En bloc resection for lung cancer with chest wall invasion

Prognostic relevance of rib invasion and modification of T description for resected NSCLC patients: A propensity score matching analysis of the SEER database

Introduction

The impact of rib invasion on the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) T classifications remains unclear. Our study aims to verify the impact of rib invasion on survival in patients with NSCLC through multicenter data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, and proposed a more appropriate pT for the forthcoming 9^th tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classifications.

Method

The SEER database was used to collect T_2b-4N_0-2M₀ NSCLC cases from the period of 2010-2015 according to the 7^th TNM classification system. Subsequently, the T classification was restaged according to the 8^th TNM classification system based on the following codes: tumor size and tumor extension. Cases with T1-2 disease and incomplete clinicopathological information were excluded. Finally, 6479 T3 and T4 NSCLC patients were included in the present study and divided into a rib invasion group (n = 131), other pT3 group (n = 3835), and pT4 group (n = 2513). Propensity-score matching (PSM) balanced the known confounders of the prognosis, resulting in two sets (rib invasion group vs. other pT3 and pT4 group). Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were investigated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and predictive factors of OS and CSS were assessed by Cox regression.

Result

Survival outcomes of the rib invasion group were worse than the other pT3 group (OS: 40.5% vs. 46.5%, p = 0.035; CSS: 49.2% vs. 55.5%, p = 0.047), but comparable to the pT4 group (OS: 40.5% vs. 39.9%, p = 0.876; CSS: 49.2% vs. 46.3%, p = 0.659). Similar results were obtained after PSM. Multivariate analyses for all patients revealed that age at diagnosis, gender, N stage, T stage, surgical modalities, and adjuvant therapy had a predictive value for the prognosis.

Conclusion

The rib invasion group had a worse prognosis than the other pT3 groups, but was similar to the pT4 group. Our recommendation is to change the classification of rib invasion to pT4 disease and further validate this in the forthcoming 9^th TNM classification.

Expert consensus on resection of chest wall tumors and chest wall reconstruction

Chest wall tumors are a relatively uncommon disease in clinical practice. Most of the published studies about chest wall tumors are usually single-center retrospective studies, involving few patients. Therefore, evidences regarding clinical conclusions about chest wall tumors are lacking, and some controversial issues have still to be agreed upon. In January 2019, 73 experts in thoracic surgery, plastic surgery, science, and engineering jointly released the Chinese Expert Consensus on Chest Wall Tumor Resection and Chest Wall Reconstruction (2018 edition). After that, numerous experts put forward new perspectives on some academic issues in this version of the consensus, pointing out the necessity to further discuss the points of contention. Thus, we conducted a survey through the administration of a questionnaire among 85 experts in the world. Consensus has been reached on some major points as follows. (I) Wide excision should be performed for desmoid tumor (DT) of chest wall. After excluding the distant metastasis by multi-disciplinary team, solitary sternal plasmacytoma can be treated with extensive resection and adjuvant radiotherapy. (II) Wide excision with above 2 cm margin distance should be attempted to obtain R0 resection margin for chest wall tumor unless the tumor involves vital organs or structures, including the great vessels, heart, trachea, joints, and spine. (III) For patients with chest wall tumors undergoing unplanned excision (UE) for the first time, it is necessary to carry out wide excision as soon as possible within 1–3 months following the previous surgery. (IV) Current Tumor Node Metastasis staging criteria (American Joint Committee on Cancer) of bone tumor and soft tissue sarcoma are not suitable for chest wall sarcomas. (V) It is necessary to use rigid implants for chest wall reconstruction once the maximum diameter of the chest wall defect exceeds 5 cm in adults and adolescents. (VI) For non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) invading the chest wall, wide excision with neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy are recommended for patients with stage T_3-4N_0-1M₀. As clear guidelines are lacking, these consensus statements on controversial issues on chest wall tumors and resection could possibly serve as further guidance in clinical practice during the upcoming years.

