CRP in acute appendicitis--is it a necessary investigation?

Point-of-care measurement of C-reactive protein promotes de-escalation of treatment decisions and strengthens the perceived clinical confidence of physicians in out-of-hours outpatient emergency medical services

OBJECTIVES

Out-of-hours outpatient emergency medical services (OEMS) provide healthcare for patients with non-life-threatening conditions in need for urgent care when outpatient practices are closed. We studied the use of point-of-care-testing of C-reactive protein (CRP-POCT) at OEMS.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey.

SETTING

Single centre OEMS practice in Hildesheim, Germany (October 2021 to March 2022).

PARTICIPANTS

OEMS physicians answering a questionnaire immediately after performing CRP-POCTs (CUBE-S Analyzer, Hitado) on any patients.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES

Impact of CRP-POCTs on clinical decision-making and perceived usefulness.

RESULTS

In the 6-month study period, 114 valid CRP-POCTs were performed in the OEMS practice by 18 physicians and the questionnaire was answered in 112 cases (response rate: 98.2%). CRP-POCTs were used in the diagnosis of inflammatory diseases of the gastrointestinal tract (60.0%), respiratory tract infections (17.0%), urinary tract infections (9.0%) and other non-gastrointestinal/non-specified infections (11.0%). The use of a CRP-POCT resulted in a change of the physicians' clinical decision in 83.3% of the cases. Specifically, in 13.6% and 35.1% of the cases, rapid CRP measurements led to decision changes in the (1) initiation of antimicrobial therapy and (2) other drug treatment, respectively. Notably, in 60% of all cases, the use of a CRP-POCT reportedly changed the decision on hospitalisation/non-hospitalisation of OEMS patients. In respect of antimicrobial therapy and hospitalisation, these decision changes primarily (≥73%) promoted 'step-down' decisions, that is, no antibiotic therapy and no hospital admission. In the great majority of CRP-POCT applications (≥95%), OEMS physicians reported that rapid CRP measurements increased the confidence in their diagnostic and therapeutic decision. In almost all cases (97%), physicians rated the CRP-POCT use as useful in the treatment situation.

CONCLUSION

Quantitative CRP-POCT promotes step-down clinical decisions and strengthens the clinical confidence of physicians in out-of-hours OEMS.

Role of inflammatory and hematological markers in predicting the complicated and perforated acute appendicitis in pediatric population: A cohort study

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

•

Evaluation of inflammatory markers is considered helpful in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

•

C-Reactive Protein (CRP) is considered one of the most important inflammatory markers.

•

CRP was helpful not only as an independent marker of severity in acute appendicitis but also predicting complications and perforation as well with higher sensitivity.

•

CRP has the highest specificity for complicated appendicitis and the highest positive likelihood ratio for perforated appendicitis.

Diagnostic Value of Monocyte-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Against Other Biomarkers in Children With Appendicitis

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate diagnostic value of monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio as a novel biomarker in children with appendicitis and to compare with other biomarkers.

METHODS

A total of 683 children were included in this retrospective study. Patients were categorized as acute appendicitis (AA, n = 254), perforated appendicitis (PA, n = 82), nonspecific abdominal pain (NAP, n = 197), and control (n = 150). The groups were compared for demographics, duration of symptoms, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), white blood cell count, neutrophil percentage (NP), C-reactive protein (CRP), mean platelet volume, and sodium level.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between all groups for MLR, PLR, and CRP. White blood cell count, NP, and NLR were significantly increased in patients with appendicitis, but there was no significant difference in the differential diagnosis between PA and AA. Sodium levels significantly decreased in patients with appendicitis. No statistically significance was determined between all groups in term of mean platelet volume. Among the biomarkers, MLR showed the highest diagnostic value (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve = 0.798) for AA, while CRP showed excellent diagnostic value (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve = 0.897) for PA.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first study showing that MLR is a valuable parameter to differentiate patients with and without appendicitis. White blood cell, NP, and NLR are also useful parameters. On the other hand, an increased CRP level and hyponatremia are indicators of PA.

