Mechanisms of sister chromatid pairing

Acentric chromosome congression and alignment on the metaphase plate via kinetochore-independent forces in Drosophila

Chromosome congression and alignment on the metaphase plate involves lateral and microtubule plus-end interactions with the kinetochore. Here we take advantage of our ability to efficiently generate a GFP-marked acentric X chromosome fragment in Drosophila neuroblasts to identify forces acting on chromosome arms that drive congression and alignment. We find acentrics efficiently align on the metaphase plate, often more rapidly than kinetochore-bearing chromosomes. Unlike intact chromosomes, the paired sister acentrics oscillate as they move to and reside on the metaphase plate in a plane distinct and significantly further from the main mass of intact chromosomes. Consequently, at anaphase onset acentrics are oriented either parallel or perpendicular to the spindle. Parallel-oriented sisters separate by sliding while those oriented perpendicularly separate via unzipping. This oscillation, together with the fact that in monopolar spindles acentrics are rapidly shunted away from the poles, indicates that distributed plus-end directed forces are primarily responsible for acentric migration. This conclusion is supported by the observation that reduction of EB1 preferentially disrupts acentric alignment. In addition, reduction of Klp3a activity, a gene required for the establishment of pole-to-pole microtubules, preferentially disrupts acentric alignment. Taken together these studies suggest that plus-end forces mediated by the outer pole-to-pole microtubules are primarily responsible for acentric metaphase alignment. Surprisingly, we find that a small fraction of sister acentrics are anti-parallel aligned indicating that the kinetochore is required to ensure parallel alignment of sister chromatids. Finally, we find induction of acentric chromosome fragments results in a global reorganization of the congressed chromosomes into a torus configuration.

Article Summary

The kinetochore serves as a site for attaching microtubules and allows for successful alignment, separation, and segregation of replicated sister chromosomes during cell division. However, previous studies have revealed that sister chromosomes without kinetochores (acentrics) often align to the metaphase plate, undergo separation and segregation, and are properly transmitted to daughter cells. In this study, we discuss the forces acting on chromosomes, independent of the kinetochore, underlying their successful alignment in early mitosis.

Somatic chromosome pairing has a determinant impact on 3D chromatin organization

In the nucleus, chromatin is intricately structured into multiple layers of 3D organization important for genome activity. How distinct layers influence each other is not well understood. In particular, the contribution of chromosome pairing to 3D chromatin organization has been largely neglected. Here, we address this question in Drosophila, an organism that shows robust chromosome pairing in interphasic somatic cells. The extent of chromosome pairing depends on the balance between pairing and anti-pairing factors, with the anti-pairing activity of the CAP-H2 condensin II subunit being the best documented. Here, we identify the zinc-finger protein Z4 as a strong anti-pairer that interacts with and mediates the chromatin binding of CAP-H2. We also report that hyperosmotic cellular stress induces fast and reversible chromosome unpairing that depends on Z4/CAP-H2. And, most important, by combining Z4 depletion and osmostress, we show that chromosome pairing reinforces intrachromosomal 3D interactions. On the one hand, pairing facilitates RNAPII occupancy that correlates with enhanced intragenic gene-loop interactions. In addition, acting at a distance, pairing reinforces chromatin-loop interactions mediated by Polycomb (Pc). In contrast, chromosome pairing does not affect which genomic intervals segregate to active (A) and inactive (B) compartments, with only minimal effects on the strength of A-A compartmental interactions. Altogether, our results unveil the intimate interplay between inter-chromosomal and intra-chromosomal 3D interactions, unraveling the interwoven relationship between different layers of chromatin organization and the essential contribution of chromosome pairing.

IRX3/5 regulate mitotic chromatid segregation and limb bud shape

Pattern formation is influenced by transcriptional regulation as well as by morphogenetic mechanisms that shape organ primordia, although factors that link these processes remain under-appreciated. Here we show that, apart from their established transcriptional roles in pattern formation, IRX3/5 help to shape the limb bud primordium by promoting the separation and intercalation of dividing mesodermal cells. Surprisingly, IRX3/5 are required for appropriate cell cycle progression and chromatid segregation during mitosis, possibly in a nontranscriptional manner. IRX3/5 associate with, promote the abundance of, and share overlapping functions with co-regulators of cell division such as the cohesin subunits SMC1, SMC3, NIPBL and CUX1. The findings imply that IRX3/5 coordinate early limb bud morphogenesis with skeletal pattern formation.

