The role of pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy in previously irradiated head-and-neck cancer

Advancements of radiotherapy for recurrent head and neck cancer in modern era

Head and neck cancer is a kind of cancer which can be eradicated from radical radiation therapy. However, with best efforts, nearly 40% patients will experience locoregional recurrence. Locoregional recurrence is the main cause of cancer-related death in head and neck cancers, so local treatments play a key role in improving progression free survival. In the last decades, radiation techniques have been tremendously developed, highly conformal radiation techniques such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, brachytherapy and proton or heavy ion radiation therapy have their unique radiobiological advances. Although reirradiation is widely used in clinical practice, but little is known when comparing the different techniques. In this review, we will provide a comprehensive overview of the role of reirradiation in recurrent head and neck cancers including radiation techniques, patient selection, overall clinical benefits, and toxicities.

Exercise-based rehabilitation on functionality and quality of life in head and neck cancer survivors. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) is a globally rare cancer that includes a variety of tumors affecting the upper aerodigestive tract. It presents with difficulty breathing or swallowing and is mainly treated with radiation therapy, chemotherapy, or surgery for tumors that have spread locally or throughout the body. Alternatively, exercise can be used during cancer treatment to improve function, including pain relief, increase range of motion and muscle strength, and reduce cancer-related fatigue, thereby enhancing quality of life. Although existing evidence suggests the adjunctive use of exercise in other cancer types, no previous studies have examined the effects on HNC survivors. The aim of this meta-analysis was to quantify the effect of exercise-based rehabilitation on functionality and quality of life in HNC survivors who underwent surgery and/or chemoradiotherapy. A systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out following PRISMA statement and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023390300). The search was performed in MEDLINE (PubMED), Cochrane Library, CINAHL and Web of Science (WOS) databases from inception to 31st December 2022 using the terms "cancer", "head and neck neoplasms", "exercise", "rehabilitation", "complications", "muscle contraction", "muscle stretching exercises" combining with booleans "AND"/"OR". PEDro scale, Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and GRADE were used to assess methodological quality, risk of bias and grade of recommendation of included studies respectively. 18 studies (n = 1322) were finally included which 1039 (78.6%) were men and 283 (21.4%) were women. In patients who underwent radio-chemotherapy, overall pain [SMD = - 0.62 [- 4.07, 2.83] CI 95%, Z = 0.35, p = 0.72] and OP [SMD = - 0.07 [- 0.62, 0.48] CI 95%, Z = 0.25, p = 0.81] were slightly reduced with exercise in comparison to controls. Besides, lower limb muscle strength [SMD = - 0.10 [- 1.52, 1.32] CI 95%, Z = 0.14, p = 0.89] and fatigue [SMD = - 0.51 [- 0.97, - 0.057] CI 95%, Z = 2.15, p < 0.01] were also improved in those who receive radio-chemoradiation. In HNC survivors treated with neck dissection surgery, exercise was superior to controls in overall pain [SMD = - 1.04 [- 3.31, 1.23] CI 95%, Z = 0.90, p = 0.37] and, in mid-term, on shoulder pain SMD = - 2.81 [- 7.06, 1.43] CI 95%, Z = 1.76, p = 0.08]. No differences in quality of life were found at any of the follow-up periods. There is evidence of fair to good methodological quality, low to moderate risk of bias, and weak recommendations supporting the use of exercise-based rehabilitation to increase functionality. However, no evidence was found in favor of the use of this modality for improving the quality of life of HNC survivors who underwent chemoradiotherapy or surgery.

