Intermediate fibrosis staging in hepatitis C: a problem not overcome by optimal samples or pathologists’ expertise

The impact of hepatic and splenic volumetric assessment in imaging for chronic liver disease: a narrative review

Chronic liver disease is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can fully visualise the liver and adjacent structures in the upper abdomen providing a reproducible assessment of the liver and biliary system and can detect features of portal hypertension. Subjective interpretation of CT and MRI in the assessment of liver parenchyma for early and advanced stages of fibrosis (pre-cirrhosis), as well as severity of portal hypertension, is limited. Quantitative and reproducible measurements of hepatic and splenic volumes have been shown to correlate with fibrosis staging, clinical outcomes, and mortality. In this review, we will explore the role of volumetric measurements in relation to diagnosis, assessment of severity and prediction of outcomes in chronic liver disease patients. We conclude that volumetric analysis of the liver and spleen can provide important information in such patients, has the potential to stratify patients' stage of hepatic fibrosis and disease severity, and can provide critical prognostic information. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This review highlights the role of volumetric measurements of the liver and spleen using CT and MRI in relation to diagnosis, assessment of severity, and prediction of outcomes in chronic liver disease patients. KEY POINTS: Volumetry of the liver and spleen using CT and MRI correlates with hepatic fibrosis stages and cirrhosis. Volumetric measurements correlate with chronic liver disease outcomes. Fully automated methods for volumetry are required for implementation into routine clinical practice.

Aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index and Fibrosis-4 index score predict hepatic fibrosis evaluated by transient hepatic elastography in hepatitis C virus-infected hemodialysis patients

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the performance of aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) and Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) in chronic kidney disease stage 5D HCV-infected patients compared to transient hepatic elastography (TE) as the gold standard.

METHODS

Hemodialysis HCV-infected patients submitted to TE (FibroScan, Echosens, Paris, France) had APRI and FIB-4 calculated. Based on the best area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for significant fibrosis and cirrhosis, APRI and FIB-4 cutoffs were determined and their performances were compared.

RESULTS

Seventy patients were included. Both APRI and FIB-4 showed good performance for identifying significant fibrosis [AUROC = 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61-0.83 and 0.79, 95% CI 0.68-0.88; P < 0.05] and cirrhosis [AUROC = 0.82, 95% CI 0.71-0.90 and 0.85, 95% CI 0.75-0.93; P < 0.05]. APRI ≤ 0.25 excluded significant fibrosis with negative predictive value (NPV) of 81.8% and APRI > 0.61 confirmed it with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 81.8%. Similarly, NPV for FIB-4 ≤ 0.60 regarding significant fibrosis was 90.9%. NPV for cirrhosis for APRI ≤ 0.42 or FIB-4 ≤ 1.40 was 97%. However, APRI > 0.73 or FIB-4 > 2.22 showed a modest PPV of 60 and 70% to confirm cirrhosis, respectively.

CONCLUSION

APRI and FIB-4 are simple, non-expensive scoring systems with good accuracy to assess fibrosis in HCV-infected hemodialysis patients, mainly excluding both significant fibrosis or cirrhosis and may be an alternative to TE in the evaluation of this population.

Noninvasive monitoring of hepatic steatosis: controlled attenuation parameter and magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

With an increase in the worldwide prevalence of obesity, the incidence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has been on the rise, such that it has been recently considered to be a major public health concern. Traditional interventions, such as lifestyle modifications, regular exercise, and healthy diet, have been significant in improving NAFLD with reduction of liver fat. Areas covered: Although liver biopsy is still the gold standard for diagnosis of NAFLD, there is a need for non-invasive, quantitative assessments of hepatic steatosis, especially in clinical trials of anti-steatotic medications or in the follow-up of patients undergoing lifestyle modifications. Liver biopsy has various shortcomings, such as invasive nature, risk of complications and possibility of sampling error. Therefore, it is impractical to use liver biopsy routinely in patients with NAFLD, clearly indicating the need for non-invasive and accurate diagnostic methods. Recently, controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) have been employed in various studies to monitor the dynamic changes of hepatic steatosis in response to treatment in patients with NAFLD. Expert commentary: Although further validations are required, CAP and MRI-PDFF could be used as potential diagnostic and monitoring tools in clinical setting.

Controlled attenuation parameter for steatosis grading in chronic hepatitis C compared with digital morphometric analysis of liver biopsy: impact of individual elastography measurement quality

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) diagnostic performance for steatosis grading has been controversial and considerable observer-related variability in liver biopsy has been reported. This is a subanalysis of a larger chronic hepatitis C study on noninvasive fibrosis staging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were prospectively enrolled for paired liver biopsy and transient elastography. Biopsy fragments were subjected to digital morphometric steatosis quantification. Associated patient and technical factors, including a newly described elastogram quality score, were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 312 patients were included in the final analysis. The mean liver stiffness was 8.7±2.1 kPa. Morphometry showed S0 in 19.2% of patients, S1 in 28.5%, S2 in 31.1%, and S3 in 21.2%. CAP showed S0 in 11.2% of patients, S1 in 26.6%, S2 in 56.7%, and S3 in 5.4%. Spearman coefficient showed a positive and independent correlation between CAP and morphometric analysis (r=0.48, P<0.05), except for distinguishing S1 and S2 (P=0.11). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the presence or absence of steatosis was 0.944; differentiation between levels I, II, and III were 0.776, 0.812, and 0.879. Elastogram quality independently predicted accuracy [odds ratio (OR): 6.95, 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 4.45-9.06 as well as CAP interquartile range OR: 2.81, 95%CI: 1.67-3.99] and liver stiffness (OR: 0.78, 95%CI: 0.51-0.80).

CONCLUSION

We present an external validation for CAP against the objective steatosis quantification provided by digital morphometry. Fairly good performance indicators were found, except for S1 versus S2 differentiation. Variability and higher liver stiffness were associated with lower performance. Achieving higher quality measurements, however, overcame such limitations with excellent accuracy.

Real-world data in the molecular era-finding the reality in the real world

Real-world data (RWD) promises to provide a pivotal element to the understanding of personalized medicine. However, without true representation (or the reality) of the patient-disease biosystem and its molecular contributors, RWD may hamper rather than help this advancement. In this review article, we discuss RWD vs. clinical reality and the disconnects that exist currently (emphasizing molecular medicine), and methods of closing the gaps between RWD and reality.