[Radial artery spasm in transradial cardiac catheterization. Assessment of factors related to its occurrence, and of its consequences during follow-up]

Efficacy and safety of distal radial approach for cardiac catheterization: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The traditional radial approach (RA) is recommended as the standard method for coronary angiography (CAG), while a distal RA (DRA) has been recently used for CAG.

AIM

To assess the efficacy and safety of the DRA vs RA during CAG.

METHODS

The following databases were searched through December 2020: MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Platform Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Individual randomized-controlled trials for adult patients undergoing cardiac catheterization were included. The primary outcomes were the successful cannulation rate and the incidence of radial artery spasm (RAS) and radial artery occlusion (RAO). Study selection, data abstraction and quality assessment were independently performed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.

RESULTS

Three randomized control trials and 13 registered trials were identified. The two approaches showed similar successful cannulation rates [risk ratio (RR) 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72-1.13]. The DRA did not decrease RAS (RR 0.43, 95%CI: 0.08-2.49) and RAO (RR 0.48, 95%CI: 0.18-1.29). Patients with the DRA had a shorter hemostasis time in comparison to those with the RA (mean difference -6.64, 95%CI: -10.37 to -2.90). The evidence of certainty was low.

CONCLUSION

For CAG, the DRA would be safer than the RA with comparable cannulation rates. Given the limited data, additional research, including studies with standard protocols, is necessary.

Invasive Diagnosis of Coronary Functional Disorders Causing Angina Pectoris

Coronary vasomotion disorders represent a frequent cause of angina and/or dyspnoea in patients with non-obstructed coronary arteries. The highly sophisticated interplay of vasodilatation and vasoconstriction can be assessed in an interventional diagnostic procedure. Established parameters characterising adequate vasodilatation are coronary blood flow at rest, and, after drug-induced vasodilation, coronary flow reserve, and microvascular resistance (hyperaemic microvascular resistance, index of microcirculatory resistance). An increased vasoconstrictive potential is diagnosed by provocation testing with acetylcholine or ergonovine. This enables a diagnosis of coronary epicardial and/or microvascular spasm. Ischaemia associated with microvascular spasm can be confirmed by ischaemic ECG changes and the measurement of lactate concentrations in the coronary sinus. Although interventional diagnostic procedures are helpful for determining the mechanism of the angina, which may be the key to successful medical treatment, they are still neither widely accepted nor applied in many medical centres. This article summarises currently well-established invasive methods for the diagnosis of coronary functional disorders causing angina pectoris.

Radial artery access site complications during cardiac procedures, clinical implications and potential solutions: The role of nitric oxide

Percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of coronary artery disease is most commonly performed in the UK through the radial artery, as this is safer than the femoral approach. However, despite improvements in technology and techniques, complications can occur. The most common complication, arterial spasm, can cause intense pain and, in some cases, procedural failure. The incidence of spasm is dependent on several variables, including operator experience, artery size, and equipment used. An anti-spasmolytic cocktail can be applied to reduce spasm, which usually includes an exogenous nitric oxide (NO) donor (glyceryl trinitrate). NO is an endogenous local vasodilator and therefore is a potential target for anti-spasm intervention. However, systemic administration can result in unwanted side-effects, such as hypotension. A method that adopts local delivery of NO might be advantageous. This review article describes the mechanisms involved in radial artery spasm, discusses the advantages and disadvantages of current strategies to reduce spasm, and highlight the potential of NO-loaded nanoporous materials for use in this setting.

Comparative study of nicorandil and a spasmolytic cocktail in preventing radial artery spasm during transradial coronary angiography

BACKGROUND

Radial artery spasm is one of the most common complications during coronary angiography via the transradial approach, causing patient discomfort or sometimes interrupting the procedure. This study was designed to compare the spasmolytic effect between nicorandil and a cocktail during transradial coronary angiography.

METHODS

A randomized study to compare 4 mg of nicorandil and a cocktail (mixture of normal saline, 200 microg of verapamil) was performed in 150 patients. We examined vasospasms of the radial artery that were expressed as stenosis of the radial artery vessel diameter after the procedure.

RESULT

The reductions of systolic and diastolic blood pressures showed no significant differences between the two groups (15.4+/-11.5/7.7+/-7.8 mmHg for nicorandil and 16.3+/-13.4/6.2 mmHg for cocktail). Both agents induced a significant radial artery vasodilation after transradial administration at proximal and mid segments (P < 0.001 for all). Nicorandil showed a significant increase of the mean change of the radial artery diameter compared to the cocktail at mid-segment (0.32+/-0.23 mm for nicorandil and 0.24+/-0.15 mm for a cocktail, P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in radial artery spasm (50.7% vs. 52.0% in nicorandil and a cocktail, respectively) after catheterization.

CONCLUSION

Nicorandil with vasodilator effects by a dual mechanism was effective as the cocktail in preventing radial artery spasm during transradial coronary angiography.