Simulation Training in Obstetrics and Gynaecology Residency Programs in Canada

COVID Recovery Laparoscopic Simulation Program for Gynecological Registrars-Trainee Perceptions of Regional Model

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The acquisition of gynecological operating skills can be challenging for trainees given the conflicting demands of clinical work. Alternative models of surgical skill training such as laparoscopic simulation is, therefore, required. This study demonstrates the development of a regional gynecological surgery laparoscopic simulation program and trainee perceptions of such an approach.

DESIGN

An intervention-based cohort study.

SETTING

A regional model based in West Midlands training region.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Responses from 64 trainees in the training region who participated in this regional program were included.

INTERVENTIONS

A 3-stream curriculum was developed to deliver key training outcomes as required by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) core curriculum as a component of a COVID Recovery Program. Courses were held in 7 teaching hospitals. Courses consisted of both theory and practical teaching.

MEASUREMENTS

A structured feedback tool was used to collect trainee perceptions of the program. Trainee satisfaction was measured on the Likert scale of 1 to 3. A qualitative thematic analysis was conducted with rank-order analysis of coded free-text responses.

MAIN RESULTS

Overall, the majority of trainees 92% (n = 58/64) were very satisfied with the course. Rank-order analysis demonstrated hands-on-practice to be the key perceived benefit of laparoscopic simulation among basic and intermediate trainees, while feedback on procedural skills was felt most useful among advanced trainees.

CONCLUSION

A regional approach to laparoscopic simulation training is both achievable and acceptable. Trainee perceptions of usefulness are altered by seniority and experience. This should be accounted for in the development of laparoscopic simulation programs.

Motivation to access laparoscopic skills training: Results of a Canadian survey of obstetrics and gynecology residents

Objective

Competency based medical education (CBME) requires novel approaches to surgical education. Significant investment has been made in laparoscopic simulation, which has been shown to foster skill development prior to patient encounters. However, research suggests variable voluntary use of these resources by residents, and little is known about the motivational factors that influence their utilization. The purpose of this study was to characterize factors that motivate residents to seek laparoscopic simulation experience outside of the formal curriculum.

Design

We developed a questionnaire grounded in Expectancy Value Theory, an established psychological theory of motivation, by adapting validated measures to fit the study context. We conducted a cross sectional survey of Canadian obstetrics and gynecology residents.

Setting

We invited residents enrolled in English-language obstetrics and gynecology training programs in Canada to participate.

Participants

All residents engaged in clinical duties during Winter 2018 were invited to complete the questionnaire. Forty-four Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ob/Gyn) residents participated in the study.

Results

Residents reported limited use of simulation resources and identified multiple barriers including lack of time, access, and supervision. They expressed concern about development of bad habits during independent practice, and simulation use was positively correlated with perceived utility. Compared to junior residents, senior residents reported greater enjoyment of laparoscopic surgery, less emotional costs, and higher self-efficacy for learning laparoscopy.

Conclusions

Residents’ perception of utility and barriers impede voluntary simulation use and overall use was limited. As programs undertake curricula redevelopment for CBME, mitigating barriers and improving perceived utility of laparoscopic simulation is vital to increase use and enhance skill development.

Implementation and validation of a retroperitoneal dissection curriculum

BACKGROUND

Competency-based education requires educators to use simulation training for the purposes of education and assessment of resident trainees. Research demonstrates that improvement in surgical skills acquired in a simulated environment is transferrable to the operative environment. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal dissection, opening the retroperitoneal space and identifying the ureter, is a fundamental skill for gynecologists. Integrating simulation models into a formal and comprehensive curriculum for teaching ureterolysis could translate to increased surgical competency.

OBJECTIVE

Our goal was to validate a comprehensive curriculum for laparoscopic retroperitoneal dissection for the purpose of identification of the ureter by evaluating intraoperative performance.

STUDY DESIGN

A comprehensive curriculum, encompassing didactic and technical skills components and using a previously developed pelvic model, was designed to teach laparoscopic ureterolysis. Novice surgeons (postgraduate years 3-5) were recruited. Participants completed precurriculum and postcurriculum multiple-choice questionnaires to evaluate a didactic component. Preperformance and postperformance on the model was video-recorded. As part of the technical component, participants received constructive feedback from expert surgeons on how to perform laparoscopic retroperitoneal dissection using the simulation model. Participants were then video-recorded performing laparoscopic retroperitoneal dissection in the operating room within 3 months of the curriculum. All videos were blindly assessed by an expert using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills tool. At the conclusion of the study, participants completed a course evaluation.

