De Lucca L, da Costa Marques M, Weinfeld I. Guided bone regeneration with polypropylene barrier in rabbit's calvaria: A preliminary experimental study.
Heliyon 2018;
4:e00651. [PMID:
30003155 PMCID:
PMC6041361 DOI:
10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00651]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2018] [Revised: 05/14/2018] [Accepted: 06/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives
This study aimed to evaluate the bone formation process in experimental defects created on rabbit calvarial, in which one of the bone defects was covered by the impermeable membrane before suturing the skin flap, while the other was closed only by the cutaneous flap. The experimental holes were filled only by the blood clot.
Material and methods
Sixteen New Zealand female rabbits weighing between 3.5 and 4 kg were used. Two experimental bone defects were made in the rabbit calvarial. The holes were filled only with the blood clot and one of them was covered with an impermeable polypropylene membrane. A histological analysis was made at 21 and 42 days following the surgery. Histological evaluation consisted of the following: 1. inflammatory process; 2. Bone repair; 3. Bone remodeling; 4. Presence of osteoid matrix and mineralization, and 5. Formation of hematopoietic tissue. Each characteristic was analyzed semi quantitatively.
Results
There was a statistical difference between the test and the control group at 21 days of healing in the following items: presence of cementation line (p = 0.012), presence of osteoid tissue (p = 0.012), and trabecular bone tissue development and mineralization (p = 0.012). A greater amount of lamellar bone tissue (mature) was also observed in the test group compared to the control group.
Conclusion
The semiquantitative analysis showed that at 21 days there was a superiority of the repair process in the test group; at 42 days there was no significant difference in bone formation between the two groups; and that the polypropylene membrane is feasible to be used in GBR.
Clinical significance
The impermeable polypropylene barrier is feasible for use in the guided bone regeneration technique. It can be used only on the blood clot, without the need for grafting, and can be easily removed a few days after surgery. These results are unprecedented.
Collapse