Control de un brote escolar de enfermedad meningocócica serogrupo B mediante quimioprofilaxis con azitromicina y ciprofloxacino

Mass chemoprophylaxis for control of outbreaks of meningococcal disease

Although vaccination is the main strategy used to control meningococcal disease outbreaks, mass chemoprophylaxis has also been used as an immediate response to outbreaks, either to supplement vaccination or when vaccination is not possible. However, public health guidelines regarding the use of mass chemoprophylaxis for outbreak control vary by country, partly because the impact of mass chemoprophylaxis on the course of an individual outbreak is difficult to assess. We have reviewed data for the use of mass chemoprophylaxis during 33 outbreaks that occurred both in military populations and in communities and non-military organisations. In most outbreaks, no additional cases of meningococcal disease occurred after mass chemoprophylaxis, or cases occurred only in individuals who had not received prophylaxis. A delay of several weeks was common before cases occurred among prophylaxis recipients. Overall, the outbreak reports that we reviewed suggest that mass chemoprophylaxis might provide temporary protection to chemoprophylaxis recipients during outbreaks.

Prospects for vaccine prevention of meningococcal infection

Neisseria meningitidis is the leading cause of bacterial meningitis in the United States and worldwide. A serogroup A/C/W-135/Y polysaccharide meningococcal vaccine has been licensed in the United States since 1981 but has not been used universally outside of the military. On 14 January 2005, a polysaccharide conjugate vaccine that covers meningococcal serogroups A, C, W-135, and Y was licensed in the United States for 11- to 55-year-olds and is now recommended for the routine immunization of adolescents and other high-risk groups. This review covers the changing epidemiology of meningococcal disease in the United States, issues related to vaccine prevention, and recommendations on the use of the new vaccine.

Prophylactic use of antibiotics for prevention of meningococcal infections: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials was performed in order to study the effectiveness of prophylactic treatment regimens in preventing secondary cases of meningococcal disease (i.e., those contracted after contact with a person with meningococcal disease) and in eradicating Neisseria meningitidis from the pharynx of healthy colonised individuals. The Medline, Embase, and Lilacs databases, the Cochrane Library, and the references of all studies identified were systematically searched for relevant trials. Two reviewers independently applied selection criteria, performed quality assessment, and selected data. Relative risks were pooled using a fixed effects model unless heterogeneity assessed by the I2 statistic and chi-square test was found. In such cases, a random effect model was used. There were no cases of meningococcal disease following treatment with antibiotics or placebo, thus effectiveness regarding prevention of future disease could not be directly assessed. Compared with placebo, ciprofloxacin (RR = 0.04; 95%CI, 0.01-0.12), rifampin (RR = 0.17; 95%CI, 0.12-0.24), minocycline (RR = 0.30; 95%CI, 0.19-0.45), and penicillin (RR = 0.47; 95%CI, 0.24-0.94), proved effective at eradicating Neisseria meningitidis 1 week after treatment. After 1-2 weeks, only ciprofloxacin (RR = 0.03; 95%CI, 0.00-0.42) and rifampin (RR = 0.20; 95%CI, 0.14-0.29) still proved significantly effective when compared with placebo. Rifampin continued to be effective (RR = 0.24; 95%CI, 0.16-0.37) compared with placebo until up to 4 weeks post treatment. Rifampin was the only drug to which resistance developed. Given that the use of rifampin in an outbreak setting might lead to the circulation of isolates resistant to rifampin, the use of ciprofloxacin and ceftriaxone should be considered.