Proposal for Rib invasion as an independent T descriptor for non-small cell lung cancer: A propensity-score matching analysis

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the prognosis between patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) invading difference depth of chest wall and estimate the impact of rib invasion on the pathological T classifications (pT).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 521 patients with resected pT3-4 NSCLC. Propensity-score matching (PSM) balanced the known confounders of the prognosis, resulting in two sets (rib invasion vs the pT3 and pT4 group). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and Overall survival (OS) was assessed by Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier methods. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the additional benefit for survival prediction after reclassifying rib invasion cases.

RESULTS

Chest wall invasion occurred in 171 patients (62 rib invasion, 51 parietal pleural invasion [PL3] and 58 soft tissue invasion). Rib invasion was found to be an independent prognostic factor for both RFS (p = 0.006) and OS (p < 0.001) of pT3-4 NSCLC. The survival of rib invasion group was the worst (RFS: 13.1%; OS: 19.8%), followed by PL3 (RFS: 34.2%, P = 0.001; OS: 48.8%; p < 0.001) and the soft tissue invasion group (RFS: 40.6%, p = 0.001; OS: 57.7%, p < 0.001). Besides, the prognosis of rib invasion group was also found to be worse than those of pT3 (RFS: p < 0.001; OS: p < 0.001) and pT4 group (RFS: p = 0.002; OS: p < 0.001). After PSM, the 5-year RFS rate of rib invasion group were still lower than that of pT3 and pT4 group (p < 0.001); the 5-year OS rate of rib invasion was similar with that of pT4 group (p = 0.066) but lower than that of pT3 group (p = 0.014). The time-dependent ROC curves demonstrated that reclassifying rib invasion as pT4 disease provided an additional benefit for survival prediction (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The rib invasion group had a worse prognosis than the PL3 and pT3 groups. The prognostic impact of rib invasion should be further validated as a pT4 disease in the TNM classification.

Hybrid treatment of T3 chest wall lung cancer lobectomy

Nowadays the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that invades the chest wall is still questioned. The classic approach is a lobectomy that requires chest wall resection through thoracotomy, but thanks to the progress in the field of thoracoscopic surgery, this procedure can be performed by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Major advances have been made in recent years both in the surgical technique associated with thoracoscopy and in the instrumentation available today. This has allowed the use of thoracoscopic technique even in advanced disease. To choose to perform complex surgery in assisted video surgery, considerable experience is needed to avoid making mistakes and giving up a better approach for the patient only for any technical difficulties. Thoracoscopy is not currently the preferred intervention for patients with chest wall invasion because there are insufficient studies on the feasibility of lobectomy with thoracoscopic wall resection, although the thoracoscopic approach has reduced mortality and morbidity in lung cancer cases not in advanced stage. We discuss our experience in three patients using hybrid approach with assisted video thoracoscopic lobectomy and a chest wall en-block resection with an alternative method of estimating thoracic wall resection that uses assisted video surgery and hypodermic needles (minimally invasive posterior approach).

Adjuvant Chemotherapy Does Not Improve Survival for Lung Cancer With Chest Wall Invasion

BACKGROUND

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for patients with completely resected (R0) pT3N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with chest wall invasion. There is minimal evidence to support this recommendation. We aimed to determine whether there is a survival benefit with AC and if so whether it depends on tumor size.

METHODS

Patients who had undergone R0 resection for pT3N0M0 NSCLC with chest wall invasion were identified in the National Cancer Data Base from 2008 to 2012. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to determine independent predictors of overall mortality.

RESULTS

Of 247 patients, 92 (37.3%) received AC. The median tumor size without AC was 42 mm (interquartile range [IQR], 30 to 60 mm) and with AC was 56 mm (IQR, 40 to 70 mm; p = 0.003). Median follow-up was 21.7 months (IQR, 10.6 to 29.1 months). There was no difference in AC based on tumor grade, but the 3-year overall survival for those with well-differentiated or moderately differentiated tumors was 68% versus 55% in those with poorly differentiated or undifferentiated tumors. Three-year overall survival for the entire cohort was 59%. There was no difference in overall survival between those who received AC and those who did not. The only significant predictor of mortality in both univariable and multivariable analyses was poorly or undifferentiated tumor grade.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with pT3N0M0 NSCLC with chest wall invasion there is no survival benefit with AC, regardless of tumor size or grade, after R0 resection. Poorly differentiated or undifferentiated tumor grade is an independent predictor of mortality.

