Response comparison of multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance to the same anti-myeloma therapy: a retrospective cohort study

Early M-protein immune reconstitution after autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a good prognostic marker for patients with high-risk cytogenetic multiple myeloma

The presence of transient abnormal protein banding (M-protein immune reconstitution) in serum immunofixation electrophoresis after autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma has been reported. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of post-transplant M-protein immune reconstitution on the prognosis of patients with multiple myeloma. M-protein immune reconstitution was observed in 25.9% (75/290) of patients. The CR rate and MRD negativity were higher in the M-protein immune reconstitution group (85.3% vs. 69.3%, p = 0.013, 81.9% vs. 66.5%, p = 0.014). Although there were no significant differences between the groups, the overall median survival time was longer in the M-protein immune reconstruction group (80 vs. 72 m, p = 0.076; not reached vs. 105 m, p = 0.312). Among patients in the cytogenetic high-risk group, the occurrence of M-protein immune reconstitution predicted better PFS and OS (80 vs. 31 m, p = 0.010; not reached vs. 91 m, p = 0.026). Additionally, in revised-International Staging System stage III patients, PFS and OS were better in those who achieved M-protein immune reconstitution (80 vs. 20 m, p = 0.025; 57 vs. 32 m, p = 0.103). The better prognosis of M-protein immune reconstitution patients may be associated with the acquisition of a deeper response. In high-risk patients, early acquisition of M-protein immune reconstitution may suggest a better prognosis.

Monoclonal gammopathy of increasing significance: time to screen?

Monoclonal gammopathy (MG) is a frequently detected clonal B-cell or plasma-cell disorder. Importantly, every multiple myeloma (MM) case is preceded by MG. Although clinical algorithms now allow earlier treatment of patients with biomarkers of malignancy before MM-induced tissue damage (CRAB) occurs, most patients are still diagnosed late. It is important to revisit how MG should be managed in clinical practice and whether screening is required. As the prevalence of MG and other medical co-morbidities both rise with increasing age, the degree of contribution of MG to disease states other than malignant progression is often unclear. This can lead to monitoring lapses and under recognition of the organ dysfunction that can occur with monoclonal gammopathy of clinical significance (MGCS). Therefore, models of progression to MM and/or MGCS require further refinement. While MG is currently detected incidentally, a case for screening has been made with ongoing studies in this area. Screening has the potential benefit of earlier detection and prevention of both MGCS and delayed MM presentations, but important drawbacks include the psychosocial impact on individuals and resource burden on healthcare services. MG terminology should transition alongside our increasing understanding of the condition and genomic characterization that have already begun to revise the MG nomenclature. The biology of MG has been poorly understood and is often inferred from the biology of MM, which is unhelpful. We review the literature and case for MG screening in this paper. In particular, we highlight areas that require focus to establish screening for MG.

Immune Signatures Associated With Clonal Isotype Switch After Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma

BACKGROUND

High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) are integral components of the overall treatment for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) aged ≤ 65 years. The emergence of oligoclonal immunoglobulin bands (ie, immunoglobulins differing from those originally identified at diagnosis [termed clonal isotype switch (CIS)]) has been reported in patients with MM after high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation. However, the clinical relevance and the correlation with immune reconstitution remains unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with MM who had undergone ASCT from 2007 to 2016 were included in the present study. The percentage of natural killer cells, B-cells, and T-cells was measured using flow cytometry in pre- and post-ASCT bone marrow samples. CIS was defined as the appearance of a new serum monoclonal spike on serum protein electrophoresis and immunofixation that differed from original heavy or light chain detected at diagnosis.

RESULTS

A retrospective analysis of 177 patients with MM who had undergone ASCT detected CIS in 39 (22%). CIS after ASCT correlated with improved progression-free survival (52.2 vs. 36.6 months; P = .21) and overall survival (75.1 vs. 65.4 months; P = .021). Patients with a relapse had an isotype that differed from a CIS, confirming the benign nature of this phenomenon. CIS was also associated with lower CD8 T-cell percentages and a greater CD4/CD8 ratio (2.8 vs. 0.2; P = .001) compared with patients who did not demonstrate a CIS, suggestive of more profound T-cell immune reconstitution in this group.

CONCLUSION

Taken together, our data have demonstrated that a CIS is a benign phenomenon and correlates with a reduced disease burden and enriched immune repertoire beyond the B-cell compartment.

Mass spectrometry methods for detecting monoclonal immunoglobulins in multiple myeloma minimal residual disease

Mass spectrometry methods that can detect low levels of monoclonal immunoglobulin in serum have recently been developed. These assays are based on the principle that each immunoglobulin has a unique amino acid sequence and therefore, has a unique mass. This mass can be used as a surrogate marker in order to monitor a patient's disease over time and at low levels. Here, we explain these methods, discuss their advantages and disadvantages and how they may be used to monitor monoclonal immunoglobulins for minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma.