Integration of hepatitis B virus containing mutations in the core promoter/X gene in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Viral hepatocarcinogenesis: from infection to cancer

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a worldwide health issue that has started receiving attention but is still poorly understood. However, the hepatitis B virus (HBV) and the hepatitis C virus (HCV) are known to be two major causative agents of HCC. They differ in their modes of infection, their treatment options, their genomes and their carcinogenic abilities. However, both share a link with HCC through alterations of the host genome. In order to continue in our search for the mechanisms behind viral hepatocarcinogenesis, the individual entities (HBV, HCV, HCC and host), their natural history, treatment options and genomic properties must be further understood. Additionally, an understanding of the genomics, the link between the entities, is crucial for the success of the ongoing search for therapeutic options for HCC. Similar to most types of cancer, hepatocarcinogenesis is a multistep process involving different genetic alterations that ultimately lead to malignant transformation of the hepatocyte. As technology advances and research continues, the genetic changes and influences among these entities will prove essential to improved diagnostic and therapeutic options. It remains a challenge to provide a clear picture of the connection between virus and cancer. We review (i) the epidemiological link between HBV/HCV infection to HCC; (ii) prevention and control of chronic hepatitis B or C in reducing HCC risk; and (iii) genetic characters of viruses and hosts and the mechanisms associated with HCC susceptibilities, with the intention of providing a direction for future research and treatment.

Pathogenesis of hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatitis B virus (HBV)-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains the most common form of HCC in large areas of Asia and Africa. It remains common even in some countries where hepatitis C virus (HCV)-associated HCC has become the predominant form, such as Japan. Integration of HBV in HCC DNA is found at random sites in the host genome in nearly all patients with HBV-associated HCC. It is not clear how often this integration results in insertional mutagenesis, but previously unknown growth regulating genes and cancer-associated genes have been found frequently near HBV integration sites in HCC in recent studies. In addition, HBV encodes a transactivating protein, the X protein, which could enable the randomly integrated HBV to alter the function of host genes that are not near the integration site. Mutations at two adjacent codons in HBV (1762(T)/1764(A) mutations) within the X gene are frequently found in HCC patients, and may play a role in the mutagenic or transactivational role of HBV in HCC. The presence of cirrhosis in most patients with HBV-associated HCC, and the presence of mutations in tumor suppressor genes in many, suggests that these are also factors in hepatocarcinogenesis. Few studies have examined the mutations of more than one gene in the same HCC patients. Fewstudies have evaluated the interactions between HBV mutations, host gene mutations, cirrhosis, and other potentially mutagenic stresses at the cellular level, with progression to HCC, and few studies have been conducted to determine whether these changes must accumulate in succession to lead to HCC. The recent availability of rapid sequencing methods and DNA microarray technologies has permitted expression profiling and permutation analysis of an array of genes to explore the pattern and succession of molecular changes leading to HBV-associated HCC. To date, these methods have been used to show patterns of molecular changes that differ in HBV-associated HCC (compared to HCV-associated HCC or to HCC in patients lacking either virus) and patterns that can predict survival (and hence may directly indicate different mechanisms of disease), and may soon make possible a universally accepted clinical classification scheme for HCC.

Chronic hepatitis B in hepatocarcinogenesis

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer in the world, and has a wide geographical variation. Eighty per cent of HCC is attributed to hepatitis B virus (HBV). The predominant carcinogenic mechanism of HBV associated HCC is through the process of liver cirrhosis, but direct oncogenic effects of HBV may also contribute. Prevention of HBV infections as well as effective treatment of chronic hepatitis B is still needed for the global control of HBV associated HCC. Continued investigation of the mechanisms of hepatocarcinogenesis will refine our current understanding of the molecular and cellular basis for neoplastic transformation in the liver.

HBsAg-negative hepatitis B virus infections in hepatitis C virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma

This study was conducted to evaluate reports that hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA sequences can be found in the serum and/or tumour tissue from some hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who have no detectable hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in their sera. Such HBV infections would be highly atypical, because prospective studies have shown a clear succession of specific serologic markers during and after most HBV infections. As most HBsAg-negative HCC patients in Japan have hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections, the present study was conducted to determine whether some of these patients actually have unrecognized HBV infections. Thirty newly diagnosed HCC patients from Kurume, Japan, with antibody to the hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) were studied. None of the 30 had HBsAg detectable in their serum. Of 22 for whom test results for antibodies to the hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) and antibodies to HBsAg (anti-HBs) were available, 14 (64%) had anti-HBc and anti-HBs, four (18%) had anti-HBc alone, and four (18%) had no HBV markers. Nested polymerase chain reaction was used to detect the HBV surface (S), core (C), polymerase (P) and core promoter gene sequences in the HCC tissues and in the adjacent nontumorous liver tissues. HBV DNA was detected in HCC and/or adjacent nontumorous liver in 22 of 30 (73%) patients [detected in both HCC and nontumorous liver in 19/30 patients (63%)]. Among the 22 patients with detectable HBV DNA, more than one HBV gene was detected in 10 (46%). Among the four patients whose sera were negative for all HBV markers, three had HBV DNA in either HCC and nontumorous liver (two cases) or only in the nontumorous liver (one case); HBV DNA could not be detected in tissues from the fourth patient. In 18 of 21 (86%) patients with detectable HBV core promoter sequences, mutations at both nucleotides 1762 (A-GT) and 1764 (G-A) in the core promoter region were found. No deletions were detected in the core promoter gene region of the type reported to be associated with some cases of HBsAg-negative HBV infection. Thus, HBV DNA was detectable in 22 (73%) HBsAg-negative, anti-HCV-positive HCCs, including three (10%) who were also negative for anti-HBc and anti-HBs. HBV mutations at both nucleotides 1762 (A-GT) and 1764 (G-A) in the core promoter region were found in the majority of cases, mutations that have previously been reported in HBV that is integrated in HCC DNA. In serologic surveys to determine etiologic associations of HCC, patients such as those in this study would have been incorrectly designated as having 'HCV-associated HCC,' whereas the data in this study suggest that HBV could have played a role in the development of their HCCs.