Resection of superior sulcus tumors (posterior approach)

Surgical resection of superior pulmonary sulcus tumor after neoadjuvant chemoradiation via the anterior transmanubrial approach: a case report

Superior pulmonary sulcus tumor is a cancer arising in the apex of the lung that with potential invasion of the brachial plexus, upper ribs, vertebrae, subclavian vessels, and stellate ganglion. Induction concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgical resection with lobectomy combined with any structures in the thoracic inlet invaded by tumor and thorough mediastinal lymph node dissection is the preferred treatment. Both anterior and posterior approaches are applied for resection. Here, we report a 61-year-old man with an 8.6 cm × 5.1 cm mass arising from the right upper lobe invading the apex of the chest wall. Brachial plexus magnetic resonance imaging suggested tumor invasion of the inferior trunk of the brachial plexus, anterior portion of the first 2 ribs, and suspicious involvement of the subclavian artery. Biopsy of the mass showed stage cT4N2M0, IIIB, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. The patient was treated by induction concurrent chemoradiotherapy, which was followed by surgical resection of the right upper lobe and the affected chest wall via the transmanubrial approach. The patient suffered prolonged postoperative air leak and empyema. After continuous chest tube drainage and intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy, he recovered well and was discharged safely. Final pathology showed no viable residue tumor, pathologic complete response of the tumor to induction treatment, a tumor size of 4.1 cm, and no lymph nodes; therefore, the final stage was ypT0N0M0. The transmanubrial approach is feasible for resection of tumor invading the branches of the subclavian artery; however, postoperative empyema which might have resulted from prolonged air leak should be carefully treated by meticulous air leak management.

Utilizing Stereotactic Spine Navigation for Posterior Partial Vertebrectomy in an En Bloc Resection of a Superior Pulmonary Sulcus Tumor Invading the Thoracic Vertebrae: A Technical Note

Prior to the development of en bloc techniques, vertebral invasion by non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) had been considered a relative contraindication to surgical intervention. However, reports in the literature have demonstrated increased progression-free survival with the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by anterior en bloc resection of the residual tumor. Stereotactic spine navigation has been shown to improve accuracy during complex vertebral osteotomies, improving patient outcomes. We report a 53-year-old woman with an NSCLC in the left upper lobe, a periosteum attachment of the second and third thoracic vertebrae (T2 and T3, respectively), and an infiltration of the corresponding nerve roots. We describe a surgical approach for the resection of NSCLC with vertebral infiltration utilizing stereotactic spine navigation and intraoperative computed tomography (CT) (O-Arm, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, US) for a posterior approach laminectomy, osteotomy, and partial vertebrectomy, followed by trans-thoracic en bloc resection of a superior pulmonary sulcus tumor with nerve root infiltration. Posterior approach vertebral osteotomy and en bloc resection for superior sulcus NSCLC infiltrating the vertebrae utilizing stereotactic spine navigation and intraoperative CT (O-Arm) is a viable alternative to the traditional anterior approach.

Management of Lung Cancer Invading the Superior Sulcus

Superior sulcus tumors have posed a formidable therapeutic challenge since their original description by Pancoast and Tobias in the early twentieth century. Initial therapeutic efforts with radiotherapy were associated with high rates of relapse and mortality. Bimodality therapy with complete surgical resection in the 1960s paved the way for trimodality therapy as the current standard of care in the treatment of superior sulcus tumors. The evolution of treatment approaches over time has provided outcomes that come increasingly closer to rivaling those of similarly staged nonapical lung cancer.

Chest wall reconstruction after en bloc Pancoast tumour resection with the use of MatrixRib and SILC fixation systems: technical note

STUDY DESIGN

Technical note.

OBJECTIVE

In cases in which partial resection of the rib cage is accomplished with vertebrectomy, reconstruction of the chest wall may be challenging. That is because of lack of the anchor point which normally would be a proximal end of a rib or transverse process. We report a straightforward technique for chest wall reconstruction with the novel use of two systems of fixation commonly applied in spinal practice.

