Helicobacter pylori eradication improves pre-existing reflux esophagitis in patients with duodenal ulcer disease

The role of digestive system diseases in cerebrovascular disease: a comprehensive Mendelian randomization study

Background

Cerebrovascular disease, among the most prevalent neurological disorders, poses a substantial threat to human health with its elevated mortality and disability rates, placing considerable strain on healthcare systems. Although several studies in recent years have suggested a potential association between digestive system diseases and cerebrovascular diseases, the findings remain inconsistent.

Methods

Genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary data for 12 digestive diseases and cerebrovascular diseases were used to conduct Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. In this investigation, we endeavored to elucidate the causal relationship between digestive system diseases and cerebrovascular diseases. Employing a comprehensive approach, including two-sample MR (TSMR), multivariate MR (MVMR), and two-step MR analysis, we leveraged summary statistics data obtained from published GWAS. The primary analysis method employed was inverse variance weighted (IVW), with MR-Egger and weighted median (WM) as secondary methods. Sensitivity analysis included heterogeneity testing, horizontal multivariate testing, MR-PRESSO, and a "leave-one-out" method. Additionally, the F-statistic was utilized to assess the strength of instrumental variables, ensuring robust results.

Results

In the TSMR analysis, this study found a significant causal relationship between genetically predicted gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and any stroke (AS), any ischemic stroke (AIS), large-artery atherosclerotic stroke (LAS), intracranial aneurysm (IA), and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). In MVMR analysis, this study found that even after adjusting for systolic blood pressure (SBP), body mass index (BMI) and type 2 diabetes (T2D), the causal relationship remains exist. In the two-step MR mediation analysis, it was found that BMI, SBP and T2D play mediating role in the causal relationship between GERD and cerebrovascular diseases.

Conclusion

This study indicates a clear positive causal relationship between GERD and cerebrovascular diseases, and this causal association remains significant even after adjusting for BMI, SBP and T2D. The mediation MR analysis suggests that BMI, SBP and T2D may mediate the causal relationship between GERD and the risk of cerebrovascular diseases.

Practice guidelines for the management of Helicobacter pylori infection: The Saudi H. pylori Working Group recommendations

The eradication rates for Helicobacter pylori globally are decreasing with a dramatic increase in the prevalence of antibiotic resistant bacteria all over the world, including Saudi Arabia. There is no current consensus on the management of H. pylori in Saudi Arabia. The Saudi Gastroenterology Association developed these practice guidelines after reviewing the local and regional studies on the management of H. pylori. The aim was to establish recommendations to guide healthcare providers in managing H. pylori in Saudi Arabia. Experts in the areas of H. pylori management and microbiology were invited to write these guidelines. A literature search was performed, and all authors participated in writing and reviewing the guidelines. In addition, international guidelines and consensus reports were reviewed to bridge the gap in knowledge when local and regional data were unavailable. There is limited local data on treatment of H. pylori. The rate of clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance is high; therefore, standard triple therapy for 10-14 days is no longer recommended in the treatment of H. pylori unless antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed. Based on the available data, bismuth quadruple therapy for 10-14 days is considered the best first-line and second-line therapy. Culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing should be considered following two treatment failures. These recommendations are intended to provide the most relevant evidence-based guidelines for the management of H. pylori infection in Saudi Arabia. The working group recommends further studies to explore more therapeutic options to eradicate H. pylori.

Neutrophils, eosinophils, and intraepithelial lymphocytes in the squamous esophagus in subjects with and without gastroesophageal reflux symptoms

Whilst intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) are considered normal within the distal esophageal mucosa, they have an increasingly recognised role in the pathogenesis of reflux esophagitis, and IEL quantification establishes the diagnosis of lymphocytic esophagitis. Knowledge regarding the upper limit of a normal IEL count in health is lacking. We studied 117 non-healthcare seeking adult volunteers from a random community sample (the Kalixanda study) with esophageal biopsies 2 cm above the gastroesophageal junction. Subjects were divided into four groups based on the presence or absence of gastro-esophageal reflux symptoms and/or esophagitis on endoscopy. Asymptomatic subjects with no endoscopic esophagitis were selected as controls, and the cell counts in this group were used to define the upper limit of normal of IELs, eosinophils and neutrophils. The entire sample was used to identify independent predictors of increased cellular counts by logistic regression analysis. None of the healthy controls had an IEL count of more than three per five high power fields (HPF), and therefore this was considered as the upper limit of normal; no controls had eosinophils or neutrophils in esophageal biopsies. Independent predictors of an elevated IEL count were spongiosis on histology (OR 11.17, 95% CI 3.32-37.58, P < 0.01) and current smoking (OR 4.84, 95% CI 1.13-2.71, P = 0.03). A receiver operating characteristics analysis concluded that a threshold of 3 IELs/5HPFs performs best in predicting reflux symptoms when a normal esophageal mucosa is visualized on endoscopy (sensitivity = 100.0%, specificity = 35.2%). The healthy esophageal mucosa does not contain more than three IELs per five HPF in the distal esophagus.

Risk of gastric cancer in the second decade of follow-up after Helicobacter pylori eradication

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori reduces the risk of gastric cancer. In this study, we investigated the risk beyond 10 years after eradication of H. pylori.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 2737 patients who had yearly endoscopic follow-up after cure of H. pylori infection. For comparison of gastric cancer risk in the second decade of follow-up with that in the first decade, we calculated standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) by dividing the number of observed cases of gastric cancer in the second decade of follow-up by that of expected cases which was estimated using the incidence rate ratio of age in the first decade.

RESULTS

During the follow-up for as long as 21.4 years (mean 7.1 years), gastric cancer developed in 68 patients (0.35% per year). The SIRs for diffuse-type gastric cancer was infinity (0 expected case and 4 observed cases) in patients with mild gastric mucosal atrophy and 10.9 (95% confidence interval 4.53-26.1) with moderate atrophy, whereas no significant increase of SIRs was observed in intestinal-type cancer regardless of the grade of baseline gastric atrophy or in diffuse-type cancer in patients with severe atrophy even though who had the highest risk.

CONCLUSIONS

The longer the follow-up, the greater the risk of developing diffuse-type gastric cancer becomes in patients with mild-to-moderate gastric atrophy at baseline. Endoscopic surveillance should be continued beyond 10 years after cure of H. pylori irrespective of the severity of gastric atrophy.

Guidelines for the management of Helicobacter pylori infection in Japan: 2016 Revised Edition

BACKGROUND

Since "Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection" was set as the indication in the Japanese Society for Helicobacter Research (JSHR) Guidelines 2009, eradication treatment for H. pylori gastritis is covered under insurance since 2013 in Japan, and the number of H. pylori eradication has rapidly increased. Under such circumstances, JSHR has made the third revision to the "Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of H. pylori infection" for the first time in 7 years.

METHODS

The Guideline Committee held 10 meetings. Articles published between the establishment of the 2009 Guidelines and March 2016 were reviewed and classified according to the evidence level; the statements were revised on the basis of this review. After inviting public comments, the revised statements were finalized using the Delphi method.

RESULTS

There was no change in the basic policy that H. pylori infectious disease is an indication for eradication. Other diseases presumed to be associated with H. pylori infection were added as indications. Serum pepsinogen level, endoscopic examination, and X-ray examination were added to the diagnostic methods. The effects of 1-week triple therapy consisting of potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB), amoxicillin, and clarithromycin have improved, and high eradication rates can also be expected with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) or P-CAB combined with amoxicillin and metronidazole. If the susceptibility test is not performed, the triple PPI or P-CAB/amoxicillin/metronidazole therapy should be chosen, because the PPI/amoxicillin/metronidazole combination demonstrated a significantly higher eradication rate than PPI/amoxicillin/clarithromycin. In the proposal for gastric cancer prevention, we divided gastric cancer prevention measures by age from adolescent to elderly, who are at an increased gastric cancer risk, and presented measures for gastric cancer prevention primarily based on H. pylori eradication.

CONCLUSION

We expect the revised guidelines to facilitate appropriate interventions for patients with H. pylori infection and accomplish its eradication and prevention of gastric cancer.

Interactions between Helicobacter pylori and gastroesophageal reflux disease

Interactions between Helicobacter Pylori (HP) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are a complex issue. Several pathophysiological factors influence the development and the course of GERD, HP infection might be only one of these. Many studies emphasize the co-existence of these diseases. HP infection could contribute to GERD through both a protective and an aggressive role. Gastric acid secretion is a key factor in the pathophysiology of reflux esophagitis. Depending on the type of gastritis related to HP, acid secretion may either increase or decrease. Gastritis in corpus leads to hypoacidity, while antrum gastritis leads to hyperacidity. In cases of antral gastritis and duodenal ulcers which have hyperacidity, the expectation is an improvement in pre-existing reflux esophagitis after eradication of HP. In adults, HP infection is often associated with atrophic gastritis in the corpus. Atrophic gastritis may protect against GERD. Pangastritis which leads to gastric atrophy is commonly associated with CagA strains of HP and it causes more severe gastric inflammation. In case of HP-positive corpus gastritis in the stomach, pangastritis, and atrophic gastritis, reflux esophagitis occurs frequently after eradication of HP. Nonetheless, as a predisposing disease of gastric cancer, HP should be treated. In conclusion, as the determinative factors affecting GERD involving in HP, detailed data on the location of gastric inflammation and CagA positivity should be obtained by the studies at future.

Reflux esophagitis triggered after Helicobacter pylori eradication: a noteworthy demerit of eradication therapy among the Japanese?

In the February 2013 Revision of Insured Medical Treatment, bacterial eradication for all Helicobacter pylori-positive individuals in Japan was covered under the insurance scheme. However, reflux esophagitis is believed to occur in approximately 10% of Japanese patients who undergo eradication therapy. Hence, the risk of reflux esophagitis among such cases should be carefully considered, particularly in the treatment for H. pylori-positive patients who are otherwise healthy. The eradication of H. pylori in cases of H. pylori-positive gastritis markedly suppresses gastric inflammation, and inhibits gastric mucosal atrophy and its progression to intestinal metaplasia. In a long-term follow-up study (10–20 years), eradication treatment was found to reduce the risk of subsequent gastric cancer. However, the fact that eradication-induced reflux esophagitis could increase the long-term risk of Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma should also be considered in the Japanese population. Appropriate treatment with proton pump inhibitors should be taken into consideration for patients undergoing eradication therapy in clinical practice.

Seventeen-year effects of eradicating Helicobacter pylori on the prevention of gastric cancer in patients with peptic ulcer; a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

We previously reported that eradication of Helicobacter pylori in our cohort of patients with peptic ulcer disease reduced their risk of developing gastric cancer to approximately one-third after a mean follow-up period of 3.4 years (up to 8.6 years). We have now followed these patients for a longer period.

METHODS

A total of 1,222 consecutive patients with peptic ulcer diseases who completed more than 1-year follow-up after receiving H. pylori eradication therapy were followed with annual endoscopic surveillance for a mean of 9.9 years (as long as 17.4 years).

RESULTS

H. pylori infection was judged cured in 1,030 patients (eradication-success group) but persisted in 192 (eradication-failure group) after initial eradication therapy. In the eradication-failure group, 114 patients received re-treatment at a mean of 4.4 years after the start of follow-up, and 105 of these were cured of infection. Gastric cancer developed in 21 of the 1,030 patients in the eradication-success group and in nine of the 192 in the failure group (p = 0.04). The risk of developing gastric cancer in the eradication-success group (0.21 %/year) was significantly lower than that in the failure group (0.45 %, p = 0.049). The longest interval between the initial H. pylori eradication and the occurrence of gastric cancer was 14.5 years in the eradication-success group and 13.7 years in the eradication-failure group.

CONCLUSIONS

A prophylactic effect for gastric cancer persists for more than 10 years after H. pylori eradication therapy, but we should be aware that cancer can develop even after that interval.

Helicobacter pylori eradication and reflux disease onset: Did gastric acid get "crazy"?

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is highly prevalent in the general population. In the last decade, a potential relationship between Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication and GORD onset has been claimed. The main putative mechanism is the gastric acid hypersecretion that develops after bacterial cure in those patients with corpus-predominant gastritis. We performed a critical reappraisal of the intricate pathogenesis and clinical data available in this field. Oesophagitis onset after H. pylori eradication in duodenal ulcer patients has been ascribed to a gastric acid hypersecretion, which could develop following body gastritis healing. However, the absence of an acid hypersecretive status in these patients is documented by both pathophysiology and clinical studies. Indeed, duodenal ulcer recurrence is virtually abolished following H. pylori eradication. In addition, intra-oesophageal pH recording studies failed to demonstrated increased acid reflux following bacterial eradication. Moreover, oesophageal manometric studies suggest that H. pylori eradication would reduce - rather than favor - acid reflux into the oesophagus. Finally, data of clinical studies would suggest that H. pylori eradication is not significantly associated with either reflux symptoms or erosive oesophagitis onset, some data suggesting also an advantage in curing the infection when oesophagitis is already present. Therefore, the legend of “crazy acid” remains - as all the others - a fascinating, but imaginary tale.

Reinfection rate of Helicobacter pylori after eradication treatment: a long-term prospective study in Japan

BACKGROUND

We previously reported that the reinfection rate with Helicobacter pylori in Japan was low despite a high prevalence of infection. In the present study, we extended our previous work to more accurately determine the reinfection rate.

METHODS

We enrolled 1625 patients (219 women and 1406 men, mean age 50.8 years) who had received H. pylori eradication therapy. After documentation of eradication, bacterial culture and urea breath test were carried out yearly. H. pylori strains were analyzed by using random amplification of polymorphic DNA fingerprinting.

RESULTS

A total of 1609 patients were followed for up to 12.5 years (mean 4.7 years); H. pylori became re-positive in 26 patients. In 13 of the 26 patients, H. pylori became positive at the first-year follow up. Stored H. pylori isolates were available for analysis from ten of the 13 patients; four of the isolates were genetically different from the initial strain, but the other six were identical to the initial strain. In the other 13 patients, H. pylori became positive at later follow up (mean 4.8 years; range 1.8-8.0 years). In all of the four of these patients whose isolates could be analyzed, the H. pylori strains were different from the initial strain. Assuming that reinfection occurred in the four patients positive for different strains of H. pylori at the first-year follow up and in the 13 positive at later follow up, the reinfection rate was 0.22% per year.

CONCLUSIONS

When probable recrudescence (H. pylori positivity with identical strains) was excluded, the reinfection rate of H. pylori in this Japanese population was very low, but we note that reinfection can occur over many years.

The long-term risk of gastric cancer after the successful eradication of Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND

We previously reported that eradication of Helicobacter pylori reduced the risk of developing gastric cancer in patients with peptic ulcer diseases. In the present study, we further followed up our patient group to investigate the occurrence and clinical features of gastric cancers that developed after cure of the infection.

METHODS

Prospective post-eradication evaluations were conducted on 1674 consecutive patients who had received successful H. pylori eradication therapy. The patients had undergone endoscopic examination before eradication therapy to evaluate peptic ulcers, background gastric mucosal atrophy, and H. pylori infection. After confirmation of cure of the infection, follow-up endoscopy was performed yearly.

