Cystic fibrosis carrier testing in pregnancy in Canada

Sickle cell trait newborn screen results: disclosure and management

This study aims to evaluate the notification process of sickle cell trait (SCT) identified by newborn screening in Alberta. On April 1, 2019, Alberta began newborn screening for sickle cell disease (SCD) and elected to report sickle cell trait (SCT). For 1 year, healthcare providers (HCPs) were sent a questionnaire which addressed the perceived importance of disclosing the SCT results, whether HCPs felt competent in disclosing the result, knowledge of available resources, and comfort with coordinating and interpreting testing for the newborn's parents. As a control, we collected data from HCPs receiving positive cystic fibrosis (CF) newborn screen results. A total of 107 out of 203 SCT questionnaires were returned and 41 of 66 CF questionnaires were returned. Respondents felt it was important that the results be shared with families (98% and 100%, respectively). Most respondents felt competent (SCT: 95%; CF: 85%), and willing to disclose the result to the family (SCT: 92%; CF: 88%). Fewer respondents were comfortable interpreting the results (SCT: 70%; CF: 51%)), and willing to arrange parental testing (SCT: 61%; CF: 59%). Family practitioners were significantly more willing to arrange SCT parental testing (88%) compared to pediatricians (40%) (OR = 5.3; CI 1.9, 15.4; p < 0.001). HCP comments revealed two themes: referral to another HCP for follow-up and identification of the primary HCP. Results support this disclosure process, and HCPs felt comfortable following up with SCT newborn screen results. The study identified challenges such as pediatricians being less comfortable ordering parental testing and the ordering HCP not always being the primary care provider.

Joint SOGC-CCMG Opinion for Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening: An Update for All Canadian Providers of Maternity and Reproductive Healthcare in the Era of Direct-to-Consumer Testing

OBJECTIVE

This guideline was written to update Canadian maternity care and reproductive healthcare providers on pre- and postconceptional reproductive carrier screening for women or couples who may be at risk of being carriers for autosomal recessive (AR), autosomal dominant (AD), or X-linked (XL) conditions, with risk of transmission to the fetus. Four previous SOGC- Canadian College of Medical Geneticists (CCMG) guidelines are updated and merged into the current document.

INTENDED USERS

All maternity care (most responsible health provider [MRHP]) and paediatric providers; maternity nursing; nurse practitioner; provincial maternity care administrator; medical student; and postgraduate resident year 1-7.

TARGET POPULATION

Fertile, sexually active females and their fertile, sexually active male partners who are either planning a pregnancy or are pregnant (preferably in the first trimester of pregnancy, but any gestational age is acceptable).

OPTIONS

Women and their partners will be able to obtain appropriate genetic carrier screening information and possible diagnosis of AR, AD, or XL disorders (preferably pre-conception), thereby allowing an informed choice regarding genetic carrier screening and reproductive options (e.g., prenatal diagnosis, preimplantation genetic diagnosis, egg or sperm donation, or adoption).

OUTCOMES

Informed reproductive decisions related to genetic carrier screening and reproductive outcomes based on family history, ethnic background, past obstetrical history, known carrier status, or genetic diagnosis. SOGC REPRODUCTIVE CARRIER SCREENING SUMMARY STATEMENT (2016): Pre-conception or prenatal education and counselling for reproductive carrier screening requires a discussion about testing within the three perinatal genetic carrier screening/diagnosis time periods, which include pre-conception, prenatal, and neonatal for conditions currently being screened for and diagnosed. This new information should be added to the standard reproductive carrier screening protocols that are already being utilized by the most responsible maternity provider through the informed consent process with the patient. (III-A; GRADE low/moderate) SOGC OVERVIEW OF RECOMMENDATIONS QUALITY AND GRADE: There was a strong observational/expert opinion (quality and grade) for the genetic carrier literature with randomized controlled trial evidence being available only for the invasive testing. Both the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care quality and classification and the GRADE evidence quality and grade are provided.

EVIDENCE

MEDLINE; PubMed; government neonatal screening websites; key words/common reproductive genetic carrier screened diseases/previous SOGC Guidelines/medical academic societies (Society of Maternal-Fetal Medicine [SMFM]; American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists [ACOG]; CCMG; Royal College Obstetrics and Gynaecology [RCOG] [UK]; American Society of Human Genetics [ASHG]; International Society of Prenatal Diagnosis [ISPD])/provincial neonatal screening policies and programs; search terms (carrier screening, prenatal screening, neonatal genetic/metabolic screening, cystic fibrosis (CF), thalassemia, hemoglobinopathy, hemophilia, Fragile X syndrome (FXS), spinal muscular atrophy, Ashkenazi Jewish carrier screening, genetic carrier screening protocols, AR, AD, XL).

SEARCH PERIOD

10 years (June 2005-September 2015); initial search dates June 30, 2015 and September 15, 2015; completed final search January 4, 2016. Validation of articles was completed by primary authors RD Wilson and I De Bie.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COST

Benefits are to provide an evidenced based reproductive genetic carrier screening update consensus based on international opinions and publications for the use of Canadian women, who are planning a pregnancy or who are pregnant and have been identified to be at risk (personal or male partner family or reproductive history) for the transmission of a clinically significant genetic condition to their offspring with associated morbidity and/or mortality. Harm may arise from having counselling and informed testing of the carrier status of the mother, their partner, or their fetus, as well as from declining to have this counselling and informed testing or from not having the opportunity for counselling and informed testing. Costs will ensue both from the provision of opportunities for counselling and testing, as well as when no such opportunities are offered or are declined and the birth of a child with a significant inherited condition and resulting morbidity/mortality occurs; these comprise not only the health care costs to the system but also the social/financial/psychological/emotional costs to the family. These recommendations are based on expert opinion and have not been subjected to a health economics assessment and local or provincial implementation will be required.

