Reducing treatment burden in the era of CFTR modulators

Update on advances in cystic fibrosis towards a cure and implications for primary care clinicians

During the past quarter century, the diagnosis and treatment of cystic fibrosis (CF) have been transformed by molecular sciences that initiated a new era with discovery of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene. The knowledge gained from that breakthrough has had dramatic clinical impact. Although once a diagnostic dilemma with long delays, preventable deaths, and irreversible pathology, CF can now be routinely diagnosed shortly after birth through newborn screening programs. This strategy of pre-symptomatic identification has eliminated the common diagnostic "odyssey" that was a failure of the healthcare delivery system causing psychologically traumatic experiences for parents. Therapeutic advances of many kinds have culminated in CFTR modulator treatment that can reduce the effects of or even correct the molecular defect in the chloride channel -the basic cause of CF. This astonishing advance has transformed CF care as described fully herein. Despite this impressive progress, there are challenges and controversies in the delivery of care. Issues include how best to achieve high sensitivity newborn screening with acceptable specificity; what course of action is appropriate for children who are identified through the unavoidable incidental findings of screening tests (CFSPID/CRMS cases and heterozygote carriers); how best to ensure genetic counseling; when to initiate the very expensive but life-saving CFTR modulator drugs; how to identify new CFTR modulator drugs for patients with non-responsive CFTR variants; how to adjust other therapeutic modalities; and how to best partner with primary care clinicians. Progress always brings new challenges, and this has been evident worldwide for CF. Consequently, this article summarizes the major advances of recent years along with controversies and describes their implications with an international perspective.

The cost of simplifying treatments for cystic fibrosis: Implications of the SIMPLIFY trial

BACKGROUND

Dornase alfa and hypertonic saline are mucoactive therapies that can improve respiratory symptoms in people with cystic fibrosis (CF). A recent randomized control trial showed that participants with well-preserved pulmonary function taking elexacaftor + tezacaftor + ivacaftor (ETI) who discontinued dornase alfa or hypertonic saline for 6 weeks had no clinically meaningful decline in lung function. This may prompt discussions with care providers regarding ongoing use of these medications.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the costs of outpatient medications between people taking ETI who continued or discontinued (1) dornase alfa or (2) hypertonic saline from 2 clinical trials and project cost differences in the US CF population if these 2 medications were used only intermittently for symptom relief instead of chronically.

METHODS

The SIMPLIFY study was 2 parallel multicenter trials that randomized participants 1:1 to either continue or discontinue therapy. To estimate costs, we used data from the Merative MarketScan Databases to identify people with CF from 2020 to 2021. Our primary outcomes were differences in costs of outpatient prescription drugs among those who continued vs discontinued dornase alfa and, separately, hypertonic saline. We obtained adjusted differences in median costs. To estimate the annual cost savings if the population of people with CF taking ETI used these medications only intermittently, we multiplied the proportion of people in MarketScan with CF diagnoses who were taking each of these medications by the median cost savings per year and subtracted the cost of "rescue" use.

RESULTS

A total of 392 participants from the dornase alfa trial and 273 from the hypertonic saline trial were included in analyses. The adjusted difference in median medication costs was not significant for the hypertonic saline trial, but we observed a significantly decreased 6-week cost of medications in the dornase alfa trial (adjusted median difference in costs between discontinue and continue of $5,860 (95% CI = $4,870-$6,850); P < 0.0001). We estimated that two-thirds of people with CF use ETI and dornase alfa in the United States; if they discontinued dornase alfa except for intermittent use, the resulting annual savings would be $1.21 billion.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the costs of dornase alfa and hypertonic saline are smaller compared with ETI, reduction in use would lead to substantial prescription drug cost savings and reduce the treatment burden. However, individual benefits of these therapies should be considered, and decisions regarding changes in therapy remain an important discussion between people with CF and their providers. Study registration number: NCT04378153.

Chronic daily respiratory care needs in people with cystic fibrosis treated with highly effective cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator modulators

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cystic fibrosis is a genetic disease that increases risk of death from respiratory failure because of impairment in mucociliary clearance. Complex daily care regimens including medications and airway clearance techniques (ACTs) aim to preserve lung function and alleviate symptoms for people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF). The success of highly effective modulator therapy (HEMT) permits evaluation of treatment simplification. In this review, we evaluate adjustments made in daily respiratory care among pwCF taking HEMT and the feasibility of treatment simplification.

RECENT FINDINGS

Treatment simplification has been identified as a top priority among pwCF, with recent studies showing pwCF are willing to sacrifice mild to moderate amounts of lung function and longevity to reduce treatment burden. Retrospective studies have shown that patients taking HEMT with better baseline lung function have lower adherence to and prescription of inhaled medications. A randomized, controlled trial found that short-term discontinuation of dornase alfa or hypertonic saline was clinically noninferior to continuation of these medications. Major knowledge gaps remain about withdrawing ACTs.

SUMMARY

This review highlights trials evaluating the feasibility of treatment simplification among pwCF taking HEMT. More data is needed to evaluate approaches to simplification in this phenotypically diverse patient population.