RESULTS

The patients were followed for up to 14.1 years (a mean of 5.6 years). During the follow-up, gastric cancer developed in 28 of the 1674 patients as long as 13.7 years after the cure of H. pylori infection. The risk of developing gastric cancer was 0.30% per year. Histologically, 16 of the gastric cancers were the intestinal type and 12 were the diffuse type; the risk of each cancer type was 0.17 and 0.13% per year, respectively. There was no significant inflammatory cell infiltration in the background gastric mucosa at the time the cancers were recognized.

CONCLUSION

There is a risk of developing gastric cancer of both the intestinal and diffuse types even after the cure of H. pylori infection and extinction of gastric inflammation. It is important to inform patients about the risk of gastric cancer after eradication therapy and offer them surveillance endoscopy.

Effect of Helicobacter pylori infection and its eradication on reflux esophagitis and reflux symptoms

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the association between current Helicobacter pylori infection and reflux esophagitis and the effect of H. pylori eradication on reflux esophagitis in a healthy screening population.

METHODS

A total of 10,102 subjects in a comprehensive screening cohort were enrolled, and 4,007 subjects had follow-up after a median of 2 years. Effects of H. pylori infection on reflux esophagitis were estimated with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using multiple logistic regression analysis. We evaluated the change in prevalence of reflux esophagitis and reflux symptoms after H. pylori eradication vs. persistence.

RESULTS

The prevalence of reflux esophagitis (as classified by the Los Angeles system) was 4.9% (490/10,102). Whereas the prevalence of reflux esophagitis was 6.4% (319/4,971) in subjects without H. pylori infection, it was 3.3% (171/5,131) in subjects with infection (P<0.001). H. pylori infection had a strong negative association with reflux esophagitis in multivariate analysis (OR 0.42; 95% CI, 0.34-0.51). Compared with the prevalence of reflux esophagitis in the persistent infection group, the prevalence of reflux esophagitis increased after successful H. pylori eradication (OR 2.34; 95% CI, 1.45-3.76; P<0.001), which was comparable to that of the H. pylori-negative group (OR 2.42; 95% CI, 1.73-3.36; P<0.001). However, reflux symptoms had no association with H. pylori infection or eradication.

CONCLUSIONS

In a healthy screening population, H. pylori infection had a strong negative association with reflux esophagitis, but H. pylori eradication increased the prevalence of erosive esophagitis to the level of H. pylori-negative individuals. Long-term clinical significance of newly developed erosive esophagitis after H. pylori eradication should be evaluated prospectively.

In vitro inhibition of Helicobacter pylori growth and of adherence of cagA-positive strains to gastric epithelial cells by Lactobacillus paraplantarum KNUC25 isolated from kimchi

Lactobacillus paraplantarum KNUC25 strain was isolated from overfermented kimchi, a Korean traditional food. The strain had a broad antimicrobial activity spectrum, from gram-positive to gram-negative bacteria. The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity of L. paraplantarum KNUC25 against Helicobacter pylori strains. Judged by a disc agar diffusion method, the anti-H. pylori activity existed in the cell-free supernatants (CFSs) of KNUC25. The mean diameters of growth inhibition by 10, 30, and 60 microL of a 15-fold concentrated CFS per disc were 11.2, 17.7, and 23.7 mm, respectively. The neutralized CFS lost its anti-H. pylori activity, suggesting that acidic pH in CFS may be responsible for the anti-H. pylori activity. Adherence was determined by urease activity of H. pylori adhered to gastric epithelial cell line AGS cells after co-incubation of AGS cells with CFS and H. pylori strain ATCC43504 (s1m1vacA/cagA(+)), ATCC51932 (s2m2vacA/cagA(-)), or SS1 (s2m2vacA/cagA(+)) in vitro followed by three washes by means of centrifugation with saline. Adherence of ATCC43504 or SS1 to AGS cells was reduced by about 70% after a 30-minute incubation with 30 microL of a 15-fold concentrated KNUC25 CFS, whereas that of ATCC51932 to AGS cells was not. The results show KNUC25 CFS is effective in inhibiting the growth of H. pylori, which is related to pH and the adherence of cagA-positive H. pylori to gastric cells.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Helicobacter pylori: What May Be the Relationship?

Relationship between Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is controversial. We aimed to review the possible relationship between H. pylori infection and GERD. Epidemiological data indicate an inverse relationship between frequency of H. pylori infection and prevalence of GERD and its complications like Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma. H. pylori eradication in patients with peptic ulcer disease may be associated with increased risk of development of GERD compared with untreated patients. Infection with cagA bearing strains of H. pylori was associated with less severe GERD including endoscopic esophagitis, possibly due to pangastritis leading to hypochlorhydria. Recent studies on inflammatory markers (IL-1β and IL-1RN) suggest pro-inflammatory genotypes to be protective against development of severe GERD, especially in patients with H. pylori infection. Identification of candidate genes playing an important role in gastric acid secretion and visceral hypersensitivity to the esophageal epithelium might help in early detection of individuals susceptible to develop GERD. Interplay between H. pylori and host factors play an important role in the pathogenesis of GERD.

