Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Surgical Patients: Identifying a Patient Group to Maximize Performance Improvement

Evaluation of the duration of thromboembolic prophylaxis after high-risk orthopaedic surgery: The ETHOS observational study

Real-life data on post-discharge venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis practices and treatments are lacking. We assessed post-operative VTE prophylaxis prescribed and received in a prospective registry, compared with the 2004 American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines in high-risk orthopaedic surgery patients. Consecutive patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA), hip fracture surgery (HFS), or knee arthroplasty (KA) were enrolled at discharge from 161 centres in 17 European countries if they had received in-hospital VTE prophylaxis that was considered in accordance with the ACCP guidelines by the treating physician. Data on prescribed and actual prophylaxis were obtained from hospital charts and patient post-discharge diaries. Post-operative prophylaxis prescribed and actual prophylaxis received were considered adherent or adequate, respectively, if recommended therapies were used for ≥28 days (HFS and THA) or ≥10 days (KA). Among 4,388 patients, 69.9% were prescribed ACCP-adherent VTE prophylaxis (THA: 1,411/2,217 [63.6%]; HFS: 701/1,112 [63.0%]; KA: 955/1,059 [90.2%]). Actual prophylaxis received was described in 3,939 patients with an available diary after discharge (non-evaluability rate of 10%). Mean actual durations of pharmacological prophylaxis from surgery were: 28.4 ± 13.7 (THA), 29.3 ± 13.9 (HFS), and 28.7 ± 14.1 days (KA). ACCP-adequate VTE prophylaxis was received by 66.5% of patients (60.9% THA, 55.4% HFS, and 88.7% KA). Prophylaxis inadequacies were mainly due to inadequate prescription, non-recommended prophylaxis prescription at discharge, or too short prophylaxis prescribed. In high-risk orthopaedic surgery patients with hospital-initiated prophylaxis, there is a gap between ACCP recommendations, prescribed and actual prophylaxis received, mainly due to inadequate prescription at discharge.

Is venous thromboembolism in colorectal surgery patients preventable or inevitable? One institution's experience

BACKGROUND

The rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in colorectal surgery patients is reportedly high. Herein, we describe characteristics of patients developing VTE in the early postoperative period.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using institutional comprehensive data on colorectal surgery patients from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. All patients from July 2009 to July 2011 were included. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess which factors were associated with increased risk of developing VTE within 30 days of operation.

RESULTS

There were 615 patients who underwent colorectal surgery. Twenty-five (4.1%) developed VTE; 16 (2.6%) deep venous thrombosis (DVT), 4 (0.7%) pulmonary embolus (PE), and 5 (0.8%) developed both DVT and PE. Among VTE patients, 23 (92%) were ordered risk-appropriate VTE prophylaxis. On multivariable analysis, risk factors associated with VTE included postoperative infection (odds ratio [OR] 4.21, 95% CI 1.79, 9.89; p = 0.001), disseminated cancer (OR 4.38, 95% CI 1.24, 15.42; p = 0.022), and emergent status (OR 2.80, 95% CI 1.15, 6.85; p = 0.024). Fourteen (56.0%) of the 25 VTE patients also developed infectious complications compared with 168 (28.5%) of patients without VTE (p = 0.001). Organ space surgical site infections were the most common infection, present in 7 VTE patients. The infectious complications in 9 (64.3%) of the 14 patients occurred before or the same day as the VTE.

CONCLUSIONS

Most VTE events occurred in colorectal surgery patients ordered current best practice prophylaxis for VTE. Further investigation is warranted to identify patients at increased risk for VTE and to develop new strategies to further reduce the incidence of postoperative VTE.

Is development of postoperative venous thromboembolism related to thromboprophylaxis use? A case-control study in the Veterans Health Administration

BACKGROUND

Observational studies continue to report thromboprophylaxis underuse for postoperative pulmonary embolism/deep vein thrombosis (pPE/DVT) despite the long-standing existence of prevention guidelines. However, data are limited on whether thromboprophylaxis use differs between patients developing pPE/DVT versus those who do not or on why prophylaxis is withheld.

METHODS

Administrative data (2002-2007) from 28 Veterans Health Administration hospitals were screened for discharges with (1) pPE/DVT as flagged by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Patient Safety Indicator software and (2) pharmacoprophylaxis-recommended procedures, and the medical records were reviewed to ascertain true pPE/DVT cases. Controls were selected by matching cases by hospital, age, sex, diagnosis-related group, and predicted probability for developing pPE/DVT, and who underwent a pharmacoprophylaxis-recommended procedure. Records were assessed for "appropriate pharmacoprophylaxis use," defined primarily per American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines, and reasons for anticoagulant nonuse.

RESULTS

The 116 case-control pairs were similar in terms of demographics, surgery type, ACCP risk category, and appropriate pharmacoprophylaxis rates overall. Of the highest-risk patients, respective pharmacoprophylaxis rates among cases and controls were 88% versus 92% among hip/knee replacements and 31% versus 48% among cancer patients. Of the cases and controls who did not receive appropriate pharmacoprophylaxis, only about 25% had documented contraindications. Reviewers identified contraindications in 14% of cases and 9% of controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Similarities in preventive pPE/DVT practice between cases and controls suggest that pPE/DVTs occur despite implementation of guideline-adherent practices.