Condensins and cohesins - one of these things is not like the other!

Condensins and cohesins are highly conserved complexes that tether together DNA loci within a single DNA molecule to produce DNA loops. Condensin and cohesin structures, however, are different, and the DNA loops produced by each underlie distinct cell processes. Condensin rods compact chromosomes during mitosis, with condensin I and II complexes producing spatially defined and nested looping in metazoan cells. Structurally adaptive cohesin rings produce loops, which organize the genome during interphase. Cohesin-mediated loops, termed topologically associating domains or TADs, antagonize the formation of epigenetically defined but untethered DNA volumes, termed compartments. While condensin complexes formed through cis-interactions must maintain chromatin compaction throughout mitosis, cohesins remain highly dynamic during interphase to allow for transcription-mediated responses to external cues and the execution of developmental programs. Here, I review differences in condensin and cohesin structures, and highlight recent advances regarding the intramolecular or cis-based tetherings through which condensins compact DNA during mitosis and cohesins organize the genome during interphase.

Pds5 regulators segregate cohesion and condensation pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Cohesins are required both for the tethering together of sister chromatids (termed cohesion) and subsequent condensation into discrete structures-processes fundamental for faithful chromosome segregation into daughter cells. Differentiating between cohesin roles in cohesion and condensation would provide an important advance in studying chromatin metabolism. Pds5 is a cohesin-associated factor that is essential for both cohesion maintenance and condensation. Recent studies revealed that ELG1 deletion suppresses the temperature sensitivity of pds5 mutant cells. However, the mechanisms through which Elg1 may regulate cohesion and condensation remain unknown. Here, we report that ELG1 deletion from pds5-1 mutant cells results in a significant rescue of cohesion, but not condensation, defects. Based on evidence that Elg1 unloads the DNA replication clamp PCNA from DNA, we tested whether PCNA overexpression would similarly rescue pds5-1 mutant cell cohesion defects. The results indeed reveal that elevated levels of PCNA rescue pds5-1 temperature sensitivity and cohesion defects, but do not rescue pds5-1 mutant cell condensation defects. In contrast, RAD61 deletion rescues the condensation defect, but importantly, neither the temperature sensitivity nor cohesion defects exhibited by pds5-1 mutant cells. In combination, these findings reveal that cohesion and condensation are separable pathways and regulated in nonredundant mechanisms. These results are discussed in terms of a new model through which cohesion and condensation are spatially regulated.

Functional characterization of kinetochore protein, Ctf19 in meiosis I: an implication of differential impact of Ctf19 on the assembly of mitotic and meiotic kinetochores in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Meiosis is a specialized cell division process through which chromosome numbers are reduced by half for the generation of gametes. Kinetochore, a multiprotein complex that connects centromeres to microtubules, plays essential role in chromosome segregation. Ctf19 is the key central kinetochore protein that recruits all the other non-essential proteins of the Ctf19 complex in budding yeast. Earlier studies have shown the role of Ctf19 complex in enrichment of cohesin around the centromeres both during mitosis and meiosis, leading to sister chromatid cohesion and meiosis II disjunction. Here we show that Ctf19 is also essential for the proper execution of the meiosis I specific unique events, such as non-homologous centromere coupling, homologue pairing, chiasmata resolution and proper orientation of homologues and sister chromatids with respect to the spindle poles. Additionally, this investigation reveals that proper kinetochore function is required for faithful chromosome condensation in meiosis. Finally, this study suggests that absence of Ctf19 affects the integrity of meiotic kinetochore differently than that of the mitotic kinetochore. Consequently, absence of Ctf19 leads to gross chromosome missegregation during meiosis as compared with mitosis. Hence, this study reports for the first time the differential impact of a non-essential kinetochore protein on the mitotic and meiotic kinetochore ensembles and hence chromosome segregation.