Guidelines for the management of Helicobacter pylori infection in Japan: 2009 revised edition

BACKGROUND

Over the past few years, the profile of Helicobacter pylori infection has changed in Japan. In particular, the relationship between H. pylori and gastric cancer has been demonstrated more clearly. Accordingly, the committee of the Japanese Society for Helicobacter Research has revised the guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of H. pylori infection in Japan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four meetings of guidelines preparation committee were held from July 2007 to December 2008. In the new guidelines, recommendations for treatment have been classified into five grades according to the Minds Recommendation Grades, while the level of evidence has been classified into six grades. The Japanese national health insurance system was not taken into consideration when preparing these guidelines.

RESULTS

Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy achieved a Grade A recommendation, being useful for the treatment of gastric or duodenal ulcer, for the treatment and prevention of H. pylori-associated diseases such as gastric cancer, and for inhibiting the spread of H. pylori infection. Levels of evidence were determined for each disease associated with H. pylori infection. For the diagnosis of H. pylori infection, measurement of H. pylori antigen in the feces was added to the tests not requiring biopsy. One week of proton-pump inhibitor-based triple therapy (including amoxicillin and metronidazole) was recommended as second-line therapy after failure of first-line eradication therapy.

CONCLUSION

The revised Japanese guidelines for H. pylori are based on scientific evidence and avoid the administrative restraints that applied to earlier versions.

Second Asia-Pacific Consensus Guidelines for Helicobacter pylori infection

The Asia-Pacific Consensus Conference was convened to review and synthesize the most current information on Helicobacter pylori management so as to update the previously published regional guidelines. The group recognized that in addition to long-established indications, such as peptic ulcer disease, early mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) type lymphoma and family history of gastric cancer, H. pylori eradication was also indicated for H. pylori infected patients with functional dyspepsia, in those receiving long-term maintenance proton pump inhibitor (PPI) for gastroesophageal reflux disease, and in cases of unexplained iron deficiency anemia or idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. In addition, a population 'test and treat' strategy for H. pylori infection in communities with high incidence of gastric cancer was considered to be an effective strategy for gastric cancer prevention. It was recommended that H. pylori infection should be tested for and eradicated prior to long-term aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy in patients at high risk for ulcers and ulcer-related complications. In Asia, the currently recommended first-line therapy for H. pylori infection is PPI-based triple therapy with amoxicillin/metronidazole and clarithromycin for 7 days, while bismuth-based quadruple therapy is an effective alternative. There appears to be an increasing rate of resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole in parts of Asia, leading to reduced efficacy of PPI-based triple therapy. There are insufficient data to recommend sequential therapy as an alternative first-line therapy in Asia. Salvage therapies that can be used include: (i) standard triple therapy that has not been previously used; (ii) bismuth-based quadruple therapy; (iii) levofloxacin-based triple therapy; and (iv) rifabutin-based triple therapy. Both CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms and cigarette smoking can influence future H. pylori eradication rates.

Increased body mass index after H. pylori eradication for duodenal ulcer predisposes to erosive reflux esophagitis

BACKGROUND

A higher body mass index (BMI) may lead to a more adverse outcome of reflux esophagitis. The study aimed to determine whether increased BMI after H. pylori eradication in duodenal ulcer patients predisposes to erosive reflux esophagitis.

METHODS

Four hundred fifty-nine patients with Helicobacter pylori-positive duodenal ulcers but without reflux esophagitis were evaluated. Serial BMIs were collected before therapy and on the 2nd, 6th, and 12th months after H. pylori eradication. New-onset reflux esophagitis was recorded.

RESULTS

In 350 patients with complete follow-up, mean BMI increased from the second month after H. pylori eradication (P<0.001). H. pylori eradication also led to a net increase of BMI >1.5 kg/m in nearly 20% of patients in the 12-month follow-up, whereas new-onset of reflux esophagitis was noted in 16.3% (57/350). Baseline BMI, prevalence rate of hiatus hernia, and net increase of BMI were higher in patients with new-onset reflux than in those without (P<0.05). Multiple logistic regression confirmed higher baseline BMI, hiatus hernia, and net BMI increase >1.5 kg/m after H. pylori eradication were independently associated with new-onset reflux esophagitis (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Eradication of H. pylori may lead to a significant net increase of BMI in patients with duodenal ulcers. Such BMI gain, as well as higher baseline BMI and hiatus hernia, predisposes to new-onset reflux esophagitis after H. pylori eradication.

Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of GERD in the Japanese population

We reviewed articles on the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in Japan to clarify these features of GERD in this country. Although the definition of GERD depends on the individual study, the prevalence of GERD has been increasing since the end of the 1990s. The reasons for the increase in the prevalence of GERD may be due to increases in gastric acid secretion, a decrease in the Helicobacter pylori infection rate, more attention being paid to GERD, and advances in the concept of GERD. More than half of GERD patients had non-erosive reflux disease, and the majority (87%) of erosive esophagitis was mild type, such as Los Angeles classification grade A and grade B. There were several identified risk factors, such as older age, obesity, and hiatal hernia. In particular, mild gastric atrophy and absence of H. pylori infection influence the characteristics of GERD in the Japanese population. We also discuss GERD in the elderly; asymptomatic GERD; the natural history of GERD; and associations between GERD and peptic ulcer disease and H. pylori eradication. We examined the prevalence of GERD in patients with specific diseases, and found a higher prevalence of GERD, compared with that in the general population, in patients with diabetes mellitus, those with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, and those with bronchial asthma. We provide a comprehensive review of GERD in the Japanese population and raise several clinical issues.

