1
|
Skaltsounis P, Kokkoris G, Papaioannou TG, Tserepi A. Closed-Loop Microreactor on PCB for Ultra-Fast DNA Amplification: Design and Thermal Validation. MICROMACHINES 2023; 14:172. [PMID: 36677232 PMCID: PMC9860919 DOI: 10.3390/mi14010172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the most common method used for nucleic acid (DNA) amplification. The development of PCR-performing microfluidic reactors (μPCRs) has been of major importance, due to their crucial role in pathogen detection applications in medical diagnostics. Closed loop (CL) is an advantageous type of μPCR, which uses a circular microchannel, thus allowing the DNA sample to pass consecutively through the different temperature zones, in order to accomplish a PCR cycle. CL μPCR offers the main advantages of the traditional continuous-flow μPCR, eliminating at the same time most of the disadvantages associated with the long serpentine microchannel. In this work, the performance of three different CL μPCRs designed for fabrication on a printed circuit board (PCB) was evaluated by a computational study in terms of the residence time in each thermal zone. A 3D heat transfer model was used to calculate the temperature distribution in the microreactor, and the residence times were extracted by this distribution. The results of the computational study suggest that for the best-performing microreactor design, a PCR of 30 cycles can be achieved in less than 3 min. Subsequently, a PCB chip was fabricated based on the design that performed best in the computational study. PCB constitutes a great substrate as it allows for integrated microheaters inside the chip, permitting at the same time low-cost, reliable, reproducible, and mass-amenable fabrication. The fabricated chip, which, at the time of this writing, is the first CL μPCR chip fabricated on a PCB, was tested by measuring the temperatures on its surface with a thermal camera. These results were then compared with the ones of the computational study, in order to evaluate the reliability of the latter. The comparison of the calculated temperatures with the measured values verifies the accuracy of the developed model of the microreactor. As a result of that, a total power consumption of 1.521 W was experimentally measured, only ~7.3% larger than the one calculated (1.417 W). Full validation of the realized CL μPCR chip will be demonstrated in future work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panagiotis Skaltsounis
- Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, National Center of Scientific Research (NCSR) “Demokritos”, Patr. Gregoriou Ε’ and 27 Neapoleos Str., 15341 Aghia Paraskevi, Greece
- School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), 75 Mikras Asias Str., 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - George Kokkoris
- Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, National Center of Scientific Research (NCSR) “Demokritos”, Patr. Gregoriou Ε’ and 27 Neapoleos Str., 15341 Aghia Paraskevi, Greece
| | - Theodoros G. Papaioannou
- School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), 75 Mikras Asias Str., 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Angeliki Tserepi
- Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, National Center of Scientific Research (NCSR) “Demokritos”, Patr. Gregoriou Ε’ and 27 Neapoleos Str., 15341 Aghia Paraskevi, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
A dual-signal amplification strategy based on pump-free SERS microfluidic chip for rapid and ultrasensitive detection of non-small cell lung cancer-related circulating tumour DNA in mice serum. Biosens Bioelectron 2022; 205:114110. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2022.114110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2021] [Revised: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
3
|
Kumar H, Bhardwaj K, Kaur T, Nepovimova E, Kuča K, Kumar V, Bhatia SK, Dhanjal DS, Chopra C, Singh R, Guleria S, Bhalla TC, Verma R, Kumar D. Detection of Bacterial Pathogens and Antibiotic Residues in Chicken Meat: A Review. Foods 2020; 9:E1504. [PMID: 33092226 PMCID: PMC7588929 DOI: 10.3390/foods9101504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Revised: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Detection of pathogenic microbes as well as antibiotic residues in food animals, especially in chicken, has become a matter of food security worldwide. The association of various pathogenic bacteria in different diseases and selective pressure induced by accumulated antibiotic residue to develop antibiotic resistance is also emerging as the threat to human health. These challenges have made the containment of pathogenic bacteria and early detection of antibiotic residue highly crucial for robust and precise detection. However, the traditional culture-based approaches are well-comprehended for identifying microbes. Nevertheless, because they are inadequate, time-consuming and laborious, these conventional methods are not predominantly used. Therefore, it has become essential to explore alternatives for the easy and robust detection of pathogenic microbes and antibiotic residue in the food source. Presently, different monitoring, as well as detection techniques like PCR-based, assay (nucleic acid)-based, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA)-based, aptamer-based, biosensor-based, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry-based and electronic nose-based methods, have been developed for detecting the presence of bacterial contaminants and antibiotic residues. The current review intends to summarize the different techniques and underline the potential of every method used for the detection of bacterial pathogens and antibiotic residue in chicken meat.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harsh Kumar
- School of Bioengineering & Food Technology, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and ManagementSciences, Solan 173229, India;
| | - Kanchan Bhardwaj
- School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and ManagementSciences, Solan 173229, India; (K.B.); (R.V.)
| | - Talwinder Kaur
- Department of Agriculture, Sri Guru Teg Bahadur Khalsa College, Sri Anandpur Sahib, Punjab 140117, India;
| | - Eugenie Nepovimova
- Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Hradec Kralove,50003 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic;
| | - Kamil Kuča
- Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Hradec Kralove,50003 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic;
| | - Vinod Kumar
- School of Water, Energy and Environment, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL, UK;
| | - Shashi Kant Bhatia
- Department of Biological Engineering, College of Engineering, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea;
| | - Daljeet Singh Dhanjal
- School of Bioengineering and Biosciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab 144411, India; (D.S.D.); (C.C.); (R.S.)
| | - Chirag Chopra
- School of Bioengineering and Biosciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab 144411, India; (D.S.D.); (C.C.); (R.S.)
| | - Reena Singh
- School of Bioengineering and Biosciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab 144411, India; (D.S.D.); (C.C.); (R.S.)
| | - Shivani Guleria
- Department of Biotechnology, TIFAC-Centre of Relevance and Excellence in Agro and Industrial Biotechnology (CORE), Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala 147001, India;
| | - Tek Chand Bhalla
- Department of Biotechnology, Himachal Pradesh University, Summer Hill, Shimla 171005, India;
| | - Rachna Verma
- School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and ManagementSciences, Solan 173229, India; (K.B.); (R.V.)
| | - Dinesh Kumar
- School of Bioengineering & Food Technology, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and ManagementSciences, Solan 173229, India;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fletcher B, Mullane K, Platts P, Todd E, Power A, Roberts J, Chapman J, Cozzolino D, Chandra S. Advances in meat spoilage detection: A short focus on rapid methods and technologies. CYTA - JOURNAL OF FOOD 2018. [DOI: 10.1080/19476337.2018.1525432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Bridget Fletcher
- School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton North, QLD, Australia
| | - Keegan Mullane
- School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton North, QLD, Australia
| | - Phoebe Platts
- School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton North, QLD, Australia
| | - Ethan Todd
- School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton North, QLD, Australia
| | - Aoife Power
- Agri-Chemistry Group, School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton North, QLD, Australia
| | - Jessica Roberts
- Agri-Chemistry Group, School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton North, QLD, Australia
| | - James Chapman
- Agri-Chemistry Group, School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton North, QLD, Australia
| | - Daniel Cozzolino
- School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton North, QLD, Australia
| | - Shaneel Chandra
- Agri-Chemistry Group, School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton North, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|