Evaluation of the diagnostic value of platelet indices in pediatric acute appendicitis

OBJECTIVE

Abdominal examination findings in pediatric acute appendicitis (AA) significantly vary by age. Therefore, grading systems have been developed for diagnosing pediatric appendicitis, and laboratory and radiological findings have an important role in this diagnosis. However, there is a need to develop new parameters for diagnosing AA. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of platelet indices in AA.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational study included 207 pediatric patients who were admitted to the Emergency Department and operated on for AA. The patients were divided into three groups on the basis of their surgical and histopathological findings (non-AA, uncomplicated AA, and complicated AA).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the mean platelet volume/platelet count (MPV/PC) ratio among the groups. The white blood cell (WBC) count and the MPV/PC ratio showed a significant negative relationship (r = -0.239). The specificity for MPV was 61.8% and the sensitivity was 68.8%. Receiver operating curve analysis of WBC and MPV showed significance for diagnosing AA.

CONCLUSION

There is a negative, but weak, relationship between the WBC count and the MPV/PC ratio. However, the MPV/PC ratio could be a useful parameter for diagnosing pediatric AA according to receiver operating curve analysis.

A comparative study on the diagnostic validity of three scoring systems in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in emergency centres

Background

Considering the inconsistencies on the validity scoring systems in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, our aim was to compare the accuracy of the three Anderson, Alvarado and Alvarado + CRP scoring systems in the diagnosis of patients with suspected acute appendicitis.

Methods

This was a prospective observational study performed on patients 15–65 years complained of abdominal pain in the RLQ with a high clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis within two years. The scoring systems of Anderson, Alvarado, and Alvarado + CRP were recorded using a pre-prepared questionnaire by a senior emergency medicine assistant. Acute appendicitis was confirmed based on the histopathologic findings. Written informed consent was obtained from all the patients before entering the study.

Results

200 patients were enrolled in the study. In 159 cases diagnosed with appendicitis based on histopathological findings, Anderson, Alvarado, and Alvarado scoring systems were able to identify 121, 152, and 147 cases respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were 77%, 19%, 78%, 17 and 64% in Anderson, 95%, 7%, 75%, 30% and 77% in Alvarado, and 92%, 7%, 79%, 20%, and 75% in Alvarado + CRP scoring systems, respectively.

Conclusion

Anderson scoring system had lower diagnostic accuracy than the Alvarado system. The role of CRP as an adjunct test to increase the accuracy of the Alvarado scoring system in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis has been under question. Given the inconsistent results of the scoring systems in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, there is a need to develop a more precise clinical-paraclinical scoring system for this condition.

The diagnostic accuracy of clinical and laboratory parameters in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the adult emergency department population - a case control pilot study

Introduction

The evaluation of patients with suspected appendicitis strives to identify all patients with presenting symptoms while minimizing negative appendectomy rate. The aim of the study was to identify the optimal combination of clinical and laboratory parameters that should facilitate the emergency department surgeon’s definite decision.

Materials and methods

The study group comprised 120 patients with suspicion of acute appendicitis (AA). In 60 patients the AA diagnosis was confirmed intraoperatively and by histological analysis. Clinical parameters included: appetite, vomiting, diarrhea, dysuria, signs of localized peritonitis and pain migration. Measured laboratory parameters were: C-reactive protein (CRP), complete blood count (CBC) and the urine test strip.

Results

The control group of patients were more likely to present following symptoms: no changes in appetite (P < 0.001), diarrhea (P = 0.009) and dysuria (P = 0.047). CRP and white blood cell count (WBC) were significantly higher in the group with confirmed AA compared to the control group (44.7 vs. 6.6, and 13.6 ± 3.9 vs. 9.0 ± 3.4, respectively; P < 0.001). The multivariate logistic regression analysis identified lack of appetite (P = 0.013), absence of diarrhea (P = 0.004), and positive finding of signs of localized peritonitis (P = 0.013), as well as WBCs (P < 0.001) and negative urine test strip results (P = 0.009) as statistically significant predictors of AA. The highest percentage of correctly classified cases (82%) was achieved by combination of common clinical exam and basic inexpensive laboratory parameters (WBCs and urine test strip).