Influence of Helicobacter pylori eradication on reflux esophagitis in Japanese patients

The relationship between Helicobacter pylori eradication and reflux esophagitis is controversial. We analyzed the development of reflux esophagitis and the change in the grade of pre-existing reflux esophagitis after eradication. Enrolled were 559 Japanese patients who received eradication therapy for H. pylori. The grade of reflux esophagitis by endoscopy before and after therapy was evaluated retrospectively. No esophagitis was present before eradication in 526 patients. H. pylori was and was not eradicated in 429 and 97, respectively. Reflux esophagitis developed in 40 of the eradication group and in three of the treatment failure group, with prevalence higher with successful eradication (P = 0.04). Successful eradication and hiatus hernia were significant risk factors for reflux esophagitis development. Twenty-seven of 33 patients with pre-existing reflux esophagitis had successful eradication and six treatment failure. The reflux esophagitis grade worsened in two (Los Angeles classification from A to B) and improved in 14 patients after eradication. With treatment failure, reflux esophagitis worsened in none and improved in three patients. There showed no significant change in the grade of pre-existing reflux esophagitis after H. pylori eradication but the sample size was too small to evaluate the difference. In conclusion, the eradication of H. pylori increases the prevalence of reflux esophagitis, and hiatus hernia was a significant risk factor for the development of reflux esophagitis.

Helicobacter pylori eradication may induce de novo, but transient and mild, reflux esophagitis: Prospective endoscopic evaluation

BACKGROUNDS AND AIM

The effect on reflux esophagitis of eradicating Helicobacter pylori is variable and not fully defined. We previously reported that in patients who have reflux esophagitis associated with duodenal ulcer, a significant improvement in the pre-existing reflux esophagitis occurred after H. pylori was eradicated. In the present study, we asked whether H. pylori eradication leads to de novo development of reflux esophagitis in peptic ulcer patients.

METHODS

Prospective post-eradication evaluations were conducted in 1195 H. pylori-positive patients with peptic ulcer diseases who were confirmed not to have reflux esophagitis by endoscopic examination before eradication therapy. After eradication therapy, endoscopy and a urea breath test were performed yearly.

RESULTS

A total of 1187 patients were followed for up to 10.0 years (a mean of 3.6 years). Reflux esophagitis developed in 279 of 1000 patients cured of infection and in 26 of 187 patients who had persistent infection (P < 0.0001, Fisher's exact test). The esophagitis was mild (Los Angeles grade A) in most patients, transient in approximately one-half, and rarely necessitated long-term medication for the condition. Cure of infection, alcohol consumption, younger age, and high body mass index were identified as significant factors for the risk of developing non-transient reflux esophagitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Cure of H. pylori infection may increase the risk of developing reflux esophagitis in patients with peptic ulcer, but the esophagitis is mostly mild and transient, and long-term medication is rarely required. Thus, H. pylori eradication therapy need not be withheld for fear of provoking reflux esophagitis.

Helicobacter pylori infection and related gastrointestinal diseases

Helicobacter pylori has been implicated in the pathogenesis of a number of digestive tract disorders, such as chronic active gastritis, peptic ulceration, gastric cancer, and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. Disease outcome is dependent on many factors, including bacterial genotype, host physiology and genetics, and environmental factors such as diet. Researchers continue to explore the complexities of H. pylori infection, seeking to explain why some individuals have asymptomatic infection, whereas others experience clinical disease. The importance of treating H. pylori infection in patients with gastrointestinal problems has been confirmed in recent years, with clinical trials showing that cure of infection can prevent duodenal ulcer and, to a lesser extent, gastric ulcer recurrence; cure early stage mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma; and reduce the chances of developing gastric cancer in high-risk individuals.

Baseline gastric mucosal atrophy is a risk factor associated with the development of gastric cancer after Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy in patients with peptic ulcer diseases

BACKGROUND

We previously reported that eradication of Helicobacter pylori could reduce the risk of developing gastric cancer in patients with peptic ulcer diseases. In the present study, we further followed up our patient groups to identify factors associated with the development of gastric cancer.

METHODS

Prospective posteradication evaluations were conducted in 1342 consecutive patients (1191 men and 151 women; mean age, 50 years) with peptic ulcer disease who had received H. pylori eradication therapy. The patients had undergone endoscopic examination before eradication therapy to evaluate peptic ulcers, background gastric mucosa, and H. pylori infection. After confirmation of eradication, follow-up endoscopy was performed yearly.

RESULTS

A total of 1131 patients were followed for up to 9.5 years (mean, 3.9 years). Gastric cancer developed in 9 of 953 patients cured of infection and in 4 of 178 who had persistent infection (P=0.04). The risk of developing gastric cancer after receiving H. pylori eradication therapy was increased according to the grade of baseline gastric mucosal atrophy (P=0.01). In patients with peptic ulcer diseases, persistent infection of H. pylori (hazard ratio, 3.9; P=0.03), the grade of baseline gastric mucosal atrophy (3.3, P=0.01) and age (2.0, P=0.04) were identified as significant risk factors for developing gastric cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The grade of gastric atrophy was closely related to the development of gastric cancer after receiving H. pylori eradication therapy. Thus, eradication of H. pylori before the significant expansion of atrophy is most beneficial to prevent gastric cancer.

