1
|
Moreau P, Hulin C, Perrot A, Arnulf B, Belhadj K, Benboubker L, Zweegman S, Caillon H, Caillot D, Avet-Loiseau H, Delforge M, Dejoie T, Facon T, Sonntag C, Fontan J, Mohty M, Jie KS, Karlin L, Kuhnowski F, Lambert J, Leleu X, Macro M, Orsini-Piocelle F, Roussel M, Schiano de Colella JM, van de Donk NW, Wuillème S, Broijl A, Touzeau C, Tiab M, Marolleau JP, Meuleman N, Vekemans MC, Westerman M, Klein SK, Levin MD, Offner F, Escoffre-Barbe M, Eveillard JR, Garidi R, Hua W, Wang J, Tuozzo A, de Boer C, Rowe M, Vanquickelberghe V, Carson R, Vermeulen J, Corre J, Sonneveld P. Bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone with or without daratumumab and followed by daratumumab maintenance or observation in transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: long-term follow-up of the CASSIOPEIA randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:1003-1014. [PMID: 38889735 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00282-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2024] [Revised: 05/10/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CASSIOPEIA part 1 demonstrated superior depth of response and prolonged progression-free survival with daratumumab in combination with bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (D-VTd) versus bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd) alone as an induction and consolidation regimen in transplant-eligible patients newly diagnosed with myeloma. In CASSIOPEIA part 2, daratumumab maintenance significantly improved progression-free survival and increased minimal residual disease (MRD)-negativity rates versus observation. Here, we report long-term study outcomes of CASSIOPEIA. METHODS CASSIOPEIA was a two-part, open-label, phase 3 trial of patients done at 111 European academic and community-based centres. Eligible patients were aged 18-65 years with transplant-eligible newly diagnosed myeloma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2. In part 1, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to pre-transplant induction and post-transplant consolidation with D-VTd or VTd. Patients who completed consolidation and had a partial response or better were re-randomised (1:1) to intravenous daratumumab maintenance (16 mg/kg every 8 weeks) or observation for 2 years or less. An interactive web-based system was used for both randomisations, and randomisation was balanced using permuted blocks of four. Stratification factors for the first randomisation (induction and consolidation phase) were site affiliation, International Staging System disease stage, and cytogenetic risk status. Stratification factors for the second randomisation (maintenance phase) were induction treatment and depth of response in the induction and consolidation phase. The primary endpoint for the induction and consolidation phase was the proportion of patients who achieved a stringent complete response after consolidation; results for this endpoint remain unchanged from those reported previously. The primary endpoint for the maintenance phase was progression-free survival from second randomisation. Efficacy evaluations in the induction and consolidation phase were done on the intention-to-treat population, which included all patients who underwent first randomisation, and efficacy analyses in the maintenance phase were done in the maintenance-specific intention-to-treat population, which included all patients who were randomly assigned at the second randomisation. This analysis represents the final data cutoff at the end of the study. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02541383. FINDINGS Between Sept 22, 2015 and Aug 1, 2017, 1085 patients were randomly assigned to D-VTd (n=543) or VTd (n=542); between May 30, 2016 and June 18, 2018, 886 were re-randomised to daratumumab maintenance (n=442) or observation (n=444). At the clinical cutoff date, Sept 1, 2023, median follow-up was 80·1 months (IQR 75·7-85·6) from first randomisation and 70·6 months (66·4-76·1) from second randomisation. Progression-free survival from second randomisation was significantly longer in the daratumumab maintenance group than the observation-alone group (median not reached [95% CI 79·9-not estimable (NE)] vs 45·8 months [41·8-49·6]; HR 0·49 [95% CI 0·40-0·59]; p<0·0001); benefit was observed with D-VTd with daratumumab maintenance versus D-VTd with observation (median not reached [74·6-NE] vs 72·1 months [52·8-NE]; 0·76 [0·58-1·00]; p=0·048) and VTd with daratumumab maintenance versus VTd with observation (median not reached [66·9-NE] vs 32·7 months [27·2-38·7]; 0·34 [0·26-0·44]; p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION The long-term follow-up results of CASSIOPEIA show that including daratumumab in both the induction and consolidation phase and the maintenance phase led to superior progression-free survival outcomes. Our results confirm D-VTd induction and consolidation as a standard of care, and support the option of subsequent daratumumab monotherapy maintenance, for transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. FUNDING Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome, Dutch-Belgian Cooperative Trial Group for Hematology Oncology, and Janssen Research & Development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Moreau
- Hematology Department, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France.
| | - Cyrille Hulin
- Department of Hematology, Hôpital Haut Lévêque, University Hospital, Pessac, France
| | - Aurore Perrot
- Service d'Hématologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Bertrand Arnulf
- Immuno-hématologie, Hôpital Saint Louis, APHP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Karim Belhadj
- Unité Fonctionnelle Hémopathies Lymphoïdes, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri Mondor, Creteil, France
| | - Lotfi Benboubker
- Hôpital de Bretonneau, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours, Tours, France
| | - Sonja Zweegman
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hélène Caillon
- Biochemistry Laboratory, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Denis Caillot
- Service d'Hematologie, Institut de Cancérologie de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Hervé Avet-Loiseau
- Unité de Genomique du Myélome, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Thomas Dejoie
- Biochemistry Laboratory, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Thierry Facon
- University of Lille, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Service des Maladies du Sang, Lille, France
| | - Cécile Sonntag
- University Hospital, Hôpital Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France
| | - Jean Fontan
- University Hospital Jean Minjoz, Besancon, France
| | - Mohamad Mohty
- Hematology and Cellular Therapy Department of Saint-Antoine Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Kon-Siong Jie
- Department of Internal Medicine, Zuyderland MC, Sittard, Netherlands
| | - Lionel Karlin
- Lyon University Hospital, Hematology Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | | | | | - Xavier Leleu
- University of Poitiers, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire and Inserm 1313, Poitiers, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Niels Wcj van de Donk
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Soraya Wuillème
- Hematology Biology, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Annemiek Broijl
- Department of Hematology, EMN/Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Cyrille Touzeau
- Hematology Department, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Mourad Tiab
- Centre Hospitalier Départemental Vendée, La Roche sur Yon, France
| | | | - Nathalie Meuleman
- Department of Hematology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | - Saskia K Klein
- Department of Hematology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Mark-David Levin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis, Dordrecht, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Réda Garidi
- Saint-Quentin Hospital Center, Saint Quentin, France
| | | | - Jianping Wang
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, USA
| | - Alba Tuozzo
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, USA
| | | | - Melissa Rowe
- Janssen Research & Development, High Wycombe, UK
| | | | - Robin Carson
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, USA
| | | | - Jill Corre
- Unité de Genomique du Myélome, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Pieter Sonneveld
- Department of Hematology, EMN/Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Baljevic M, Sborov DW, Kumar SK. Long term responders in frontline multiple myeloma-exception vs expectation of the modern era. Blood Cancer J 2024; 14:115. [PMID: 39019891 PMCID: PMC11255324 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-024-01100-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2024] [Revised: 07/09/2024] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Muhamed Baljevic
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
| | - Douglas W Sborov
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Shaji K Kumar
- Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hummel M, Hielscher T, Emde-Rajaratnam M, Salwender H, Beck S, Scheid C, Bertsch U, Goldschmidt H, Jauch A, Moreaux J, Seckinger A, Hose D. Quantitative Integrative Survival Prediction in Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated With Bortezomib-Based Induction, High-Dose Therapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation. JCO Precis Oncol 2024; 8:e2300613. [PMID: 38986047 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 04/13/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Given the high heterogeneity in survival for patients with multiple myeloma, it would be clinically useful to quantitatively predict the individual survival instead of attributing patients to two to four risk groups as in current models, for example, revised International Staging System (R-ISS), R2-ISS, or Mayo-2022-score. PATIENTS AND METHODS Our aim was to develop a quantitative prediction tool for individual patient's 3-/5-year overall survival (OS) probability. We integrated established clinical and molecular risk factors into a comprehensive prognostic model and evaluated and validated its risk discrimination capabilities versus R-ISS, R2-ISS, and Mayo-2022-score. RESULTS A nomogram for estimating OS probabilities was built on the basis of a Cox regression model. It allows one to translate the individual risk profile of a patient into 3-/5-year OS probabilities by attributing points to each prognostic factor and summing up all points. The nomogram was externally validated regarding discrimination and calibration. There was no obvious bias or overfitting of the prognostic index on the validation cohort. Resampling-based and external evaluation showed good calibration. The c-index of the model was similar on the training (0.76) and validation cohort (0.75) and significantly higher than for the R-ISS (P < .001) or R2-ISS (P < .01). CONCLUSION In summary, we developed and validated individual quantitative nomogram-based OS prediction. Continuous risk assessment integrating molecular prognostic factors is superior to R-ISS, R2-ISS, or Mayo-2022-score alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuela Hummel
- Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Abteilung für Biostatistik, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Hielscher
- Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Abteilung für Biostatistik, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martina Emde-Rajaratnam
- Department of Hematology and Immunology, Myeloma Center Brussels & Labor für Myelomforschung, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Jette, Belgium
| | - Hans Salwender
- Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, AK Altona and St Georg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Susanne Beck
- Department of Hematology and Immunology, Myeloma Center Brussels & Labor für Myelomforschung, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Jette, Belgium
- Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Molekularpathologisches Zentrum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christof Scheid
- Department I of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Uta Bertsch
- Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Medizinische Klinik V, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hartmut Goldschmidt
- Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Medizinische Klinik V, Heidelberg, Germany
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anna Jauch
- Universität Heidelberg, Institut für Humangenetik, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jérôme Moreaux
- Institute of Human Genetics, UMR 9002 CNRS-UM, Montpellier, France
| | - Anja Seckinger
- Department of Hematology and Immunology, Myeloma Center Brussels & Labor für Myelomforschung, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Jette, Belgium
| | - Dirk Hose
- Department of Hematology and Immunology, Myeloma Center Brussels & Labor für Myelomforschung, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Jette, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Akhmedov M, Zeynalova P, Fedenko A. Multiple myeloma and infections in the era of novel treatment modalities. Leuk Res 2024; 143:107544. [PMID: 38963989 DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2024.107544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Revised: 05/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024]
Abstract
Infections are major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with multiple myeloma. Current treatment landscape of newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma includes different classes of drugs, such as proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and monoclonal antibodies, all of which are characterized by specific risk and pattern of infectious complications. Additionally, autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, widely used in the treatment of multiple myeloma, are complex procedures, carrying a significant risk of complications, and mainly infections. Finally, novel treatment modalities such as bispecific T-cell engagers and chimeric antigen receptor T-lymphocytes have been changing the paradigm of myeloma treatment in relapsed-refractory setting. These agents due to unique mechanism of action carry distinct pattern of infectious complications. In this review, an attempt has been made to summarize the incidence, risk factors, and patterns of infections during different stages of myeloma treatment including novel treatment modalities, and to provide evidence underlying the current concept of infectious disease prophylaxis in this category of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mobil Akhmedov
- Department of High-dose Chemotherapy and Bone Marrow Transplantation, P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, branch of the National Medical Radiology Research Center, Russian Federation; Department of Oncology and Oncosurgery, Russian University of Medicine, Russian Federation.