Conclusions

Acute appendicitis in the emergency setting may be successfully ruled in based on elevated WBCs and negative urine test strip in combination with signs of localized peritonitis, lack of appetite and absence of diarrhea. Since CRP did not contribute to the overall diagnostic accuracy, its use in AA diagnostic protocols is of no value.

Mean platelet volume and the ratio of mean platelet volume to platelet count in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis

BACKGROUND

Mean platelet volume (MPV) is an inflammatory marker. Recent studies have shown that there is a negative correlation between platelet count (PC) and MPV and that the ratio of these two values may be more meaningful. The aim of our study was to investigate the diagnostic value of MPV and the MPV/PC ratio in acute appendicitis.

METHODS

Patients who were admitted to the emergency department and underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis between January 2013 and May 2016 were evaluated retrospectively. The patients were divided into three groups based on their histopathological findings: the control group (negative appendicectomy) and the uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis groups. Leukocyte count, CRP (C-reactive protein) levels, PC, MPV and the MPV/PC ratio were compared among the groups.

RESULTS

A total of 424 patients, including 231 men, were included in the study. The average age of all patients was 34.9 ± 13.2 years. There was no statistically significant difference between the uncomplicated appendicitis, complicated appendicitis and control groups in terms of MPV, PC and the MPV/PC ratio. Leukocyte count had a strong discriminatory property based on the area under curve (AUC) 0.73, (p < 0.001). CRP levels, MPV, PC and the MPV/PC ratio had weak discriminatory power with AUC values <0.65. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the sensitivity and specificity of MPV were 83.79% and 23.21%, respectively, and 66.48% and 48.21%, respectively, for the MPV/PC ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, MPV and the MPV/PC ratio were not useful in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Role of C-Reactive Protein, White Blood Cell Counts, Bilirubin Levels, and Imaging in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis as a Cause of Right Iliac Fossa Pain

Background Right iliac fossa (RIF) pain is one of the most common modalities of presentation to surgical emergency. It remains a challenge to the treating clinicians to accurately diagnose or to rule out appendicitis. Objective The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of clinical impression, biochemical markers, and imaging in the diagnosis of RIF pain with special reference to appendicitis and their implication in reducing the negative appendicectomy rates. Methods All patients presenting to casualty with RIF pain were included in the study. Blood investigations including C-reactive protein (CRP), serum bilirubin, white blood cell counts (WBC), and ultrasound (USG) were done. Based on the clinical impression, patients were either posted for appendicectomy or observed in equivocal cases. Patients who had recurrent pain on follow-up underwent appendicectomy or underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in equivocal cases. Patients who only had a single self-limiting episode with no other alternative diagnosis or had a normal CECT report were included in a non-specific RIF pain group. Results The negative appendicectomy rate was 8.2%. The mean value of WBC counts (9.57x109/L vs 7.88x109/L; p<0.05) and that of serum bilirubin (1.37 mg/dl vs 0.89mg/dl; p<0.05) in the appendicitis and non-appendicitis group, respectively, were statistically significant. The percentage of CRP positivity was higher in the appendicitis group (51.9% vs 15%; p<0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for USG (84.2%, 77.17%, 85.4%, and 75.5%), for CRP (51.8%, 85%, 82%, and 57%), for WBC count (45.1%, 88%, 86.6%, and 48.3%), and for serum bilirubin (69.2%, 75%, 81.4%, and 60.5%) were statistically significant between the groups. Conclusion Imaging and biochemical investigations including bilirubin can act as useful adjuncts to the clinical diagnosis of appendicitis.

Surgeon's clinical valuation and accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: A comparison with intraoperative evaluation. Five years experience

INTRODUCTION

Acute appendicitis is the most common cause of acute abdomen in adolescents, with an overall incidence of 7%. Two such tools are used to diagnose acute appendicitis: ultrasound and Computer Tomography imaging. End point of this study was to verify the accuracy of ultrasound imaging in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis with respect to intraoperative observations and the respective clinical and laboratory findings in young and in the elderly.

