1
|
Orlova YA, Begrambekova YL, Plisuk AG. [Expert opinion. Spironolactone: a new twist on an old story]. KARDIOLOGIYA 2021; 61:99-103. [PMID: 34763644 DOI: 10.18087/cardio.2021.10.n1734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The article presents recent data on possibilities of a broader use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for existing indications and of expanding indications for the use of this pharmaceutical group in the context of the novel coronavirus infection COVID-19. The authors discussed prospects for expanded detection of aldosteronism using a new diagnostic approach, including an additional evaluation of blood pressure response to spironolactone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ya A Orlova
- Medical Research and Educational Center of the M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia Faculty of Fundamental Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Yu L Begrambekova
- Medical Research and Educational Center of the M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia Faculty of Fundamental Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| | - A G Plisuk
- Medical Research and Educational Center of the M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia Faculty of Fundamental Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Şahinarslan A, Gazi E, Aktoz M, Özkan Ç, Okyay GU, Elalmış ÖU, Belen E, Bitigen A, Derici Ü, Tütüncü NB, Yıldırır A. Consensus paper on the evaluation and treatment of resistant hypertension by the Turkish Society of Cardiology. Anatol J Cardiol 2020; 24:137-152. [PMID: 32870176 PMCID: PMC7585974 DOI: 10.14744/anatoljcardiol.2020.74154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Asife Şahinarslan
- Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University; Ankara-Turkey
| | - Emine Gazi
- Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, 18 Mart University; Çanakkale-Turkey
| | - Meryem Aktoz
- Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Trakya University; Edirne-Turkey
| | - Çiğdem Özkan
- Department of Endocrinology, İzmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital; İzmir-Turkey
| | - Gülay Ulusal Okyay
- Department of Nephrology, Health Sciences University, Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Training and Research Hospital; Ankara-Turkey
| | | | - Erdal Belen
- Department of Cardiology, İstanbul Okmeydanı State Hospital; İstanbul-Turkey
| | - Atila Bitigen
- Department of Cardiology, Fatih Medical Park Hospital; İstanbul-Turkey
| | - Ülver Derici
- Department of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University; Ankara-Turkey
| | | | - Aylin Yıldırır
- Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Başkent University; Ankara-Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hua Q, Fan L, Li J. 2019 Chinese guideline for the management of hypertension in the elderly. J Geriatr Cardiol 2019; 16:67-99. [PMID: 30923539 PMCID: PMC6431598 DOI: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Qi Hua
- Hypertension Branch of Chinese Geriatrics Society
- National Clinical Research Center of the Geriatric Diseases-Chinese Alliance of Geriatric Cardiovascular Disease
| | - Li Fan
- Hypertension Branch of Chinese Geriatrics Society
- National Clinical Research Center of the Geriatric Diseases-Chinese Alliance of Geriatric Cardiovascular Disease
| | - Jing Li
- Hypertension Branch of Chinese Geriatrics Society
- National Clinical Research Center of the Geriatric Diseases-Chinese Alliance of Geriatric Cardiovascular Disease
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pio-Abreu A, Drager LF. Resistant Hypertension: Time to Consider the Best Fifth Anti-Hypertensive Treatment. Curr Hypertens Rep 2018; 20:67. [PMID: 29909538 DOI: 10.1007/s11906-018-0866-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Resistant hypertension (RH) is a growing clinical condition worldwide associated with target-organ damage and poor prognosis compared to non-resistant counterparts. The purpose of this review is to perform a critical evaluation of preferable drug choices for managing RH highlighting the evidence that significant proportion of patients remained uncontrolled despite using four anti-hypertensive drugs. RECENT FINDINGS Until recently, the fourth drug therapy was main derived from personal opinion or small interventional studies. The recent data derived from two multicentric randomized trials, namely PATHWAY-2 and ReHOT, pointed spironolactone as the preferable fourth drug therapy in patients with confirmed RH as compared to bisoprolol and doxazosin (PATHWAY-2) as well as clonidine (ReHOT). However, significant proportion of patients (especially observed in ReHOT trial that used 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring) did not achieve optimal blood pressure with the fourth drug. This finding underscores the need of new approaches and treatment options in this important research area. The current evidence pointed that significant proportion of RH patients are requiring more than four drugs for controlling BP. This statement is particularly true considering the new criteria proposed by the 2017 Guidelines for diagnosing RH (> 130 × 80 mmHg). New combinations, drugs, or treatments should be tested aiming to reduce the RH burden. Based on the aforementioned multicentric trials, we proposed the first five preferable anti-hypertensive classes in the overall context of RH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Pio-Abreu
- Hypertension Unit, Renal Division, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Luciano F Drager
- Hypertension Unit, Renal Division, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
