1
|
Garg A, Jaiswal A. Evaluation and Management of Premature Rupture of Membranes: A Review Article. Cureus 2023; 15:e36615. [PMID: 37155446 PMCID: PMC10122752 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.36615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Premature rupture of membranes (PROM), now also referred to as "pre-labour rupture of membranes," is the rupture of gestational membranes after 37 weeks but before the process of labour begins. When membrane rupture occurs before 37 weeks of gestation, it is referred to as preterm PROM (PPROM). Prematurity is held accountable for the majority of newborn morbidity and mortality. PROM causes around one-third of all preterm deliveries and complicates 3% of pregnancies. Significant morbidity and mortality rates have been associated with PROM. Preterm (PROM) pregnancies are more difficult to manage. Pre-labour rupture of membranes is characterised by its short latency, higher intrauterine infection risk, and greater umbilical cord compression probability. Women with preterm PROM are more likely to develop chorioamnionitis and placental abruption. Various diagnostic modalities include sterile speculum examination, the nitrazine test, the ferning test, and the latest advances, which are the Amnisure test and the Actim test. Despite all these tests, there is still a need for newer, non-invasive, rapid, and accurate tests. Admission to a hospital, amniocentesis to rule out infection, and, if necessary, prenatal corticosteroids and broad-spectrum antibiotics are all alternatives for treatment. As a result, the clinician managing a pregnant woman whose pregnancy has been affected by PROM plays a crucial role in the management and must be well aware of probable complications and control measures to reduce risks and increase the likelihood of the required outcome. PROM's proclivity for recurrence in later pregnancies provides a chance for prevention. Furthermore, prenatal and neonatal care developments will continue to enhance the outcomes of women and their children. The purpose of this article is to summarise the concepts related to the evaluation and management of PROM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditi Garg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Wardha, IND
| | - Arpita Jaiswal
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Wardha, IND
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Successful Anesthesia Management of Postoperative Maternal Pulmonary Edema and Uterine Hyperactivity following Open Fetal Myelomeningocele Repair. Case Rep Anesthesiol 2021; 2021:6679845. [PMID: 33747571 PMCID: PMC7954628 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6679845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Effective tocolysis is essential after fetal myelomeningocele repair and is associated with the development of pulmonary edema. The increased uterine activity in the immediate postoperative period is commonly treated with magnesium sulfate. However, other tocolytic agents such as nitroglycerine, nifedipine, indomethacin, terbutaline, and atosiban (outside the US) have also been used to combat uterine contractility. The ideal tocolytic regimen which balances the risks and benefits of in-utero surgery has yet to be determined. In this case report, we describe a unique case of fetal myelomeningocele repair complicated by maternal pulmonary edema and increased uterine activity resistant to magnesium sulfate therapy.
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective is to provide guidelines for the use of antenatal magnesium sulphate for fetal neuroprotection of the preterm infant. OPTIONS Antenatal magnesium sulphate administration should be considered for fetal neuroprotection when women present at ≤33 + 6 weeks with imminent preterm birth, defined as a high likelihood of birth because of active labour with cervical dilatation ≥4 cm, with or without preterm pre-labour rupture of membranes, and/or planned preterm birth for fetal or maternal indications. There are no other known fetal neuroprotective agents. OUTCOMES The outcomes measured are the incidence of cerebral palsy (CP) and neonatal death. EVIDENCE Published literature was retrieved through searches of PubMed or Medline, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library in December 2017, using appropriate controlled vocabulary and key words (magnesium sulphate, cerebral palsy, preterm birth). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and relevant observational studies. There were no date or language restrictions. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the guideline to December 2017. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology assessment-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies. VALUES The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Table 1). BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS Antenatal magnesium sulphate for fetal neuroprotection reduces the risk of "death or CP" (relative risk [RR] 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-0.98; 4 trials, 4446 infants), "death or moderate-severe CP" (RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.73-0.99; 3 trials, 4250 infants), "any CP" (RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.55-0.91; 4, trials, 4446 infants), "moderate-to-severe CP" (RR 0.60; 95% CI 0.43-0.84; 3 trials, 4250 infants), and "substantial gross motor dysfunction" (inability to walk without assistance) (RR 0.60; 95% CI 0.43-0.83; 3 trials, 4287 women) at 2 years of age. Results were consistent between trials and across the meta-analyses. There is no anticipated significant increase in health care-related costs because women eligible to receive antenatal magnesium sulphate will be judged to have imminent preterm birth. VALIDATION Australian National Clinical Practice Guidelines were published in March 2010 by the Antenatal Magnesium Sulphate for Neuroprotection Guideline Development Panel. Antenatal magnesium sulphate was recommended for fetal neuroprotection in the same dosage as recommended in these guidelines. However, magnesium sulphate was recommended only at <30 weeks gestation, based on 2 considerations. First, no single gestational age subgroup was considered to show a clear benefit. Second, in the face of uncertainty, the committee felt it was prudent to limit the impact of their clinical practice guidelines on resource allocation. In March 2010, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists issued a Committee Opinion on magnesium sulphate for fetal neuroprotection. It stated that "the available evidence suggests that magnesium sulfate given before anticipated early preterm birth reduces the risk of cerebral palsy in surviving infants." No official opinion was given on a gestational age cut-off, but it was recommended that physicians develop specific guidelines around the issues of inclusion criteria, dosage, concurrent tocolysis, and monitoring in accordance with 1 of the larger trials. Similarly, the World Health Organization also strongly recommends use of magnesium sulphate for fetal neuroprotection in its 2015 recommendations on interventions to improve preterm birth outcomes but cites further researching on dosing regimen and re-treatment. SPONSORS Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). SUMMARY STATEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS.
