Building a strategic alliance to end coercion of people with mental disorders in Indonesia

Pasung: A qualitative study of shackling family members with mental illness in Indonesia

Use of coercion on people with mental illness is a deeply embedded practice around the world. Not only does the practice raise human rights issues, it also leads to further mental, physical, and emotional harms. In Indonesia, 'pasung' is a common practice of physical restraint, which involves lay people using a variety of illegal methods to tie a person. In this article, we explore the meanings families attach to their actions when using pasung by asking the question: to what extent does the use of pasung by families emerge from socioculturally prescribed norms and conventions? To explore this question, we conducted and analysed eight interviews with family members from Nias Island, Indonesia using Giorgi's descriptive phenomenological method. Our findings reveal that pasung emerges in the disjunction between sociocultural demands and the family's capacity to meet these demands. Struggling to understand the behaviour of a family member with mental illness, the family tries to cope with neighbourhood reactions to ever more visible behavioural signs alongside managing their everyday life. These struggles, in turn, make their social situation increasingly stressful, which initiates a process of depersonalization as a response. Moreover, the prevailing sociocultural values convey a need to act according to expected norms. As such, pasung materializes as a socioculturally accepted practice that allows families to take back control in stressful social situations. In sum, when families feel overwhelming emotional stress and a sense of powerlessness, they try to resolve their situation by using pasung to regain control and thus manage their lives.

An Evidence-Based Educational Intervention for Reducing Coercive Measures in Psychiatric Hospitals: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Investing in health care staffs' education can change the scope of action and improve care. The effectiveness of staff education remains inconclusive.

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether an evidence-based educational intervention for nurses decreases the use of seclusion rooms in psychiatric hospitals compared with usual practice.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

In this pragmatic, 2-arm parallel, stratified cluster randomized clinical trial, 28 wards in 15 psychiatric hospitals in Finland were screened for eligibility and randomly allocated (1:1). Nurses joined on either intervention (n = 13) or usual practice (n = 15) wards. The intervention was performed from May 1, 2016, to October 31, 2017. The follow-up data for January 1 to December 31, 2017, were collected from hospital registers in 2018. Data analysis was performed October 27, 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

Evidence-based education delivered during 18 months, including 8 months of active education, followed by a 10-month maintenance period.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the occurrence of patient seclusion (events per total number of patients).

RESULTS

Of 28 psychiatric hospital wards screened (437 beds and 648 nurses), 27 wards completed the study. A total of 8349 patients were receiving care in the study wards, with 53% male patients and a mean (SD) age of 40.6 (5.7) years. The overall number of seclusions was 1209 (14.5%) in 2015 and 1349 (16.5%) in 2017. In the intervention group, the occurrence rate of seclusion at the ward level decreased by 5.3% from 629 seclusions among 4163 patients (15.1%) to 585 seclusions among 4089 patients (14.3%) compared with a 34.7% increase from 580 seclusions among 4186 patients (13.9%) to 764 seclusions among 4092 patients (18.7%) in the usual practice group. The adjusted rate ratio was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.40-1.82) in 2015 and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.31-1.41) in 2017 (P = .003). However, the number of forced injections increased in the intervention group from 317 events among 4163 patients (7.6%) in 2015 to 486 events among 4089 patients (11.9%) in 2017 compared with an increase in the usual practice group from 414 events among 4186 patients (9.9%) in 2015 to 481 events among 4092 patients (11.8%) in 2017. Seven adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this randomized clinical trial, the educational intervention had a limited effect on the change of occurrence rate of patient seclusion, whereas the use of forced injections increased. More studies are needed to better understand the reasons for these findings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02724748.