| | - Pervin Zeynalova
- Department of Oncology, Sechenov University, Russian Federation; Department of Oncology, Lapino Clinical Hospital, Russian Federation
| | - Alexander Fedenko
- Department of High-dose Chemotherapy and Bone Marrow Transplantation, P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, branch of the National Medical Radiology Research Center, Russian Federation
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Morè S, Corvatta L, Manieri VM, Morsia E, Offidani M. The Challenging Approach to Multiple Myeloma: From Disease Diagnosis and Monitoring to Complications Management. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2263. [PMID: 38927968 PMCID: PMC11202048 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16122263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2024] [Revised: 06/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
The outcome of multiple myeloma (MM) has significantly improved in the last few decades due to several factors such as new biological discoveries allowing to better stratify disease risk, development of more effective therapies and better management of side effects related to them. However, handling all these aspects requires an interdisciplinary approach involving multiple knowledge and collaboration of different specialists. The hematologist, faced with a patient with MM, must not only choose a treatment according to patient and disease characteristics but must also know when therapy needs to be started and how to monitor it during and after treatment. Moreover, he must deal not only with organ issues related to MM such as bone disease, renal failure or neurological disease but also with adverse events, often very serious, related to novel therapies, particularly new generation immunotherapies such as CAR T cell therapy and bispecific antibodies. In this review, we provide an overview on the newer MM diagnostic and monitoring strategies and on the main side effects of MM therapies, focusing on adverse events occurring during treatment with CAR T cells and bispecific antibodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Morè
- Clinica di Ematologia Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (S.M.); (V.M.M.); (E.M.)
| | - Laura Corvatta
- U.O.C. Medicina, Ospedale Profili, 60044 Fabriano, Italy;
| | - Valentina Maria Manieri
- Clinica di Ematologia Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (S.M.); (V.M.M.); (E.M.)
| | - Erika Morsia
- Clinica di Ematologia Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (S.M.); (V.M.M.); (E.M.)
| | - Massimo Offidani
- Clinica di Ematologia Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (S.M.); (V.M.M.); (E.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Patel K, Ivanov A, Jocelyn T, Hantel A, Garcia JS, Abel GA. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Phase 3 Clinical Trials for Blood Cancers: A Systematic Review. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2414425. [PMID: 38829615 PMCID: PMC11148691 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.14425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Published research suggests that patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are neither commonly collected nor reported in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) for solid tumors. Little is known about these practices in RCTs for hematological malignant neoplasms. Objective To evaluate the prevalence of PROs as prespecified end points in RCTs of hematological malignant neoplasms, and to assess reporting of PROs in associated trial publications. Evidence Review All issues of 8 journals known for publishing high-impact RCTs (NEJM, Lancet, Lancet Hematology, Lancet Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Blood, JAMA, and JAMA Oncology) between January 1, 2018, and December 13, 2022, were searched for primary publications of therapeutic phase 3 trials for adults with hematological malignant neoplasms. Studies that evaluated pretransplant conditioning regimens, graft-vs-host disease treatment, or radiotherapy as experimental treatment were excluded. Data regarding trial characteristics and PROs were extracted from manuscripts and trial protocols. Univariable analyses assessed associations between trial characteristics and PRO collection or reporting. Findings Ninety RCTs were eligible for analysis. PROs were an end point in 66 (73%) trials: in 1 trial (1%) as a primary end point, in 50 (56%) as a secondary end point, and in 15 (17%) as an exploratory end point. PRO data were reported in 26 of 66 primary publications (39%): outcomes were unchanged in 18 and improved in 8, with none reporting worse PROs with experimental treatment. Trials sponsored by for-profit entities were more likely to include PROs as an end point (49 of 55 [89%] vs 17 of 35 [49%]; P < .001) but were not significantly more likely to report PRO data (20 of 49 [41%] vs 6 of 17 [35%]; P = .69). Compared with trials involving lymphoma (18 of 29 [62%]) or leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome (18 of 28 [64%]), those involving plasma cell disorders or multiple myeloma (27 of 30 [90%]) or myeloproliferative neoplasms (3 of 3 [100%]) were more likely to include PROs as an end point (P = .03). Similarly, compared with trials involving lymphoma (3 of 18 [17%]) or leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome (5 of 18 [28%]), those involving plasma cell disorders or multiple myeloma (16 of 27 [59%]) or myeloproliferative neoplasms (2 of 3 [67%]) were more likely to report PROs in the primary publication (P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance In this systematic review, almost 3 of every 4 therapeutic RCTs for blood cancers collected PRO data; however, only 1 RCT included PROs as a primary end point. Moreover, most did not report resulting PRO data in the primary publication and when reported, PROs were either better or unchanged, raising concern for publication bias. This analysis suggests a critical gap in dissemination of data on the lived experiences of patients enrolled in RCTs for hematological malignant neoplasms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kishan Patel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alexandra Ivanov
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tajmah Jocelyn
- Center for Clinical Investigation, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrew Hantel
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jacqueline S. Garcia
- Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Gregory A. Abel
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Facon T, Dimopoulos MA, Leleu XP, Beksac M, Pour L, Hájek R, Liu Z, Minarik J, Moreau P, Romejko-Jarosinska J, Spicka I, Vorobyev VI, Besemer B, Ishida T, Janowski W, Kalayoglu-Besisik S, Parmar G, Robak P, Zamagni E, Goldschmidt H, Martin TG, Manier S, Mohty M, Oprea C, Brégeault MF, Macé S, Berthou C, Bregman D, Klippel Z, Orlowski RZ. Isatuximab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma. N Engl J Med 2024. [PMID: 38832972 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2400712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) is a preferred first-line treatment option for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Whether the addition of the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody isatuximab to the VRd regimen would reduce the risk of disease progression or death among patients ineligible to undergo transplantation is unclear. METHODS In an international, open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 3:2 ratio, patients 18 to 80 years of age with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were ineligible to undergo transplantation to receive either isatuximab plus VRd or VRd alone. The primary efficacy end point was progression-free survival. Key secondary end points included a complete response or better and minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status in patients with a complete response. RESULTS A total of 446 patients underwent randomization. At a median follow-up of 59.7 months, the estimated progression-free survival at 60 months was 63.2% in the isatuximab-VRd group, as compared with 45.2% in the VRd group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.60; 98.5% confidence interval, 0.41 to 0.88; P<0.001). The percentage of patients with a complete response or better was significantly higher in the isatuximab-VRd group than in the VRd group (74.7% vs. 64.1%, P = 0.01), as was the percentage of patients with MRD-negative status and a complete response (55.5% vs. 40.9%, P = 0.003). No new safety signals were observed with the isatuximab-VRd regimen. The incidence of serious adverse events during treatment and the incidence of adverse events leading to discontinuation were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Isatuximab-VRd was more effective than VRd as initial therapy in patients 18 to 80 years of age with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were ineligible to undergo transplantation. (Funded by Sanofi and a Cancer Center Support Grant; IMROZ ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03319667.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thierry Facon
- From the Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, University of Lille, Lille (T.F., S. Manier), the French National Academy of Medicine (T.F.), and the Department of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University and INSERM (M.M.), Paris, Service d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, CHU and Centre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM Unité 1402, Poitiers (X.P.L.), the Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes (P.M.), and Sanofi, Research and Development, Vitry-sur-Seine (C.O., M.-F.B., S. Macé, C.B.) - all in France; the Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (M.-A.D.); the Department of Hematology, Ankara University, and the Istinye University Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara (M.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul (S.K.-B.) - all in Turkey; the Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno (L.P.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava (R.H.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (J.M.), and the Charles University and General Hospital in Prague, Prague (I.S.) - all in the Czech Republic; Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China (Z.L.); the Department of Lymphoid Malignancies, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (J.R.-J.), and the Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź (P.R.) - both in Poland; the S.P. Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow (V.I.V.); the Department of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen (B.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg (H.G.) - both in Germany; the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo (T.I.); Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW (W.J.), and the Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, NSW (G.P.) - both in Australia; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," and Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (E.Z.); the Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (T.G.M.); Sanofi, Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Bridgewater, NJ (D.B.); Sanofi, Cambridge, MA (Z.K.); and the Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.Z.O.)
| | - Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos
- From the Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, University of Lille, Lille (T.F., S. Manier), the French National Academy of Medicine (T.F.), and the Department of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University and INSERM (M.M.), Paris, Service d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, CHU and Centre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM Unité 1402, Poitiers (X.P.L.), the Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes (P.M.), and Sanofi, Research and Development, Vitry-sur-Seine (C.O., M.-F.B., S. Macé, C.B.) - all in France; the Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (M.-A.D.); the Department of Hematology, Ankara University, and the Istinye University Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara (M.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul (S.K.-B.) - all in Turkey; the Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno (L.P.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava (R.H.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (J.M.), and the Charles University and General Hospital in Prague, Prague (I.S.) - all in the Czech Republic; Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China (Z.L.); the Department of Lymphoid Malignancies, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (J.R.-J.), and the Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź (P.R.) - both in Poland; the S.P. Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow (V.I.V.); the Department of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen (B.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg (H.G.) - both in Germany; the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo (T.I.); Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW (W.J.), and the Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, NSW (G.P.) - both in Australia; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," and Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (E.Z.); the Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (T.G.M.); Sanofi, Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Bridgewater, NJ (D.B.); Sanofi, Cambridge, MA (Z.K.); and the Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.Z.O.)
| | - Xavier P Leleu
- From the Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, University of Lille, Lille (T.F., S. Manier), the French National Academy of Medicine (T.F.), and the Department of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University and INSERM (M.M.), Paris, Service d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, CHU and Centre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM Unité 1402, Poitiers (X.P.L.), the Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes (P.M.), and Sanofi, Research and Development, Vitry-sur-Seine (C.O., M.-F.B., S. Macé, C.B.) - all in France; the Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (M.-A.D.); the Department of Hematology, Ankara University, and the Istinye University Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara (M.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul (S.K.-B.) - all in Turkey; the Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno (L.P.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava (R.H.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (J.M.), and the Charles University and General Hospital in Prague, Prague (I.S.) - all in the Czech Republic; Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China (Z.L.); the Department of Lymphoid Malignancies, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (J.R.-J.), and the Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź (P.R.) - both in Poland; the S.P. Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow (V.I.V.); the Department of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen (B.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg (H.G.) - both in Germany; the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo (T.I.); Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW (W.J.), and the Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, NSW (G.P.) - both in Australia; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," and Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (E.Z.); the Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (T.G.M.); Sanofi, Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Bridgewater, NJ (D.B.); Sanofi, Cambridge, MA (Z.K.); and the Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.Z.O.)