Chl1 DNA helicase regulates Scc2 deposition specifically during DNA-replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The conserved family of cohesin proteins that mediate sister chromatid cohesion requires Scc2, Scc4 for chromatin-association and Eco1/Ctf7 for conversion to a tethering competent state. A popular model, based on the notion that cohesins form huge ring-like structures, is that Scc2, Scc4 function is essential only during G1 such that sister chromatid cohesion results simply from DNA replisome passage through pre-loaded cohesin rings. In such a scenario, cohesin deposition during G1 is temporally uncoupled from Eco1-dependent establishment reactions that occur during S-phase. Chl1 DNA helicase (homolog of human ChlR1/DDX11 and BACH1/BRIP1/FANCJ helicases implicated in Fanconi anemia, breast and ovarian cancer and Warsaw Breakage Syndrome) plays a critical role in sister chromatid cohesion, however, the mechanism through which Chl1 promotes cohesion remains poorly understood. Here, we report that Chl1 promotes Scc2 loading unto DNA such that both Scc2 and cohesin enrichment to chromatin are defective in chl1 mutant cells. The results further show that both Chl1 expression and chromatin-recruitment are tightly regulated through the cell cycle, peaking during S-phase. Importantly, kinetic ChIP studies reveals that Chl1 is required for Scc2 chromatin-association specifically during S-phase, but not during G1. Despite normal chromatin enrichment of both Scc2 and cohesin during G1, chl1 mutant cells exhibit severe chromosome segregation and cohesion defects--revealing that G1-loaded cohesins is insufficient to promote cohesion. Based on these findings, we propose a new model wherein S-phase cohesin loading occurs during DNA replication and in concert with both cohesion establishment and chromatin assembly reactions--challenging the notion that DNA replication fork navigates through or around pre-loaded cohesin rings.

Cohesin codes - interpreting chromatin architecture and the many facets of cohesin function

Sister chromatid tethering is maintained by cohesin complexes that minimally contain Smc1, Smc3, Mcd1 and Scc3. During S-phase, chromatin-associated cohesins are modified by the Eco1/Ctf7 family of acetyltransferases. Eco1 proteins function during S phase in the context of replicated sister chromatids to convert chromatin-bound cohesins to a tethering-competent state, but also during G2 and M phases in response to double-stranded breaks to promote error-free DNA repair. Cohesins regulate transcription and are essential for ribosome biogenesis and complete chromosome condensation. Little is known, however, regarding the mechanisms through which cohesin functions are directed. Recent findings reveal that Eco1-mediated acetylation of different lysine residues in Smc3 during S phase promote either cohesion or condensation. Phosphorylation and SUMOylation additionally impact cohesin functions. Here, we posit the existence of a cohesin code, analogous to the histone code introduced over a decade ago, and speculate that there is a symphony of post-translational modifications that direct cohesins to function across a myriad of cellular processes. We also discuss evidence that outdate the notion that cohesion defects are singularly responsible for cohesion-mutant-cell inviability. We conclude by proposing that cohesion establishment is linked to chromatin formation.

Cohesin: a guardian of genome integrity

Ability to reproduce is one of the hallmark features of all life forms by which new organisms are produced from their progenitors. During this process each cell duplicates its genome and passes a copy of its genome to the daughter cells along with the cellular matrix. Unlike bacteria, in eukaryotes there is a definite time gap between when the genome is duplicated and when it is physically separated. Therefore, for precise halving of the duplicated genome into two, it is required that each pair of duplicated chromosomes, termed sister chromatids, should be paired together in a binary fashion from the moment they are generated. This pairing function between the duplicated genome is primarily provided by a multimeric protein complex, called cohesin. Thus, genome integrity largely depends on cohesin as it ensures faithful chromosome segregation by holding the sister chromatids glued together from S phase to anaphase. In this review, we have discussed the life cycle of cohesin during both mitotic and meiotic cell divisions including the structure and architecture of cohesin complex, relevance of cohesin associated proteins, mechanism of cohesin loading onto the chromatin, cohesion establishment and the mechanism of cohesin disassembly during anaphase to separate the sister chromatids. We have also focused on the role of posttranslational modifications in cohesin biology. For better understanding of the complexity of the cohesin regulatory network to the readers, we have presented an interactome profiling of cohesin core subunits in budding yeast during mitosis and meiosis.

Sister chromatid cohesion establishment occurs in concert with lagging strand synthesis

Cohesion establishment is central to sister chromatid tethering reactions and requires Ctf7/Eco1-dependent acetylation of the cohesin subunit Smc3. Ctf7/Eco1 is essential during S phase, and a number of replication proteins (RFC complexes, PCNA and the DNA helicase Chl1) all play individual roles in sister chromatid cohesion. While the mechanism of cohesion establishment is largely unknown, a popular model is that Ctf7/Eco1 acetylates cohesins encountered by and located in front of the fork. In turn, acetylation is posited both to allow fork passage past cohesin barriers and convert cohesins to a state competent to capture subsequent production of sister chromatids. Here, we report evidence that challenges this pre-replicative cohesion establishment model. Our genetic and biochemical studies link Ctf7/Eco1 to the Okazaki fragment flap endonuclease, Fen1. We further report genetic and biochemical interactions between Fen1 and the cohesion-associated DNA helicase, Chl1. These results raise a new model wherein cohesin deposition and establishment occur in concert with lagging strand-processing events and in the presence of both sister chromatids.