Primary lung tumors invading the chest wall

Chest wall (CW) involvement occurs in approximately 5% of all primary lung neoplasms. According to the most recent TNM classification, lung tumors invading CW are classified as T3, and they represent approximately 45% of all T3 lung cancers. The most common clinical symptom at presentation is chest pain (>60%), which is highly specific of CW infiltration (>90%). Dyspnoea and hemoptysis are also described, especially in case of large lesions. A realistic chance to cure locally advanced tumors invading CW is a surgical resection, consisting in the excision of the primary lung cancer along with the involved CW (sometimes an "en-bloc" resection) and an appropriate lymph-nodal dissection. However, such patients are at high-risk of facing postoperative complications; prognosis mainly depends on: (I) the completeness of resection; and (II) the lymph-nodal involvement. Hence, due to these reasons (incidence, symptoms, prognosis, post-operative complications), such category of patients are to be carefully assessed preoperatively and if deemed practicable, surgery should be taken into consideration. In this view, the aim of this paper is to critically review the most recent series of lung tumors invading the CW, with a particular focus on patients' preoperative evaluation, surgical techniques, postoperative complications and overall outcome.

Extended chest wall resection and reconstruction in the setting of lung cancer

Reconstruction of large chest wall defects after resection remains a significant undertaking. Obtaining a negative margin is of paramount importance for long-term survival. While reconstructing the chest wall, recreating a stable chest wall with adequate functional capacity and reasonable cosmesis are always the end goals. Morbidity from these procedures is significant, and mortality continues to hover around 5%. With continued advancement in reconstructive techniques and improved perioperative management, these procedures will continue to result in improved outcomes for patients.

Lung cancer with chest wall invasion: retrospective analysis comparing en-bloc resection and 'resection in bird cage'

Background

Invasion of the chest wall per se is not a contraindication for tumor resection in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), provided there is no mediastinal lymph node or vital structure involvement. Although widely known to Brazilian surgeons, the ‘resection in bird cage’ technique has never been widely studied in terms of patient survival. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the postoperative consequences and overall survival of extra-musculoperiosteal resection compared with en-bloc resection in NSCLC patients with invasion of the endothoracic fascia.

Methods

Between January 1990 and December 2009, 33 NSCLC patients with invasion of the thoracic wall who underwent pulmonary resection were retrospectively analyzed. Of the 33 patients evaluated, 20 patients underwent en-bloc resection and 13 underwent ‘resection in bird cage.’ For each patient, a retrospective case note review was made.

Results

The median age at surgery, gender, indication, rate of comorbidities, tumor size and the degree of uptake in the costal margin were similar for both groups. The rate of postoperative complications and the duration of hospitalization did not differ between the groups. Regarding the outcome variables, the disease-free interval, rate of local recurrence, metastasis-free time after surgery, overall mortality rate, mortality rate related to metastatic disease, duration following surgery in which deaths occurred, and overall survival were also similar between groups. The cumulative survival curves between the ‘resection in bird cage’ and en-bloc resection and between stages Ia + Ib and IIb + IIIa + IV were not significantly different (p = 0.68 and p = 0.64, respectively). The cumulative metastasis-free survival curves were not significantly different between the two types of surgery (p = 0.38).

Conclusions

In NSCLC patients with invasion of the endothoracic fascia, ‘resection in bird cage’ is a less aggressive procedure that yields similar results in terms of morbidity and mortality compared with en-bloc resection. Thus, ‘resection in bird cage’ meets the oncologic principles of resection and does not adversely affect the patients in terms of cure.

