Wedge Resection for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Patients with Pulmonary Insufficiency: Prospective Ten-Year Survival

Wedge resection versus lobectomy in T1 lung cancer patients: a propensity matched analysis

OBJECTIVES

Performing wedge resection rather than lobectomy for primary lung cancer remains controversial. Recent studies demonstrate no survival advantage for non-anatomical resection compared to lobectomy in patients with early-stage lung cancer. The objective of this study was to investigate whether in patients with T1 tumours, non-anatomical wedge resection is associated with equivalent survival to lobectomy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent lung resection at the Lancashire Cardiac Centre between April 2005 and April 2018. Patients were subjected to multidisciplinary team discussion. The extent of resection was decided by the team based on British Thoracic Society guidelines. The primary outcome was overall survival. Propensity matching of patients with T1 tumours was also performed to determine whether differences in survival rates exist in a subset of these patients with balanced pre-operative characteristics.

RESULTS

There were 187 patients who underwent non-anatomical wedge resection and 431 patients who underwent lobectomy. Cox modelling demonstrated no survival difference between groups for the first 1.6 years then a risk of death 3-fold higher for wedge resection group after 1.6 years (HR 3.14, CI 1.98-4.79). Propensity matching yielded 152 pairs for which 5-year survival was 66.2% for the lobectomy group and 38.5% for the non-anatomical wedge group (SMD = 0.58, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-anatomical wedge resection was associated with significantly reduced 5-year survival compared to lobectomy in matched patients. Lobectomy should remain the standard of care for patients with early-stage lung cancer who are fit enough to undergo surgical resection.

Bilateral synchronous multiple lung nodules: Surgical experience from two cases

Synchronous multiple lung cancer (SMPLC) has been increasingly detected as a result of improved imaging techniques, though the incidence of SMPLC is rare. Surgery is currently the only treatment offering potential cure and long-term survival in patients with SMPLC, and complete resection is widely accepted as the first choice of procedure for this type. However, due to the rarity of this clinical scenario, many surgeons lack experience in surgical treatment of SMPLC. Here, we present two cases whose SMPLC was successfully managed with aggressive surgical therapy through video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Validating margin status in lung wedge resection for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer

Stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a localized disease without metastasis; therefore, it can be treated effectively with local therapies. Pulmonary resection is the most frequent treatment, performed as pulmonary wedge resection, segmentectomy, lobectomy, or pneumonectomy. Some retrospective clinical studies of pulmonary wedge resection suggest that its outcome may be inferior to that of anatomical pulmonary resection, whereas other recent studies, which assess surgical margin status, leveled acceptable outcomes. Since the outcome of pulmonary wedge resection for lung cancer may depend on tumor size, distance from the surgical margin to the tumor, tumor size/margin distance ratio, and margin cytology results, a prospective study assessing these parameters is ongoing. This will allow us to identify the clinical implications of these factors and predict which patients are likely to have a good outcome.

Lung cancer in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: enhancing surgical options and outcomes

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are at increased risk for both the development of primary lung cancer, as well as poor outcome after lung cancer diagnosis and treatment. Because of existing impairments in lung function, patients with COPD often do not meet traditional criteria for tolerance of definitive surgical lung cancer therapy. Emerging information regarding the physiology of lung resection in COPD indicates that postoperative decrements in lung function may be less than anticipated by traditional prediction tools. In patients with COPD, more inclusive consideration for surgical resection with curative intent may be appropriate as limited surgical resections or nonsurgical therapeutic options provide inferior survival. Furthermore, optimizing perioperative COPD medical care according to clinical practice guidelines including smoking cessation can potentially minimize morbidity and improve functional status in this often severely impaired patient population.