Is Brachytherapy Feasible After Head and Neck Cancer Reconstructive Surgery? Preliminary Report

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the influence of interstitial postoperative brachytherapy for the vitality and quality of flaps used for reconstruction of tissue defects after head and neck cancer salvage resection. We aimed at presenting six consecutive patients with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma in head and neck region who underwent salvage surgery and tissue reconstruction with a regional or free flap followed by brachytherapy. Reconstruction was performed with a free radial forearm flap in 2 cases, with a free thigh flap in 2 cases, and with a myocutaneous lateral upper arm flap in the next 2 cases. In all patients, pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy was used with a median value of 0.7 Gy (range 0.6–0.8 Gy) per pulse and a median total dose of 20 Gy (range 20–40 Gy). In the analyzed group, there were no serious wound and flap complications after brachytherapy. In one case, peripheral skin necrosis was noticed. No revision surgery was needed but only surgical debridement of the necrotic margins. All wounds healed within 14 days after surgery as well as donor sites which healed within 4 weeks. Based upon our data, pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy seems to be a safe option that can be performed at the site of reconstruction in immediate postoperative period with minimal wound complications and with no impact on flap survival. Further clinical study based on larger patient series is needed to present statistically proven results.

Five-year outcome of ultrasound-guided interstitial permanent 125I seeds implantation for local head and neck recurrent tumors: a single center retrospective study

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of interstitial permanent low-dose-rate ultrasound-guided ¹²⁵I seeds implantation of local head and neck recurrent tumors.

Material and methods

Sixty-four consecutive patients, with 81 lesions in total, underwent permanent implantation of ¹²⁵I seeds under ultrasound guidance. Post-operative dosimetry was performed for all patients. Follow-up period ranged 103.5 months (median, 14 months).

Results

Among the 81 lesions, the totally response rate was 80.2%, and 22 (27%) and 43 (53%) lesions showed complete and partial remission. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year tumor control rates were 75.2%, 73.0%, and 69.1%, respectively. The results for cervical lymph node recurrence were better than those for recurrence or residual disease of primary head and neck neoplasms, with 5-year local control rates of 72.7% and 39.9%, respectively. D₉₀ was an independent prognostic factor of the tumor control, and lesion recurrence location and time to tumor progression were prognostic factors of survival. As of the date of follow-up, 22 of 64 patients were still alive. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 57.4%, 31%, and 26.6%, respectively, with a median survival of 20 months. Grade 4 skin ulceration was seen in two patients; grade 1 or 2 skin reactions were seen in 11 patients (17%) who had received external beam radiotherapy before. Other severe complications were absent.

Conclusions

Interstitial permanent implantation of ¹²⁵I seeds under ultrasound guidance is feasible, efficacious, and safe for refractory head and neck metastasis or recurrence.

Cesium-131 brachytherapy in high risk and recurrent head and neck cancers: first report of long-term outcomes

Purpose

The feasibility and efficacy of re-irradiation using contemporary radiation techniques to treat recurrent head and neck cancer has been demonstrated but the role of brachytherapy is unclear. Here we describe the use of ¹³¹Cs brachytherapy with concurrent salvage surgery in 18 patients.

Material and methods

Eligible patients underwent maximal gross resection of the tumor with implantation of brachytherapy seeds delivering a minimum dose of 80 Gy to the tumor bed. Rates of overall survival, locoregional progression free survival, disease-free survival, and radiation-induced toxicity were analyzed.

Results

Retrospective Kaplan-Meier analysis shows median overall survival was 15 months and disease free survival was 12 months. Two patients developed grade 3 toxicity; all other complications were grade 1-2 with no grade 4 or 5 complications.

Conclusions

Compared to prior literature, our study shows comparable rates of survival with a decreased rate of radiation-induced toxicity.

A review of the clinical experience in pulsed dose rate brachytherapy

Pulsed dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy is a treatment modality that combines physical advantages of high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy with the radiobiological advantages of low dose rate brachytherapy. The aim of this review was to describe the effective clinical use of PDR brachytherapy worldwide in different tumour locations. We found 66 articles reporting on clinical PDR brachytherapy including the treatment procedure and outcome. Moreover, PDR brachytherapy has been applied in almost all tumour sites for which brachytherapy is indicated and with good local control and low toxicity. The main advantage of PDR is, because of the small pulse sizes used, the ability to spare normal tissue. In certain cases, HDR resembles PDR brachytherapy by the use of multifractionated low-fraction dose.