Many functions of the meiotic cohesin

Sister chromatids are held together from the time of their formation in S phase until they segregate in anaphase by the cohesin complex. In meiosis of most organisms, the mitotic Mcd1/Scc1/Rad21 subunit of the cohesin complex is largely replaced by its paralog named Rec8. This article reviews the specialized functions of Rec8 that are crucial for diverse aspects of chromosome dynamics in meiosis, and presents some speculations relating to meiotic chromosome organization.

Rfc5p regulates alternate RFC complex functions in sister chromatid pairing reactions in budding yeast

Sister chromatid pairing reactions, termed cohesion establishment, occur during S-phase and appear to be regulated by Replication Factor C (RFC) complexes. For instance, RFCs that contain Ctf18p exhibit pro-establishment activities while those that contain Elg1p exhibit anti-establishment activities. It remains unknown whether Ctf18p-RFC and Elg1p-RFC functions are simply opposing or instead reveal complicated and non-parallel regulatory mechanisms. To better understand the nature of these novel pathways, we analyzed the small RFC subunit Rfc5p that is common to both Ctf18p-RFC and Elg1p-RFC. Despite this commonality, the data show that diminished Rfc5p function rescues ctf7/eco1 mutant cell phenotypes, revealing that Rfc5p promotes anti-establishment activities. This rescue is specific to establishment pathways in that rfc5-1 greatly accentuates growth defects when expressed in scc2 (deposition), mcd1/scc1 or smc3 (cohesion maintenance) mutated cells. Our results reveal for the first time a role for small RFC subunits in directing RFC complex functions-in this case towards anti-establishment pathways. We further report that Pds5p exhibits both establishment and anti-establishment functions in cohesion. This duality suggests that categorizations of establishment and anti-establishment activities require further examination.

Replication factor C complexes play unique pro- and anti-establishment roles in sister chromatid cohesion

Recent studies have lead to a rapid expansion of sister chromatid cohesion pathways. Of particular interest is the growth in classifications of anti-establishment factors-now including those that are cohesin-associated (Rad61/WAPL and Pds5) or DNA replication fork-associated (Elg1-RFC). In this study, we show that the two classes of anti-establishment complexes are indistinguishable when challenged both genetically and functionally. These findings suggest that both classes function in a singular pathway that is centered on Ctf7/Eco1 (herein termed Ctf7) regulation. The anti-establishment activity of Elg1-RFC complex is particular intriguing given that an alternate Ctf18-RFC complex exhibits robust pro-establishment activity. Here, we provide several lines of evidence, including the use of Ctf7 bypass suppressors, indicating that these activities are not simply antagonistic. Moreover, the results suggest that Ctf18-RFC is capable of promoting sister chromatid pairing reactions independent of Ctf7. The combination of these studies suggest a new model of sister chromatid pairing regulation.

Epitope tag-induced synthetic lethality between cohesin subunits and Ctf7/Eco1 acetyltransferase

Ctf7/Eco1-dependent acetylation of Smc3 is essential for sister chromatid cohesion. Here, we use epitope tag-induced lethality in cells diminished for Ctf7/Eco1 activity to map cohesin architecture in vivo. Tagging either Smc1 or Mcd1/Scc1, but not Scc3/Irr1, appears to abolish access to Smc3 in ctf7/eco1 mutant cells, suggesting that Smc1 and Smc3 head domains are in direct contact with each other and also with Mcd1/Scc1. Thus, cohesin complexes may be much more compact than commonly portrayed. We further demonstrate that mutation in ELG1 or RFC5 anti-establishment genes suppress tag-induced lethality, consistent with the notion that the replication fork regulates Ctf7/Eco1.