| | - Meral Beksac
- From the Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, University of Lille, Lille (T.F., S. Manier), the French National Academy of Medicine (T.F.), and the Department of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University and INSERM (M.M.), Paris, Service d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, CHU and Centre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM Unité 1402, Poitiers (X.P.L.), the Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes (P.M.), and Sanofi, Research and Development, Vitry-sur-Seine (C.O., M.-F.B., S. Macé, C.B.) - all in France; the Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (M.-A.D.); the Department of Hematology, Ankara University, and the Istinye University Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara (M.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul (S.K.-B.) - all in Turkey; the Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno (L.P.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava (R.H.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (J.M.), and the Charles University and General Hospital in Prague, Prague (I.S.) - all in the Czech Republic; Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China (Z.L.); the Department of Lymphoid Malignancies, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (J.R.-J.), and the Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź (P.R.) - both in Poland; the S.P. Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow (V.I.V.); the Department of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen (B.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg (H.G.) - both in Germany; the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo (T.I.); Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW (W.J.), and the Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, NSW (G.P.) - both in Australia; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," and Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (E.Z.); the Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (T.G.M.); Sanofi, Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Bridgewater, NJ (D.B.); Sanofi, Cambridge, MA (Z.K.); and the Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.Z.O.)
| | - Ludek Pour
- From the Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, University of Lille, Lille (T.F., S. Manier), the French National Academy of Medicine (T.F.), and the Department of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University and INSERM (M.M.), Paris, Service d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, CHU and Centre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM Unité 1402, Poitiers (X.P.L.), the Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes (P.M.), and Sanofi, Research and Development, Vitry-sur-Seine (C.O., M.-F.B., S. Macé, C.B.) - all in France; the Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (M.-A.D.); the Department of Hematology, Ankara University, and the Istinye University Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara (M.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul (S.K.-B.) - all in Turkey; the Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno (L.P.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava (R.H.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (J.M.), and the Charles University and General Hospital in Prague, Prague (I.S.) - all in the Czech Republic; Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China (Z.L.); the Department of Lymphoid Malignancies, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (J.R.-J.), and the Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź (P.R.) - both in Poland; the S.P. Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow (V.I.V.); the Department of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen (B.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg (H.G.) - both in Germany; the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo (T.I.); Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW (W.J.), and the Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, NSW (G.P.) - both in Australia; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," and Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (E.Z.); the Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (T.G.M.); Sanofi, Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Bridgewater, NJ (D.B.); Sanofi, Cambridge, MA (Z.K.); and the Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.Z.O.)
| | - Roman Hájek
- From the Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, University of Lille, Lille (T.F., S. Manier), the French National Academy of Medicine (T.F.), and the Department of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University and INSERM (M.M.), Paris, Service d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, CHU and Centre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM Unité 1402, Poitiers (X.P.L.), the Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes (P.M.), and Sanofi, Research and Development, Vitry-sur-Seine (C.O., M.-F.B., S. Macé, C.B.) - all in France; the Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (M.-A.D.); the Department of Hematology, Ankara University, and the Istinye University Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara (M.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul (S.K.-B.) - all in Turkey; the Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno (L.P.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava (R.H.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (J.M.), and the Charles University and General Hospital in Prague, Prague (I.S.) - all in the Czech Republic; Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China (Z.L.); the Department of Lymphoid Malignancies, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (J.R.-J.), and the Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź (P.R.) - both in Poland; the S.P. Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow (V.I.V.); the Department of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen (B.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg (H.G.) - both in Germany; the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo (T.I.); Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW (W.J.), and the Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, NSW (G.P.) - both in Australia; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," and Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (E.Z.); the Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (T.G.M.); Sanofi, Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Bridgewater, NJ (D.B.); Sanofi, Cambridge, MA (Z.K.); and the Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.Z.O.)
| | - Zhuogang Liu
- From the Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, University of Lille, Lille (T.F., S. Manier), the French National Academy of Medicine (T.F.), and the Department of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University and INSERM (M.M.), Paris, Service d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, CHU and Centre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM Unité 1402, Poitiers (X.P.L.), the Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes (P.M.), and Sanofi, Research and Development, Vitry-sur-Seine (C.O., M.-F.B., S. Macé, C.B.) - all in France; the Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (M.-A.D.); the Department of Hematology, Ankara University, and the Istinye University Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara (M.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul (S.K.-B.) - all in Turkey; the Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno (L.P.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava (R.H.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (J.M.), and the Charles University and General Hospital in Prague, Prague (I.S.) - all in the Czech Republic; Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China (Z.L.); the Department of Lymphoid Malignancies, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (J.R.-J.), and the Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź (P.R.) - both in Poland; the S.P. Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow (V.I.V.); the Department of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen (B.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg (H.G.) - both in Germany; the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo (T.I.); Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW (W.J.), and the Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, NSW (G.P.) - both in Australia; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," and Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (E.Z.); the Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (T.G.M.); Sanofi, Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Bridgewater, NJ (D.B.); Sanofi, Cambridge, MA (Z.K.); and the Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.Z.O.)
| | - Jiri Minarik
- From the Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, University of Lille, Lille (T.F., S. Manier), the French National Academy of Medicine (T.F.), and the Department of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University and INSERM (M.M.), Paris, Service d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, CHU and Centre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM Unité 1402, Poitiers (X.P.L.), the Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes (P.M.), and Sanofi, Research and Development, Vitry-sur-Seine (C.O., M.-F.B., S. Macé, C.B.) - all in France; the Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (M.-A.D.); the Department of Hematology, Ankara University, and the Istinye University Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara (M.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul (S.K.-B.) - all in Turkey; the Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno (L.P.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava (R.H.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (J.M.), and the Charles University and General Hospital in Prague, Prague (I.S.) - all in the Czech Republic; Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China (Z.L.); the Department of Lymphoid Malignancies, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (J.R.-J.), and the Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź (P.R.) - both in Poland; the S.P. Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow (V.I.V.); the Department of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen (B.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg (H.G.) - both in Germany; the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo (T.I.); Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW (W.J.), and the Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, NSW (G.P.) - both in Australia; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," and Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (E.Z.); the Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (T.G.M.); Sanofi, Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Bridgewater, NJ (D.B.); Sanofi, Cambridge, MA (Z.K.); and the Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.Z.O.)
| | - Philippe Moreau
- From the Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, University of Lille, Lille (T.F., S. Manier), the French National Academy of Medicine (T.F.), and the Department of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University and INSERM (M.M.), Paris, Service d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, CHU and Centre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM Unité 1402, Poitiers (X.P.L.), the Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes (P.M.), and Sanofi, Research and Development, Vitry-sur-Seine (C.O., M.-F.B., S. Macé, C.B.) - all in France; the Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (M.-A.D.); the Department of Hematology, Ankara University, and the Istinye University Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara (M.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul (S.K.-B.) - all in Turkey; the Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno (L.P.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava (R.H.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (J.M.), and the Charles University and General Hospital in Prague, Prague (I.S.) - all in the Czech Republic; Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China (Z.L.); the Department of Lymphoid Malignancies, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (J.R.-J.), and the Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź (P.R.) - both in Poland; the S.P. Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow (V.I.V.); the Department of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen (B.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg (H.G.) - both in Germany; the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo (T.I.); Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW (W.J.), and the Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, NSW (G.P.) - both in Australia; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," and Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (E.Z.); the Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (T.G.M.); Sanofi, Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Bridgewater, NJ (D.B.); Sanofi, Cambridge, MA (Z.K.); and the Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.Z.O.)
| | - Joanna Romejko-Jarosinska
- From the Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, University of Lille, Lille (T.F., S. Manier), the French National Academy of Medicine (T.F.), and the Department of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University and INSERM (M.M.), Paris, Service d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, CHU and Centre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM Unité 1402, Poitiers (X.P.L.), the Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes (P.M.), and Sanofi, Research and Development, Vitry-sur-Seine (C.O., M.-F.B., S. Macé, C.B.) - all in France; the Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (M.-A.D.); the Department of Hematology, Ankara University, and the Istinye University Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara (M.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul (S.K.-B.) - all in Turkey; the Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno (L.P.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava (R.H.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (J.M.), and the Charles University and General Hospital in Prague, Prague (I.S.) - all in the Czech Republic; Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China (Z.L.); the Department of Lymphoid Malignancies, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (J.R.-J.), and the Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź (P.R.) - both in Poland; the S.P. Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow (V.I.V.); the Department of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen (B.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg (H.G.) - both in Germany; the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo (T.I.); Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW (W.J.), and the Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, NSW (G.P.) - both in Australia; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," and Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (E.Z.); the Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (T.G.M.); Sanofi, Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Bridgewater, NJ (D.B.); Sanofi, Cambridge, MA (Z.K.); and the Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.Z.O.)
| | - Ivan Spicka
- From the Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, University of Lille, Lille (T.F., S. Manier), the French National Academy of Medicine (T.F.), and the Department of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University and INSERM (M.M.), Paris, Service d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, CHU and Centre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM Unité 1402, Poitiers (X.P.L.), the Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes (P.M.), and Sanofi, Research and Development, Vitry-sur-Seine (C.O., M.-F.B., S. Macé, C.B.) - all in France; the Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (M.-A.D.); the Department of Hematology, Ankara University, and the Istinye University Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara (M.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul (S.K.-B.) - all in Turkey; the Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno (L.P.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava (R.H.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (J.M.), and the Charles University and General Hospital in Prague, Prague (I.S.) - all in the Czech Republic; Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China (Z.L.); the Department of Lymphoid Malignancies, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (J.R.-J.), and the Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź (P.R.) - both in Poland; the S.P. Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow (V.I.V.); the Department of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen (B.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg (H.G.) - both in Germany; the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo (T.I.); Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW (W.J.), and the Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, NSW (G.P.) - both in Australia; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," and Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (E.Z.); the Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (T.G.M.); Sanofi, Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Bridgewater, NJ (D.B.); Sanofi, Cambridge, MA (Z.K.); and the Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.Z.O.)
| | - Vladimir I Vorobyev
- From the Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, University of Lille, Lille (T.F., S. Manier), the French National Academy of Medicine (T.F.), and the Department of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University and INSERM (M.M.), Paris, Service d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, CHU and Centre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM Unité 1402, Poitiers (X.P.L.), the Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes (P.M.), and Sanofi, Research and Development, Vitry-sur-Seine (C.O., M.-F.B., S. Macé, C.B.) - all in France; the Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (M.-A.D.); the Department of Hematology, Ankara University, and the Istinye University Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara (M.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul (S.K.-B.) - all in Turkey; the Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno (L.P.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava (R.H.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (J.M.), and the Charles University and General Hospital in Prague, Prague (I.S.) - all in the Czech Republic; Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China (Z.L.); the Department of Lymphoid Malignancies, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (J.R.-J.), and the Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź (P.R.) - both in Poland; the S.P. Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow (V.I.V.); the Department of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen (B.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg (H.G.) - both in Germany; the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo (T.I.); Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW (W.J.), and the Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, NSW (G.P.) - both in Australia; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," and Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (E.Z.); the Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (T.G.M.); Sanofi, Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Bridgewater, NJ (D.B.); Sanofi, Cambridge, MA (Z.K.); and the Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.Z.O.)
