Analgesia and serum assays of controlled-release dihydrocodeine and metabolites in cancer patients with pain

UPLC-MS-MS Determination of Dihydrocodeine in Human Plasma and Its Application to a Pharmacokinetic Study

A sensitive and rapid ultra performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS-MS) method was developed to determine dihydrocodeine (DHC) in human plasma using diazepam as the internal standard (IS). Sample preparation was accomplished through a liquid-liquid extraction procedure with ethyl acetate. The analyte and IS were separated on an Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column (2.1 × 50 mm, 1.7 μm) with the mobile phase of acetonitrile and 1% formic acid in water with gradient elution at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. The detection was performed on a triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer equipped with positive-ion electrospray ionization by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) of the transitions at m/z 302.3 → 199.2 for DHC and m/z 285.1 → 193.1 for IS. The linearity of this method was found to be within the concentration range of 0.5-100 ng/mL with a lower limit of quantification of 0.5 ng/mL. The overall run time was 4.0 min. The method herein described was superior to previous methods and was successfully applied to the pharmacokinetic study of DHC in healthy Chinese volunteers after oral administration.

Simultaneous determination of acetaminophen and dihydrocodeine in human plasma by UPLC-MS/MS: Its pharmacokinetic application

An ultra performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method was developed and validated to determine acetaminophen (AAP) and dihydrocodeine (DHC) in human plasma simultaneously. Plasma samples were prepared using protein precipitation with acetonitrile, the two analytes and the internal standard midazolam were separated on an Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column and mass spectrometric analysis was performed using a QTrap5500 mass spectrometer coupled with an electro-spray ionization (ESI) source in the positive ion mode. The MRM transitions of m/z 151.2→110.0 and m/z 302.3→199.2 were used to quantify for AAP and DHC, respectively. The linearity of this method was found to be within the concentration range of 50-10000ng/mL for AAP, and 1-100ng/mL for DHC in human plasma, respectively. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 50ng/mL and 1ng/mL for AAP and DHC in human plasma, respectively. The relative standard deviations (RSD) of intra and inter precision were less than 10% for both AAP and DHC. The analysis time of per sample was 1.0min. The developed and validated method was successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study of AAP (500mg) with DHC (20mg) capsule in Chinese healthy volunteers (N=20).

Involvement of spinal PKA/CREB signaling pathway in the development of bone cancer pain

BACKGROUND

It has been shown that spinal PKA/CREB signaling pathway is involved in neuropathic and inflammatory pain, but its effects on bone cancer pain have not previously been investigated. The aim of this study was to examine the potential role of the spinal PKA/CREB signaling pathway in the development of bone cancer pain.

METHODS

A bone cancer pain model was made by inoculation of Walker 256 cells into the intramedullary space of rat tibia. Western blot analysis examined the expression of PKAca (PKA catalytic subunit) and phospho-CREB (p-CREB) protein levels. The authors further investigated effects of intrathecal treatment with H-89 (a PKA inhibitor, 8 nmol) or forskolin (a PKA agonist, 10 nmol) on nociceptive behavior and the expression of PKAca and p-CREB.

RESULTS

On days 6, 9, and 15 after inoculation, the expression of PKAca and p-CREB protein levels were higher in the bone cancer pain rats compared to the sham rats. On day 9, intrathecal administration of H-89 significantly attenuated bone cancer-induced mechanical allodynia as well as upregulation of PKAca and p-CREB protein levels. These effects were completely abolished by intrathecal pretreatment with the PKA agonist forskolin.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that the spinal PKA/CREB signaling pathway may participate in the development of bone cancer pain. The findings of this study may provide an evidence for developing novel analgesics to block bone cancer pain.

Decreased analgesic effect of morphine, but not buprenorphine, in patients with advanced P-glycoprotein(+) cancers

BACKGROUND

P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is expressed on the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and acts as a transporter regulating the analgesic effect of morphine. The P-gp is also expressed by different types of tumors. The aim of this study was to determine the potential association of the P-gp expression in malignant tumors with analgesic effects in patients.

METHODS

The P-gp expression in 120 malignant tumors was examined by immunohistochemistry. The analgesic responses of individual patients to morphine and buprenorphine (BNP) were evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS). The levels of plasma morphine and BNP were determined by HPLC.

RESULTS

We found that there was no significant difference in the values of VAS between patients with P-gp(+) and P-gp(-) malignant tumors in responses to 0.000025 g x kg(-2) of BNP administered by patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA), accompanied by similar levels of plasma BNP in those patients. In contrast, the values of VAS in response to 0.00075 g x kg(-2) of morphine in patients with P-gp(+) tumors were significantly greater than those in the patients with P-gp(-) tumors, although similar levels of plasma morphine were detected in both groups of patients. Furthermore, treatment with a higher dose (0.0011 g x kg(-2)) of morphine effectively controlled pain in those with P-gp(+) tumors.

CONCLUSION

Our data indicated that patients with P-gp(+) tumors required a higher dose of morphine to achieve an analgesic effect and that the P-gp expression in tumors may be valuable for predicting the analgesic responses of patients with severe pain to morphine.