- Hypertension Unit, Heart Institute (InCor), University of Sao Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Resistant hypertension (RH) is defined as blood pressure (BP) that remains above target levels despite adherence to at least three different antihypertensive medications, typically including a diuretic. Epidemiological studies estimate that RH is increasing in prevalence, and is associated with detrimental health outcomes. The pathophysiology underlying RH is complex, involving multiple, overlapping contributors including activation of the renin-angiotensin aldosterone system and the sympathetic nervous system, volume overload, endothelial dysfunction, behavioural and lifestyle factors. Hypertension guidelines currently recommend specific pharmacotherapy for 1st, 2nd and 3rd-line treatment, however no specific fourth-line pharmacotherapy is provided for those with RH. Rather, five different antihypertensive drug classes are generally suggested as possible alternatives, including: mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, α1-adrenergic antagonists, α2-adrenergic agonists, β-blockers, and peripheral vasodilators. Each of these drug classes vary in their efficacy, tolerability and safety profile. This review summarises the available data on each of these drug classes as a potential fourth-line drug and reveals a lack of robust clinical evidence for preferred use of most of these classes in the setting of RH. Moreover, there is a lack of direct comparative trials that could assist in identifying a preferred fourth-line pharmacologic approach and in providing evidence for hypertensive guidelines for adequate treatment of RH.
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Emerging evidence suggests that multiple mechanisms may be responsible for the development of treatment-resistant hypertension (TRH). This review aims to summarize recent data on potential mechanisms of resistance and discuss current pharmacotherapeutic options available in the management of TRH. RECENT FINDINGS Excess sodium and fluid retention, increased activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, and heightened activity of the sympathetic nervous system appear to play an important role in development of TRH. Emerging evidence also suggests a role for arterial stiffness and, potentially, gut dysbiosis. Therapeutic approaches for TRH should include diuretic optimization and the addition of aldosterone antagonists as the preferred fourth agent in most patients. Further therapeutic approaches may be guided by the suspected underlying mechanism of TRH in conjunction with other patient-specific factors. The pathophysiology of TRH is multifaceted; however, increasing evidence supports several mechanisms that may be targeted to improve blood pressure control among patients with TRH. Further studies are needed to determine whether such approaches may be more effective than usual care.
Collapse
|
7
|
Personalised Single-Pill Combination Therapy in Hypertensive Patients: An Update of a Practical Treatment Platform. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev 2017; 24:463-472. [PMID: 29086364 PMCID: PMC5681620 DOI: 10.1007/s40292-017-0239-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2017] [Accepted: 10/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the improvements in the management of hypertension during the last three decades, it continues to be one of the leading causes of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality worldwide. Effective and sustained reductions in blood pressure (BP) reduce the incidence of myocardial infarction, stroke, congestive heart failure and cardiovascular death. However, the proportion of patients who achieve the recommended BP goal (< 140/90 mmHg) is persistently low, worldwide. Poor adherence to therapy, complex therapeutic regimens, clinical inertia, drug-related adverse events and multiple risk factors or comorbidities contribute to the disparity between the potential and actual BP control rate. Previously we published a practical therapeutic platform for the treatment of hypertension based on clinical evidence, guidelines, best practice and clinical experience. This platform provides a personalised treatment approach and can be used to improve BP control and simplify treatment. It uses long-acting, effective and well-tolerated angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) olmesartan, in combination with a calcium channel blocker amlodipine, and/or a thiazide diuretic hydrochlorothiazide. These drugs were selected based on the availability in most European Countries of single-pill, fixed formulations in a wide range of doses for both dual- and triple-drug combinations. The platform approach could be applied to other ARBs or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors available in single-pill, fixed-dose combinations. Here, we present an update, which takes into account the results of the recently published studies and extends the applicability of the platform to common conditions that are often neglected or poorly considered in clinical practice guidelines.
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Treatment resistant hypertension (TRH), defined as a blood pressure above goal despite treatment with optimally tolerated doses of 3 antihypertensive agents of different classes, ideally including a diuretic, remains a significant problem and its management an area of uncertainty for physicians. One hypothesis is that resistant hypertension is due to abnormal sodium retention, mediated by aldosterone breakthrough occurring despite blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB). Thus, there has been renewed interest in the use of mineralocorticoid receptor blockers (MRB) to treat this condition. This article critically evaluates new evidence supporting the use of MRB in TRH published in the last 3 years. We conclude that there is now sufficient evidence to recommend MRB, in particular spironolactone, as the first choice medication to treat this condition, and for its inclusion in future guidelines.