| | - Britta Besemer
- From the Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, University of Lille, Lille (T.F., S. Manier), the French National Academy of Medicine (T.F.), and the Department of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University and INSERM (M.M.), Paris, Service d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, CHU and Centre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM Unité 1402, Poitiers (X.P.L.), the Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes (P.M.), and Sanofi, Research and Development, Vitry-sur-Seine (C.O., M.-F.B., S. Macé, C.B.) - all in France; the Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (M.-A.D.); the Department of Hematology, Ankara University, and the Istinye University Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara (M.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul (S.K.-B.) - all in Turkey; the Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno (L.P.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava (R.H.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (J.M.), and the Charles University and General Hospital in Prague, Prague (I.S.) - all in the Czech Republic; Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China (Z.L.); the Department of Lymphoid Malignancies, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (J.R.-J.), and the Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź (P.R.) - both in Poland; the S.P. Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow (V.I.V.); the Department of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen (B.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg (H.G.) - both in Germany; the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo (T.I.); Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW (W.J.), and the Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, NSW (G.P.) - both in Australia; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," and Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (E.Z.); the Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (T.G.M.); Sanofi, Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Bridgewater, NJ (D.B.); Sanofi, Cambridge, MA (Z.K.); and the Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.Z.O.)
| | - Tadao Ishida
- From the Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, University of Lille, Lille (T.F., S. Manier), the French National Academy of Medicine (T.F.), and the Department of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University and INSERM (M.M.), Paris, Service d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, CHU and Centre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM Unité 1402, Poitiers (X.P.L.), the Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes (P.M.), and Sanofi, Research and Development, Vitry-sur-Seine (C.O., M.-F.B., S. Macé, C.B.) - all in France; the Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (M.-A.D.); the Department of Hematology, Ankara University, and the Istinye University Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara (M.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul (S.K.-B.) - all in Turkey; the Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno (L.P.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava (R.H.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (J.M.), and the Charles University and General Hospital in Prague, Prague (I.S.) - all in the Czech Republic; Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China (Z.L.); the Department of Lymphoid Malignancies, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (J.R.-J.), and the Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź (P.R.) - both in Poland; the S.P. Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow (V.I.V.); the Department of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen (B.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg (H.G.) - both in Germany; the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo (T.I.); Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW (W.J.), and the Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, NSW (G.P.) - both in Australia; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," and Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (E.Z.); the Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (T.G.M.); Sanofi, Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Bridgewater, NJ (D.B.); Sanofi, Cambridge, MA (Z.K.); and the Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.Z.O.)
| | - Wojciech Janowski
- From the Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, University of Lille, Lille (T.F., S. Manier), the French National Academy of Medicine (T.F.), and the Department of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University and INSERM (M.M.), Paris, Service d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, CHU and Centre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM Unité 1402, Poitiers (X.P.L.), the Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes (P.M.), and Sanofi, Research and Development, Vitry-sur-Seine (C.O., M.-F.B., S. Macé, C.B.) - all in France; the Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (M.-A.D.); the Department of Hematology, Ankara University, and the Istinye University Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara (M.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul (S.K.-B.) - all in Turkey; the Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno (L.P.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava (R.H.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (J.M.), and the Charles University and General Hospital in Prague, Prague (I.S.) - all in the Czech Republic; Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China (Z.L.); the Department of Lymphoid Malignancies, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (J.R.-J.), and the Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź (P.R.) - both in Poland; the S.P. Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow (V.I.V.); the Department of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen (B.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg (H.G.) - both in Germany; the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo (T.I.); Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW (W.J.), and the Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, NSW (G.P.) - both in Australia; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," and Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (E.Z.); the Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (T.G.M.); Sanofi, Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Bridgewater, NJ (D.B.); Sanofi, Cambridge, MA (Z.K.); and the Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.Z.O.)
| | - Sevgi Kalayoglu-Besisik
- From the Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, University of Lille, Lille (T.F., S. Manier), the French National Academy of Medicine (T.F.), and the Department of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University and INSERM (M.M.), Paris, Service d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, CHU and Centre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM Unité 1402, Poitiers (X.P.L.), the Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes (P.M.), and Sanofi, Research and Development, Vitry-sur-Seine (C.O., M.-F.B., S. Macé, C.B.) - all in France; the Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (M.-A.D.); the Department of Hematology, Ankara University, and the Istinye University Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara (M.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul (S.K.-B.) - all in Turkey; the Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno (L.P.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava (R.H.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (J.M.), and the Charles University and General Hospital in Prague, Prague (I.S.) - all in the Czech Republic; Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China (Z.L.); the Department of Lymphoid Malignancies, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (J.R.-J.), and the Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź (P.R.) - both in Poland; the S.P. Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow (V.I.V.); the Department of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen (B.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg (H.G.) - both in Germany; the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo (T.I.); Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW (W.J.), and the Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, NSW (G.P.) - both in Australia; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," and Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (E.Z.); the Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (T.G.M.); Sanofi, Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Bridgewater, NJ (D.B.); Sanofi, Cambridge, MA (Z.K.); and the Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.Z.O.)
| | - Gurdeep Parmar
- From the Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, University of Lille, Lille (T.F., S. Manier), the French National Academy of Medicine (T.F.), and the Department of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University and INSERM (M.M.), Paris, Service d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, CHU and Centre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM Unité 1402, Poitiers (X.P.L.), the Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes (P.M.), and Sanofi, Research and Development, Vitry-sur-Seine (C.O., M.-F.B., S. Macé, C.B.) - all in France; the Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (M.-A.D.); the Department of Hematology, Ankara University, and the Istinye University Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara (M.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul (S.K.-B.) - all in Turkey; the Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno (L.P.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava (R.H.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (J.M.), and the Charles University and General Hospital in Prague, Prague (I.S.) - all in the Czech Republic; Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China (Z.L.); the Department of Lymphoid Malignancies, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (J.R.-J.), and the Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź (P.R.) - both in Poland; the S.P. Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow (V.I.V.); the Department of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen (B.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg (H.G.) - both in Germany; the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo (T.I.); Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW (W.J.), and the Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, NSW (G.P.) - both in Australia; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," and Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (E.Z.); the Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (T.G.M.); Sanofi, Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Bridgewater, NJ (D.B.); Sanofi, Cambridge, MA (Z.K.); and the Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.Z.O.)
| | - Pawel Robak
- From the Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, University of Lille, Lille (T.F., S. Manier), the French National Academy of Medicine (T.F.), and the Department of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University and INSERM (M.M.), Paris, Service d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, CHU and Centre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM Unité 1402, Poitiers (X.P.L.), the Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes (P.M.), and Sanofi, Research and Development, Vitry-sur-Seine (C.O., M.-F.B., S. Macé, C.B.) - all in France; the Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (M.-A.D.); the Department of Hematology, Ankara University, and the Istinye University Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara (M.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul (S.K.-B.) - all in Turkey; the Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno (L.P.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava (R.H.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (J.M.), and the Charles University and General Hospital in Prague, Prague (I.S.) - all in the Czech Republic; Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China (Z.L.); the Department of Lymphoid Malignancies, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (J.R.-J.), and the Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź (P.R.) - both in Poland; the S.P. Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow (V.I.V.); the Department of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen (B.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg (H.G.) - both in Germany; the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo (T.I.); Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW (W.J.), and the Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, NSW (G.P.) - both in Australia; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," and Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (E.Z.); the Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (T.G.M.); Sanofi, Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Bridgewater, NJ (D.B.); Sanofi, Cambridge, MA (Z.K.); and the Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.Z.O.)
| | - Elena Zamagni
- From the Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, University of Lille, Lille (T.F., S. Manier), the French National Academy of Medicine (T.F.), and the Department of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University and INSERM (M.M.), Paris, Service d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, CHU and Centre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM Unité 1402, Poitiers (X.P.L.), the Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes (P.M.), and Sanofi, Research and Development, Vitry-sur-Seine (C.O., M.-F.B., S. Macé, C.B.) - all in France; the Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (M.-A.D.); the Department of Hematology, Ankara University, and the Istinye University Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara (M.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul (S.K.-B.) - all in Turkey; the Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno (L.P.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava (R.H.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (J.M.), and the Charles University and General Hospital in Prague, Prague (I.S.) - all in the Czech Republic; Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China (Z.L.); the Department of Lymphoid Malignancies, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (J.R.-J.), and the Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź (P.R.) - both in Poland; the S.P. Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow (V.I.V.); the Department of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen (B.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg (H.G.) - both in Germany; the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo (T.I.); Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW (W.J.), and the Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, NSW (G.P.) - both in Australia; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," and Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (E.Z.); the Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (T.G.M.); Sanofi, Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Bridgewater, NJ (D.B.); Sanofi, Cambridge, MA (Z.K.); and the Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.Z.O.)
| | - Hartmut Goldschmidt
- From the Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, University of Lille, Lille (T.F., S. Manier), the French National Academy of Medicine (T.F.), and the Department of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University and INSERM (M.M.), Paris, Service d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, CHU and Centre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM Unité 1402, Poitiers (X.P.L.), the Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes (P.M.), and Sanofi, Research and Development, Vitry-sur-Seine (C.O., M.-F.B., S. Macé, C.B.) - all in France; the Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (M.-A.D.); the Department of Hematology, Ankara University, and the Istinye University Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara (M.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul (S.K.-B.) - all in Turkey; the Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno (L.P.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava (R.H.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (J.M.), and the Charles University and General Hospital in Prague, Prague (I.S.) - all in the Czech Republic; Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China (Z.L.); the Department of Lymphoid Malignancies, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (J.R.-J.), and the Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź (P.R.) - both in Poland; the S.P. Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow (V.I.V.); the Department of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen (B.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg (H.G.) - both in Germany; the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo (T.I.); Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW (W.J.), and the Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, NSW (G.P.) - both in Australia; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," and Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (E.Z.); the Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (T.G.M.); Sanofi, Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Bridgewater, NJ (D.B.); Sanofi, Cambridge, MA (Z.K.); and the Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.Z.O.)
| | - Thomas G Martin
- From the Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, University of Lille, Lille (T.F., S. Manier), the French National Academy of Medicine (T.F.), and the Department of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University and INSERM (M.M.), Paris, Service d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, CHU and Centre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM Unité 1402, Poitiers (X.P.L.), the Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes (P.M.), and Sanofi, Research and Development, Vitry-sur-Seine (C.O., M.-F.B., S. Macé, C.B.) - all in France; the Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (M.-A.D.); the Department of Hematology, Ankara University, and the Istinye University Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara (M.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul (S.K.-B.) - all in Turkey; the Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno (L.P.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava (R.H.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (J.M.), and the Charles University and General Hospital in Prague, Prague (I.S.) - all in the Czech Republic; Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China (Z.L.); the Department of Lymphoid Malignancies, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (J.R.-J.), and the Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź (P.R.) - both in Poland; the S.P. Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow (V.I.V.); the Department of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen (B.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg (H.G.) - both in Germany; the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo (T.I.); Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW (W.J.), and the Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, NSW (G.P.) - both in Australia; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," and Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (E.Z.); the Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (T.G.M.); Sanofi, Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Bridgewater, NJ (D.B.); Sanofi, Cambridge, MA (Z.K.); and the Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.Z.O.)