The influence of Helicobacter pylori infection on the prevalence of endoscopic erosive esophagitis

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the frequency of endoscopic esophagitis and Helicobacter pylori infection in a large Turkish population over a 6-year period.

METHODS

We studied a consecutive series of 14,380 patients who had been newly referred for diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy from 2000 to 2006. The mean age value was 45 +/- 10 (18-89) years. All endoscopic findings were retrospectively evaluated. Two antral and two corpus biopsies were taken from patients for rapid urease test. Endoscopic esophagitis was defined as the presence of erosions and/or ulceration. The relationship between erosive esophagitis and various relevant factors was analyzed.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of endoscopic esophagitis was 7.8% (95% CI, 6.9-8.1). The prevalence of positive rapid urease test was 49% (95% CI, 38-53) in patients with esophagitis and 85% (95% CI, 70-96) in patients without esophagitis (p < .001). From 2000 to 2006, the frequency of endoscopic esophagitis and the rate of positive rapid urease test remained unchanged. After adjusting for the effects of mean age, male gender, and percentage of hiatal hernia, there was a 0.785% risk reduction in esophagitis with every 1% increase in the rate of positive rapid urease test result.

CONCLUSIONS

The frequency of endoscopic esophagitis is significantly lower in patients with a positive rapid urease test result. This negative correlation with H. pylori infection reflects a protective effect of H. pylori from endoscopic esophagitis in a Turkish population and deserves further investigation.

Factors associated with the development of reflux esophagitis after Helicobacter pylori eradication

We investigated whether Helicobacter pylori (HP) eradication increases the incidence of reflux esophagitis (RE) in patients with peptic ulcers. From 2001-2005 consecutive out patients with peptic ulcers and HP received eradication and were followed endoscopically. HP was cured in 119 and RE developed in 33 of the 153 patients. RE developed in 24 of the 119 HP-eradicated patients and 9 of the 34 HP-persistent patients. The estimated RE occurrence rate within 1 year was higher in the HP-eradicated patients than in the HP-persistent patients, but it was reversed at 2 years by the Kaplan-Meier analysis. In 76 patients follow up for > or = 18 months, hiatal hernia, duodenal ulcer, and eradication failure were significantly associated with the increased RE rate by univariate and multivariate analysis. The follow-up period after HP eradication affected the RE occurrence rate, and eradication failure significantly increased the RE development in patients followed up for > or = 18 months.

Lower prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection with vacAs1a, cagA-positive, and babA2-positive genotype in erosive reflux esophagitis disease

BACKGROUND

Increased prevalence of esophagitis has been recognized in the West. Helicobacter pylori infection, particularly virulent strains, is proposed as a protective factor against the development of gastroesophageal reflux disease. To evaluate the relationship of reflux esophagitis with virulent H. pylori infection, we studied the prevalence of reflux esophagitis among H. pylori-infected and -uninfected patients and the genotype of isolates in Taiwan.

METHODS

Patients who had routine physical examination were investigated. The severity of esophagitis was evaluated using the Los Angeles grading system. H. pylori status was assessed by histology, rapid urease test, and bacterial culture. Genotyping of vacA, cagA, and babA2 was determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Risk factors for severe esophagitis were evaluated.

RESULTS

Reflux esophagitis was found in 21.2% of 1622 patients. The prevalence of H. pylori infection was found in 33.0% of 276 patients with reflux esophagitis compared with 67.5% of 378 patients with normal esophagus (p < .001). Esophagitis occurred in a significantly lower rate among H. pylori-positive patients with peptic ulcer than those without peptic ulcer. cagA, babA2, and vacAs1a were detected in 100% of 143 isolates. Factors that predicted severe esophagitis included age, gender, and hiatus hernia but not H. pylori infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests significantly lower incidence of H. pylori infection with the triple-positive virulent genotype in patients with reflux esophagitis in Taiwan.

The incidence of reflux oesophagitis after eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND

Although several studies have indicated that Helicobacter pylori eradication develops reflux oesophagitis, others reported that its eradication had a beneficial effect on reflux symptoms. The results are still controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To study whether H. pylori eradication increases the occurrence rate of reflux oesophagitis in patients with peptic ulcers.

METHOD

One hundred and two consecutive patients who had peptic ulcers and were H. pylori-positive by C-urea breath testing were followed prospectively. They all received 1-week triple therapy and underwent endoscopy at 1-year intervals or when relapse of the peptic ulcer or occurrence of reflux oesophagitis was suspected.

RESULTS

Reflux oesophagitis developed in 32 (31.4%) out of 102 patients and they were of grade A (27 patients) and grade B (five patients) by the Los Angeles classification System. H. pylori infection was cured in 77 (75.5%) out of 102 patients. There was no significant difference in age (53.4+/-1.2 vs. 53.9+/-1.4 years, P = 0.43), gender (male/female, 29/3 vs. 53/17, P = 0.14), ulcer location (gastric/duodenal/both, 15/12/5 vs. 35/26/9, P = 0.97), H. pylori status (persistent/cured, 9/23 vs. 16/54, P = 0.57) or length of follow-up time (355+/-32 vs. 348+/-23 days, P = 0.30) between the 32 patients with reflux oesophagitis and the other 70 patients. Only the presence of hiatal hernia before therapy was significant for the prevalence of reflux oesophagitis by the log-rank test (P = 0.002), and the Cox proportional hazard models confirmed these findings (odds ratio, 3.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.64-7.30; P = 0.0012).