Collapse
|
9
|
Václavík J, Sedlák R, Jarkovský J, Kociánová E, Táborský M. Effect of spironolactone in resistant arterial hypertension: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (ASPIRANT-EXT). Medicine (Baltimore) 2014; 93:e162. [PMID: 25501057 PMCID: PMC4602792 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000000162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
This study was designed to assess the effect of the addition of low-dose spironolactone on blood pressure (BP) in patients with resistant arterial hypertension. Patients with office systolic blood pressure (SBP) >140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) >90 mm Hg despite treatment with at least 3 antihypertensive drugs, including a diuretic, were enrolled in this double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. One hundred sixty-one patients in outpatient internal medicine departments of 6 hospitals in the Czech Republic were randomly assigned to receive 25 mg of spironolactone (N = 81) or a placebo (N = 80) once daily as an add-on to their antihypertensive medication, using simple randomization. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00524615. A nalyses were done with 150 patients who finished the follow-up (74 in the spironolactone and 76 in the placebo group). At 8 weeks, BP values were decreased more by spironolactone, with differences in mean fall of SBP of -9.8, -13.0, -10.5, and -9.9 mm Hg (P < 0.001 for all) in daytime, nighttime, and 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring and in the office. The respective DBP differences were -3.2, -6.4, -3.5, and -3.0 mm Hg (P = 0.013, P < 0.001, P = 0.005, and P = 0.003). Adverse events in both groups were comparable. The office SBP goal <14 mm Hg at 8 weeks was reached in 73% of patients using spironolactone and 41% using placebo (P = 0.001). Spironolactone in patients with resistant arterial hypertension leads to a significant decrease of both SBP and DBP and markedly improves BP control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Václavík
- From the Department of Internal Medicine I-Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University Hospital Olomouc and Palacký University, Olomouc (JV, EK, MT); Department of Internal Medicine, Prostějov Hospital, Mathonova, Prostějov (RS); and Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses at the Faculty of Medicine and the Faculty of Science of the Masaryk University, Kamenice, Brno, Czech Republic (JJ)
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jansen PM, Verdonk K, Imholz BP, Jan Danser AH, van den Meiracker AH. Long-term use of aldosterone-receptor antagonists in uncontrolled hypertension: a retrospective analysis. Int J Hypertens 2011; 2011:368140. [PMID: 21629869 PMCID: PMC3095958 DOI: 10.4061/2011/368140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2010] [Accepted: 01/24/2011] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. The long-term efficacy of aldosterone-receptor antagonists (ARAs) as add-on treatment in uncontrolled hypertension has not yet been reported.
Methods. Data from 123 patients (21 with primary aldosteronism, 102 with essential hypertension) with difficult-to-treat hypertension who received an ARA between May 2005 and September 2009 were analyzed retrospectively for their blood pressure (BP) and biochemical response at first followup after start with ARA and the last follow-up available. Results. Systolic BP decreased by 22 ± 20 and diastolic BP by 9.4 ± 12 mmHg after a median treatment duration of 25 months. In patients that received treatment >5 years, SBP was 33 ± 20 and DBP was 16 ± 13 mmHg lower than at baseline. Multivariate analysis revealed that baseline BP and follow-up duration were positively correlated with BP response. Conclusion. Add-on ARA treatment in difficult-to-treat hypertension results in a profound and sustained BP reduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pieter M Jansen
- Division of Pharmacology, Vascular and Metabolic Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, 3015 CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Resistant hypertension is a common medical problem. It carries a significantly increased risk of end-organ damage and cardiovascular events compared with more easily controlled hypertension. Resistant hypertension is most often related to isolated systolic hypertension and is characterized by aldosterone excess and increased intravascular volume. Its diagnosis requires the exclusion of pseudoresistance. The etiology of resistant hypertension is almost always multifactorial. Common reversible contributing factors need to be identified and addressed. Secondary causes of hypertension, such as primary aldosteronism, parenchymal and vascular kidney disease, and obstructive sleep apnea, require investigation and effective treatment if present. Therapy for resistant hypertension should be based on use of rational drug class combinations at optimal doses, with particular attention to adequate diuretic use. The addition of an aldosterone antagonist may further improve blood pressure control.
Collapse
|