| | - Salomon Manier
- From the Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, University of Lille, Lille (T.F., S. Manier), the French National Academy of Medicine (T.F.), and the Department of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University and INSERM (M.M.), Paris, Service d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, CHU and Centre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM Unité 1402, Poitiers (X.P.L.), the Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes (P.M.), and Sanofi, Research and Development, Vitry-sur-Seine (C.O., M.-F.B., S. Macé, C.B.) - all in France; the Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (M.-A.D.); the Department of Hematology, Ankara University, and the Istinye University Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara (M.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul (S.K.-B.) - all in Turkey; the Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno (L.P.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava (R.H.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (J.M.), and the Charles University and General Hospital in Prague, Prague (I.S.) - all in the Czech Republic; Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China (Z.L.); the Department of Lymphoid Malignancies, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (J.R.-J.), and the Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź (P.R.) - both in Poland; the S.P. Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow (V.I.V.); the Department of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen (B.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg (H.G.) - both in Germany; the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo (T.I.); Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW (W.J.), and the Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, NSW (G.P.) - both in Australia; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," and Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (E.Z.); the Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (T.G.M.); Sanofi, Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Bridgewater, NJ (D.B.); Sanofi, Cambridge, MA (Z.K.); and the Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.Z.O.)
| | - Mohamad Mohty
- From the Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, University of Lille, Lille (T.F., S. Manier), the French National Academy of Medicine (T.F.), and the Department of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University and INSERM (M.M.), Paris, Service d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, CHU and Centre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM Unité 1402, Poitiers (X.P.L.), the Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes (P.M.), and Sanofi, Research and Development, Vitry-sur-Seine (C.O., M.-F.B., S. Macé, C.B.) - all in France; the Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (M.-A.D.); the Department of Hematology, Ankara University, and the Istinye University Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara (M.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul (S.K.-B.) - all in Turkey; the Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno (L.P.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava (R.H.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (J.M.), and the Charles University and General Hospital in Prague, Prague (I.S.) - all in the Czech Republic; Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China (Z.L.); the Department of Lymphoid Malignancies, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (J.R.-J.), and the Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź (P.R.) - both in Poland; the S.P. Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow (V.I.V.); the Department of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen (B.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg (H.G.) - both in Germany; the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo (T.I.); Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW (W.J.), and the Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, NSW (G.P.) - both in Australia; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," and Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (E.Z.); the Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (T.G.M.); Sanofi, Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Bridgewater, NJ (D.B.); Sanofi, Cambridge, MA (Z.K.); and the Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.Z.O.)
| | - Corina Oprea
- From the Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, University of Lille, Lille (T.F., S. Manier), the French National Academy of Medicine (T.F.), and the Department of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University and INSERM (M.M.), Paris, Service d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, CHU and Centre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM Unité 1402, Poitiers (X.P.L.), the Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes (P.M.), and Sanofi, Research and Development, Vitry-sur-Seine (C.O., M.-F.B., S. Macé, C.B.) - all in France; the Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (M.-A.D.); the Department of Hematology, Ankara University, and the Istinye University Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara (M.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul (S.K.-B.) - all in Turkey; the Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno (L.P.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava (R.H.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (J.M.), and the Charles University and General Hospital in Prague, Prague (I.S.) - all in the Czech Republic; Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China (Z.L.); the Department of Lymphoid Malignancies, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (J.R.-J.), and the Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź (P.R.) - both in Poland; the S.P. Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow (V.I.V.); the Department of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen (B.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg (H.G.) - both in Germany; the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo (T.I.); Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW (W.J.), and the Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, NSW (G.P.) - both in Australia; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," and Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (E.Z.); the Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (T.G.M.); Sanofi, Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Bridgewater, NJ (D.B.); Sanofi, Cambridge, MA (Z.K.); and the Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.Z.O.)
| | - Marie-France Brégeault
- From the Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, University of Lille, Lille (T.F., S. Manier), the French National Academy of Medicine (T.F.), and the Department of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University and INSERM (M.M.), Paris, Service d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, CHU and Centre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM Unité 1402, Poitiers (X.P.L.), the Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes (P.M.), and Sanofi, Research and Development, Vitry-sur-Seine (C.O., M.-F.B., S. Macé, C.B.) - all in France; the Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (M.-A.D.); the Department of Hematology, Ankara University, and the Istinye University Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara (M.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul (S.K.-B.) - all in Turkey; the Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno (L.P.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava (R.H.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (J.M.), and the Charles University and General Hospital in Prague, Prague (I.S.) - all in the Czech Republic; Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China (Z.L.); the Department of Lymphoid Malignancies, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (J.R.-J.), and the Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź (P.R.) - both in Poland; the S.P. Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow (V.I.V.); the Department of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen (B.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg (H.G.) - both in Germany; the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo (T.I.); Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW (W.J.), and the Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, NSW (G.P.) - both in Australia; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," and Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (E.Z.); the Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (T.G.M.); Sanofi, Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Bridgewater, NJ (D.B.); Sanofi, Cambridge, MA (Z.K.); and the Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.Z.O.)
| | - Sandrine Macé
- From the Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, University of Lille, Lille (T.F., S. Manier), the French National Academy of Medicine (T.F.), and the Department of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University and INSERM (M.M.), Paris, Service d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, CHU and Centre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM Unité 1402, Poitiers (X.P.L.), the Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes (P.M.), and Sanofi, Research and Development, Vitry-sur-Seine (C.O., M.-F.B., S. Macé, C.B.) - all in France; the Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (M.-A.D.); the Department of Hematology, Ankara University, and the Istinye University Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara (M.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul (S.K.-B.) - all in Turkey; the Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno (L.P.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava (R.H.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (J.M.), and the Charles University and General Hospital in Prague, Prague (I.S.) - all in the Czech Republic; Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China (Z.L.); the Department of Lymphoid Malignancies, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (J.R.-J.), and the Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź (P.R.) - both in Poland; the S.P. Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow (V.I.V.); the Department of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen (B.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg (H.G.) - both in Germany; the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo (T.I.); Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW (W.J.), and the Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, NSW (G.P.) - both in Australia; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," and Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (E.Z.); the Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (T.G.M.); Sanofi, Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Bridgewater, NJ (D.B.); Sanofi, Cambridge, MA (Z.K.); and the Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.Z.O.)
| | - Christelle Berthou
- From the Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, University of Lille, Lille (T.F., S. Manier), the French National Academy of Medicine (T.F.), and the Department of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University and INSERM (M.M.), Paris, Service d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, CHU and Centre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM Unité 1402, Poitiers (X.P.L.), the Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes (P.M.), and Sanofi, Research and Development, Vitry-sur-Seine (C.O., M.-F.B., S. Macé, C.B.) - all in France; the Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (M.-A.D.); the Department of Hematology, Ankara University, and the Istinye University Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara (M.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul (S.K.-B.) - all in Turkey; the Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno (L.P.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava (R.H.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (J.M.), and the Charles University and General Hospital in Prague, Prague (I.S.) - all in the Czech Republic; Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China (Z.L.); the Department of Lymphoid Malignancies, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (J.R.-J.), and the Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź (P.R.) - both in Poland; the S.P. Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow (V.I.V.); the Department of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen (B.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg (H.G.) - both in Germany; the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo (T.I.); Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW (W.J.), and the Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, NSW (G.P.) - both in Australia; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," and Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (E.Z.); the Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (T.G.M.); Sanofi, Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Bridgewater, NJ (D.B.); Sanofi, Cambridge, MA (Z.K.); and the Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.Z.O.)
| | - David Bregman
- From the Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, University of Lille, Lille (T.F., S. Manier), the French National Academy of Medicine (T.F.), and the Department of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University and INSERM (M.M.), Paris, Service d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, CHU and Centre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM Unité 1402, Poitiers (X.P.L.), the Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes (P.M.), and Sanofi, Research and Development, Vitry-sur-Seine (C.O., M.-F.B., S. Macé, C.B.) - all in France; the Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (M.-A.D.); the Department of Hematology, Ankara University, and the Istinye University Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara (M.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul (S.K.-B.) - all in Turkey; the Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno (L.P.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava (R.H.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (J.M.), and the Charles University and General Hospital in Prague, Prague (I.S.) - all in the Czech Republic; Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China (Z.L.); the Department of Lymphoid Malignancies, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (J.R.-J.), and the Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź (P.R.) - both in Poland; the S.P. Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow (V.I.V.); the Department of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen (B.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg (H.G.) - both in Germany; the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo (T.I.); Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW (W.J.), and the Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, NSW (G.P.) - both in Australia; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," and Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (E.Z.); the Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (T.G.M.); Sanofi, Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Bridgewater, NJ (D.B.); Sanofi, Cambridge, MA (Z.K.); and the Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.Z.O.)
| | - Zandra Klippel
- From the Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, University of Lille, Lille (T.F., S. Manier), the French National Academy of Medicine (T.F.), and the Department of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University and INSERM (M.M.), Paris, Service d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, CHU and Centre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM Unité 1402, Poitiers (X.P.L.), the Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes (P.M.), and Sanofi, Research and Development, Vitry-sur-Seine (C.O., M.-F.B., S. Macé, C.B.) - all in France; the Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (M.-A.D.); the Department of Hematology, Ankara University, and the Istinye University Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara (M.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul (S.K.-B.) - all in Turkey; the Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno (L.P.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava (R.H.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (J.M.), and the Charles University and General Hospital in Prague, Prague (I.S.) - all in the Czech Republic; Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China (Z.L.); the Department of Lymphoid Malignancies, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (J.R.-J.), and the Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź (P.R.) - both in Poland; the S.P. Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow (V.I.V.); the Department of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen (B.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg (H.G.) - both in Germany; the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo (T.I.); Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW (W.J.), and the Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, NSW (G.P.) - both in Australia; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," and Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (E.Z.); the Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (T.G.M.); Sanofi, Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Bridgewater, NJ (D.B.); Sanofi, Cambridge, MA (Z.K.); and the Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.Z.O.)
