Can Surgical Debulking Reverse Platinum Resistance in Patients With Metastatic Epithelial Ovarian Cancer?

Surgery in platinum-resistant recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer is one of the three most common malignant tumors of the female reproductive tract and ranks first in terms of mortality among gynecological tumors. Epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) is the most common ovarian malignancy, accounting for 90% of all primary ovarian tumors. The clinical value of cytoreductive surgery in patients with platinum-resistant recurrent EOC remains largely unclear.

AIM

To evaluate the feasibility of secondary cytoreductive surgery for treating platinum-resistant recurrent EOC.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of the clinical data of patients with platinum-resistant EOC admitted to the Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences between September 2012 and June 2018. Patient baseline data were obtained from clinical records. Routine follow-up of disease progression was performed as follows. CA125 assessment and physical examination were performed every 3 wk during treatment, including gynecological examination. Imaging assessment was carried out every 12 wk by B-mode ultrasound, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), chemotherapy-free interval (CFI), and complications. Follow-up ended on April 15, 2019.

RESULTS

A total of 38 patients were included. R0 resection was achieved in 25 (65.8%) patients and R1/2 in 13 (34.2%). Twenty-five (65.8%) patients required organ resection. Nine (23.7%) patients had operative complications, 36 (94.7%) received chemotherapy, and five (13.2%) had targeted therapy. Median PFS and OS were 10 (95%CI: 8.27-11.73) months and 28 (95%CI: 12.75-43.25) months, respectively; median CFI was 9 (95%CI: 8.06-9.94) months. R0 resection and postoperative chemotherapy significantly prolonged PFS and OS (all P < 0.05), and R0 resection also significantly prolonged CFI (P < 0.05). Grade ≥ 3 complications were observed, including rectovaginal fistula (n = 1), intestinal and urinary fistulas (n = 1), and renal failure-associated death (n = 1). Except for the patient who died after surgery, all other patients with complications were successfully managed. Two patients developed intestinal obstruction and showed improvement after conservative treatment.

CONCLUSION

Secondary cytoreductive surgery is feasible for treating platinum-resistant recurrent EOC. These findings provide important references for the selection of clinical therapeutic regimens.

[Retrospective study: Late surgery post chemotherapy versus after 3-4 cures in treatment of advanced ovarian cancer]

INTRODUCTION

Treatment in locally advanced ovarian cancer is optimal surgery followed by chemotherapy. Patients with significant tumor spread, OMS>2, age>75 years old are poor candidates for aggressive primary surgery. Interval surgery, after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, aims to achieve more complete surgery, increase survival, and reduce surgical morbidity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Secondary outcomes were overall survival and postoperative morbidity and mortality.

METHOD

This is a retrospective study conducted in 2 French referral centers between January 2000 and December 2015. Patients who could not benefit from a complete initial surgery were operated after 3 cures of chemotherapy at the François Baclesse center and after least 5 cures at the center René Gauducheau.

RESULTS

The population analyzed included 104 patients, 43 (41.0%) patients treated at the René Gauducheau center (group 1) and 61 (59.0%) patients treated at the François Baclesse center (group 2). Progression-free and overall survival were similar between the 2 groups, they were, respectively, 15.9 months and 34 months in group 1 vs. 15.4 months and 37.6 months in group 2 (P=0.72; P=0.65). Mean hospital stay and postoperative morbidity were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

For weak patients, to limit invasive surgery, doing more than 5 courses of chemotherapy may be a reasonable option.

Impact of residual disease on overall survival in women with Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIB-IIIC vs stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to determine the impact of intra-abdominal residual disease size, type (carcinomatosis, tumor mass or both), and location (upper/lower abdominal/both) on overall survival in women with Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIB-IIIC vs stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent primary debulking surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Altogether 2092 women diagnosed with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing primary debulking surgery in Denmark during 2005-2016 were identified in the Danish Gynecological Cancer Database. The impact of residual disease size, type, and location were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Complete cytoreduction (residual disease = 0) was achieved in 47.3% and 38.4% of women with stage IIIB-IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian cancer, respectively. A benefit in overall survival was observed in women with residual disease = 0 compared with women with residual disease, and among women with residual disease ≤1 cm compared with residual disease >2 cm in both stages IIIB-IIIC and stage IV in multivariate analyses. Multivariate analyses showed an inferior overall survival for women with both residual carcinomatosis and residual tumor mass compared with those with residual tumor mass or residual carcinomatosis only for stage IIIB-IIIC and IV, and an inferior overall survival for women with residual disease located in both the upper and lower abdomen compared with residual disease in the upper abdomen only in stages IIIB-IIIC.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirm the positive prognostic impact of both complete cytoreduction and residual disease ≤1 cm in stages IIIB-IIIC as well as stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer. Women with stage IV do benefit from cytoreductive surgery and should be considered for primary debulking surgery, if residual disease = 0 can initially be expected.