The role of re-irradiation of secondary and recurrent head and neck carcinomas. Is it a potentially curative treatment? A practical approach

Despite aggressive efforts to cure head and neck cancer patients, including altered fractionation and the addition of chemotherapy to radiation, locoregional recurrence remains a serious issue to face in clinical practice. Indeed, recurrent and second primary tumors occurring in previously irradiated area are common clinical challenge. Whenever possible, patients are advised to undergo salvage surgery. Nevertheless, few patients are suitable candidates for curative resection. In such cases, chemotherapy alone has traditionally been considered, with a poor response rate. It has been questioned whether re-irradiation toxicity outweighs the potential benefits, considering that the median survival of re-irradiated patients marginally exceeds the benefits observed with chemotherapy alone. However, full-dose re-irradiation is a viable treatment option, offering long-term survival for selected patients. Moreover, several prognostic factors should be considered for patients undergoing re-irradiation, such as basic patient characteristics, performance status, the location and extension of recurrent disease, patient co-morbidities, current speech and swallowing function, the interval from the initial radiation therapy to recurrence, previously received doses by critical structures and prior treatment toxicity. Nevertheless, several questions remain unanswered. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the major issues in the field of re-irradiation regarding the current evidence. Therefore, the major selection criteria and new treatment strategies are discussed to define the ideal candidates to undergo re-irradiation and describe a practical approach to these patients. Given the limited evidence in this field, the optimal treatment of recurrent and second primary cancers remains to be defined. Future prospective study of this approach is warranted.

An investigation of 125I seed permanent implantation for recurrent carcinoma in the head and neck after surgery and external beam radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

A preliminary assessment was conducted of the feasibility, efficacy, and morbidity of 125I seed implantation for recurrent head and neck carcinoma after surgery and external beam radiotherapy.

METHODS

Nineteen patients with recurrent head and neck carcinomas underwent 125I seed implantation under ultrasound or computed tomography guidance. The actuarial D90 of 125I seed implantation ranged from 90 to 160 Gy (median, 131 Gy). The follow-up period ranged from 3 to 44 months (median, 11 months).

RESULTS

The median local control was 24 months (95% confidence interval, 10.2 to 37.8). The one- year, two-year and three-year local controls were 73.3%, 27.5% and 27.5%, respectively, whereas the one-year, two-year and three-year survival rates were 53.0%, 18.2% and 18.2%, respectively, and the median survival was 13 months (95% confidence interval, 6.6 to 19.4). A total of 26.3% of patients (5/19) died of local recurrence and 21.1% of patients (4/19) died of metastases. One suffered from a grade 1 skin reaction.

CONCLUSIONS

125I seed implantation is feasible and safe as a salvage treatment for patients with recurrent head and neck cancers. The high local control results and low morbidity merits further investigation.

Long term results of a prospective dose escalation phase-II trial: interstitial pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy as boost for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer

PURPOSE

We reviewed our seven year single institution experience with pulsed dose rate brachytherapy dose escalation study in patients with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We treated a total of 130 patients for intermediate and high risk prostate cancer at our institution between 2000 and 2007 using PDR-brachytherapy as a boost after conformal external beam radiation therapy to 50.4 Gy. The majority of patients had T2 disease (T1c 6%, T2 75%, T3 19%). Seventy three patients had intermediate-risk and 53 patients had high-risk disease according to the D'Amico classification. The dose of the brachytherapy boost was escalated from 25 to 35 Gy - 33 pts. received 25 Gy (total dose 75 Gy), 63 pts. 30 Gy (total dose 80 Gy) and 34 pts. 35 Gy, (total dose 85 Gy) given in one session (dose per pulse was 0.60 Gy or 0.70 Gy/h, 24h per day, night and day, with a time interval of 1h between two pulses). PSA-recurrence-free survival according to Kaplan-Meier using the Phoenix definition of biochemical failure was calculated and also late toxicities according to Common Toxicity Criteria scale were assessed.