| | - Robert Z Orlowski
- From the Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, University of Lille, Lille (T.F., S. Manier), the French National Academy of Medicine (T.F.), and the Department of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University and INSERM (M.M.), Paris, Service d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, CHU and Centre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM Unité 1402, Poitiers (X.P.L.), the Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes (P.M.), and Sanofi, Research and Development, Vitry-sur-Seine (C.O., M.-F.B., S. Macé, C.B.) - all in France; the Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (M.-A.D.); the Department of Hematology, Ankara University, and the Istinye University Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara (M.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul (S.K.-B.) - all in Turkey; the Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno (L.P.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava (R.H.), the Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (J.M.), and the Charles University and General Hospital in Prague, Prague (I.S.) - all in the Czech Republic; Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China (Z.L.); the Department of Lymphoid Malignancies, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (J.R.-J.), and the Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź (P.R.) - both in Poland; the S.P. Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow (V.I.V.); the Department of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen (B.B.), and the Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg (H.G.) - both in Germany; the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo (T.I.); Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW (W.J.), and the Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, NSW (G.P.) - both in Australia; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," and Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (E.Z.); the Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (T.G.M.); Sanofi, Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Bridgewater, NJ (D.B.); Sanofi, Cambridge, MA (Z.K.); and the Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.Z.O.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Leleu X, Hulin C, Lambert J, Bobin A, Perrot A, Karlin L, Roussel M, Montes L, Cherel B, Chalopin T, Slama B, Chretien ML, Laribi K, Dingremont C, Roul C, Mariette C, Rigaudeau S, Calmettes C, Dib M, Tiab M, Vincent L, Delaunay J, Santagostino A, Macro M, Bourgeois E, Orsini-Piocelle F, Gay J, Bareau B, Bigot N, Vergez F, Lebreton P, Tabrizi R, Waultier-Rascalou A, Frenzel L, Le Calloch R, Chalayer E, Braun T, Lachenal F, Corm S, Kennel C, Belkhir R, Bladé JS, Joly B, Richez-Olivier V, Gardeney H, Demarquette H, Robu-Cretu D, Garderet L, Newinger-Porte M, Kasmi A, Royer B, Decaux O, Arnulf B, Belhadj K, Touzeau C, Mohty M, Manier S, Moreau P, Avet-Loiseau H, Corre J, Facon T. Isatuximab, lenalidomide, dexamethasone and bortezomib in transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma: the randomized phase 3 BENEFIT trial. Nat Med 2024:10.1038/s41591-024-03050-2. [PMID: 38830994 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-03050-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
CD38-targeting immunotherapy is approved in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) that are transplant ineligible (TI) and is considered the best standard of care (SOC). To improve current SOC, we evaluated the added value of weekly bortezomib (V) to isatuximab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IsaRd versus Isa-VRd). This Intergroupe Francophone of Myeloma phase 3 study randomized 270 patients with NDMM that were TI, aged 65-79 years, to IsaRd versus Isa-VRd arms. The primary endpoint was a minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rate at 10-5 by next-generation sequencing at 18 months from randomization. Key secondary endpoints included response rates, MRD assessment rates, survival and safety. The 18-month MRD negativity rates at 10-5 were reported in 35 patients (26%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 19-34) in IsaRd versus 71 (53%, 95% CI 44-61) in Isa-VRd (odds ratio for MRD negativity 3.16, 95% CI 1.89-5.28, P < 0.0001). The MRD benefit was consistent across subgroups at 10-5 and 10-6, and was already observed at month 12. The proportion of patients with complete response or better at 18 months was higher with Isa-VRd (58% versus 33%; P < 0.0001), as was the proportion of MRD negativity and complete response or better (37% versus 17%; P = 0.0003). At a median follow-up of 23.5 months, no difference was observed for survival times (immature data). The addition of weekly bortezomib did not significantly affect the relative dose intensity of IsaRd. Isa-VRd significantly increased MRD endpoints, including the 18-month negativity rate at 10-5, the primary endpoint, compared with IsaRd. This study proposes Isa-VRd as a new SOC for patients with NDMM that are TI. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04751877 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier Leleu
- Hematology, CIC 1082, U1313, CHU, University, Poitiers, France.
| | | | | | - Arthur Bobin
- Hematology, CIC 1082, U1313, CHU, University, Poitiers, France
| | - Aurore Perrot
- University Hospital, iUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Marie-Lorraine Chretien
- Hematology, University Hospital, Inserm U1231, University of Burgundy Franche-Comté, Dijon, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mourad Tiab
- Hematology, CH Departemental de La Roche-sur-Yon, La Roche-sur-Yon, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Julie Gay
- Hematology, CH de la côte basque, Bayonne, France
| | - Benoit Bareau
- Hematology, Les Hôpitaux Privés Rennais Cesson Sévigné - Vivalto Santé, Cesson Sévigné, France
| | | | - François Vergez
- Unit for Genomics in Myeloma, iUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Reza Tabrizi
- Hematology, CHI de Mont De Marsan, Mont-de-Marsan, France
| | | | | | - Ronan Le Calloch
- Hematology, CH de Cornouaille, Quimper Concarneau, Concarneau, France
| | | | | | | | - Selim Corm
- Medipole de Savoie, Challes les Eaux, France
| | | | - Rakiba Belkhir
- Rheumatology, Hopital Bicetre, AP-HP, Universite Paris Saclay, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Helene Gardeney
- Hematology, CIC 1082, U1313, CHU, University, Poitiers, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Olivier Decaux
- Hematology, UMR U1236, University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | | | | | | | - Mohamad Mohty
- Hematology, Sorbonne University, Saint-Antoine Hôpital (AP-HP), UMRs 938, Paris, France
| | - Salomon Manier
- Hematology, University Hospital Inserm U-S1277 and CNRS UMR9020, Lille, France
| | | | | | - Jill Corre
- Unit for Genomics in Myeloma, iUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Thierry Facon
- Hematology, University Hospital Inserm U-S1277 and CNRS UMR9020, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Quach H, Parmar G, Mateos MV, Ailawadhi S, Leleu X. Recent Developments in Convenience of Administration of the Anti-CD38 Antibody Isatuximab: Subcutaneous Delivery and Fast Intravenous Infusion in Patients With Multiple Myeloma. CLINICAL LYMPHOMA, MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA 2024; 24:358-363. [PMID: 38519329 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2024.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
Isatuximab-based combinations are among the accepted standard-of-care regimens for early-line treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), based on the results of the Phase 3 ICARIA-MM and IKEMA trials. Further study findings have shown benefit with Isa-based combinations in patients with newly diagnosed MM, as reported from the randomized GMMG-HD7 and CONCEPT trials. Isa is currently approved in various countries for intravenous (IV) administration in patients with RRMM. A more convenient route of administration, such as subcutaneous (SC) injection, and faster IV infusion may substantially increase convenience of treatment. In this review, we outline evidence emerging from clinical trials that shows increasing clinical applicability of Isa across the MM therapeutic spectrum. We then review recent study results demonstrating that new treatment modalities, either SC Isa administration via an on-body delivery system (OBDS) or fast, 30-minute, fixed-volume IV infusion, are safe and effective, and enhance convenience of treatment with Isa for MM patients and healthcare providers. In the recently reported Phase 1b study, the safety profile and efficacy of Isa administered SC plus pomalidomide-dexamethasone were comparable to those observed with Isa administered IV plus pomalidomide-dexamethasone in the control arm and in the ICARIA-MM trial. Analysis of patient-reported outcomes indicated patient confidence in SC Isa administration and satisfaction with treatment delivery by OBDS. These findings point to SC administration as the preferred route for future treatment with Isa-based combinations, as well as to the use of fast, 30-minute IV infusions in settings where SC administration of Isa might not be available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hang Quach
- Clinical Haematology Service, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, University of Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
| | - Gurdeep Parmar
- Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Maria-Victoria Mateos
- University Hospital of Salamanca and Cancer Research Center (IBMCC-CSICUSAL), Salamanca, Spain
| | | | - Xavier Leleu
- Service d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, CHU and CIC Inserm 1402, Poitiers Cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rees MJ, D'Agostino M, Leypoldt LB, Kumar S, Weisel KC, Gay F. Navigating High-Risk and Ultrahigh-Risk Multiple Myeloma: Challenges and Emerging Strategies. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2024; 44:e433520. [PMID: 38772002 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_433520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2024]
Abstract
Despite significant improvement in the outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) with novel therapies, there is still an underserved high-risk (HR) population that experiences early disease progression and death. With the median survival crossing 10 years, we defined ultrahigh-risk (uHR)MM as MM leading to death within 24-36 months of diagnosis and HRMM as MM leading to death within 36-60 months. Several features have emerged as markers of uHRMM: the co-occurrence of two or more high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities, extramedullary disease, plasma cell leukemia and a high-risk gene expression profiling signature. The heterogeneous risk definition across trials, the few trials available designed for HR patients, and the small HR subgroups in all-comers trials make it difficult to generate recommendations with high levels of evidence. Nevertheless, regardless of treatment administered, several studies consistently showed that achieving and maintaining measurable residual disease negativity is now considered the main factor able to mitigate the adverse prognosis related to baseline features. For fit patients with HR transplant-eligible (TE) NDMM, quadruplet induction/consolidation treatment with anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, immunomodulatory agents, proteasome inhibitors and dexamethasone, and autologous stem-cell transplant and maintenance with, if available, at least a doublet combination could be considered the option of choice. For non-TE NDMM, considering the recent data generated and carefully reviewing those upcoming, quadruplet treatment consisting of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, immunomodulatory agents, proteasome inhibitors, and dexamethasone should also be considered. Future trials integrating BCMA-directed novel generation immunotherapies hold great potential for further advancing the treatment landscape in all NDMM patients with HR disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mattia D'Agostino
- Division of Hematology, Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Lisa B Leypoldt
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Shaji Kumar
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Katja C Weisel
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Francesca Gay
- Division of Hematology, Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
O'Donnell E, Mo C, Yee AJ, Nadeem O, Laubach J, Rosenblatt J, Munshi N, Midha S, Cirstea D, Chrysafi P, Horick N, Richardson PG, Raje N. Isatuximab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed, transplantation-eligible multiple myeloma (SKylaRk): a single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Haematol 2024; 11:e415-e424. [PMID: 38677302 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(24)00070-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Revised: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Isatuximab is a CD38 monoclonal antibody approved for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. We aimed to evaluate the addition of isatuximab to weekly carfilzomib (K), lenalidomide (R), and dexamethasone (d; Isa-KRd) in transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and stratified maintenance by cytogenetic risk. METHODS This single-arm phase 2 trial was done at three cancer centres (two hospitals and a cancer institute) in Boston (MA, USA). Eligible patients were aged at least 18 years and had transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and an ECOG performance status of 2 or less. Patients received four 28-day cycles of Isa-KRd, including isatuximab 10 mg/kg intravenously weekly for 8 weeks, then every other week for 16 weeks, and every 4 weeks thereafter; carfilzomib 56 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 (20 mg/m2 for cycle 1 day 1); lenalidomide 25 mg orally on days 1-21; and dexamethasone 20 mg orally the day of and day after all doses of carfilzomib and isatuximab. Consolidation involved either upfront haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) with two additional cycles or deferred HSCT with four additional cycles of treatment. The primary endpoint was complete response after four cycles of treatment. Analyses were by intention-to-treat. All patients who received one dose of study drug were included in the safety analyses. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04430894, and has completed enrolment. FINDINGS Between July 31, 2020 and Jan 31, 2022, 50 patients were enrolled. Median age was 59 years (range 40-70), 54% (27 of 50 patients) were male, and 44 (88%) were White. 46% (23 of 50) of patients had high-risk cytogenetics. Median follow-up was 26 months (IQR 20·7-30·1). 32% (16 of 50 patients) achieved a complete response after four cycles. The overall response rate (ORR) was 90% (45 patients) and 78% (39 patients) achieved a very good partial response (VGPR) or better. After completion of consolidation, 58% (29 patients) achieved a complete response; the ORR was 90% (45 patients) and 86% (43 patients) achieved a VGPR or better. The most common grade 3 or 4 side-effects (≥two patients) included neutropenia (13 [26%] of 50 patients), elevated alanine aminotransferase (six [12%] patients), fatigue (three [6%] patients), thrombocytopenia (three [6%] patients), acute kidney injury (two [4%] patients), anaemia (two [4%] patients), and febrile neutropenia (two [4%] patients). Grade 1-2 infusion-related reactions were seen in 20% (ten patients), with none grade 3. Grade 1-2 hypertension was seen in 14% (seven patients) with one grade 3 (one [2%] patient). There were two deaths assessed as unrelated to treatment. INTERPRETATION Although the study did not achieve the prespecified complete response threshold, Isa-KRd induced deep and durable responses in transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. The treatment proved safe and consistent with similar regimens in this setting. FUNDING Amgen, Sanofi, and Adaptive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth O'Donnell
