Comparison of 8-mm-tip and irrigated-tip catheters in the ablation of isthmus-dependent atrial flutter: a prospective randomized trial

Comparison between the novel diamond temp and the classical 8-mm tip ablation catheters in the setting of typical atrial flutter

PURPOSE

Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation is widely accepted as a first-line therapy for cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent atrial flutter (AFL). The novel DiamondTemp (DT) catheter with temperature feedback during RF ablation has been released recently on the market. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of DiamondTemp (DT) technology on ablation efficiency during AFL.

METHODS

In this single-center study, 30 consecutive patients with typical AFL indicated to ablation of CTI were included. The first 15 patients underwent CTI ablation using 8-mm tip catheter, and the following 15 patients underwent temperature-controlled RF ablation using DT catheter. The endpoints were number and mean total duration of RF applications, mean temperature reached in the setting of CTI, procedural times, and fluoroscopy times.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two groups concerning baseline characteristics. Mean duration of the each application (71.5 s ± 30.6 vs 12.4 s ± 13.2, p value < 0.001), mean total duration of RF applications (517,73 s ± 377,96 vs 112,8 s ± 43,58; p value < 0.001), procedural times (51.6 min ± 24.2 vs 38.6 ± 8.2; p = 0.03), and fluoroscopy times (16.2 min ± 10.2 vs 8 min ± 4.24; p = 0.005) were longer in the 8-mm ablation catheter group. Mean temperature measurements (51.9 °C ± 3.59 vs 56.7 °C ± 3.34, p value < 0.003) were as well lower in the 8-mm ablation catheter group.

CONCLUSIONS

Catheter ablation of CTI-dependent AFL by means of DT resulted in a significant reduction of total and single application RF delivery time, procedure, and fluoroscopy times.

High-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter

Background

High-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation has been explored for pulmonary vein isolation. Early data suggest similar efficacy with shorter procedure times and perhaps greater safety. Data are lacking on the use of this ablation strategy for other arrhythmias.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and clinical outcomes of HPSD ablation in patients with typical atrial flutter compared to those undergoing ablation with conventional settings.

Methods

Consecutive patients undergoing cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation using standard power settings were compared to those performed after transitioning to HPSD ablation. Demographics, procedural details, and ablation outcomes were prospectively collected. The primary endpoint was duration of radiofrequency energy delivery. Secondary endpoints were radiation duration and analgesia requirements.

Results

A total of 114 consecutive subjects undergoing CTI ablation (57 standard power, 57 HPSD) were included. HPSD ablation and electroanatomic mapping/contact force (EAM/CF) use were associated with 66% (95% confidence interval [CI] 58%–73%) and 50% (95% CI 37%–60%) shorter ablation times compared to standard power and not using EAM/CF, respectively. Patients in the HPSD group required 50 mcg less fentanyl relative to the standard ablation arm after adjusting for sex, age, and comorbidities (P = .048). At a median follow-up of 6 months, 4 patients (7%) in the standard arm had recurrence of atrial flutter, compared to none in HPSD group (P = .057).

Conclusion

HPSD is a safe and effective approach to CTI ablation. This strategy may reduce ablation time and analgesia requirements. Larger studies and longer follow-up are needed to further evaluate this strategy.

Health-related quality of life in different clinical subgroups with typical AFL who have undergone cavo-tricuspid isthmus ablation

Background

To evaluate changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in different sub-groups of a cohort of patients with typical atrial flutter (AFL) treated with cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) radiofrequency catheter ablation.

Methods

95 consecutive patients due to undergo CTI ablation were enrolled in a study involving their completion of two SF-36 HRQOL questionnaires, before ablation and at one-year follow-up.

Results

88 of the initial 95 patients finished the study. Regardless of whether patients experienced atrial fibrillation (AF) during follow-up, a statistically significant improvement in HRQOL was observed, compared with pre-ablation scores and in all dimensions except Bodily Pain. However, patients without AF during follow-up had significantly higher absolute HRQOL scores in most dimensions. No differences were seen in most HRQOL dimensions, with respect to AFL type (paroxysmal, persistent) or duration, whether AFL was first-episode or recurrent, Class I-III drug dependent, sex, or presence of structural heart disease or tachycardiomyopathy. Patients with persistent AFL showed the greatest improvement in HRQOL when they also had a ventricular cycle length ≤500 ms. The combination of recurrent AFL, ventricular cycle length ≤500 ms and structural heart disease led to a significantly greater improvement in physical HRQOL dimensions than did first-episode AFL, no structural heart disease and ventricular cycle >500 ms. The only independent factor associated with a greater improvement was structural cardiopathy.

Conclusions

CTI-ablation treatment leads to a significant improvement in HRQOL in patients with typical AFL. Patients with AF during follow-up show a significantly lower HRQOL at one-year post-ablation. The only independent risk factor found to be associated with a greater improvement in the physical summary component was structural cardiopathy.