GUIDELINE UPDATE

This guideline is an update of four previous joint SOGC-CCMG Genetic Screening Guidelines dated 2002, 2006, 2008, and 2008 developed by the SOGC Genetic Committee in collaboration with the CCMG Prenatal Diagnosis Committee (now Clinical Practice Committee). 2016 CARRIER SCREENING RECOMMENDATIONS.

Nationwide genetic analysis for molecularly unresolved cystic fibrosis patients in a multiethnic society: implications for preconception carrier screening

Background

Preconception carrier screening for cystic fibrosis (CF) is usually performed using ethnically targeted panels of selected mutations. This has been recently challenged by the use of expanded, ethnically indifferent, pan‐population panels. Israel is characterized by genetically heterogeneous populations carrying a wide range of CFTR mutations. To assess the potential of expanding the current Israeli preconception screening program, we sought the subset of molecularly unresolved CF patients listed in the Israeli CF data registry comprising ~650 patients.

Methods

An Israeli nationwide genotyping of 152 CF cases, representing 176 patients lacking molecular diagnosis, was conducted. Molecular analysis included Sanger sequencing for all exons and splice sites, multiplex ligation probe amplification (MLPA), and next‐generation sequencing of the poly‐T/TG tracts.

Results

We identified 54 different mutations, of which only 16 overlapped the 22 mutations included in the Israeli preconception screening program. A total of 29/54 (53.7%) mutations were already listed as CF causing by the CFTR2 database, and only 4/54 (7.4%) were novel. Molecular diagnosis was reached in 78/152 (51.3%) cases. Prenatal diagnosis of 24/78 (30.8%) cases could have been achieved by including all CFTR2‐causing mutations in the Israeli panel.

Conclusions

Our data reveal an overwhelming hidden abundance of CFTR gene mutations suggesting that expanded preconception carrier screening might achieve higher preconception detection rates.

Changing trends in carrier screening for genetic disease in the United States

Genetic disease is the leading cause of infant death in the United States, accounting for approximately 20% of annual infant mortality. Advances in genomic medicine and technological platforms have made possible low cost, pan-ethnic expanded genetic screening that enables obstetric care providers to offer screening for over 100 recessive genetic diseases. However, the rapid integration of genomic medicine into routine obstetric practice has raised some concerns about the practical implementation of such testing. These changing trends in carrier screening, along with concerns and potential solutions, will be addressed.

Cystic fibrosis carrier screening

Carrier screening for cystic fibrosis (CF) has been available since the early 1990s, yet there are few programs, and none funded as part of a national health care strategy. The aim of this paper is to provide a description of carrier screening for CF and examine the progress that has been made towards the establishment of universal population-based carrier screening programs. This is an evidence based commentary on population-based carrier screening for CF. Peak body recommendations were examined and existing programs for CF carrier screening are reviewed. The attitudes from the non-CF community, CF healthcare professionals and people with CF were studied. Data from health economic assessments is examined. The future of carrier screening for CF in the context of advancing genetic technologies and potentially curative therapies is considered.

Clinical practice and genetic counseling for cystic fibrosis and CFTR-related disorders

Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator-related disorders encompass a disease spectrum from focal male reproductive tract involvement in congenital absence of the vas deferens to multiorgan involvement in classic cystic fibrosis. The reproductive, gastrointestinal, and exocrine manifestations of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator deficiency are correlated with CFTR genotype, whereas the respiratory manifestations that are the main cause of morbidity and mortality in cystic fibrosis are less predictable. Molecular genetic testing of CFTR has led to new diagnostic strategies and will enable targeting of molecular therapies now in development. Older diagnostic methods that measure sweat chloride and nasal potential difference nonetheless remain important because of their sensitivity and specificity. In addition, the measurement of immunoreactive trypsinogen and the genotyping of CFTR alleles are key to newborn screening programs because of low cost. The multiorgan nature of cystic fibrosis leads to a heavy burden of care, thus therapeutic regimens are tailored to the specific manifestations present in each patient. The variability of cystic fibrosis lung disease and the variable expressivity of mild CFTR alleles complicate genetic counseling for this autosomal recessive disorder. Widespread implementation of newborn screening programs among populations with significant cystic fibrosis mutation carrier frequencies is expected to result in increasing demands on genetic counseling resources.

Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis

Early diagnosis of cystic fibrosis (CF) provides an opportunity to improve disease control and prevent early complications. Of patients with CF in the United States, 10% are identified early through newborn screening (including infants born in Colorado, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Wisconsin, Wyoming, and parts of California, Connecticut, Pennsylvania, and Montana). Successful screening programs in these states have stimulated other states to consider adding CF screening to their newborn programs. Additionally, new technology permits expanded screening for numerous genetic conditions. Genetic screening, such as that used most frequently for CF, creates new challenges for the clinician, including atypical disease presentations and carrier detection. In this review, we examine the many advances in CF newborn screening and early care that were reported during the last few years.