RESULTS

At the time of analysis with a median follow-up of 60 months biochemical control was achieved by 88% of patients - only 16/130 patients (12.3%) developed a biochemical relapse. Biochemical relapse free survival calculated according to Kaplan-Meier for all patients at 5 years was 85.6% (83.9% for intermediate-risk patients and 84.2% for high-risk patients) and at 9 years' follow up it was 79.0%. Analysing biochemical relapse free survival separately for different boost dose levels, at 5 years it was 97% for the 35 Gy boost dose and 82% for the 25 and 30 Gy dose levels. The side effects of therapy were negligible: There were 18 cases (15%) of grade 1/2 rectal proctitis, one case (0.8%) of grade 3 proctitis, 18 cases (15%) of grade 1/2 cystitis, and no cases (0%) with dysuria grade 3. No patient had a bulbourethral stricture requiring dilation or new onset incontinence.

CONCLUSIONS

Image-guided conformal PDR-brachytherapy using up to 35 Gy as boost dose after 50 Gy of external beam radiation therapy (total dose up to 85 Gy) is a very effective treatment option with very low morbidity in patients with intermediate or high risk prostate cancer. Further dose escalation seems possible.

CT-guided iodine-125 seed permanent implantation for recurrent head and neck cancers

BACKGROUND

To investigate the feasibility, and safety of 125I seed permanent implantation for recurrent head and neck carcinoma under CT-guidance.

RESULTS

A retrospective study on 14 patients with recurrent head and neck cancers undergone 125I seed implantation with different seed activities. The post-plan showed that the actuarial D90 of 125I seeds ranged from 90 to 218 Gy (median, 157.5 Gy). The follow-up was 3 to 60 months (median, 13 months). The median local control was 18 months (95% CI, 6.1-29.9 months), and the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5- year local controls were 52%, 39%, 39%, and 39%, respectively. The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5- survival rates were 65%, 39%, 39% and 39%, respectively, with a median survival time of 20 months (95% CI, 8.7-31.3 months). Of all patients, 28.6% (4/14) died of local recurrence, 7.1% (1/14) died of metastases, one patient died of hepatocirrhosis, and 8 patients are still alive to the date of data analysis.

CONCLUSION

CT-guided 125I seed implantation is feasible and safe as a salvage or palliative treatment for patients with recurrent head and neck cancers.

GEC-ESTRO recommendations for brachytherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas

Both primary and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck are classic indications for brachytherapy. A high rate of local tumor control at the cost of limited morbidity can be achieved with brachytherapy through good patient selection, meticulous source implantation and careful treatment planning. However, no randomized trials have been performed, and there is scant evidence in the literature especially regarding practical clinical recommendations for brachytherapy for head and neck subsites. The Head and Neck Working Group of the European Brachytherapy Group (Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie-European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (GEC-ESTRO) therefore decided to formulate the present consensus recommendations for low-dose rate, pulsed-dose rate and high-dose rate brachytherapy. The use of brachytherapy in combination with external beam radiotherapy and/or surgery is also covered as well as the use of brachytherapy in previously irradiated patients. Given the paucity of evidence in the literature, these recommendations are mainly based on clinical experience accumulated by the members of the working group over several decades and the respective publications. The recommendations cover in a general part (1) patient selection, the pre-treatment work up and patient care, (2) treatment strategy, (3) target definition, (4) implant techniques, (5) dose and dose rate prescription, (6) treatment planning and reporting, (7) treatment monitoring (8) catheter removal, and (9) post-treatment patient care and follow-up. The recommendations are then specified for the classical brachytherapy tumor sites following an analogue more focussed structure (patient selection, implant technique, target definition, dose and dose rate prescription, results): lip, oral mucosa, mobile tongue, floor of mouth, oropharynx, nasopharynx, paranasal sinuses.