CONCLUSIONS

The eradication of H. pylori did not increase the prevalence of reflux oesophagitis, and only the presence of hiatal hernia before therapy was significantly related to the development of reflux oesophagitis.

The effect of eradicating helicobacter pylori on the development of gastric cancer in patients with peptic ulcer disease

OBJECTIVES

Infection with Helicobacter pylori is a risk factor for the development of gastric cancer. However, it is not known whether eradication therapy can prevent the development of gastric cancer in persons in whom the cancer is not yet established. In the present study, we investigated whether the eradication of H. pylori in patients with peptic ulcer disease reduces the likelihood of their developing gastric cancer.

METHODS

Prospective posteradication evaluations were conducted in 1,342 consecutive patients (1,191 men and 151 women; mean age: 50 yr) with peptic ulcer diseases who had received H. pylori eradication therapy. After confirmation of eradication, endoscopy and a urea breath test were performed yearly.

RESULTS

A total of 1,120 patients completed more than 1-yr follow-up and were followed for up to 8.6 yr (a mean of 3.4 yr). Gastric cancer developed in 8 of 944 patients cured of infection and 4 of 176 who had persistent infection (p= 0.04; log-rank test). All the gastric cancer developed in patients with gastric ulcer, but none in patients with duodenal ulcer (p= 0.005; Fisher's exact test). In patients with gastric ulcer, persistent infection was identified as a significant factor for the risk of developing gastric cancer (hazard ratio: 3.35; 95% confidence interval: 1.00-11.22; p= 0.04; Cox's proportional-hazards model).

CONCLUSION

H. pylori eradication may reduce their risk of developing gastric cancer in patients with gastric ulcer. Large-scale studies in additional populations of this important international public-health issue are warranted.

Indicaciones y consecuencias de la erradicación de Helicobacter pylori en la enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico

Several epidemiological data indicate that H. pylori infection prevalence in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is lower than that reported in respective controls, which would suggest that the organism plays a protective role against this disease. On the other hand, most studies demonstrate that the presence of the infection in patients with GERD does not negatively affect the therapeutic efficacy of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), and, in case of negatively influencing it, the effects are not clinically relevant and are easily controllable with standard antisecretory treatment. Therefore, the decision to administer H. pylori eradication treatment to a patient should not be influenced by the concomitant presence of GERD. In most cases, H. pylori eradication does not seem to induce GERD development, and it does not seem to worsen GERD when it was already present. Nevertheless, when the gastritis pattern is unknown before the antibiotic administration, the effect of H. pylori eradication on gastric acid secretion and the incidence of GERD is unpredictable. In the exceptional cases in which H. pylori eradication could have negative effects on GERD, its clinical relevance will be limited, and reflux symptoms or endoscopic esophagitis will favourably respond to the standard PPI antisecretory treatment. Therefore, again, when H. pylori eradication is indicated in a particular patient, the concomitant diagnosis of GERD should not change our attitude. Finally, is has recently been recommended to eradicate H. pylori infection in those patients with GERD needing long-term treatment with PPI, as some studies have reported that these drugs induce, in presence of the organism, an atrophic gastritis, with the consequent risk of gastric cancer. However, most of these studies have important methodological defects, and several authors have reported contrary results. In any case, the appearance in the gastric mucosa of clinically relevant lesions, such as intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia or adenocarcinoma, in patients treated with PPI for several years, has not yet been demonstrated, although this could simply be a problem of time. This question seems to be too controversial to be answered with the available data, and we should wait until new studies clarify this topic. In the meantime, as it occurs with any controversial indication, the decision of the doctor facing a patient infected by H. pylori and needing maintenance therapy with PPIs should be assessed on a case by case basis.

There is no difference in the disease severity of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease between patients infected and not infected with Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND

The role of Helicobacter pylori in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is controversial.

AIM

To compare the severity of GERD in infected vs. non-infected patients, as part of an ongoing randomized controlled trial that examines the impact of H. pylori eradication on GERD-related outcomes.

METHODS

Consecutive GERD patients underwent urea breath testing and completed validated GERD symptom severity, and quality of life questionnaires as well as, 24-h pH-metry. These parameters, as well as demographics and endoscopic findings were assessed in double-blinded fashion and compared between H. pylori-infected and non-infected subjects.

RESULTS

Helicobacter pylori-infected GERD patients (n=50) were significantly older and less educated than non-infected patients (n=51). They also used proton pump inhibitors less often but had no difference in symptoms (as measured with both the Spechler's Activity Index and the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale), quality of life, endoscopic findings or 24-h pH-metry findings.

CONCLUSION

This prospective, double-blind study demonstrates, using excellent GERD quantifying measures including validated symptom severity scores, endoscopy, and 24-h pH-metry, that there exist no clinically significant differences in clinical or laboratory-related GERD manifestations between H. pylori-infected and non-infected GERD patients.