, first using a Cobalt-60 teletherapy unit and later medical linear accelerators. The parallel development and related studies of the Scanning Ultrasound Reflector Linear Arrays System (SURLAS), an advanced system specifically designed and developed for simultaneous thermoradiotherapy, follows. The performance characteristics of the SURLAS are reviewed and power limitation problems at high acoustic frequencies (>3 MHz) are discussed along with potential solutions. Next, the feasibility of simultaneous SURLAS hyperthermia and intensity modulated radiation therapy/image-guided radiotherapy (IMRT/IGRT) is established based on published and newly presented studies. Finally, based on the encouraging clinical results thus far, it is concluded that new trials employing the latest technologies are warranted along with further developments in treatment planning.

CT-guided iodine-125 seed permanent implantation for recurrent head and neck cancers

BACKGROUND

To investigate the feasibility, and safety of 125I seed permanent implantation for recurrent head and neck carcinoma under CT-guidance.

RESULTS

A retrospective study on 14 patients with recurrent head and neck cancers undergone 125I seed implantation with different seed activities. The post-plan showed that the actuarial D90 of 125I seeds ranged from 90 to 218 Gy (median, 157.5 Gy). The follow-up was 3 to 60 months (median, 13 months). The median local control was 18 months (95% CI, 6.1-29.9 months), and the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5- year local controls were 52%, 39%, 39%, and 39%, respectively. The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5- survival rates were 65%, 39%, 39% and 39%, respectively, with a median survival time of 20 months (95% CI, 8.7-31.3 months). Of all patients, 28.6% (4/14) died of local recurrence, 7.1% (1/14) died of metastases, one patient died of hepatocirrhosis, and 8 patients are still alive to the date of data analysis.

CONCLUSION

CT-guided 125I seed implantation is feasible and safe as a salvage or palliative treatment for patients with recurrent head and neck cancers.

GEC-ESTRO recommendations for brachytherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas

Both primary and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck are classic indications for brachytherapy. A high rate of local tumor control at the cost of limited morbidity can be achieved with brachytherapy through good patient selection, meticulous source implantation and careful treatment planning. However, no randomized trials have been performed, and there is scant evidence in the literature especially regarding practical clinical recommendations for brachytherapy for head and neck subsites. The Head and Neck Working Group of the European Brachytherapy Group (Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie-European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (GEC-ESTRO) therefore decided to formulate the present consensus recommendations for low-dose rate, pulsed-dose rate and high-dose rate brachytherapy. The use of brachytherapy in combination with external beam radiotherapy and/or surgery is also covered as well as the use of brachytherapy in previously irradiated patients. Given the paucity of evidence in the literature, these recommendations are mainly based on clinical experience accumulated by the members of the working group over several decades and the respective publications. The recommendations cover in a general part (1) patient selection, the pre-treatment work up and patient care, (2) treatment strategy, (3) target definition, (4) implant techniques, (5) dose and dose rate prescription, (6) treatment planning and reporting, (7) treatment monitoring (8) catheter removal, and (9) post-treatment patient care and follow-up. The recommendations are then specified for the classical brachytherapy tumor sites following an analogue more focussed structure (patient selection, implant technique, target definition, dose and dose rate prescription, results): lip, oral mucosa, mobile tongue, floor of mouth, oropharynx, nasopharynx, paranasal sinuses.