Long-term Benefit of Tumor Volume-Directed Involved Field Radiation Therapy in the Management of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to report on long-term effectiveness of involved field radiation therapy (IFRT) in the salvage of localized recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 27 patients with a diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer who received tumor volume-directed IFRT for localized extraperitoneal recurrences (either as consolidation after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) or as attempted salvage if unresectable) forms the basis of this report. All patients were heavily pretreated with multiple chemotherapy regimens. Involved field radiation therapy was primarily with external beam (median dose, 50.4 Gy). Local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was defined as freedom from in-field recurrences and was considered as a measure of effectiveness of radiotherapy. Statistical analyses evaluated association between disease-free survival, overall survival, LRFS, and various prognostic factors. Comparison was also made with a similar but unmatched cohort with localized recurrences salvaged by additional chemotherapy instead of local therapies (NIFRT group).

RESULTS

Of 27 patients, 17 had optimal CRS before RT. The actuarial survival at 5 and 10 years (in parenthesis) from date of radiation were LRFS (70% and 60%), overall survival (30% and 19%), and disease-free survival (33% and 20%). None of the NIFRT patients survived beyond 5 years from initiation of salvage chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term follow-up in this selected series confirmed the benefit of IFRT (±CRS) in localized ROC. Chemotherapy salvage in a similar NIFRT group was not equivalent, suggesting a role for locoregional therapies in selected patients with ROC.

Optimal timing of interval debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer: yet to be defined?

OBJECTIVES

Interval debulking surgery (IDS) following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a treatment option in advanced ovarian cancer. It is recommended to perform IDS early, after 3 cycles of NAC, but late IDS (after 6 cycles) may yield better results. Delaying IDS, however, harbours the risk of loosing the opportunity for debulking surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective comparison of two groups of patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma (stages IIC-IV) treated by platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) having undergone early IDS (after 3.6 cycles, group 1, n=33) or late IDS (after 6.3 cycles, group 2, n=104). Contemporary patients who had undergone standard treatment by primary debulking surgery (PDS)+CT (group 3, n=446) and those treated by CT alone (group 4, n=64 patients) served as internal controls.

RESULTS

Prognosis in IDS patients (groups 1+2) was comparable to that in PDS patients (group 3). Only a few patients in group 4 potentially had lost an opportunity for debulking surgery. Groups 1 and 2 were well-matched concerning usual prognostic factors. Surgery extent and post-operative outcomes were similar in both. In contrast, complete cytoreductions were significantly more frequent in late than in early IDS (group 2 vs.1: 58% vs. 36%, p=0.03) and survival was not inferior in the late IDS group compared to the early IDS group with 37 vs. 22 months, respectively (p=0.09).

CONCLUSION

Late IDS yields higher complete resection rates than early IDS and should be evaluated prospectively for outcome in further trials.

Should laparoscopy be included in the work-up of advanced ovarian cancer patients attempting interval debulking surgery?

OBJECTIVES

Primary: To investigate whether S-LPS could contribute to a better identification of patients to submit to IDS. Secondary: To identify the most appropriate level of laparoscopic index value (PIV) to identify inoperable patients in this subset of patients.

METHODS

A prospective single-institutional study including patients with advanced ovarian/peritoneal cancer (FIGO stage IIIC-IV) to be submitted to IDS after NACT. Patients have been considered eligible for surgical exploration in case of complete/partial radiological or serological response; stable disease if primary surgery had been performed in a different hospital; progressive radiological disease in the presence of serological response, young age, and good performance status (ECOG <1); and progressive serological disease with stable clinical and radiological disease. A laparoscopic assessment for each patient has been performed.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight consecutive AOC patients submitted to NACT have been eligible for the study. With the addition of S-LPS to the RECIST criteria, a surgical exploration is performed in all patients and the percentage of explorative laparotomies drops to about 10%. The use of S-LPS after the GCIG criteria can reduce the risk of both explorative laparotomies from 30% to 13%, and inappropriate unexplorations from 18% to 0%. Moreover, at a PIV >4 the probability of optimally resecting the disease at laparotomy is equal to 0.

CONCLUSIONS

Present data suggest that S-LPS can play a relevant role to discriminate patients with partially/stable disease or referred from other Institutions after NACT, which can be susceptible of successful IDS.

When should surgical cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer take place?

Initial surgical management is commonly accepted to date as paramount in the treatment of women presenting with epithelial ovarian cancer and permits the assessment of the disease (staging), the histological confirmation of disease type and grade, and the practice of maximal debulking preceding platinum-based chemotherapy. Many studies have shown that the volume of residual disease after initial surgical cytoreduction inversely correlates with survival. Thus, women with optimal debulking performed by a trained specialist have improved median survival. In this review, we will focus on the answers gleaned from clinical trials on primary and interval surgery, which prompts the question on the timing of surgery in respect to chemotherapy. Interval debulking surgery (IDS) is secondary cytoreduction following primary debulking and is carried out in between the courses of chemotherapy. The major clinical trials and the latest systematic reviews seem unable to give any definitive guidance or recommendation for clinical practice. The choice of aggressive primary cytoreduction or upfront chemotherapy followed by second line surgical cytoreduction seems among others to have to be individualized according to tumour load, prediction of its resectability, and response to chemotherapy. The role of tumour biology must also be kept in mind. Finally, concrete answers are awaited on the timing of surgery from the ongoing prospective randomized control trials (CHORUS and EORTC 55971) though preliminary data from the latter have already been presented at major meetings (IGCS 2008; SGO 2009) and ignited strong debate.