Collapse
|
4
|
Magee LA, De Silva DA, Sawchuck D, Synnes A, von Dadelszen P. No 376 - Recours au sulfate de magnésium aux fins de neuroprotection fœtale. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2019; 41:523-542. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.11.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
5
|
De Silva DA, Synnes AR, von Dadelszen P, Lee T, Bone JN, Magee LA. MAGnesium sulphate for fetal neuroprotection to prevent Cerebral Palsy (MAG-CP)-implementation of a national guideline in Canada. Implement Sci 2018; 13:8. [PMID: 29325592 PMCID: PMC5765609 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-017-0702-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2017] [Accepted: 12/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence supports magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) for women at risk of imminent birth at < 32-34 weeks to reduce the likelihood of cerebral palsy in the child. MAGnesium sulphate for fetal neuroprotection to prevent Cerebral Palsy (MAG-CP) was a multifaceted knowledge translation (KT) strategy for this practice. METHODS The KT strategy included national clinical practice guidelines, a national online e-learning module and, at MAG-CP sites, educational rounds, focus group discussions and surveys of barriers and facilitators. Participating sites contributed data on pregnancies with threatened very preterm birth. In an interrupted time-series study design, MgSO4 use for fetal neuroprotection (NP) was tracked prior to (Aug 2005-May 2011) and during (Jun 2011-Sept 2015) the KT intervention. Effectiveness of the strategy was measured by optimal MgSO4 use (i.e. administration when and only when indicated) over time, evaluated by a segmented generalised estimating equations logistic regression (p < 0.05 significant). Secondary outcomes included maternal effects and, using the Canadian Neonatal Network (CNN) database, national trends in MgSO4 use for fetal NP and associated neonatal resuscitation. With an anticipated recruitment of 3752 mothers over 4 years at Canadian Perinatal Network sites, we anticipated > 95% power to detect an increase in optimal MgSO4 use for fetal NP from < 5 to 80% (2-sided, alpha 0.05) and at least 80% power to detect any increases observed in maternal side effects from RCTs. RESULTS Seven thousand eight hundred eighty-eight women with imminent preterm birth were eligible for MgSO4 for fetal NP: 4745 pre-KT (18 centres) and 3143 during KT (11 centres). The KT intervention was associated with an 84% increase in the odds of optimal use (OR 1.00 to 1.84, p < 0.001), a reduction in the odds of underuse (OR 1.00 to 0.47, p < 0.001) and an increase in suboptimal use (too early or at ≥ 32 weeks; OR 1.18 to 2.18, p < 0.001) of MgSO4 for fetal NP. Maternal hypotension was uncommon (7/1512, 0.5%). Nationally, intensive neonatal resuscitation decreased (p = 0.024) despite rising MgSO4 use for fetal NP (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Multifaceted KT was associated with significant increases in use of MgSO4 for fetal NP, with neither important maternal nor neonatal risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dane A De Silva
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Anne R Synnes
- BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Department of Paediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Peter von Dadelszen
- Department of Women and Children's Health, St Thomas' Hospital, 10th Floor, North Wing, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK
- School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Tang Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Jeffrey N Bone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Laura A Magee
- Department of Women and Children's Health, St Thomas' Hospital, 10th Floor, North Wing, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
- School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chollat C, Marret S. Magnesium sulfate and fetal neuroprotection: overview of clinical evidence. Neural Regen Res 2018; 13:2044-2049. [PMID: 30323118 PMCID: PMC6199933 DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.241441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Antenatal administration of magnesium sulfate is an important part of the neuroprotective strategy for preterm infants. Strong evidence from five randomized controlled trials and five meta-analyses has demonstrated that magnesium sulfate, when administered before preterm delivery, significantly reduces the risk of cerebral palsy at two years. Through secondary analyses of randomized controlled trials and other original clinical studies, this state-of-the-art review highlights the absence of serious adverse effects in both pregnant women and neonates, as well as the impact of maternal body mass index and preeclamptic status on the maternal and neonatal magnesium levels, which could influence the magnitude of the neuroprotective effect. Although antenatal magnesium sulfate is a cost-effective strategy, some practice surveys have demonstrated that the use of magnesium sulfate is not sufficient and that its use is heterogeneous, differing among different maternity wards. Since 2010, an increasing number of obstetrical societies have recommended its use to improve the neurological outcomes of preterm infants, especially the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics and World Health Organization in 2015, and France in 2017. Considering the neuroprotective impact of magnesium sulfate when administered before delivery, postnatal administration should be considered, and its effects should be assessed using randomized controlled trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clément Chollat
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1245, Genetics and Pathophysiology of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Team 4 Neovasc, Institute of Research and Innovation in Biomedicine, Rouen School of Medicine, Normandy University, Caen; Department of Neonatal Intensive Care, Port Royal University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Stéphane Marret