RESULTS

Thirty novice gynecologic surgeons were recruited. High baseline knowledge of ureteric anatomy and injury (multiple-choice question score median and interquartile range) still significantly increased from 7 (5-7.25) precurriculum to 8 (7-9) postcurriculum (P < .001). The median (interquartile range) technical Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills score increased significantly from 24.5 (23-28.25) precurriculum to 30 (29.75-32) postcurriculum (P < .001). Video-recordings were completed for 23 participants performing laparoscopic retroperitoneal dissection in the operating room. Intraoperative Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills scores (median of 29 [interquartile range 27-32]) correlated with postcurriculum Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills scores on the model (r = 0.53, P = .01). The ureter was identified intraoperatively by 91% (n = 21/23) of participants. The majority of residents (81%, n = 21/26) were more comfortable completing a supervised retroperitoneal dissection as a result of participating in the curriculum. Residents believed that this model would be useful to enhance skills acquisition prior to performing the skill in the operating room (65%, n = 17/26).

CONCLUSION

A comprehensive retroperitoneal dissection curriculum showed improvement in cognitive knowledge and technical skills, which also translated to competent performance in the operating room. In addition to the objective measures, residents believed that their skills acquisition was improved following course completion.

Investigating the Efficacy of Anatomical Silicone Models Developed from a 3D Printed Mold for Perineal Repair Suturing Simulation

There is a scarcity of affordable, validated, standardized and anatomically correct silicone perineum models for the rehearsal of postpartum laceration repair. The purpose of this technical report is to describe and validate evidence for a silicone, perineal repair model created from a 3D printed mold for medical resident training and clinical skills maintenance. A pre-existing model from an open-source royalty-free website was purchased and converted using Fusion360TM (Autodesk Inc., San Rafael, CA, USA) into a stereolithography (.stl) file and altered to produce a negative mold. Using a spatula, a fine silicone layer was first applied inside the mold, followed by a small piece of flesh-colored mesh netting material within the perineal surface area, fitting the width of the mold. The mesh was pressed into the thin layer of silicone, which was meant to provide anatomical structure to prevent the sutures from tearing through the silicone. The remainder of the silicone mix was then poured into the mold, which required three hours to fully set before being removed from the mold. Twelve silicone models were produced and used during a one-hour workshop at the Rural and Remote Conference by 16 obstetrics and gynecology residents and practicing rural physicians, and four facilitators. At the end of the workshop, the participants were provided with a qualitative survey and asked to rate the perceived realism and educational effectiveness of the silicone perineum model as compared to pre-existing simulation models that they have used previously. The overall workshop participant feedback was positive, noting that the models provided more realistic visualization for the suturing simulation of first- and second-degree perineal injuries. The silicone models were considered to be useful in simulation training when attempting first- and second-degreeperineum suturing techniques within a confined space. The overall feedback was positive, noting that they provided more realistic visualization experience compared to pre-existing simulation models, such as beef tongues and synthetic sponges. The feedback from the participants and facilitators included thoughts about how to add additional mesh to the silicone model so the subcutaneous and vaginal plane sutures would hold, as well as increase the size of the vaginal canal size to more accurately represent a postpartum repair. There were also suggestions to alter the colour of the model to be flesh-toned as opposed to pink, to more accurately simulate human tissue. Silicone perineum models, created from a 3D printed mold, are an economical training tool as compared to commercially available, cost prohibitive models. They also provide anatomically accurate simulation training opportunities for residents to learn and maintain clinical skills in perineal repair, as compared to beef tongues and synthetic sponges, which have previously been used in obstetrics and gynecology simulation-based medical education.

Review of Simulation Training in Interventional Radiology

Simulation training has evolved and is now able to offer numerous training opportunities to supplement the practice of and overcome some of the shortcomings of the traditional Master-Apprentice model currently used in medical training. Simulation training provides new opportunities to practice skills used in clinical procedures, crisis management scenarios, and everyday clinical practice in a risk-free environment. Procedural and nonprocedural skills used in interventional radiology can be taught with the use of simulation devices and technologies. This review will inform the reader of which clinical skills can be trained with simulation, the types of commercially available simulators and their educational validity, and the assessment tools used to evaluate simulation training.

