Adduction laryngeal dystonia: proposal and evaluation of nasofibroscopy

Laryngeal Dystonia, Dystonic Tremor and Vocal Tremor: Three Different Entities

OBJECTIVE

The main objective of this study was to compare the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with laryngeal dystonia (LD), dystonic tremor (DT), and vocal tremor (VT).

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective longitudinal study.

METHODS

Data analysis from every patient diagnosed with LD, DT, or VT from January 1, 2010, to September 30, 2022, at a tertiary hospital center. Differential diagnosis between these entities was clinical (clinical history, voice assessment, and endoscopy) and confirmed by laryngeal electromyography.

RESULTS

A total of 87 patients were included in this study: 50 patients with LD, 23 with DT, and 14 with VT. Age at diagnosis was significantly lower in patients with LD, with a mean age of 56.2 years when compared to DT (67.6 years; P = 0.002) and VT (70.5 years; P = 0.009). Furthermore, VT had a higher female prevalence (92.9%) when compared with LD (52%; P = 0.011). LD was mainly adductor, with only two patients diagnosed with abductor LD, and DT was adductor in every case. Tremor direction in patients with VT was horizontal in 50% and mixed (horizontal + vertical) in 50%, while in DT was mixed in 65.2% and horizontal in 34.8%. LD was more commonly an isolated laryngeal movement disorder (78%) when compared to DT (47.8%; P = 0.015) or VT (28.5%; P < 0.001), which were more often secondary to generalized neurological disorders. There were no differences between groups on Voice Handicap Index-10, self-reported grade of dysphonia on a visual analogic scale (0-10), maximum phonation time, and G, R, B, A, and I in the GRBAS-I scale at diagnosis (P > 0.05). S was significantly higher in LD when compared to VT (P < 0.001) and nonsignificantly higher than in DT (P = 0.075).

CONCLUSIONS

LD, DT, and VT seem to be different entities with different demographics and clinical characteristics.

Laryngoscopy evaluation protocol for the differentiation of essential and dystonic voice tremor

Introduction

Although syndromes that cause voice tremor have singular characteristics, the differential diagnosis of these diseases is a challenge because of the overlap of the existing signs and symptoms.

Objective

To develop a task-specific protocol to assess voice tremor by means of nasofibrolaryngoscopy and to identify those tasks that can distinguish between essential and dystonic tremor syndromes.

Methods

Cross-sectional study. The transnasal fiberoptic laryngoscopy protocol, which consisted of the assessment of palate, pharynx and larynx tremor during the performance of several vocal and non-vocal tasks with distinct phenomenological characteristics, was applied to 19 patients with voice tremor. Patients were diagnosed with essential or dystonic tremor according to the phenomenological characterization of each group. Once they were classified, the tasks associated with the presence of tremor in each syndrome were identified.

Results

The tasks that significantly contributed to the differential diagnosis between essential and dystonic tremor were /s/ production, continuous whistling and reduction of tremor in falsetto. These tasks were phenomenologically different with respect to the presence of tremor in the two syndromes.

Conclusion

The protocol of specific tasks by means of transnasal fiberoptic laryngoscopy is a viable method to differentiate between essential and dystonic voice tremor syndromes through the following tasks: /s/ production, continuous whistling and reduction of tremor in falsetto.