Treatment of chronic hepatitis D with thymus-derived polypeptide thymic humoral factor-gamma 2: a pilot study

Precursors of thymic peptides as stress sensors

INTRODUCTION

A large volume of data indicates that the known thymic hormones, thymulin, thymopoietin, thymosin-α, thymosin-β, and thymic humoral factor-y2, exhibit different spectra of activities. Although large in volume, available data are rather fragmented, resulting in a lack of understanding of the role played by thymic hormones in immune homeostasis.

AREA COVERED

Existing data compartmentalizes the effect of thymic peptides into 2 categories: influence on immune cells and interconnection with neuroendocrine systems. The current study draws attention to a third aspect of the thymic peptide effect that has not been clarified yet, wherein ubiquitous and highly abundant intranuclear precursors of so called 'thymic peptides' play a fundamental role in all somatic cells.

EXPERT OPINION

Our analysis indicated that, under certain stress-related conditions, these precursors are cleaved to form immunologically active peptides that rapidly leave the nucleus and intracellular spaces, to send 'distress signals' to the immune system, thereby acting as stress sensors. We propose that these peptides may form a link between somatic cells and immune as well as neuroendocrine systems. This model may provide a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying immune homeostasis, leading thereby to the development of new therapeutic regimes utilizing the characteristics of thymic peptides.

HBV/HDV Coinfection: A Challenge for Therapeutics

Chronic hepatitis D (CHD) results from an infection with the hepatitis B virus and hepatitis D virus (HDV). CHD is the most severe form of human viral hepatitis. Current treatment options consist of interferon alfa, which is effective only in a minority of patients. Study of HDV molecular virology has resulted in new approaches entering clinical trials, with phase-3 studies the most advanced. These include the entry inhibitor bulevirtide, the nucleic acid polymer REP 2139-Ca, the farnesyltransferase inhibitor lonafarnib, and pegylated interferon lambda. This article summarizes the available data on these emerging therapeutics.

Therapy of Delta Hepatitis

Delta hepatitis is the less frequently encountered but most severe form of viral hepatitis. Acute delta hepatitis, as a result of coinfection with hepatitis B and hepatitis delta, is rare, but may lead to fulminant hepatitis, and no therapy exists for this form. Chronic delta hepatitis (CDH) mostly develops as a result of superinfection of a hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) carrier with hepatitis delta virus (HDV). In general, HDV is the dominant virus. However, a dynamic shift of the dominant virus may occur with time in rare instances, and hepatitis B virus (HBV) may become the dominant virus, at which time nucleos(t)ide analog therapy may be indicated. Otherwise, the only established management of CDH consists of conventional or pegylated interferon therapy, which has to be administered at doses used for hepatitis B for a duration of at least 1 year. Posttreatment week-24 virologic response is the most widely used surrogate marker of treatment efficacy, but it does not represent a sustained virologic response, and late relapse can occur. As an easy-to-use simple serological test, anti-HDV-immunoglobulin M (IgM) correlates with histological inflammatory activity and clinical long-term outcome; however, it is not as sensitive as HDV RNA in assessing treatment response. No evidence-based rules for treating CDH exist, and treatment duration needs to be individualized based on virologic response at end of treatment or end of follow-up. Effective treatment may decrease liver-related complications, such as decompensation or liver-related mortality. In patients with decompensated cirrhosis, interferons are contraindicated and liver transplantation has to be considered. Alternative treatment options are an urgent need in CDH. New treatment strategies targeting different steps of the HDV life cycle, such as hepatocyte entry inhibitors or prenylation inhibitors, are emerging and provide hope for the future.

Pegylated Interferon α Therapy in Chronic Delta Hepatitis: A One-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

The only established therapy for chronic viral delta hepatitis, the most severe form of viral hepatitis is treatment with pegylated-interferon α (Peg IFN α).

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we aimed to determine the efficacy of pegylated-interferon α 2a (Peg-IFN α 2a) and 2b (Peg IFN α 2b) in the treatment of patients infected with chronic delta hepatitis virus.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The sample size was based on available patients potentially to be recruited. Data of 63 patients receiving either Peg IFN alpha 2a or Peg IFN alpha 2b were retrospectively assessed in the present cohort study performed in Turkey. Of 56 patients completed the study, 41 received Peg IFN α 2a and 15 received Peg IFN α 2b for 12 months. Patients were evaluated for biochemical and virological responses at the end of given treatment and six months after the treatment.

