Potential Role of α1-Adrenoceptors in the Aetiology of LUTS

Drug Repositioning of the α1-Adrenergic Receptor Antagonist Naftopidil: A Potential New Anti-Cancer Drug?

Failure of conventional treatments is often observed in cancer management and this requires the development of alternative therapeutic strategies. However, new drug development is known to be a high-failure process because of the possibility of a lower efficacy than expected for the drug or appearance of non-manageable side effects. Another way to find alternative therapeutic drugs consists in identifying new applications for drugs already approved for a particular disease: a concept named "drug repurposing". In this context, several studies demonstrated the potential anti-tumour activity exerted by α1-adrenergic receptor antagonists and notably renewed interest for naftopidil as an anti-cancer drug. Naftopidil is used for benign prostatic hyperplasia management in Japan and a retrospective study brought out a reduced incidence of prostate cancer in patients that had been prescribed this drug. Further studies showed that naftopidil exerted anti-proliferative and cytotoxic effects on prostate cancer as well as several other cancer types in vitro, as well as ex vivo and in vivo. Moreover, naftopidil was demonstrated to modulate the expression of Bcl-2 family pro-apoptotic members which could be used to sensitise cancer cells to targeting therapies and to overcome resistance of cancer cells to apoptosis. For most of these anti-cancer effects, the molecular pathway is either not fully deciphered or shown to involve α1-adrenergic receptor-independent pathway, suggesting off target transduction signals. In order to improve its efficacy, naftopidil analogues were designed and shown to be effective in several studies. Thereby, naftopidil appears to display anti-cancer properties on different cancer types and could be considered as a candidate for drug repurposing although its anti-cancerous activities need to be studied more deeply in prospective randomized clinical trials.

Antimuscarinics and bladder outlet obstruction: From a contraindication to an indication?

AIM

To review if the existing data support the new concept that antimuscarinic agents can be used for the treatment of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) with coexisting overactive bladder (OAB).

METHOD

A literature search of Medline publications (up to 2008) on use of antimuscarinic agents for treatment BOO was performed and all data were presented. All relevant data from published studies in congress abstracts were as well included.

RESULTS

The existing data show that this treatment effectively improves patient quality of life. Concerns about the possibility of urinary retention were shown to be unfounded. It seems that antimuscarinic agents do not affect voiding pressures and the use of antimuscarinic agents for BOO seems safe.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of an alpha-blocker and antimuscarinic agent for the treatment of BOO with concomitant OAB seems promising.

Alpha1-, alpha2- and beta-adrenoceptors in the urinary bladder, urethra and prostate

1 We have systematically reviewed the presence, functional responses and regulation of alpha(1)-, alpha(2)- and beta-adrenoceptors in the bladder, urethra and prostate, with special emphasis on human tissues and receptor subtypes. 2 Alpha(1)-adrenoceptors are only poorly expressed and play a limited functional role in the detrusor. Alpha(1)-adrenoceptors, particularly their alpha(1A)-subtype, show a more pronounced expression and promote contraction of the bladder neck, urethra and prostate to enhance bladder outlet resistance, particularly in elderly men with enlarged prostates. Alpha(1)-adrenoceptor agonists are important in the treatment of symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia, but their beneficial effects may involve receptors within and outside the prostate. 3 Alpha(2)-adrenoceptors, mainly their alpha(2A)-subtype, are expressed in bladder, urethra and prostate. They mediate pre-junctional inhibition of neurotransmitter release and also a weak contractile effect in the urethra of some species, but not humans. Their overall post-junctional function in the lower urinary tract remains largely unclear. 4 Beta-adrenoceptors mediate relaxation of smooth muscle in the bladder, urethra and prostate. The available tools have limited the unequivocal identification of receptor subtypes at the protein and functional levels, but it appears that the beta(3)- and beta(2)-subtypes are important in the human bladder and urethra, respectively. Beta(3)-adrenoceptor agonists are promising drug candidates for the treatment of the overactive bladder. 5 We propose that the overall function of adrenoceptors in the lower urinary tract is to promote urinary continence. Further elucidation of the functional roles of their subtypes will help a better understanding of voiding dysfunction and its treatment.

QSAR study for a novel series of ortho disubstituted phenoxy analogues of α1-adrenoceptor antagonist WB4101

On the basis of the affinities at the alpha1a-, alpha1b- and alpha1d-adrenoceptors and the 5-HT1A receptor of a previous series of sixteen 2-[(2-phenoxyethyl)aminomethyl]-1,4-benzodioxanes ortho monosubstituted at the phenoxy moiety, a number of ortho disubstituted analogues were designed, synthesized in both the enantiomeric forms and tested in binding assays on the same receptors. The affinity values of the new compounds 1-11 were compared with those of the enantiomers of the 2,6-dimethoxyphenoxy analogue, the well-known alpha1 antagonist WB4101, and of the ortho monosubstituted derivatives, suggesting some distinctive aspects of the interaction of the phenoxy moiety, in particular with the alpha1a-AR and the 5-HT1A receptor, of the monosubstituted and the disubstituted compounds. A classical quantitative structure-activity relationship (Hansch) analysis was applied to the whole set of the S enantiomers of the ortho mono- and disubstituted WB4101 analogues (26 compounds), finding a very good correlation for the alpha1a affinity. For this latter, a significant parabolic relationship was also found with the volume of the two ortho substituents. Diametrically opposite, the same relationships for the 5-HT1A exhibit low or insignificant correlation coefficients.

Polymorphisms in the alpha1A-adrenoceptor gene do not modify the short- and long-term efficacy of alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonists in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE To determine whether a common single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the ADRA1A gene encoding the alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor modifies the short- and long-term efficacy of alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). PATIENTS AND METHODS For 254 patients with BPH and/or lower urinary tract symptoms who received alpha(1)-adrenergic antagonists for > or = 3 months, the ADRA1A genotype at position 1475 of the coding region was determined. The patients' short-term response to treatment was determined for four outcome measures, i.e. the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), the IPSS quality-of-life score, peak urinary flow rate, and obstruction grade, stratified by genotype. Eventual BPH-related invasive therapy was used as the outcome for assessing the long-term response to treatment. Genetic variants at positions 834, 896, 898 and 1831 were too rare to be considered in the analysis. RESULTS There were no significant differences for the genotype strata in three of the four outcome measures. Patients with the CC genotype responded significantly better in quality-of-life perception than patients with the CT or TT genotype. There were also no significant differences in the risk of BPH-related invasive therapy among the three genotypes. CONCLUSIONS The 1475C-->T SNP in the ADRA1A gene does not modify the short- and long-term efficacy of alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists for treating BPH. There was a small effect on perceived quality of life but this was not reflected in other variables that measured the treatment response more directly.