METHODS

We considered all the appendectomies for acute appendicitis performed between 1 January 2010 and 1 January 2015. We evaluated clinical symptoms, laboratory findings, ultrasound findings, intraoperative signs, and anatomical and pathological findings. In the study we compared the ultrasound and intraoperative findings and then compared these with the respective clinical and laboratory data.

RESULTS

In a comparison of diagnostic accuracy, the difference between clinical and ultrasound examinations was not significant. The differences between the diagnostic accuracy of clinical and laboratory findings and between ultrasound and laboratory investigations were statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

We defined white blood cells and C protein levels as non-diagnostic of the type of acute inflammation but rather as indicators of the severity of the inflammatory process. We also agree with the authors who proposed the incorporation of ultrasonography into routine practice in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, but only and exclusively to support other diagnostic procedures and preferably within emergency departments. A thorough clinical examination of patients with suspected acute appendicitis is still the best diagnostic procedure available to us.

[Perioperative CRP quantification for appendectomy: Clinically useful or a waste of money?]

BACKGROUND

Appendectomy is the most frequently performed non-elective surgical procedure in general surgery. Despite the questionable benefit, inflammatory markers, such as leukocyte count and C-related protein (CRP) are often determined before and after the surgical procedure. Clinicians are not infrequently confronted with the question whether a patient can be discharged despite an increase in inflammatory laboratory parameters.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the current study was to retrospectively evaluate the clinical course of patients after appendectomy and the correlation with inflammatory laboratory findings.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 969 patients underwent a surgical procedure due to clinically suspected acute appendicitis. All clinical, laboratory and histopathological data were obtained from the patient records and a quality control database. Laboratory results were correlated with clinical and histopathological data (e.g. t-test, χ (2)-test, regression analysis and ROC curves).

RESULTS

In patients without acute appendicitis operative trauma caused an increase in CRP up to a median of 31 mg/dl on the first postoperative day and up to 47 mg/dl on postoperative day 2. The overall morbidity was 6.2%. The strongest predictive parameter for complications was a CRP of more than 108 mg/l on the first postoperative day with an odds ratio of 16.6 (96% CI 6.4/42.8, p < 0.001, specificity 88% and sensitivity 69%). Patients with CRP values below the threshold suffered from complications in 1.1 % of cases in contrast to patients above the threshold in 16.8% of cases (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

A moderate postoperative elevation of CRP values is not a general contraindication for discharge; however, postoperative determination of CRP serum values after appendectomy might be an effective predictor for complications and should therefore be measured in the clinical routine.

Serum total bilirubin elevation is a predictor of the clinicopathological severity of acute appendicitis

PURPOSE

Elevation of the serum total bilirubin (STB) level not stemming from hepatic dysfunction or biliary obstruction may be seen in cases of acute appendicitis. This paper deals with the clinical significance of such elevations.

METHODS

Data from 410 appendectomized patients classified into two groups (a high preoperative STB group and a normal preoperative STB group) were analyzed to reveal the significance of preoperative hyperbilirubinemia. We also examined whether the preoperative STB level might serve as a risk factor for gangrenous appendicitis by a multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Gangrenous appendicitis was more common in the high preoperative STB group (p < 0.001). The multivariate analysis revealed that an elevated preoperative STB level (odds ratio 1.7919) was a risk factor for gangrenous appendicitis.

CONCLUSION

In patients with an elevated preoperative STB level, it is very likely that the inflammation is severe and that the disease has progressed to a severe condition histopathologically; therefore, meticulous attention should be paid to the selection of the surgical procedure, as well as to the postoperative clinical course.