- Department of Neonatal Intensive Care, Port Royal University Hospital, Paris; Department of Neonatal Pediatrics and Intensive Care and Neuropediatrics, Charles-Nicolle University Hospital, Rouen, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
De Silva DA, Proctor L, von Dadelszen P, McCoach M, Lee T, Magee LA. Determinants of magnesium sulphate use in women hospitalized at <29 weeks with severe or non-severe pre-eclampsia. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0189966. [PMID: 29272274 PMCID: PMC5741231 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2017] [Accepted: 12/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Magnesium sulphate is recommended by international guidelines to prevent eclampsia among women with pre-eclampsia, especially when it is severe, but fewer than 70% of such women receive magnesium sulphate. We aimed to identify variables that prompt Canadian physicians to administer magnesium sulphate to women with pre-eclampsia. METHODS Data were used from the Canadian Perinatal Network (2005-11) of women hospitalized at <29 weeks' who were thought to be at high risk of delivery due to pre-eclampsia (using broad Canadian definition). Unadjusted analyses of relative risks were estimated directly and population attributable risk percent (PAR%) calculated to identify variables associated with magnesium sulphate use. A multivariable model was created and a generalized estimating equation was used to estimate the adjusted RR that explained magnesium sulphate use in pre-eclampsia. The adjusted PAR% was estimated by bootstrapping. RESULTS Of 631 women with pre-eclampsia, 174 (30.1%) had severe pre-eclampsia, of whom 131 (75.3%) received magnesium sulphate. 457 (69.9%) women had non-severe pre-eclamspia, of whom 291 (63.7%) received magnesium sulphate. Use of magnesium sulphate among women with pre-eclampsia could be attributed to the following clinical factors (PAR%): delivery for 'adverse conditions' (48.7%), severe hypertension (21.9%), receipt of antenatal corticosteroids (20.0%), maternal transport prior to delivery (9.9%), heavy proteinuria (7.8%), and interventionist care (3.4%). CONCLUSIONS Clinicians are more likely to administer magnesium sulphate for eclampsia prophylaxis in the presence of more severe maternal clinical features, in addition to concomitant antenatal corticosteroid administration, and shorter admission to delivery periods related to transport from another institution or plans for interventionist care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dane A. De Silva
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Lily Proctor
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Peter von Dadelszen
- Department of Women and Children’s Health, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Meghan McCoach
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Tang Lee
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - Laura A. Magee
- Department of Women and Children’s Health, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wolf HT, Huusom L, Weber T, Piedvache A, Schmidt S, Norman M, Zeitlin J. Use of magnesium sulfate before 32 weeks of gestation: a European population-based cohort study. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e013952. [PMID: 28132012 PMCID: PMC5278293 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2016] [Revised: 12/19/2016] [Accepted: 01/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The use of magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) in European obstetric units is unknown. We aimed to describe reported policies and actual use of MgSO4 in women delivering before 32 weeks of gestation by indication. METHODS We used data from the European Perinatal Intensive Care in Europe (EPICE) population-based cohort study of births before 32 weeks of gestation in 19 regions in 11 European countries. Data were collected from April 2011 to September 2012 from medical records and questionnaires. The study population comprised 720 women with severe pre-eclampsia, eclampsia or HELLP and 3658 without pre-eclampsia delivering from 24 to 31 weeks of gestation in 119 maternity units with 20 or more very preterm deliveries per year. RESULTS Among women with severe pre-eclampsia, eclampsia or HELLP, 255 (35.4%) received MgSO4 before delivery. 41% of units reported use of MgSO4 whenever possible for pre-eclampsia and administered MgSO4 more often than units reporting use sometimes. In women without pre-eclampsia, 95 (2.6%) received MgSO4. 9 units (7.6%) reported using MgSO4 for fetal neuroprotection whenever possible. In these units, the median rate of MgSO4 use for deliveries without severe pre-eclampsia, eclampsia and HELLP was 14.3%. Only 1 unit reported using MgSO4 as a first-line tocolytic. Among women without pre-eclampsia, MgSO4 use was not higher in women hospitalised before delivery for preterm labour. CONCLUSIONS Severe pre-eclampsia, eclampsia or HELLP are not treated with MgSO4 as frequently as evidence-based medicine recommends. MgSO4 is seldom used for fetal neuroprotection, and is no longer used for tocolysis. To continuously lower morbidity, greater attention to use of MgSO4 is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H T Wolf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
| | - L Huusom
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
| | - T Weber
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
| | - A Piedvache
- Inserm UMR 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (Epopé), Center for Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, DHU Risks in pregnancy, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - S Schmidt
- Department of Obstetrics, University Hospital, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany
| | - M Norman
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Pediatrics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Neonatal Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Zeitlin
- Inserm UMR 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (Epopé), Center for Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, DHU Risks in pregnancy, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|