Pulsed dose rate brachytherapy

Pulsed dose rate (PDR) is a new modality for dose delivery in brachytherapy. It uses modern afterloading technology (miniaturized source, cable driven, software controlled), with source activities in the range of 1 Ci, which is actually one tenth of the normal activity used for high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy. Modern technology allows dose optimization, and source strength in the above-mentioned range creates a new dose rate condition. For small fractions (pulses) with short interpulse intervals, PDR mimics the radiobiology of high dose rate brachytherapy, whereas for bigger doses per fraction, dose adjustments are needed to compensate for the loss of therapeutic ratio. Clinical series showed good figures for local control and toxicity. Almost every clinical site has been reported to have been treated with PDR, with some thousand of patients having been reported. Technical difficulties in some body sites can be overcome by slightly modifying the implant technique. PDR brachytherapy is an ideal environment for the development of new dose fractionation schedules. It creates unique conditions in which to operate. Knowledge of tissue repair kinetics is extremely important for adequate selection of dose per pulse and interpulse interval. Therapeutic ratio can be improved by adjusting interpulse intervals to the repair half-times for normal tissues. On the other hand, superfractionated schedules with low dose per pulse can be explored in conditions of tumor hypoxia, thanks to the predicted hypersensitivity at low dose per fraction. The use of chemical agents (nicotinamide and others) in concomitance with this superfractionated schedules is foreseen in controlled clinical trials. In conclusion, PDR brachytherapy can be considered a new paradigm for dose delivery. It is safe and reliable, can be used in the setting of image-guided radiation therapy, and exploit the differential effect of ionizing radiations by a thorough knowledge of tissue kinetics for an improved therapeutic ratio.

Safety aspects of pulsed dose rate brachytherapy: analysis of errors in 1,300 treatment sessions

PURPOSE

To determine the safety of pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy by analyzing errors and technical failures during treatment.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

More than 1,300 patients underwent treatment with PDR brachytherapy, using five PDR remote afterloaders. Most patients were treated with consecutive pulse schemes, also outside regular office hours. Tumors were located in the breast, esophagus, prostate, bladder, gynecology, anus/rectum, orbit, head/neck, with a miscellaneous group of small numbers, such as the lip, nose, and bile duct. Errors and technical failures were analyzed for 1,300 treatment sessions, for which nearly 20,000 pulses were delivered. For each tumor localization, the number and type of occurring errors were determined, as were which localizations were more error prone than others.

RESULTS

By routinely using the built-in dummy check source, only 0.2% of all pulses showed an error during the phase of the pulse when the active source was outside the afterloader. Localizations treated using flexible catheters had greater error frequencies than those treated with straight needles or rigid applicators. Disturbed pulse frequencies were in the range of 0.6% for the anus/rectum on a classic version 1 afterloader to 14.9% for orbital tumors using a version 2 afterloader. Exceeding the planned overall treatment time by >10% was observed in only 1% of all treatments. Patients received their dose as originally planned in 98% of all treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the experience in our institute with 1,300 PDR treatments, we found that PDR is a safe brachytherapy treatment modality, both during and outside of office hours.

