International guideline recommendations and eligibility criteria for home oxygen therapy

The benefits and drawbacks of home oxygen therapy for COPD: what's next?

INTRODUCTION

Home oxygen therapy is one of the few interventions that can improve survival in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) when administered appropriately, although it may cause side effects and be an unnecessary burden for some patients.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review summarizes the current literature on the assessment of hypoxemia, different types of home oxygen therapy, potential beneficial and adverse effects, and emerging research on home oxygen therapy in COPD. A literature search was performed using MEDLINE and EMBASE up to January 2024, with additional articles being identified through clinical guidelines.

EXPERT OPINION

Hypoxemia is common in patients with more severe COPD. Long-term oxygen therapy is established to prolong survival in patients with chronic severe resting hypoxemia. Conversely, in the absence of chronic severe resting hypoxemia, home oxygen therapy has an unclear or conflicting evidence base, including for palliation of breathlessness, and is generally not recommended. However, beneficial effects in some patients cannot be precluded. Evidence is emerging on the optimal daily duration of oxygen use, the role of high-flow and auto-titrated oxygen therapy, improved informed decision-making, and telemonitoring. Further research is needed to validate novel oxygen delivery systems and monitoring tools and establish long-term effects of ambulatory oxygen therapy in COPD.

Smoking and home oxygen therapy: a review and consensus statement from a multidisciplinary Swedish taskforce

BACKGROUND

Home oxygen therapy (HOT) improves survival in patients with hypoxaemic chronic respiratory disease. Most patients evaluated for HOT are former or active smokers. Oxygen accelerates combustion and smoking may increase the risk of burn injuries and fire hazards; therefore, it is considered a contraindication for HOT in many countries. However, there is variability in the practices and policies regarding this matter. This multidisciplinary Swedish taskforce aimed to review the potential benefits and risks of smoking in relation to HOT, including medical, practical, legal and ethical considerations.

METHODS

The taskforce of the Swedish Respiratory Society comprises 15 members across respiratory medicine, nursing, medical law and ethics. HOT effectiveness and adverse risks related to smoking, as well as practical, legal and ethical considerations, were reviewed, resulting in five general questions and four PICO (population-intervention-comparator-outcome) questions. The strength of each recommendation was rated according to the GRADE (grading of recommendation assessment, development and evaluation) methodology.

RESULTS

General questions about the practical, legal and ethical aspects of HOT were discussed and summarised in the document. The PICO questions resulted in recommendations about assessment, management and follow-up of smoking when considering HOT, if HOT should be offered to people that meet the eligibility criteria but who continue to smoke, if a specific length of time of smoking cessation should be considered before assessing eligibility for HOT, and identification of areas for further research.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple factors need to be considered in the benefit/risk evaluation of HOT in active smokers. A systematic approach is suggested to guide healthcare professionals in evaluating HOT in relation to smoking.

Supplemental Oxygen Therapy in Interstitial Lung Disease: A Narrative Review

Patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILD) often have hypoxemia at rest and/or with exertion, for which supplemental oxygen is commonly prescribed. The number of patients with ILD who require supplemental oxygen is unknown, although estimates suggest it could be as much as 40%; many of these patients may require high-flow support (>4 L/min). Despite its frequent use, there is limited evidence for the impact of supplemental oxygen on clinical outcomes in ILD, with recommendations for its use primarily based on older studies in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Oxygen use in ILD is rarely included as an outcome in clinical trials. Available evidence suggests that supplemental oxygen in ILD may improve quality of life and some exercise parameters in patients whose hypoxemia is a limiting factor; however, oxygen therapy also places new burdens and barriers on some patients that may counter its beneficial effects. The cost of supplemental oxygen in ILD is also unknown but likely represents a significant portion of overall healthcare costs in these patients. Current Centers for Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement policies provide only a modest increase in payment for high oxygen flows, which may negatively impact access to oxygen services and equipment for some patients with ILD. Future studies should examine clinical and quality-of-life outcomes for oxygen use in ILD. In the meantime, given the current limited evidence for supplemental oxygen and considering cost factors and other barriers, providers should take a patient-focused approach when considering supplemental oxygen prescriptions in patients with ILD.