METHODS

The operation of a squamous cell carcinoma (Pancoast tumour) of the right lung infiltrating T2, T3 and T4 vertebrae was performed though T4 lateral thoracotomy. Posterior instrumentation with transpedicular screws T1-3-5 on the left and T1-5 on the right side was followed with the right upper lobectomy and hemivertebrectomy. The laminae and facet joints of T2-T4 vertebrae were removed on the side of the tumour. An osteotomy was performed medial to the pedicle at the lateral aspect of the dural sac on the side of the tumour. Proximal parts of four adjacent ribs were removed allowing radical en bloc resection with tumour-free margins. The distal end of each of four rib plates used (MatrixRib Precontoured Plate system) was attached to the proximal end of the rib. The proximal end of the plate was then attached to the rod of posterior fixation construct with the use of a flexible polyethylene terephthalate (PeT) band of the SILC™ fixation system. The other end of the PeT band was then passed through the top-loading clamp subsequently attached to the rod of the posterior fixation.

RESULTS

The patient did not require additional procedures for chest wall reconstruction. On the 7-month follow-up, in chest CT he was found with satisfactory expansion of the remaining lung tissue with proper spinal alignment and anatomical shape of the rib cage.

CONCLUSIONS

The reported technique can be applied for chest wall reconstruction in cases of total or subtotal vertebrectomy accomplished with the resection extending towards rib cage. It appears to be straightforward, safe and effective allowing good cosmetic and functional outcome.

The "cut-in patch-out" technique for Pancoast tumor resections results in postoperative pain reduction: a case control study

BACKGROUND

Since 2001 we have utilized a novel surgical approach for Pancoast tumors in which lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection are performed directly though the chest wall defect. The defect is then patched at the completion of the procedure ("cut-in patch-out") thereby avoiding a separate thoracotomy with rib spreading. We undertook a study to compare outcomes of this novel "cut-in patch-out" technique with traditional thoracotomy for patients with Pancoast tumors.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 41 patients undergoing surgical resection of Pancoast tumors requiring en-bloc removal of at least 3 ribs at our institution from 1999 to 2012. Surgery was accomplished by either a "cut-in patch-out" technique (n = 25) or traditional posterolateral thoracotomy and separate chest wall resection (n = 16). Multiple variables including patient demographics, neoadjuvant therapy, extent of resection, and pathology were analyzed with respect to outcomes from morbidity, narcotic use, and oncologic perspectives.

RESULTS

Baseline demographics, neoadjuvant therapy, and perioperative factors including extent of surgery, complete resections (R0), nodal status and lymph node number, morbidity, and mortality were similar between the two groups. The mean duration of out-patient narcotic use was significantly lower in the "cut-in patch-out" group compared to the thoracotomy group (80.6 days ± 62.4 vs. 158.2 days ± 119.2, p < 0.01). Using multivariate regression analysis, the traditional thoracotomy technique (OR 7.72; p = 0.01) was independently associated with prolonged oral narcotic requirements (>100 days). Additionally, five year survival for the "cut-in patch-out" group was 48% versus the traditional group at 12.5% (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with a traditional thoracotomy and separate chest wall resection approach for P-NSCLC, a "cut-in patch-out" technique offers an alternative approach that appears to have at least oncologic equivalence while decreasing pain. We have more recently adapted this technique to select patients with pulmonary neoplasms involving chest wall invasion and believe further investigation is warranted.