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Clifton Mo
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew J Yee
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Omar Nadeem
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jacob Laubach
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jacalyn Rosenblatt
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nikhil Munshi
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shonali Midha
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Diana Cirstea
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Nora Horick
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Paul G Richardson
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Noopur Raje
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Derman BA, Cooperrider J, Rosenblatt J, Avigan DE, Rampurwala M, Barnidge D, Major A, Karrison T, Jiang K, Ramsland A, Kubicki T, Jakubowiak AJ. Final analysis of a phase II trial of daratumumab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma without transplant. Blood Cancer J 2024; 14:87. [PMID: 38811560 PMCID: PMC11136961 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-024-01045-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
We evaluated the efficacy and safety of 24 cycles of Dara in combination with carfilzomib (K), lenalidomide (R), and dexamethasone (d) without autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) irrespective of ASCT eligibility in a single-arm, phase II study. The primary endpoint was the rate of stringent complete response (sCR) and/or measurable residual disease (MRD) < 10-5 by next-generation sequencing (NGS) at the end of cycle 8 (C8). MRD was also assessed on peripheral blood samples using both the EXENT® system and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Forty-two patients entered the treatment phase; forty were evaluable for the primary endpoint. The rate of sCR and/or MRD < 10-5 following C8 was 30/40 (75%), meeting the statistical threshold for efficacy. The 10-6 MRD negative rate improved with treatment beyond C8. Agreement between EXENT® and NGS was high and increased over time; agreement between LC-MS and NGS was lower. The estimated 3-year progression-free survival progression-free survival was 85%, and 3-year overall survival was 95%. Upper respiratory infections occurred in 67% (7% grade 3-4). There were no treatment-related deaths. Extended frontline Dara-KRd induced a high rate of sCR and/or MRD negativity; the rate and depth of MRD negativity improved beyond C8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin A Derman
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - David Barnidge
- The Binding Site Group, part of Thermo Fisher, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Theodore Karrison
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ken Jiang
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Tadeusz Kubicki
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rocchi S, Zannetti BA, Marconi G, Lanza F. Multiple Myeloma: The Role of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in the Era of Immunotherapy. Cells 2024; 13:853. [PMID: 38786075 PMCID: PMC11120591 DOI: 10.3390/cells13100853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2024] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Upfront high-dose therapy with melphalan (HDM) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has established itself as a core treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients in the past 30 years. Induction therapy, HDM-ASCT, and subsequent consolidation and maintenance therapy comprise the current fundamental framework for MM treatment. The introduction of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies such as daratumumab and isatuximab has changed the treatment paradigm for transplant-eligible NDMM patients in that quadruplets have become the new standard induction therapy. The treatment landscape of MM is undergoing a transformative shift with the introduction of potent new immunotherapies, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells and bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), which are currently used in the relapsed/refractory setting (RRMM) and are already being tested in the NDMM. This review will focus on the incorporation of immunotherapy in the treatment scenario of NDMM patients eligible for ASCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Francesco Lanza
- Hematology Unit and Romagna Metropolitan Transplant Network—Ravenna, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy; (S.R.); (B.A.Z.); (G.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wennmann M, Rotkopf LT, Bauer F, Hielscher T, Kächele J, Mai EK, Weinhold N, Raab MS, Goldschmidt H, Weber TF, Schlemmer HP, Delorme S, Maier-Hein K, Neher P. Reproducible Radiomics Features from Multi-MRI-Scanner Test-Retest-Study: Influence on Performance and Generalizability of Models. J Magn Reson Imaging 2024. [PMID: 38733369 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.29442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2024] [Revised: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiomics models trained on data from one center typically show a decline of performance when applied to data from external centers, hindering their introduction into large-scale clinical practice. Current expert recommendations suggest to use only reproducible radiomics features isolated by multiscanner test-retest experiments, which might help to overcome the problem of limited generalizability to external data. PURPOSE To evaluate the influence of using only a subset of robust radiomics features, defined in a prior in vivo multi-MRI-scanner test-retest-study, on the performance and generalizability of radiomics models. STUDY TYPE Retrospective. POPULATION Patients with monoclonal plasma cell disorders. Training set (117 MRIs from center 1); internal test set (42 MRIs from center 1); external test set (143 MRIs from center 2-8). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE 1.5T and 3.0T; T1-weighted turbo spin echo. ASSESSMENT The task for the radiomics models was to predict plasma cell infiltration, determined by bone marrow biopsy, noninvasively from MRI. Radiomics machine learning models, including linear regressor, support vector regressor (SVR), and random forest regressor (RFR), were trained on data from center 1, using either all radiomics features, or using only reproducible radiomics features. Models were tested on an internal (center 1) and a multicentric external data set (center 2-8). STATISTICAL TESTS Pearson correlation coefficient r and mean absolute error (MAE) between predicted and actual plasma cell infiltration. Fisher's z-transformation, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test; significance level P < 0.05. RESULTS When using only reproducible features compared with all features, the performance of the SVR on the external test set significantly improved (r = 0.43 vs. r = 0.18 and MAE = 22.6 vs. MAE = 28.2). For the RFR, the performance on the external test set deteriorated when using only reproducible instead of all radiomics features (r = 0.33 vs. r = 0.44, P = 0.29 and MAE = 21.9 vs. MAE = 20.5, P = 0.10). CONCLUSION Using only reproducible radiomics features improves the external performance of some, but not all machine learning models, and did not automatically lead to an improvement of the external performance of the overall best radiomics model. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY Stage 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Wennmann
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lukas T Rotkopf
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Bauer
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Hielscher
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jessica Kächele
- Division of Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elias K Mai
- Heidelberg Myeloma Center, Department of Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Niels Weinhold
- Heidelberg Myeloma Center, Department of Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marc-Steffen Raab
- Heidelberg Myeloma Center, Department of Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hartmut Goldschmidt
- Heidelberg Myeloma Center, Department of Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tim F Weber
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Delorme
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Maier-Hein
- Division of Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Pattern Analysis and Learning Group, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Neher
- Division of Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Pattern Analysis and Learning Group, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ding J, Gong S. Quadruplet regimen for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma is effective in the standard-risk subgroup but not in the high-risk subgroup. Front Pharmacol 2024; 15:1398879. [PMID: 38783962 PMCID: PMC11111930 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1398879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jianghua Ding
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Jiujiang University Affiliated Hospital, Jiujiang, China
| | - Shengping Gong
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Barbieri E, Martino EA, Rivolti E, Quaresima M, Vigna E, Neri A, Morabito F, Gentile M. Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies in multiple myeloma with gain/amplification of chromosome arm 1q: a review of the literature. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2024; 24:365-381. [PMID: 38757726 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2024.2357382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gain/amplification of 1q (+1q) represents one of the most prevalent cytogenetic abnormalities (CAs) observed in multiple myeloma (MM). Historical studies predating the advent of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (moAbs) implicated + 1q in poor prognoses, prompting its integration into novel staging systems. However, with the emergence of daratumumab and isatuximab, two pivotal anti-CD38 moAbs, the landscape of MM therapy has undergone a profound transformation. AREAS COVERED This review encompasses a comprehensive analysis of diverse study methodologies, including observational investigations, clinical trials, meta-analyses, and real-world database analyses. By synthesizing these data sources, we aim to provide an overview of the current understanding of + 1q in the context of anti-CD38 moAbs therapies. EXPERT OPINION Despite the paucity of available data, evidence suggests a potential mitigating effect of daratumumab on the adverse prognostic implications of + 1q. However, this benefit seems to diminish in patients harboring ≥ 4 copies or with concurrent high-risk CAs. On the other hand, isatuximab demonstrated promising outcomes in the relapsed-refractory setting for + 1q MM patients. Nevertheless, direct comparison between the two compounds is currently challenging. The current evidence firmly supports the integration of anti-CD38 moAb-based therapies as the standard of care for + 1q patients, pending further elucidation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emiliano Barbieri
- Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Elena Rivolti
- Hematology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Micol Quaresima
- Hematology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Ernesto Vigna
- Hematology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Annunziata, Cosenza, Italy
| | - Antonino Neri
- Scientific Directorate, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | | | - Massimo Gentile
- Hematology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Annunziata, Cosenza, Italy
- Department of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Science, University of Calabria, Rende, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tang HKK, Fung CY, Hwang YY, Lee H, Lau G, Yip SF, Kho B, Lau CK, Leung KH, Au E, Tse E, Sim J, Kwong YL, Chim CS. Prognostic factors in 448 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma receiving bortezomib-based induction: impact of ASCT, transplant refusal and high-risk MM. Bone Marrow Transplant 2024; 59:660-669. [PMID: 38383715 PMCID: PMC11073964 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-024-02227-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
In Hong Kong, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) receives bortezomib-based triplet induction. Upfront autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is offered to transplant eligible (TE) patients (NDMM ≤ 65 years of age), unless medically unfit (TE-unfit) or refused (TE-refused). Data was retrieved for 448 patients to assess outcomes. For the entire cohort, multivariate analysis showed that male gender (p = 0.006), international staging system (ISS) 3 (p = 0.003), high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (p = 7.6 × 10-7) were adverse predictors for overall survival (OS), while complete response/ near complete response (CR/nCR) post-induction (p = 2.7 × 10-5) and ASCT (p = 4.8 × 10-4) were favorable factors for OS. In TE group, upfront ASCT was conducted in 252 (76.1%). Failure to undergo ASCT in TE patients rendered an inferior OS (TE-unfit p = 1.06 × 10-8, TE-refused p = 0.002) and event free survival (EFS) (TE-unfit p = 0.00013, TE-refused p = 0.002). Among TE patients with ASCT, multivariate analysis showed that age ≥ 60 (p = 8.9 × 10-4), ISS 3 (p = 0.019) and high LDH (p = 2.6 × 10-4) were adverse factors for OS. In those with high-risk features (HR cytogenetics, ISS 3, R-ISS 3), ASCT appeared to mitigate their adverse impact. Our data reaffirmed the importance of ASCT. The poor survival inherent with refusal of ASCT should be recognized by clinicians. Finally, improved outcome with ASCT in those with high-risk features warrant further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hoi Ki Karen Tang
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
| | - Chi Yeung Fung
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
| | - Yu Yan Hwang
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
| | - Harold Lee
- Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Hospital, Kwai Chung, Hong Kong
| | - Grace Lau
- Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Hospital, Kwai Chung, Hong Kong
| | - Sze Fai Yip
- Department of Medicine, Tuen Mun Hospital, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong
| | - Bonnie Kho
- Department of Medicine, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Chai Wan, Hong Kong
| | - Chi Kuen Lau
- Department of Medicine, Tseung Kwan O Hospital, Tseung Kwan O, Hong Kong
| | - Kwan Hung Leung
- Department of Medicine, United Christian Hospital, Kwun Tong, Hong Kong
| | - Elaine Au
- Department of Pathology, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
| | - Eric Tse
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
| | - Joycelyn Sim
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
| | - Yok Lam Kwong
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
| | - Chor Sang Chim
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong.
