Cure of Helicobacter pylori-positive active duodenal ulcer patients: a double-blind, multicentre, 12-month study comparing a two-week dual vs a one-week triple therapy. GISU (Interdisciplinary Group for Ulcer Study)

Efficacy of 2-week, second-line Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy using rabeprazole, amoxicillin, and metronidazole for the Japanese population

BACKGROUND

Following the failure of first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy using a proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin, second-line therapy is conducted for 1 week using metronidazole instead of clarithromycin in Japan. Recent studies indicate that metronidazole-containing therapy has a higher eradication rate with prolonged treatment duration, even with metronidazole resistance. The aim of this study was to reveal the efficacy of 2-week metronidazole-containing second-line therapy.

METHODS

Eighty-two consecutive outpatients who had failed in the first-line eradication therapy were enrolled and second-line therapy was initiated with 10 mg rabeprazole, 750 mg amoxicillin, and 250 mg metronidazole twice daily. After they had been screened by hematological examination 1 week after initiation, the treatment was continued for 2 weeks after initiation in patients without hematological abnormality. Cure was essentially confirmed by the urea breath test.

RESULTS

After one patient was lost, hematological examination showed elevated serum aminotransferase in 14 of 81 patients. Although it was mild without clinical issues, they were ethically excluded from this study. In the remaining 67 patients and the lost patient, the eradication rate with 2-week therapy was 65/68 (96%, 95% confidence interval: 88-98%) by intention to treat analysis and 65/65 (100%, 94-100%) by per protocol analysis. The main adverse event was soft stools (39%), and no serious adverse event was observed.

CONCLUSION

This 2-week metronidazole-containing second-line therapy provides high efficacy in Japan where metronidazole resistance is rare.

A third-line levofloxacin-based rescue therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori infection persists in a considerable proportion of patients after both first- and second-line current treatments. A standard therapy for re-treatment in such refractory patients is still lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a levofloxacin-amoxycillin combination in patients who previously failed two or more therapeutic attempts.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients with persistent Helicobacter pylori infection were enrolled. Bacterial infection was assessed by rapid urease test and histology on gastric biopsies at endoscopy. Patients were assigned to receive a 10-day triple therapy, comprising rabeprazole 20 mg b.d., levofloxacin 250 mg b.d., and amoxycillin 1 g b.d. Four to 6 weeks after therapy, Helicobacter pylori eradication was assessed by a further endoscopy or 13C urea breath test.

RESULTS

Overall, 36 patients were enrolled, but two patients were lost to follow-up. Helicobacter pylori was successfully cured in 30 patients, giving an 83.3% (95% CI=71.2-95.5) and 88.2% (95% CI=77.4-99) eradication rate at intention-to-treat and per protocol analysis, respectively. Compliance was good in all but two patients, who discontinued the treatment at 8 and 6 days, respectively, on account of glossitis. No major side-effects were reported, whilst 7 (20.1%) patients complained of mild side-effects.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that a 10-day levofloxacin-amoxycillin triple therapy is a safe and successful third-line therapeutic approach for Helicobacter pylori eradication.

Triple therapy for 7 days vs. triple therapy for 7 days plus omeprazole for 21 days in treatment of active duodenal ulcer with Helicobacter pylori infection. A double blind placebo controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The current treatment for active duodenal ulcer implies a 4 weeks course with anti-secretory drugs and two antibiotics for 7 to 10 days in the case of Helicobacter pylori infection.

AIM

To establish whether triple therapy with omeprazole given for 7 days with two antibiotics eradicates H. pylori, heals and prevents ulcer recurrence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 103 patients with active duodenal ulcer and H. pylori were randomly divided into: a group of 50 patients treated with omeprazole, clarithromycin and tinidazole for 7 days followed by omeprazole for 21 days, and a group of 53 patients who received the same treatment as the previous group, followed by placebo for 21 days. Endoscopy with quick urease test, histology and culture was performed at entry and after 4 and 16 weeks.

RESULTS

Ulcer healing rate after 16 weeks' treatment was 95% in the former and 96% in the latter group (ns). Eradication after 16 weeks was 84% in the former and 83% in the latter group (ns). At 56 weeks, all patients examined were ulcer free and without H. pylori.

CONCLUSION

Omeprazole, clarithromycin and tinidazole for 7 days heals active duodenal ulcer and eradicates H. pylori infection in most patients. Treatment extension with omeprazole, for 3 weeks, after triple therapy does not modify healing and eradication rates.

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori: current perspectives

Helicobacter pylori appears to be a necessary cofactor for the majority of non-drug-associated duodenal and gastric ulcers. H. pylori infection is a chronic and transmissible infectious disease whose eradication has proved difficult. The last decade has seen > 1000 clinical trials using different eradication regimens. Many of these trials had severe limitations, some of which will be discussed here. The current review also focuses on the regimens that were used in the past, the present regimens and possibilities for the future. Also highlighted are some other aspects of H. pylori management, such as eradication failures and drug resistance.

"Cervia Working Group Report": guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection

Different national attitudes exist between countries in Europe concerning eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection due to the wide differences in Helicobacter pylori prevalence, gastric cancer risk, bacterial resistance to antibiotics, health care systems and financial resources. The Cervia Working Group Report has been established in order to fill the gap in the absence of National Guidelines in Italy concerning the diagnosis and treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. The recommendations made are, by and large, similar to the European Guidelines but differ slightly with regard to the "test-and-treat" approach to young dyspeptics without sinister symptoms. In the absence of a national validation of this strategy a case-by-case assessment of dyspepsia has been promoted, both at primary care and specialist level. Another area of partial disagreement concerns the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in patients undergoing long-term proton pump inhibitor treatment which has not been generally recommended as scientific evidence in support of this policy is at present rather weak.