1
|
Feinberg J, Shaw S, Kashyap N, Illuzzi J, Campbell K, Hsiao AL, Pettker CM. Evaluating the Impact of a New Smartphone Texting Tool on Patient Care in Obstetrics, an Emergent Healthcare Setting. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10:879-887. [PMID: 31747710 DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1700868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hospitals across the country are investing millions of dollars to adopt new Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant secure text messaging systems. However, in nearly all cases, these implementations are occurring without evaluation of their impact on patient care. OBJECTIVE To evaluate perceived impact on patient care and workflow of new text messaging system implemented in obstetrics at Yale-New Haven Hospital and to inform guidelines for future implementations in emergent settings. METHODS A new HIPAA-compliant texting system was implemented in obstetrics in 2016. Before implementation of the new system, residents and nurses were surveyed on perceived effect of communication system (pagers with text receiving, service mobile phones, personal cell phones) on clinical workflow and patient care using 5-point Likert scale and open-ended questions. Following roll-out (1 and 6 months), both teams were surveyed with same questions. Results were compared using Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test (0-1 months and then 0-6 months). Open-ended question results were qualitatively compared for recurrent unifying themes. RESULTS In both nursing and resident domains, 1 month after implementation, the new communication system was perceived to significantly improve efficiency and patient care across all metrics. After 6 months, this effect decayed in nearly all categories (including efficiency, real-time communication, and knowledge of covering provider). The exception was nurse's knowledge of which resident to contact and resident's timely evaluation of patient, for which we observed sustained improvements. System shortcomings identified included interrupted connection (i.e., dropped calls), dysfunctional and inaccurate alert system, and unclear identification of the covering provider. CONCLUSION A new text-messaging-based communication system may improve efficiency and patient care in emergent settings, but system shortcomings can substantially erode potential benefits over time. We recommend implementers evaluate new systems for a set of specific functional requirements to increase probability of sustained improvement and decrease risk of poor patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Feinberg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
| | - Sara Shaw
- Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
| | - Nitu Kashyap
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
| | - Jessica Illuzzi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
| | - Katherine Campbell
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
| | - Allen L Hsiao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
| | - Christian M Pettker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chaillet N, Bujold E, Masse B, Grobman WA, Rozenberg P, Pasquier JC, Shorten A, Johri M, Beaudoin F, Abenhaim H, Demers S, Fraser W, Dugas M, Blouin S, Dubé E, Gauthier R. A cluster-randomized trial to reduce major perinatal morbidity among women with one prior cesarean delivery in Québec (PRISMA trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2017; 18:434. [PMID: 28931404 PMCID: PMC5608183 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-2150-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2017] [Accepted: 08/15/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Rates of cesarean delivery are continuously increasing in industrialized countries, with repeated cesarean accounting for about a third of all cesareans. Women who have undergone a first cesarean are facing a difficult choice for their next pregnancy, i.e.: (1) to plan for a second cesarean delivery, associated with higher risk of maternal complications than vaginal delivery; or (b) to have a trial of labor (TOL) with the aim to achieve a vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) and to accept a significant, but rare, risk of uterine rupture and its related maternal and neonatal complications. The objective of this trial is to assess whether a multifaceted intervention would reduce the rate of major perinatal morbidity among women with one prior cesarean. Methods/design The study is a stratified, non-blinded, cluster-randomized, parallel-group trial of a multifaceted intervention. Hospitals in Quebec are the units of randomization and women are the units of analysis. As depicted in Figure 1, the study includes a 1-year pre-intervention period (baseline), a 5-month implementation period, and a 2-year intervention period. At the end of the baseline period, 20 hospitals will be allocated to the intervention group and 20 to the control group, using a randomization stratified by level of care. Medical records will be used to collect data before and during the intervention period. Primary outcome is the rate of a composite of major perinatal morbidities measured during the intervention period. Secondary outcomes include major and minor maternal morbidity; minor perinatal morbidity; and TOL and VBAC rate. The effect of the intervention will be assessed using the multivariable generalized-estimating-equations extension of logistic regression. The evaluation will include subgroup analyses for preterm and term birth, and a cost-effectiveness analysis. Discussion The intervention is designed to facilitate: (1) women’s decision-making process, using a decision analysis tool (DAT), (2) an estimate of uterine rupture risk during TOL using ultrasound evaluation of low-uterine segment thickness, (3) an estimate of chance of TOL success, using a validated prediction tool, and (4) the implementation of best practices for intrapartum management. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials, ID: ISRCTN15346559. Registered on 20 August 2015. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2150-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Chaillet
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada. .,Faculté de Médecine, Département d'Obstétrique & Gynécologie, Université Laval, Centre de recherche du CHUQ, 2705, Boul. Laurier, local T-R-92, Quebec, QC, G1V 4G2, Canada.