Therapeutic modalities for Pancoast tumors

A Pancoast tumor, also called a pulmonary sulcus tumor or superior sulcus tumor, is a tumor of the pulmonary apex. It is a type of lung cancer defined primarily by its location situated at the top end of either the right or left lung. It typically spreads to nearby tissues such as the ribs and vertebrae. Most Pancoast tumors are non-small cell cancers. The growing tumor can cause compression of a brachiocephalic vein, subclavian artery, phrenic nerve, recurrent laryngeal nerve, vagus nerve, or, characteristically, compression of a sympathetic ganglion resulting in a range of symptoms known as Horner's syndrome. Pancoast tumors are named for Henry Pancoast, a US radiologist, who described them in 1924 and 1932.The treatment of a Pancoast lung cancer may differ from that of other types of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Its position and close proximity to vital structures may make surgery difficult. As a result, and depending on the stage of the cancer, treatment may involve radiation and chemotherapy given prior to surgery. Surgery may consist of the removal of the upper lobe of a lung together with its associated structures as well as mediastinal lymphadenectomy. Surgical access may be via thoracotomy from the back or the front of the chest and modification. Careful patient selection, improvements in imaging such as the role of PET-CT in restaging of tumors, radiotherapy and surgical advances, the management of previously inoperable lesions by a combined experienced thoracic-neurosurgical team and prompt recognition and therapy of postoperative complications has greatly increased local control and overall survival for patients with these tumors.

Analysis of the surgical treatment for superior sulcus tumors

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to assess the mortality, complication, and major morbidity rates of surgical treatment for superior sulcus tumors (SSTs), and to estimate the significance of prognostic factors.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the hospital records of 50 consecutive patients undergoing surgical treatment for SSTs between 1992 and 2007. The significance of risk factors for an adverse outcome was investigated.

RESULTS

Both the thirty-day and in-hospital mortality rates were 0 %. Complications developed in 18.0 % (9/50) of the patients. The overall 5-year survival was 32.7 %. Pathological T4 and N1 or more were the risk factors predicting an adverse outcome. Survival was not significantly influenced by the preoperative symptoms, the histological type, the invaded organ or the curability.

CONCLUSION

Surgical treatment for SSTs is associated with acceptable overall morbidity and mortality rates. However, special care must be taken for the patients with pathological T4 and N1 or higher tumors. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical treatment has become a logical strategy for SSTs. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for SSTs may yield better results than surgery alone.

Venous hemangioma presenting as a superior sulcus tumor

Non-small cell pulmonary carcinomas represent the majority of tumors located in the superior sulcus. However, only 5% of all non-small cell pulmonary carcinomas present in the superior sulcus. Other causes of superior sulcus tumors include metastatic tumors, hematologic malignancies, infectious causes, and amyloid nodules, as well as other lesions. We report a case in which a venous hemangioma presented as a superior sulcus tumor.

Treatment of pancoast tumors from the surgeons prospective: re-appraisal of the anterior-manubrial sternal approach

Pancoast tumours are now amenable to multimodality treatment with an acceptable survival. This is because trimodality treatment improves tumor sterilization and hence outcome. Moreover the development of an anterior approach to access the tumor, further improved the technical challenges for a sound resection.The Anterior-manubrial sternal approach was described more than a decade ago and although this method facilitates better exposure of the extreme apex of the lung, brachial plexus and subclavian vessels, its popularity has not reached high levels. We felt that by re-addressing this topic we would stimulate reconsideration of the anterior approach.

The Surgical Management of Lung Cancer

Since the introduction of the pneumonectomy as a technically feasible strategy for the treatment of lung cancer, surgical resection has played a pivotal role in the management of early stage non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). In the last two decades, surgical, medical, and radiation oncologists have produced a growing body of evidence to support the combination of neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatments with standard surgical resection, to improve disease-free and overall survival for specific patient subgroups. Furthermore, alternatives to aggressive surgical management have evolved for patients who are medically inoperable due to compromised pulmonary function or other comorbidities. In this review, surgical options and multimodal treatment strategies are discussed, as well as completed and ongoing clinical trials addressing the surgical management of NSCLC.

Management of Pancoast tumours

Non-small-cell lung carcinomas of the superior sulcus, frequently termed Pancoast tumours, are some of the most challenging thoracic malignant diseases to treat because of their proximity to vital structures at the thoracic inlet. Originally deemed universally fatal, Pancoast tumours are now amenable to curative treatment because of improvements in combined modality therapy and development of new techniques for resection. This review includes discussion of anatomical considerations, initial assessment, multimodality treatment, and surgical approaches for these cancers.