The development of a retroperitoneal dissection model

Knowledge of ureteric anatomy is essential for ureteric injury prevention in laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Rates of injury increase with limited surgical experience and reduced surgical volume. Currently, there are no low-fidelity or high-fidelity simulation models for teaching and practicing ureteric dissection. Our goal was to design a laparoscopic simulation model for retroperitoneal anatomy with high face validity that is low-cost and easily reproducible. A low-fidelity 3-dimensional simulation model was developed that represents key anatomic structures encountered during retroperitoneal dissection and ureteric identification. Materials, construction steps, and costs were determined. The models were trialed by expert laparoscopic surgeons. Demographic information that included age, gender, surgical experience, and complex laparoscopic case volumes was collected. Face validity was assessed with a 5-item Likert-scale. The total cost of 1 model ranged from $65 to $75. The majority of the materials that were used were reusable, except for 2 components that cost <$1 per use. Seven expert surgeons participated in the study, all of whom were fellowship-trained minimally invasive gynecologic surgeons or currently enrolled in this type of fellowship program. Participants agreed or strongly agreed that the model resembled the texture of the ureter, vessels, and peritoneal layer (n=6; 86%), approximated the correct anatomic course of the ureter (n=7; 100%), and closely approximated live surgery (n=5; 71%). They also agreed or strongly agreed that the model would be useful for teaching laparoscopic retroperitoneal dissection (n=7; 100%), for assessing a learner's ability before performing in the operating room (n=6; 86%), was low-cost (n=7; 100%), and was easily reproducible (n=6; 86%). This unique model fills a gap in laparoscopic simulation training. No other low- or high-fidelity models for laparoscopic retroperitoneal ureteric dissection have been identified in the literature. This simulation model is low-cost, easily reproducible, closely resembles retroperitoneal dissection during laparoscopic gynecologic surgery, and can be used for education and assessment.

Developing a Canadian Curriculum for Simulation-Based Education in Obstetrics and Gynaecology: A Delphi Study

OBJECTIVE

As obstetrics and gynaecology (Ob/Gyn) residency training programs move towards a competence-based approach to training and assessment, the development of a national standardized simulation curriculum is essential. The primary goal of this study was to define the fundamental content for the Canadian Obstetrics and Gynecology Simulation curriculum.

METHODS

A modified Delphi technique was used to achieve consensus in three rounds by surveying residency program directors or their local simulation educator delegates in 16 accredited Canadian Ob/Gyn residency programs. A consensus rate of 80% was agreed upon. Survey results were collected over 11 months in 2016.

RESULTS

Response rates for the Delphi were 50% for the first round, 81% for the second round, and 94% for the third round. The first survey resulted in 84 suggested topics. These were organized into four categories: obstetrics high acuity low frequency events, obstetrics common events, gynaecology high acuity low frequency events, and gynaecology common events. Using the modified Delphi method, consensus was reached on 6 scenarios.

CONCLUSION

This study identified the content for a national simulation-based curriculum for Ob/Gyn residency training programs and is the first step in the development of this curriculum.

A serious game skills competition increases voluntary usage and proficiency of a virtual reality laparoscopic simulator during first-year surgical residents' simulation curriculum

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to assess the effect of a serious game skills competition on voluntary usage of a laparoscopic simulator among first-year surgical residents' standard simulation curriculum.

METHODS

With research ethics board approval, informed consent was obtained from first-year surgical residents enrolled in an introductory surgical simulation curriculum. The class of 2013 served as a control cohort following the standard curriculum which mandates completion of six laparoscopic simulator skill tasks. For the 2014 competition cohort, the only change introduced was the biweekly and monthly posting of a leader board of the top three and ten fastest peg transfer times. Entry surveys were administered assessing attitudes towards simulation-based training and competition. Cohorts were observed for 5 months.

RESULTS

There were 24 and 25 residents in the control and competition cohorts, respectively. The competition cohort overwhelmingly (76 %) stated that they were not motivated to deliberate practice by competition. Median total simulator usage time was 132 min (IQR = 214) in the competition cohort compared to 89 (IQR = 170) in the control cohort. The competition cohort completed their course requirements significantly earlier than the control cohort (χ ² = 6.5, p = 0.01). There was a significantly greater proportion of residents continuing to use the simulator voluntarily after completing their course requirements in the competition cohort (44 vs. 4 %; p = 0.002). Residents in the competition cohort were significantly faster at peg transfer (194 ± 66 vs. 233 ± 53 s, 95 % CI of difference = 4-74 s; p = 0.03) and significantly decreased their completion time by 33 ± 54 s (95 % CI 10-56 s; paired t test, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

A simple serious games skills competition increased voluntary usage and performance on a laparoscopic simulator, despite a majority of participants reporting they were not motivated by competition. Future directions should endeavour to examine other serious gaming modalities to further engage trainees in simulated skills development.

Surgical Simulation and Competency

Simulation in surgical training is playing an increasingly important role as postgraduate medical education programs navigate an environment of increasing costs of education, increased attention on patient safety, and new duty hour restrictions. In obstetrics and gynecology, simulation has been used to teach many procedures; however, it lacks a standardized curriculum. Several different simulators exist for teaching various routes and aspects of hysterectomy. This article describes how a formal framework of increasing levels of competencies can be applied to simulation in teaching the procedure of hysterectomy.