Quality of interstitial PDR-brachytherapy-implants of head-and-neck-cancers: predictive factors for local control and late toxicity?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Parameters and indices related to the implant geometry in use for describing the quality of volume implants in interstitial brachytherapy were developed on the basis of LDR-brachytherapy. The aim of our study was to evaluate their usefulness for predicting late toxicity and local control in the PDR-brachytherapy of head-and-neck-tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2000 and October 2004, 210 patients were treated with PDR-brachytherapy which was administered either postoperatively or as definitive treatment. Brachytherapy was used as sole treatment in some cases while in others a combination with EBRT was used. For assessment of quality of implants we analyzed the following indices and parameters using the univariate chi2 test and multivariate logistic regression analysis: V85, V120 and V150 (volume enclosed by the surface of the 85%-, 120%- and 150%-isodose), UI (uniformity index), QI (quality index), HI (homogeneity index), VGR (volume gradient ratio), DNR (dose non-uniformity ratio), LD (low dose), HD (high dose), PD (peak dose) and the intersource spacing.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 24 months (4-50) the rate of - usually transient - soft tissue necrosis (STN) was 11%, osteoradionecrosis (ORN) was seen in 7.6% of cases and local relapse occurred in 7% of cases. Univariate analysis shows a significant influence on the development of soft tissue necrosis for V85, and on osteoradionecrosis for HD and PD. In the multivariate analysis a correlation between soft tissue necrosis and QI was found. For local control a correlation with QI, VGR and minimal tube distance was found using univariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Using interstitial PDR-brachytherapy in head-and-neck-tumors the probability of local control and of the development of soft tissue necrosis or osteoradionecrosis is dependent on dose and volume parameter like the volume of the reference isodose, the high and peak dose values, on the homogeneity of the dose distribution, quantified by the quality index or the volume gradient ratio as well on the minimal tube distance.

Recent Advances in Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer

The treatment of locally advanced or recurrent head and neck cancers has improved from single modality interventions of surgery and radiation therapy alone to include combined modality therapy with surgery, chemotherapy and radiation. Combined therapy has led to improved local control and disease-free survival. New developments in radiation oncology such as altered fractionation, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy, charged-particle radiotherapy, neutron-beam radiotherapy, and brachytherapy have helped to improve this outlook even further. These recent advances allow for a higher dose to be delivered to the tumor while minimizing the dose delivered to the surrounding normal tissue. This article provides an update of the new developments in radiotherapy in the management of head and neck cancers.

Salvage for cervical recurrences of head and neck cancer with dissection and interstitial high dose rate brachytherapy

Salvage therapy in head and neck cancer (HNC) is a controversy issue and the literature is scarce regarding the use of interstitial high-dose rate brachytherapy (I-HDR) in HNC. We evaluated the long-term results of a treatment policy combining salvage surgery and I-HDR for cervical recurrences of HNC. Charts of 21 patients treated from 1994 to 2004 were reviewed. The crude local control rate for all patients was 52.4%. The 5- and 8-years overall (OS) and local relapse-free survival (LRFS) rates were 50%, 42.9%, 42.5% and 28.6%, respectively. The only predictive factor associated to LFRS and OS was negative margin status (p = 0.0007 and p = 0.0002). We conclude that complete surgery is mandatory for long term control and the doses given by brachytherapy are not high enough to compensate for microscopic residual disease after surgery.

Manually after-loaded 192Ir low-dose rate brachytherapy after subtotal excision and flap reconstruction of recurrent cervical lymphadenopathy from head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

Treatment of extensive recurrent cervical lymph node metastases from previously irradiated head and neck cancer represents a difficult clinical challenge. We report the results of an approach of maximal surgical debulking and manually after-loaded intra-operative brachytherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-four procedures were carried out at the Royal Marsden Hospital between 1979 and 2003. All patients had previously been treated with radical radiotherapy or chemoradiation. Patients underwent maximal surgical debulking, followed by brachytherapy to the tumour bed with low-dose rate (192)Ir to a dose of 60 Gy to the reference isodose using the Paris system.

RESULTS

Overall and disease specific survival rates were 31% and 28% at two years and 23% and 17% at five years. Corresponding Loco-regional control rates were 37% and 23%, respectively. Fifty per cent of patients developed metastatic disease within 5 years of treatment. Best results were obtained with surgical excision, brachytherapy and reconstruction of the skin defect using a vascularised myo-cutaneous flap with in-field control rates of 72% at two years and 66% at 5 years. Nine per cent of patients developed fistulae, 4% had haemorrhage and 8% wound breakdown/infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Maximal surgical debulking, including removal of overlying skin, and brachytherapy to the surgical tumour bed provides high levels of local control, and can be achieved with acceptable morbidity. Only a minority of patients achieve long-term survival because of the high risk of systemic relapse.

Perioperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy (PHDRB) in previously irradiated head and neck cancer: Initial results of a Phase I/II reirradiation study

BACKGROUND

This study was undertaken to determine the feasibility of salvage surgery and perioperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy (PHDRB) at the dose/fractionation schedule proposed in patients with previously irradiated, recurrent head and neck cancer or second primary tumors arising in a previously irradiated field.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-five patients were treated with surgical resection and PHDRB. The PHDRB dose was 4 Gy b.i.d. x 8 (32 Gy) for R0 resections and 4 Gy b.i.d. x 10 (40 Gy) for R1 resections. Further external beam radiotherapy or chemotherapy was not given.

RESULTS

Resections were categorized as R0 (negative margins of at least 10 mm) in 3 patients (12.0%) and R1 (negative margins of less than 10 mm or microscopically positive margins) in 22 (88.0%). Twelve patients with R1 resections had microscopically positive margins (48%), and 10 patients had close margins (40%), with a median of 2.0 mm. Ten patients (40.0%) developed Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 3 or greater toxicity. Seven patients (28%) presented complications requiring a major surgical procedure. Four of these complications appeared in the immediate postoperative period and were surgical in nature (flap failure, n = 2; fistula, n = 2), and the other three were mainly related to the brachytherapy procedure (n = 2) or the radiation dose delivered (n = 1). One patient died on postoperative day 11 due to bleeding. After a median followup of 14 months, the 4-year local control rate and overall survival were 85.6% and 46.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical salvage and PHDRB at the dose/fractionation proposed are feasible in this high-risk population. Toxicity is high, but not substantially different from other reirradiation series. Four-year local control results are encouraging taking into account that 22 of 25 patients (88%) had either close or microscopically positive margins.

Feasibility report for retreatment of locally recurrent head-and-neck cancers by combined brachy-chemotherapy using frameless image-guided 3D interstitial brachytherapy

PURPOSE

Brachytherapy re-irradiation may offer an alternative re-treatment of recurrent head-and-neck cancer even after previous full dose radiation therapy. The purposes of this study were to determine the feasibility and accuracy of frameless image-guided interstitial needle implantation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between January 2000 and March 2003, 14 patients with biopsy-proven locally recurrent head-and-neck-cancer were retreated after previous full dose irradiation with combined external beam-brachytherapy with concomitant chemotherapy. Brachytherapy needle implantation was virtually planned taking into account the surrounding risk structures. Needles were implanted using an adapted frameless navigation system. Chemoradiotherapy was followed by 2-4 courses of chemotherapy every fourth week starting 4 weeks after the end of brachytherapy.

RESULTS

The 1- and 2-year local control rates were 78% and 57%, respectively. Local control was obtained in 8/14 patients. The actuarial 1- and 2-year survival rates were 83% and 64%, respectively. The median survival was 28 months after a median follow-up of 21 months (range, 8-53). Six weeks after brachytherapy, 1 patient developed localized soft tissue necrosis which did not require surgical intervention. No additional grade III or IV late toxicity was seen after re-irradiation. Mean deviation of image-guided needle implantation was 3.4 mm for each needle (SD, 1.9 mm; range, 0.5-14 mm). The mean deviation of all needles of an implant was 4.3 mm (range, 2.3-8.6 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate that pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy in combination with sequential chemotherapy is effective and safe in re-irradiation of locally recurrent oropharyngeal carcinomas and can be offered to patients with curative intent. Image guidance allows virtual planning and navigated implantation of brachytherapy needles with regard to optimized needle distribution and risk structures.