Buck the establishment: reinventing sister chromatid cohesion

The time between chromosome replication and segregation can be from hours to decades. Cohesion is thus crucial for identifying replication products as sister chromatids from S-phase until mitosis. Early models posited active sister chromatid tethering reactions in which cohesins deposited onto each sister chromatid are converted to a paired state by replication-fork-associated establishment factors. Subsequent, but now largely marginalized, models suggested instead that establishment occurs passively - requiring only cohesin preloading and passage of the replication fork through huge cohesin rings. More recent models return to active establishment reactions but remain predicated on preloaded ring structures. Here, new models are presented in which replication-coupled cohesin deposition is followed by conversion to a pairing-competent C-clamp structure that does not require DNA entrapment.

Complex regulation of sister kinetochore orientation in meiosis-I

Kinetochores mediate chromosome movement during cell division by interacting with the spindle microtubules. Sexual reproduction necessitates the daunting task of reducing ploidy (number of chromosome sets) in the gametes, which depends upon the specialized properties of meiosis. Kinetochores have a central role in the reduction process. In this review, we discuss the complexity of this role of kinetochores in meiosis-I.

Cohesins coordinate gene transcriptions of related function within Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Cohesion factors pair together sister chromatids from early S-phase until anaphase onset. Numerous findings also establish an additional role in transcription. In humans, mutations in cohesion factors result in developmental abnormalities such as Cornelia de Lange, Roberts Syndrome/SC-Phocomelia, Rothman-Thompson Syndrome and others. While clinically relevant, a detailed study that links experimentally-defined cohesin defects to transcriptional changes remains lacking. Here, we report on the effects of cohesin inactivation during an early and discrete portion of the cell cycle. Even transient cohesin inactivation during the G1 portion of the cell cycle results in significant and reproducible changes in transcription. Surprisingly, over a third of the affected genes exhibit inter-related functions, suggesting that cohesin positioning along chromosomes evolved to coordinate gene expression. Prior studies indicate that defects in rRNA maturation/ribosome biogenesis produce developmental maladies in humans. Thus, the identification of genes critical for rRNA maturation in this study is of particular interest.

Establishment of sister chromatid cohesion

The process of sister chromatid pairing, or cohesion establishment, is coupled to DNA replication and fundamental to proper chromosome segregation and cell viability. In the past year, several articles have provided important new insights into cohesion establishment, an activity predicated on the acetyltransferase Ctf7/Eco1. Here, I review new findings that the conversion of chromatid-bound cohesins into a cohesion-competent state involves Ctf7/Eco1-mediated acetylation of the cohesin subunit Smc3. These studies further explore an anti-establishment activity that involves the binding of accessory factors WAPL/Rad61 and Pds5 to the cohesin subunit Scc3/Irr1. The anti-establishment activity of WAPL/Rad61 and Pds5 is temporarily relaxed by Ctf7/Eco1 during S phase to promote sister chromatid pairing. These findings are likely to be of clinical relevance, given the role of cohesion pathways in a wide range of disease states.

Cohesins: chromatin architects in chromosome segregation, control of gene expression and much more

Cells have evolved to develop molecules and control mechanisms that guarantee correct chromosome segregation and ensure the proper distribution of genetic material to daughter cells. In this sense, the establishment, maintenance, and removal of sister chromatid cohesion is one of the most fascinating and dangerous processes in the life of a cell because errors in the control of these processes frequently lead to cell death or aneuploidy. The main protagonist in this mechanism is a four-protein complex denominated the cohesin complex. In the last 10 years, we have improved our understanding of the key players in the regulation of sister chromatid cohesion during cell division in mitosis and meiosis. The last 2 years have seen an increase in evidence showing that cohesins have important functions in non-dividing cells, revealing new, unexplored roles for these proteins in the control of gene expression, development, and other essential cell functions in mammals.

Sister chromatid cohesion role for CDC28-CDK in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

High-fidelity chromosome segregation requires that the sister chromatids produced during S phase also become paired during S phase. Ctf7p (Eco1p) is required to establish sister chromatid pairing specifically during DNA replication. However, Ctf7p also becomes active during G2/M in response to DNA damage. Ctf7p is a phosphoprotein and an in vitro target of Cdc28p cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK), suggesting one possible mechanism for regulating the essential function of Ctf7p. Here, we report a novel synthetic lethal interaction between ctf7 and cdc28. However, neither elevated CDC28 levels nor CDC28 Cak1p-bypass alleles rescue ctf7 cell phenotypes. Moreover, cells expressing Ctf7p mutated at all full- and partial-consensus CDK-phosphorylation sites exhibit robust cell growth. These and other results reveal that Ctf7p regulation is more complicated than previously envisioned and suggest that CDK acts in sister chromatid cohesion parallel to Ctf7p reactions.