[Chest wall resection and reconstruction for thoracic tumor invading the chest wall: a report of 12 cases]

背景与目的

胸部肿瘤累及胸壁是临床常见事件，若无远处转移，完整切除受累胸壁仍可获得良好疗效。本文结合12例肿瘤患者胸壁切除与重建（chest wall resection and reconstruction, CWRR）的经验就重建人工材料、软组织覆盖等方面作一介绍，并强调切除外科与重建外科合作的重要性。

方法

总结2005年10月-2011年4月北京大学肿瘤医院胸外一科和重建外科共同参与的CWRR 12例，详细复习自确诊至今的诊治全过程，包括术前治疗、手术方式、切除范围、重建方式，主要的局部及全身并发症及生存情况。

结果

12例均为根治性手术，均行骨性胸壁切除，切除后骨性胸壁缺损为25 cm²-700 cm²，胸壁软组织缺损为56 cm²-400 cm²。骨性胸壁修补材料采用聚丙烯单丝网片（polypropylene mesh），软组织修复采用转移肌瓣、转移肌皮瓣及大网膜瓣。术后1例发生呼吸衰竭，呼吸机辅助通气1个月后痊愈，余11例均无并发症，全组12例至今全部存活。

结论

只有切除外科和重建外科同时参与才能完成符合肿瘤原则的复杂CWRR。由切除外科主导、重建外科协助、了解并熟悉重建材料及胸壁软组织重建，是达到手术根治性及保证远期生存的关键。

Extensive resections: pancoast tumors, chest wall resections, en bloc vascular resections

Infiltration by lung tumor of adjacent anatomic structures including major vessels, main bronchi, and chest wall not only influences the oncologic severity of the disease but also increases the technical complexity of surgery, requiring extended resections and demanding reconstructive procedures. Completeness of resection represents in every case one of the main factors influencing the long-term outcome of patients. Technical and oncologic aspects of extended operations, including resection of Pancoast tumors and chest wall, bronchovascular sleeve resections, and en bloc resections of major thoracic vessels, are reported in this article.

Surgical outcomes of newly categorized peripheral T3 non-small cell lung cancers: comparisons between chest wall invasion and large tumors (>7 cm)

The prognosis for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with chest wall invasion can vary due to the heterogeneous nature of the cell population. Because NSCLC with large tumors (>7 cm) have been reclassified as T3, the applicability of the new designation must be evaluated. We reviewed 140 patients with chest wall T3 and 28 patients with T3 NSCLC with large tumors, but no chest wall invasion who underwent resection at our institution. Among chest wall T3 patients, elderly T3 patients (≥80 years old) who died within 42 months, patients with either lymph node or pulmonary metastasis, or patients with a large tumor (>7 cm) had poorer prognoses than those who had not. The survival rates for cases with chest wall T3 and cases with a large tumor without chest wall invasion were not significantly different. NSCLC patients with chest wall T3 with lymph node, or pulmonary metastasis, or with a large tumor should be considered for further multimodal treatment with or without resection to enhance their survival time. Elderly patients with chest wall invasion may not be good candidates for resection. A large tumor is so aggressive that re-classification of large tumor cases as T3 is suitable.

Survival status of veterans with lung cancer is poorer than that among civilians due to age and sex differences: a study of Chinese veterans in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

This study was undertaken to analyze and compare the clinical characteristics and survival difference among veterans and civilians in Taiwan with lung cancer, especially non-small-cell lung cancer, and to determine whether or not veterans have a poorer prognosis than civilians.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and computer files of lung cancer patients diagnosed between 1996 and 2000 at our hospital. Patients' clinical characteristics, marital status, staging, treatment modality, and overall survival were analyzed and compared, based on the patients' standing as veterans or civilians.

RESULTS

During this period, 3,727 lung cancer patients (2,386 veterans, 1,341 civilians) were diagnosed. The overall survival of all lung cancer patients showed that civilians had better survival than veterans (median, 12 months vs. 8 months, p < 0.001). Survival of non-small-cell lung cancer patients was also better for civilians than veterans (median, 13 months vs. 9 months, p < 0.001). Surgery was the main treatment modality in both stage I and II civilians and veterans. A greater proportion of veterans in stage II and III received radiotherapy than civilians in the same stage, with a statistically significant difference in stage III patients (p < 0.001). Multivariate survival analysis showed that age and sex were independent risk factors for mortality, while standing (veteran or civilian) was not, in both all lung cancers and non-small-cell lung cancer alone.

CONCLUSION

Veterans, who mainly came from China, had a poorer prognosis than civilians when suffering from lung cancer in Taiwan, due to age and gender, rather than standing.