Role of mean platelet volume in diagnosis of childhood acute appendicitis

Introduction. Acute appendicitis is the leading cause of abdominal pain in children requiring emergency surgical intervention. The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic value of MPV in early diagnosis of acute appendicitis cases in pediatric age group. Methods. This study was performed retrospectively. Three hundred five patients operated on with the diagnosis of appendicitis and pathologically found to be acute appendicitis were classified as Group 1 and 305 healthy children were classified as control Group 2. Results. One hundred ninety-seven of 305 cases in Group 1 are males (64.6%), in Group 2, 151 of 305 cases are males (49.5%). The mean MPV in Group 1 was 7.9 ± 0.9 (fL), and whereas in Group 2 was 7.7 ± 0.8 (fL). There was no statistically significant difference regarding MPV values (P > 0.05). Conclusion. In our study we detected that mean platelet volume has no diagnostic value in pediatric acute appendicitis cases.

Appendicectomy at a children's hospital: what has changed over a decade?

BACKGROUND

Appendicectomy remains the most common abdominal emergency procedure performed by surgeons. We reviewed appendicectomies for the calendar years 1999 and 2009 to assess any changes in the referral, presentation and management at a tertiary paediatric institution.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review on all appendicectomies at our institution in 1999 and 2009. Patients were identified using the International Classification of Diseases 9 and 10 Australian Modification codes. A P-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

The number of emergency appendicectomies more than doubled from 126 to 296 between 1999 and 2009. The rate of laparoscopic appendicectomy increased from <1% in 1999 to 70.3% in 2009. Overall, the mean patient age increased from 8.6 years in 1999 to 9.68 in 2009 (P = 0.005). There was an increase in the proportion (19.8% versus 39.5%, P < 0.001) and age (5.3 versus 8.8, P < 0.0001) of patients referred via inter-hospital transfers between the two time periods. In 2009, laparoscopic surgery required on average 13.6 min longer than open surgery. This increase in surgical duration was offset by a decrease in the length of stay (5.0 ± 0.7 versus 3.5 ± 0.3, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our institution has experienced an extraordinary rise in the number of appendicectomies performed, which cannot be explained by an increase in the local paediatric population alone. There appears to have been dramatic shift in the surgical care of children to our tertiary paediatric centre. The majority of appendicectomies in 2009 were laparoscopic, with a reduced length of stay despite longer operative times.

Preoperative diagnostic role of hyperbilirubinaemia as a marker of appendix perforation

This retrospective study investigated preoperative markers of appendix perforation in 351 acute appendicitis cases: group 1, appendicitis not histologically confirmed; group 2, appendicitis without perforation or gangrenous changes; and group 3, histologically confirmed perforated appendicitis with gangrenous changes. In group 3, symptom duration was significantly longer, and white blood cell (WBC) and bilirubin values significantly higher, than for the other groups. Symptom duration, gender, bilirubin and elevated WBC were significantly associated with early diagnosis of acute appendicitis in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis identified increased WBC counts and male gender as independent variables for the early diagnosis of acute suppurative appendicitis, and symptom duration, total bilirubin and elevated WBC as independent variables for identifying appendix perforation amongst acute suppurative appendicitis patients. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed good discrimination of bilirubin and moderate discrimination of WBC as markers of appendix perforation. It is concluded that assessment of preoperative total bilirubin is useful for the differential diagnosis of perforated versus acute suppurative appendicitis, whereas WBC assessment is effective for diagnosing the presence versus absence of appendicitis. Symptom duration, WBC and total bilirubin should be used as independent parameters in the early diagnosis of appendix perforation.

Acute appendicitis: relationships between CT-determined severities and serum white blood cell counts and C-reactive protein levels

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationships between the severity of appendicitis as depicted on CT and blood inflammatory markers of serum white blood cell (WBC) count and C-reactive protein (CRP).

METHODS

CT images in 128 patients (109 surgically proven and 19 with clinically excluded appendicitis) were retrospectively reviewed. Two radiologists by consensus evaluated and scored (using a 0, 1 or 2 point scale) severities based on CT-determined appendiceal diameters, appendiceal wall changes, caecal changes, periappendiceal inflammatory stranding and phlegmon or abscess formation. We investigated whether CT findings were significantly related to elevated WBC counts or CRP levels and performed the correlations of WBC counts and CRP levels with CT severity scores. Patients were also subjectively classified using four grades from normal (Grade I) to perforated appendicitis (Grade IV) on the basis of CT findings to evaluate differences in WBC counts and CRP levels between grades.