Quality of interstitial PDR-brachytherapy-implants of head-and-neck-cancers: predictive factors for local control and late toxicity?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Parameters and indices related to the implant geometry in use for describing the quality of volume implants in interstitial brachytherapy were developed on the basis of LDR-brachytherapy. The aim of our study was to evaluate their usefulness for predicting late toxicity and local control in the PDR-brachytherapy of head-and-neck-tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2000 and October 2004, 210 patients were treated with PDR-brachytherapy which was administered either postoperatively or as definitive treatment. Brachytherapy was used as sole treatment in some cases while in others a combination with EBRT was used. For assessment of quality of implants we analyzed the following indices and parameters using the univariate chi2 test and multivariate logistic regression analysis: V85, V120 and V150 (volume enclosed by the surface of the 85%-, 120%- and 150%-isodose), UI (uniformity index), QI (quality index), HI (homogeneity index), VGR (volume gradient ratio), DNR (dose non-uniformity ratio), LD (low dose), HD (high dose), PD (peak dose) and the intersource spacing.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 24 months (4-50) the rate of - usually transient - soft tissue necrosis (STN) was 11%, osteoradionecrosis (ORN) was seen in 7.6% of cases and local relapse occurred in 7% of cases. Univariate analysis shows a significant influence on the development of soft tissue necrosis for V85, and on osteoradionecrosis for HD and PD. In the multivariate analysis a correlation between soft tissue necrosis and QI was found. For local control a correlation with QI, VGR and minimal tube distance was found using univariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Using interstitial PDR-brachytherapy in head-and-neck-tumors the probability of local control and of the development of soft tissue necrosis or osteoradionecrosis is dependent on dose and volume parameter like the volume of the reference isodose, the high and peak dose values, on the homogeneity of the dose distribution, quantified by the quality index or the volume gradient ratio as well on the minimal tube distance.

Feasibility report for retreatment of locally recurrent head-and-neck cancers by combined brachy-chemotherapy using frameless image-guided 3D interstitial brachytherapy

PURPOSE

Brachytherapy re-irradiation may offer an alternative re-treatment of recurrent head-and-neck cancer even after previous full dose radiation therapy. The purposes of this study were to determine the feasibility and accuracy of frameless image-guided interstitial needle implantation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between January 2000 and March 2003, 14 patients with biopsy-proven locally recurrent head-and-neck-cancer were retreated after previous full dose irradiation with combined external beam-brachytherapy with concomitant chemotherapy. Brachytherapy needle implantation was virtually planned taking into account the surrounding risk structures. Needles were implanted using an adapted frameless navigation system. Chemoradiotherapy was followed by 2-4 courses of chemotherapy every fourth week starting 4 weeks after the end of brachytherapy.

RESULTS

The 1- and 2-year local control rates were 78% and 57%, respectively. Local control was obtained in 8/14 patients. The actuarial 1- and 2-year survival rates were 83% and 64%, respectively. The median survival was 28 months after a median follow-up of 21 months (range, 8-53). Six weeks after brachytherapy, 1 patient developed localized soft tissue necrosis which did not require surgical intervention. No additional grade III or IV late toxicity was seen after re-irradiation. Mean deviation of image-guided needle implantation was 3.4 mm for each needle (SD, 1.9 mm; range, 0.5-14 mm). The mean deviation of all needles of an implant was 4.3 mm (range, 2.3-8.6 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate that pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy in combination with sequential chemotherapy is effective and safe in re-irradiation of locally recurrent oropharyngeal carcinomas and can be offered to patients with curative intent. Image guidance allows virtual planning and navigated implantation of brachytherapy needles with regard to optimized needle distribution and risk structures.

Image fusion of CT and MRI data enables improved target volume definition in 3D-brachytherapy treatment planning

PURPOSE

To integrate MRI into CT-based 3D-brachytherapy treatment planning using a software system for image registration and fusion.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Sixteen patients with recurrent head-and-neck cancer, vulvar cancer, liposarcoma, and cervical cancer were treated with interstitial (n=12) and endocavitary (n=4) brachytherapy. CT and MRI scans were performed after implantation and prior to treatment planning. Image registration to integrate the CT and MR information into a single geometric framework was performed using a software algorithm based on mutual information. Conventional 3D-brachytherapy planning based on CT-information alone was compared to brachytherapy planning based on fused CT and MRI data. The accuracy of the image fusion was measured using predefined corresponding landmarks in the CT and MRI data.

RESULTS

The presented automated algorithm proved to be robust and reliable (mean registration error 1.8 mm, range 0.8-4.1 mm, SD 0.9 mm). Tumor visualization was difficult using CT alone in all cases. Brachytherapy treatment planning based on fused CT and MRI data enabled better definition of target volume and risk structures as compared to treatment planning based on CT alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Image registration and fusion is feasible for afterloading brachytherapy treatment planning. Treatment planning based on fused CT and MRI data resulted in improved target volume and risk structure definition.