RESULTS

Stage of fibrosis was found high in both groups (85.4% vs. 86.7%), while cirrhosis was higher in the group of Peg IFN α 2b (53.3% vs. 34.1%). At the end of treatment, either hepatitis delta virus RNA (HDV RNA) alone or both HDV RNA and hepatitis b virus DNA (HBV DNA) had negative results in 32% of patients. Although HDV RNA negativity was sustained in 30.3% of patients, negativity of both HDV RNA and HBV DNA was decreased to 19.6% six months after completion of the treatment. HBV DNA became positive in one third of patients with response at six months after completion of the treatment (10.7% of all patients). HDV RNA negativity at month six was found as a predictor of positive response. No significant difference was found between Peg IFN α 2a and Peg IFN α 2b for virological response rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with Peg IFN α achieved a sustained negativity of HDV RNA in about one third of patients. Duration of Peg IFN α therapy might be prolonged to at least 24 months or more to prevent the occurrence of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) relapse encountered six months after completion of the treatment.

Natural history and treatment of chronic delta hepatitis

Chronic delta hepatitis (CDH) represents a severe form of chronic viral hepatitis, induced by the hepatitis delta virus (HDV) in conjunction with the hepatitis B virus (HBV). Delta hepatitis may lead to disease in humans through co-infection. The former leads to acute hepatitis which clinically can range from mild hepatitis to fulminant hepatitis and death. Severe or fulminant hepatitis is more often observed with HBV-HDV co-infection compared to HBV mono-infection. Chronic infection after acute hepatitis B + D co-infection is infrequent and similar to the rate in mono-infected patients. CDH develops in 70-90% of patients with superinfection. CDH runs a more progressive course than chronic hepatitis B and may lead to cirrhosis within 2 years in 10-15% of patients. However, as with any immune-mediated disease, different patterns of progression, ranging from mild to severe progressive disease, are observed. Active replication of both HBV and HDV may be associated with a more progressive disease pattern. Further, different HDV and HBV genotypes may contribute to various disease outcomes. CDH may be frequently associated with hepatocellular carcinoma development although recent studies provided conflicting results. The only established therapy for CDH is treatment with interferons for a duration of at least 1 year. On treatment, 6 month HDV RNA assessment may give clues as to whether to stop treatment at 1 year or continue beyond 1 year. New approaches to treatment of CDH are an urgent need of which the use of prenylation inhibitors appears the most promising.

Pegylated interferon alpha-2b as monotherapy or in combination with ribavirin in chronic hepatitis delta

Therapy of chronic hepatitis delta with standard interferon therapy has met with limited efficacy. This study was designed to examine the efficacy and safety of peginterferon with or without ribavirin. Thirty-eight serum hepatitis B surface antigen- and HDV RNA-positive patients with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) more than 1.5 times the upper normal limit received peginterferon alpha-2b (1.5 microg/kg) alone as monotherapy (n=16) or in combination with ribavirin (n=22), for 48 weeks. Thereafter, all the patients were maintained on peginterferon for 24 weeks and followed for 24 weeks off therapy. The primary end point studied was the virological and biochemical response at the end of follow-up. HDV RNA was determined by single or nested polymerase chain reaction assays. Twenty-seven patients (71%), 11 receiving monotherapy and 16 receiving the combination treatment, completed the follow-up. At the end of treatment, a virological response was observed in 3 of the patients treated with peginterferon (19%) and in 2 of the patients treated with combination therapy (9%), and a biochemical response was observed in 6 (37.5%) and 9 patients (41%), respectively. In nonresponders, ALT diminished from a mean of 174+/-53 to 86+/-41 IU/L. At the end of follow-up, serum HDV RNA was negative in 8 patients (21%), and a biochemical response was detected in 10 patients (26%). Treatment was discontinued in 25% of the patients, and dosing was modified in 58%. In conclusion, a prolonged course of peginterferon alpha-2b resulted in clearance of serum HDV RNA and ALT normalization in a fifth of patients with chronic hepatitis D, while ribavirin had no effect on the viral clearance rate. Overall tolerance of therapy was poor.

Natural Course and Treatment of Hepatitis D Virus Infection

Hepatitis D virus (HDV) is a subviral satellite with hepatitis B virus (HBV) as its natural helper virus. After entry into hepatocytes, it utilizes host cellular enzymes to replicate by a double-rolling-circle mechanism. HDV is most often transmitted by contact with contaminated blood and body fluid, similar to HBV infection. Approximately 5% of the global HBV carriers are coinfected with HDV, leading to a total of 10-15 million HDV carriers worldwide. HDV infection can occur concurrently with HBV infection (coinfection) or in a patient with established HBV infection (superinfection). The pathogenesis of HDV remains controversial. A decline in the prevalence of both acute and chronic hepatitis D (CHD) has been observed worldwide. At present, therapy for chronic HDV infection is by the use of interferon-alpha. Compared to chronic hepatitis B or C, CHD treatment requires a higher dosage and a longer duration of treatment, and post-treatment relapses are common. In order to prevent the progression of CHD and its related morbidity and mortality, more effective treatments are needed.