RESULTS

Only appendiceal wall changes and the phlegmon or abscess formation were related to elevated WBC counts and CRP levels, respectively (p<0.05). CT severity scores were found to be more strongly correlated with CRP levels (r = 0.669) than with WBC counts (r = 0.222). On the basis of CT grades, the WBC counts in Grade I were significantly lower than in other grades (p<0.001), whereas CRP levels in Grade IV were significantly higher than in other grades (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

CRP levels were found to correlate with CT-determined acute appendicitis severity and could be a useful predictor for perforated appendicitis, whereas WBC counts might be useful to detect early acute appendicitis.

[Evaluation of using Alvarado score and C-reactive protein in diagnosing acute appendicitis in children]

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Acute appendicitis (AA) remains a diagnostic challenge in children, despite ongoing researches. With an aim to facilitate making diagnosis of AA many scoring systems have been created; among them Alvarado score is the most popular. C-reactive protein (CRP) has proven significance for diagnosing AA in adults, but not in children. The aim of this study was to evaluate significance of Alvarado score, as well as CRP values, in making diagnosis of AA in children.

METHODS

This prospective six-month study was performed on 257 patients under the age of 15, admitted for acute abdominal pain in the Clinic of Pediatric Surgery and Orthopedics in the Clinical Centre of Nis. Alvarado score and CRP values were determined on admission and compared with final diagnosis on discharge. The patients were divided into two groups: group I--non operated patients with abdominal pain (n=184) and group II--operated on patients for appendectomy (n=73).

RESULTS

Values of Alvardo score were statistically significantly different between groups (group I: 4.9 +/- 1.21, group II: 8.55 +/- 1.32). Also, our results showed significantly high values of CRP measured in operated children (group I: 8.17 +/- 4.7 mg/L, group II: 38 +/- 26 mg/L). Values of validity parameters for Alvarado score were: sensitivity 90%, specifity 80%, positive predictive values 87%; for CRP 95%, 70% and 80%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Alvarado score and CRP are very useful adjuvant diagnostic tool for AA to a less experienced surgeon. High values of Alvarado score and CRP cannot be ignored neither at the same time, used as the sole diagnostic method for discriminating children with AA.

An evaluation of the utility of additional tests in the preoperative diagnostics of acute appendicitis

BACKGROUND

Determining the optimum algorithm for diagnostic procedure in suspected acute appendicitis (AA) may not only reduce the number of unnecessary operations, but also the frequency of complications, and may contribute measurably to reducing the costs of treating patients with acute abdominal conditions.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to assess the value of standard diagnostic methods and measurement of selected biochemical and hematological parameters (C-reactive protein, CRP; interleukin-6, IL-6; procalcitonin, PCT; total count of white blood cell, WBC) in the accuracy of preoperative AA diagnosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The prospective study included 132 patients (female: 52.3%, male: 47.7%) emergency admitted to the Surgical Department, aged 15 to 74 years (mean 36 years), with a suspicion of appendicitis. Measurement of PCT concentration was carried out by immunoluminometric assay, IL-6 concentration by micro enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and CRP concentration by immunonephelometric assay. Statistical analysis was done by the chi-square test and Fisher's exact test for categorized discrete variables, and the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests for continuous variables. In order to assay the diagnostic utility of tests, the receiver operating characteristic model of curve analysis was used.