| | - E Bujold
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - B Masse
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - W A Grobman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - P Rozenberg
- Service de gynécologie obstétrique et médecine de la reproduction, Centre hospitalier intercommunal de Poissy/Saint-Germain-en-Laye, 10, rue du Champ-Gaillard, 78303, Poissy, France
| | - J C Pasquier
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sherbrooke University, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - A Shorten
- UAB School of Nursing, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - M Johri
- University of Montreal, Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - F Beaudoin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - H Abenhaim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Jewish Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - S Demers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - W Fraser
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sherbrooke University, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - M Dugas
- Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - S Blouin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - E Dubé
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - R Gauthier
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mushambi MC, Kinsella SM, Popat M, Swales H, Ramaswamy KK, Winton AL, Quinn AC. Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association and Difficult Airway Society guidelines for the management of difficult and failed tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia 2016; 70:1286-306. [PMID: 26449292 PMCID: PMC4606761 DOI: 10.1111/anae.13260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 298] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/27/2015] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association and Difficult Airway Society have developed the first national obstetric guidelines for the safe management of difficult and failed tracheal intubation during general anaesthesia. They comprise four algorithms and two tables. A master algorithm provides an overview. Algorithm 1 gives a framework on how to optimise a safe general anaesthetic technique in the obstetric patient, and emphasises: planning and multidisciplinary communication; how to prevent the rapid oxygen desaturation seen in pregnant women by advocating nasal oxygenation and mask ventilation immediately after induction; limiting intubation attempts to two; and consideration of early release of cricoid pressure if difficulties are encountered. Algorithm 2 summarises the management after declaring failed tracheal intubation with clear decision points, and encourages early insertion of a (preferably second-generation) supraglottic airway device if appropriate. Algorithm 3 covers the management of the 'can't intubate, can't oxygenate' situation and emergency front-of-neck airway access, including the necessity for timely perimortem caesarean section if maternal oxygenation cannot be achieved. Table 1 gives a structure for assessing the individual factors relevant in the decision to awaken or proceed should intubation fail, which include: urgency related to maternal or fetal factors; seniority of the anaesthetist; obesity of the patient; surgical complexity; aspiration risk; potential difficulty with provision of alternative anaesthesia; and post-induction airway device and airway patency. This decision should be considered by the team in advance of performing a general anaesthetic to make a provisional plan should failed intubation occur. The table is also intended to be used as a teaching tool to facilitate discussion and learning regarding the complex nature of decision-making when faced with a failed intubation. Table 2 gives practical considerations of how to awaken or proceed with surgery. The background paper covers recommendations on drugs, new equipment, teaching and training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M C Mushambi
- Department of Anaesthesia, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK
| | - S M Kinsella
- Department of Anaesthesia, St Michael's Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - M Popat
- Nuffield Department of Anaesthesia, Oxford University Hospital NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - H Swales
- Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospitals Southampton Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - K K Ramaswamy
- Department of Anaesthesia, Northampton General Hospital, Northampton, UK
| | - A L Winton
- Department of Anaesthesia, St Michael's Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - A C Quinn
- Department of Anaesthesia, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesborough, UK.,Leeds University, Leeds, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lopez E, Patkai J, El Ayoubi M, Jarreau PH. [Benefits and harms to the newborn of maternal attempt at trial of labor after prior caesarean versus elective repeat caesarean delivery]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012; 41:727-34. [PMID: 23141133 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.09.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate neonatal outcome after elective repeat cesarean delivery (ERCD) versus trial of labor (TOL) after previous cesarean delivery. METHODS This systematic evidence review is based on Pubmed search, Cochrane library and experts recommendations. RESULTS The risks of fetal, perinatal and neonatal mortality are low after previous cesarean delivery but significantly higher for TOL as compared with ERCD. The risk of bag-and-mask ventilation and intubation for meconium-stained amniotic fluid are higher for TOL as compared with ERCD. Infants born after ERCD are more likely presented transient tachypnea. The risk of hypoxic encephalopathy/asphyxia is low after previous cesarean delivery but significantly higher for TOL as compared with ERCD. The risk of neonatal sepsis after previous cesarean delivery is significantly higher for TOL as compared with ERCD. There is no significant difference between TOL or ERCD regarding NICU admission. The strength of evidence is low to conclude about the impact of route of delivery upon birth trauma and Apgar score. CONCLUSIONS The risk of the main neonatal complications is low whatever the route of delivery after previous caesarean delivery. However, the risk of perinatal mortality, bag-and-mask ventilation, perinatal asphyxia, is higher after TOL compared with ERCD. The risk of transient tachypnea is higher after ERCD compared with TOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Lopez
- Service de médecine néonatale de Port-Royal, bâtiment Port-Royal, groupe hospitalier Cochin, Broca, Hôtel-Dieu, AP-HP, 53, avenue de l'Observatoire, 75014 Paris, France.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Go MDA, Emeis C, Guise JM, Schelonka RL. Fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality following delivery after previous cesarean. Clin Perinatol 2011; 38:311-9. [PMID: 21645798 DOI: 10.1016/j.clp.2011.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
This article examines data from a recent systematic evidence review on term deliveries conducted for the National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality on vaginal birth after caesarean, from a meta-analysis of associated perinatal outcomes, and subsequent publications that meet stringent quality review standards. We present a summary of fetal and neonatal outcomes emphasizing information that clinicians and patients need to make decisions regarding mode of delivery after prior cesarean and look for areas where future studies may provide important insights.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitzi Donabel A Go
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health & Science University, Mail code CDRCP, Portland, OR 97239-2998, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|