Comparison of clinical characteristics and neutrophil values in omental infarction and acute appendicitis in children

Omental infarction in an overweight child: conservative treatment is a safe approach

A previously healthy but overweight (body mass index (BMI) of 24.4) adolescent boy presented with fever and significant right-sided abdominal pain. An abdominal ultrasound scan revealed an omental infarction (OI), which was treated conservatively. OI has been described in overweight teenage children with abdominal trauma but can be missed if not considered. A missed diagnosis could result in an unnecessary laparotomy or laparoscopic surgery. Although CT is the gold standard for diagnosis, ultrasonography is an effective approach to identifying OI in children. The benefits of early diagnosis of OI by abdominal ultrasound include a shorter hospital stay and a reduction in unnecessary investigations and surgery.

Omental infarction diagnosed by computed tomography, missed with ultrasonography: A case report

BACKGROUND

Omental infarction (OI) is a surgical abdominal disease that is not common in adults and is very rare in children. Similar to various acute abdominal pain diseases including appendicitis, diagnosis was previously achieved by diagnostic laparotomy but more recently, ultrasonography or computed tomography (CT) examination has been used.

CASE SUMMARY

A 6-year-old healthy boy with no specific medical history visited the emergency room with right lower abdominal pain. He underwent abdominal ultrasonography by a radiologist to rule out acute appendicitis. He was discharged with no significant sonographic finding and symptom relief. However, the symptoms persisted for 2 more days and an outpatient visit was made. An outpatient abdominal CT was used to make a diagnosis of OI. After laparoscopic operation, his symptoms resolved.

CONCLUSION

In children’s acute abdominal pain, imaging studies should be performed for appendicitis and OI.

Omental Infarction: An Underrecognized Cause of Right-Sided Acute Abdominal Pain in Children

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence of omental infarction (OI) in children with suspected appendicitis, the role of ultrasonography (US) in its diagnosis and management and the efficacy of conservative management.

METHODS

Consecutive children with suspected acute appendicitis were prospectively enrolled. Ultrasonography was performed at baseline, during follow-up, before the discharge, and at 15-day intervals until US findings of OI disappeared. All children with a diagnosis of OI were treated conservatively.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-nine children (91 male; age range, 3-15 years) were evaluated. Eighty-four patients had acute appendicitis. Omental infarctions were found in 14 children (8 male; mean age, 9.8 ± 2.6 years), with an incidence of 7%. Ultrasonography depicted an echogenic mass consistent with OI in all children. Ultrasonography detected in 8 patients a normal-looking appendix, whereas in other 6 patients, it identified neither appendix nor indirect signs of acute appendicitis. A normal appendix has been detected by US during follow-up in 2 of these 6 patients. During follow-up, US finding of OI disappeared in all cases and no signs of acute appendicitis or other disease occurred. All 14 OIs were treated conservatively, with no reported complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Omental infarction is an underestimated cause of abdominal pain in children accounting for 7% of patients with suspected appendicitis. Ultrasonography is a useful method for the diagnoses and to guide clinical management of OI. Conservative therapy is a safe option for the management of OI.

Diagnosis and Management of Adult Omental Infarction: 10-Year Case Series

BACKGROUND

Omental infarction is a rare cause of an acute abdomen with nonspecific signs that can be easily mistaken with other more common intra-abdominal pathologies. The increased use of radiological imaging has brought this diagnosis to attention with respect to management plan. We present the experience of an Australian hospital network with the diagnosis and management of omental infarction to raise awareness of this uncommon pathology.

METHODS

A retrospective review of medical records of adult patients diagnosed with omental infarction from 2010 to 2020 was conducted across four major hospitals in South Western Sydney. Data relating to clinical presentation, investigations, management and outcomes were obtained.

RESULTS

Omental infarction was diagnosed in 61 patients (mean 51.1 years, range: 19-76 years old). All patients presented with nonspecific abdominal pain with the most common sites being the right iliac fossa followed by the right upper quadrant, respectively, over an average period of 2.7 days. Computed tomography and/or diagnostic laparoscopy identified omental infarction in all cases. Forty-two patients (68.9%) had successful conservative management, six failed conservative management and 19 patients had emergency laparoscopic omentectomy. The average hospital length of stay was 3.4 days with no significant morbidity or mortality.

CONCLUSION

Omental infarction generally presents with nonspecific clinical signs often masquerading as other more common abdominal diagnosis like cholecystitis or appendicitis. A trial of conservative management initially coupled with appropriate imaging should be recommended within the first 24-48 h before considering surgical treatment in refractory cases.

Epiploic Appendagitis and Omental Infarction as Rare Causes of Acute Abdominal Pain in Children

Omental infarction and epiploic appendagitis are rare causes of acute abdominal pain in the pediatric population. Radiological evaluation is necessary to establish a specific diagnosis and to differentiate appendicitis from these conditions as they can be often managed conservatively without surgical intervention.

Diagnosis and management of omental infarction in children: Our 10 year experience with ultrasound

AIM

To review children with Omental Infarction (OI) and the role of Ultrasound Scan (US) in its diagnosis and management.

METHODS

Cases of OI were identified retrospectively from 2004 to 2014 through screening of admission coding, pathology databases and radiology records. Demographic, clinical and pathological data were extracted from case records.

MAIN RESULTS

30 cases were identified (17 male, 13 female). Mean age was 10.7years (range 3.5-17.2). The majority of the patients were grossly overweight, with 83.3% of patients weighing greater than the mean for their age. All patients underwent at least one US, 4 had a repeat US and 1 patient also had a CT to rule out appendicitis after a US demonstrating OI. OI was demonstrated in 26 initial USs; in 4 cases initial USs were negative but repeat USs correctly detected OI. In 34 USs the appendix was identified on 20 occasions (15 normal, equivocal in 5). 13 patients underwent surgery, while 17 were managed nonoperatively; 7 underwent omentectomy only, 5 had omentectomy plus appendicectomy and 1 underwent appendicectomy only. All 12 omentectomy specimens were confirmed as OI histologically while none of the 6 appendices showed inflammation histologically. There were no postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

In a large series we have demonstrated the efficacy of US in the diagnosis and management of OI in children. To our knowledge this is the largest series of its kind to date. No patient with OI was incorrectly diagnosed with acute appendicitis or vice versa.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective Case Series.