RESULTS

AA was confirmed in 89 (67.5%) of the patients operated on (group A). Twenty-six (19.7%) of the patients were not operated on and did not require surgery (group C); in 13 patients (9.8%) operated with a preliminary diagnosis of AA, no changes in the appendix were found during the course of the operation (group B). Four (3%) of the patients treated conservatively for periappendicular infiltration were excluded from the following analysis (group D). The mean count of WBC in AA was 13.22 ± 4.45 × 103/μL, with no statistical significance between groups, which does not allow the patients requiring surgery to be distinguished. The highest elevation of IL-6 concentration was observed in the group with the AA and the periappendicular infiltration: 101.5 ± 355.9 vs. 173.6 ± 228.33 pg/mL, respectively; p < 0.05. No surgery patients of group C showed considerably lower CRP concentrations than those of group D: CRP: 2.05 ± 3.6 vs. 6.36 ± 4.74 mg/L; p < 0.05. In cases of advanced forms of AA, the gangrenous with perforation, higher marker values are obtained than those in the phlegmonose form (186.60 ± 541.2 vs. 40.08 ± 48.3 pg/mL; (p < 0.05) for IL-6 and 8.88 ± 7.45 vs. 2.84 ± 3.83 mg/L; (p < 0.001) for CRP, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

1. AA diagnosis based only on an assessment of clinical status may lead to an increase in the number of people operated with false-positive diagnoses of AA. 2. Applying additional diagnostic methods such as IL-6 determination seems to be useful in reducing the numbers of false-positive diagnoses of AA. 3. Laboratory tests, i.e., CRP, IL-6, and PCT are much more useful in assessing the risk of complications during the course of AA.

An evaluation of the utility of additional tests in the preoperative diagnostics of acute appendicitis

BACKGROUND

Determining the optimum algorithm for diagnostic procedure in suspected acute appendicitis (AA) may not only reduce the number of unnecessary operations, but also the frequency of complications, and may contribute measurably to reducing the costs of treating patients with acute abdominal conditions.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to assess the value of standard diagnostic methods and measurement of selected biochemical and hematological parameters (C-reactive protein, CRP; interleukin-6, IL-6; procalcitonin, PCT; total count of white blood cell, WBC) in the accuracy of preoperative AA diagnosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The prospective study included 132 patients (female: 52.3%, male: 47.7%) emergency admitted to the Surgical Department, aged 15 to 74 years (mean 36 years), with a suspicion of appendicitis. Measurement of PCT concentration was carried out by immunoluminometric assay, IL-6 concentration by micro enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and CRP concentration by immunonephelometric assay. Statistical analysis was done by the chi-square test and Fisher's exact test for categorized discrete variables, and the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests for continuous variables. In order to assay the diagnostic utility of tests, the receiver operating characteristic model of curve analysis was used.

RESULTS

AA was confirmed in 89 (67.5%) of the patients operated on (group A). Twenty-six (19.7%) of the patients were not operated on and did not require surgery (group C); in 13 patients (9.8%) operated with a preliminary diagnosis of AA, no changes in the appendix were found during the course of the operation (group B). Four (3%) of the patients treated conservatively for periappendicular infiltration were excluded from the following analysis (group D). The mean count of WBC in AA was 13.22 ± 4.45 × 103/μL, with no statistical significance between groups, which does not allow the patients requiring surgery to be distinguished. The highest elevation of IL-6 concentration was observed in the group with the AA and the periappendicular infiltration: 101.5 ± 355.9 vs. 173.6 ± 228.33 pg/mL, respectively; p < 0.05. No surgery patients of group C showed considerably lower CRP concentrations than those of group D: CRP: 2.05 ± 3.6 vs. 6.36 ± 4.74 mg/L; p < 0.05. In cases of advanced forms of AA, the gangrenous with perforation, higher marker values are obtained than those in the phlegmonose form (186.60 ± 541.2 vs. 40.08 ± 48.3 pg/mL; (p < 0.05) for IL-6 and 8.88 ± 7.45 vs. 2.84 ± 3.83 mg/L; (p < 0.001) for CRP, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

1. AA diagnosis based only on an assessment of clinical status may lead to an increase in the number of people operated with false-positive diagnoses of AA. 2. Applying additional diagnostic methods such as IL-6 determination seems to be useful in reducing the numbers of false-positive diagnoses of AA. 3. Laboratory tests, i.e., CRP, IL-6, and PCT are much more useful in assessing the risk of complications during the course of AA.