Lamivudine therapy in chronic delta hepatitis: a multicentre randomized-controlled pilot study

BACKGROUND

Delta virus (HDV)-related chronic hepatitis is difficult to treat.

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy of lamivudine 100 mg daily on serum HDV-RNA, hepatitis D virus antibodies and alanine aminotransferase levels, liver histology, and on hepatitis B surface antigen seroconversion.

METHODS

Thirty-one hepatitis B surface antigen-positive, HDV-RNA-positive patients with ALT > or = 1.5 upper normal level and compensated liver disease were randomized (1:2 ratio) to placebo (group A, n = 11) or lamivudine (group B, n = 20) for 52 weeks; thereafter, all patients were given lamivudine for 52 weeks and followed up for 16 weeks.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients (81%) completed the study. No patient was HDV-RNA-negative at week 52; three patients (11%) were negative at week 104. Two of them remained HDV-RNA-negative at week 120, and one lost the hepatitis B surface antigen without seroconversion. Paired pre-treatment and week 104 liver biopsies were available from 19 patients: of which three of seven (43%) from group A and two of 12 patients (17%) from group B had a > or =2 point decrease in the Ishak necroinflammatory score.

CONCLUSION

A sustained complete response was achieved in 8% of hepatitis D virus-infected patients treated with lamivudine and a partial histological response in 26% of them. Hepatitis D virus viraemia was unaffected, even in patients when hepatitis B virus replication was lowered by lamivudine therapy.

Treatment of hepatitis D

Delta virus related chronic hepatitis is difficult to treat. The response to alpha-interferon (IFN), which still represents the only therapy for chronic hepatitis D, varies widely and occurs at different times from the beginning of treatment. The rate of response is proportional to the dose of IFN, with 9 million units (MU) three times a week being more effective than 3 MU thrice weekly. Sustained responses are unusual and are accompanied by the clearance of serum hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg), seroconversion to anti-HBs and improvement of liver histology. Although disease of a short-standing may respond better to therapy, clear predictors of response are still unidentified. Besides IFN, other therapeutic approaches such as immunosuppressive drugs, acyclovir, ribavirin and thymosin, have been unhelpful. Available evidence does not support the use of deoxynucleotide analogues. Famciclovir has no effect on disease activity and hepatitis D virus (HDV)-RNA levels. Twelve- or 24-month lamivudine treatment does not significantly affect biochemical, virological or histological parameters. Pegylated-IFN could represent a reasonable therapeutic option in the long-term treatment required for chronic hepatitis D. Antisense oligonucleotides and prenylation inhibitors hold promise as therapeutic agents of the future. Liver transplantation provides a valid option for end-stage HDV liver disease; the risk of re-infection is lower for HDV than for HBV under long-term administration of hyperimmune serum against HBsAg. Molecularly tailored drugs capable of interfering with crucial viral replicative processes of HDV appear to be the best prospect in the treatment of hepatitis D.

Degradation of thymic humoral factor gamma2 by human plasma: involvement of angiotensin converting enzyme

The degradation of thymic humoral factor-gamma2 (THF-gamma2), an immunoregulatory octapeptide important for T-lymphocyte regulation, by enzymes present in human plasma, was investigated. THF-gamma2 was metabolized through two steps that involved the detaching of N-terminal amino acid leucine followed by hydrolysis of the Lys(6)-Phe(7) bond. The THF-gamma2 cleavages were sensitive to aminopeptidase and metalloproteinase inhibitors. The degradation was completely blocked by amastatin and specific inhibitors of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE). The cleavages occurred independently, with two different kinetics, faster for the N-terminal hydrolysis than for that of the Lys(6)-Phe(7) bond. Purified human plasma ACE was used to characterize the hydrolysis of Lys(6)-Phe(7) bond. The K(m) and K(cat) values for THF-gamma2 hydrolysis were 0.273 mM and 107 s(-1), respectively. The optimum of chloride concentration was 300 mM, while that of pH was 7.6. The presence of ACE in circulating mononuclear cells raises the possibility that it may play a role in modulating the THF-gamma2 activity.