Post RM. Adjunctive strategies in the treatment of refractory bipolar depression: clinician options in the absence of a systematic database.
Expert Opin Pharmacother 2005;
6:531-46. [PMID:
15934880 DOI:
10.1517/14656566.6.4.531]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Multiple approaches to enhancing antidepressant treatment response in bipolar depression are available and should, in many instances, be explored despite a lack of definitive controlled trial literature supporting their efficacy. Given that the morbidity of depression is three times greater than mania in bipolar illness, a range of treatment approaches to this phase of illness should be pursued. This paper highlights the preliminary evidence of efficacy versus side effects, tolerability, and safety in order to suggest an overall provisional utility grade for each well-studied to highly-experimental option. Given the general paucity of evidence to support efficacy or to sequence different approaches for augmenting treatment of bipolar depression, it is critical that patient and physician adopt a systematic and, preferably, daily rating approach to the assessment of benefit for a given patient of each strategy contemplated. The goal is to achieve and maintain remission of depressive symptoms and associated comorbidities, which is often not accomplished using primary mood stabilizer treatments alone, or in combination; thus, an active clinical approach to augmentation strategies is indicated even when the literature provides only highly preliminary guidance.
Collapse