- Department of Medicine, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Liu Y, Yu S, Chen Y, Hu Z, Fan L, Liang G. The clinical regimens and cell membrane camouflaged nanodrug delivery systems in hematologic malignancies treatment. Front Pharmacol 2024; 15:1376955. [PMID: 38689664 PMCID: PMC11059051 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1376955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Hematologic malignancies (HMs), also referred to as hematological or blood cancers, pose significant threats to patients as they impact the blood, bone marrow, and lymphatic system. Despite significant clinical strategies using chemotherapy, radiotherapy, stem cell transplantation, targeted molecular therapy, or immunotherapy, the five-year overall survival of patients with HMs is still low. Fortunately, recent studies demonstrate that the nanodrug delivery system holds the potential to address these challenges and foster effective anti-HMs with precise treatment. In particular, cell membrane camouflaged nanodrug offers enhanced drug targeting, reduced toxicity and side effects, and/or improved immune response to HMs. This review firstly introduces the merits and demerits of clinical strategies in HMs treatment, and then summarizes the types, advantages, and disadvantages of current nanocarriers helping drug delivery in HMs treatment. Furthermore, the types, functions, and mechanisms of cell membrane fragments that help nanodrugs specifically targeted to and accumulate in HM lesions are introduced in detail. Finally, suggestions are given about their clinical translation and future designs on the surface of nanodrugs with multiple functions to improve therapeutic efficiency for cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuanyuan Liu
- College of Basic Medicine and Forensic Medicine, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, Henan, China
| | - Shanwu Yu
- College of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, Henan, China
| | - Yixiang Chen
- Luoyang Vocational and Technical College, Luoyang, Henan, China
| | - Zhihong Hu
- College of Basic Medicine and Forensic Medicine, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, Henan, China
| | - Lingling Fan
- College of Basic Medicine and Forensic Medicine, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, Henan, China
| | - Gaofeng Liang
- College of Basic Medicine and Forensic Medicine, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, Henan, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
van de Donk NWCJ, Zweegman S. Monoclonal Antibodies in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2024; 38:337-360. [PMID: 38151402 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2023.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
The incorporation of monoclonal antibodies into backbone regimens has substantially improved the clinical outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Although the SLAMF7-targeting antibody elotuzumab has no single- agent activity, there is clinical synergy between elotuzumab and immunomodulatory drugs in patients with relapsed/refractory disease. Daratumumab and isatuximab are CD38-targeting antibodies which have single-agent activity and a favorable safety profile, which make these agents an attractive component of combination regimens. Monoclonal antibodies may cause infusion-related reactions, but with subcutaneous administration these are less frequently observed. All therapeutic antibodies may interfere with assessment of complete response. Next-generation Fc-engineered monoclonal antibodies are in development with the potential to further improve the outcome of patients with MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niels W C J van de Donk
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam 1081 HV, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Sonja Zweegman
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam 1081 HV, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ravi G, Bal S, Joiner L, Giri S, Sentell M, Hill T, Godby KN, Costa LJ. Subsequent therapy and outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma experiencing disease progression after quadruplet combinations. Br J Haematol 2024; 204:1300-1306. [PMID: 38291707 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.19303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Revised: 12/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
The combination of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies to a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory agent and dexamethasone (quadruplet-QUAD) in sequence with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) leads to deep and durable responses in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Disease progression in the first year post-QUADs is uncommon. We analysed 274 consecutive NDMM patients treated with QUADs + ASCT. After a median follow-up of 21.3 months, 20 patients had disease progression <18 months and 21 had progression ≥18 months after the onset of a QUAD regimen. All patients received subsequent anti-MM therapy, and 38 were evaluated for response. Nine (22.0%) received T-cell redirecting therapy as the next treatment, and 21 (51.2%) at some point in the treatment course. Response to next therapy was 26.3% for patients with progression <18 months and 52.6% for those with progression ≥18 months after the onset of a QUAD regimen. Median PFS on the next therapy was 2.5 months (95% CI 1.5-3.4) for those with progression <18 months and 7.0 months (95% CI 3.6-10.5) for those with progression ≥18 months. Efforts should focus on the early deployment of therapies with new mechanism of action for patients experiencing treatment failure after QUADs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gayathri Ravi
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Susan Bal
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Laura Joiner
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Smit Giri
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Melissa Sentell
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Tiffany Hill
- O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Kelly N Godby
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Luciano J Costa
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Neuendorff NR, Khan A, Ullrich F, Yates S, Devarakonda S, Lin RJ, von Tresckow B, Cordoba R, Artz A, Rosko AE. Cellular therapies in older adults with hematological malignancies: A case-based, state-of-the-art review. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101734. [PMID: 38430810 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Revised: 11/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
Cellular therapies, including autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), and chimeric antigen receptor- (CAR-) T cell therapies are essential treatment modalities for many hematological malignancies. Although their use in older adults has substantially increased within the past decades, cellular therapies represent intensive treatment approaches that exclude a large percentage of older adults due to comorbidities and frailty. Under- and overtreatment in older adults with hematologic malignancy is a challenge and many treatment decisions are influenced by chronologic age. The advent of efficient and well-tolerated newer treatment approaches for multiple myeloma has challenged the role of ASCT. In the modern era, there are no randomized clinical trials of transplant versus non-transplant strategies for patients ≥65 years. Nonetheless, ASCT is feasible for selected older patients and does not result in long-term compromise in quality of life. AlloHCT is the only curative approach for acute myeloid leukemia of intermediate and unfavourable risk but carries a significant risk for non-relapse mortality depending on comorbidities, general fitness, and transplant-specific characteristics, such as intensity of conditioning and donor choice. However, alloHCT is feasible in appropriately-selected older adults. Early referral for evaluation is strongly encouraged as this is the most obvious barrier. CAR-T cell therapies have shown unprecedented clinical efficacy and durability in relapsed and refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Its use is well tolerated in older adults, although evidence comes from limited case numbers. Whether patients who are deemed unfit for ASCT qualify for CAR-T cell therapy remains elusive, but the tolerability and efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy appears promising, especially for older patients. The evidence from randomized trials is strong in favor of using a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) to reduce treatment-related toxicities and guide treatment intensity in the care for solid tumors; its use for evaluation of cellular therapies is less evidence-based. However, CGA can provide useful information on patients' fitness, resilient mechanisms, and reveal potential optimization strategies for compensating for vulnerabilities. In this narrative review, we will discuss key questions on cellular therapies in older adults based on illustrative patient cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Rosa Neuendorff
- Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, D-45147 Essen, Germany.
| | - Abdullah Khan
- Department of Hematology, The Ohio State University, James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Fabian Ullrich
- Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, D-45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Samuel Yates
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology and Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Srinivas Devarakonda
- Department of Hematology, The Ohio State University, James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Richard J Lin
- Adult Bone Marrow Transplantation (BMT) Service, Cellular Therapy Service, Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Bastian von Tresckow
- Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, D-45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Raul Cordoba
- Lymphoma Unit, Department of Hematology, Health Research Institute IIS-FJD, Fundacion Jimenez Diaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Andrew Artz
- Division of Leukemia, Department of Hematology & Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Ashley E Rosko
- Department of Hematology, The Ohio State University, James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Devasia AJ, Lancman GS, Stewart AK. Management of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Today, and in the Future. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2024; 38:441-459. [PMID: 38171937 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2023.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Treatment options have expanded rapidly and widely in the past two decades for patients with multiple myeloma. Triplet novel agent-based induction regimens have been accepted as the standard practice wordwide over the last decade both for transplant-eligible and non-eligible patients. The addition of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies as part of quadruplet regimens has led to even deeper and longer-lasting responses. The impressive results shown by the quadruplets havebeen practice-changing where accessible in recent years. Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy and bispecific antibodies are being tested in the upfront setting and have the potential to once again shift the paradigm of treatment of newly diagnosed MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anup Joseph Devasia
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 700 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X6 Canada
| | - Guido Sebastian Lancman
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 700 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X6 Canada
| | - Alexander Keith Stewart
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 700 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X6 Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hwang A, Hayden P, Pawlyn C, McLornan D, Garderet L. The role of maintenance therapy following autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: Considerations on behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT. Br J Haematol 2024; 204:1159-1175. [PMID: 38390784 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.19353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
Recent treatment advancements in multiple myeloma have led to significant improvements in patient outcomes. Maintenance therapy following autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHCT) is now standard of care and has been demonstrated to prolong and deepen treatment responses. Currently, lenalidomide remains the single agent that has been approved for maintenance post-AHCT in Europe and the USA which, if tolerated, is continued until disease progression. The treatment landscape is rapidly expanding however, and the optimal personalised maintenance approach for a patient is becoming more complex. Treatment outcomes for patients with high-risk disease remain poor and choice of maintenance in this population also remains unclear. This review article evaluates up-to-date literature regarding established maintenance approaches. It further analyses ongoing studies exploring maintenance regimens using combination and novel agents, approaches to maintenance in patients with cytogenetic high-risk disease and minimal residual disease response-adapted strategies that reflect the current evolving treatment paradigm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Hwang
- Department of Haematology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Patrick Hayden
- Department of Haematology, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Donal McLornan
- Department of Haematology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Laurent Garderet
- Département d'Hématologie, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Mai EK, Hielscher T, Bertsch U, Salwender HJ, Zweegman S, Raab MS, Munder M, Pantani L, Mancuso K, Brossart P, Beksac M, Blau IW, Dürig J, Besemer B, Fenk R, Reimer P, van der Holt B, Hänel M, von Metzler I, Graeven U, Müller-Tidow C, Boccadoro M, Scheid C, Dimopoulos MA, Hillengass J, Weisel KC, Cavo M, Sonneveld P, Goldschmidt H. Predictors of early morbidity and mortality in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: data from five randomized, controlled, phase III trials in 3700 patients. Leukemia 2024; 38:640-647. [PMID: 38062124 PMCID: PMC10912032 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-023-02105-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
Early morbidity and mortality affect patient outcomes in multiple myeloma. Thus, we dissected the incidence and causes of morbidity/mortality during induction therapy (IT) for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), and developed/validated a predictive risk score. We evaluated 3700 transplant-eligible NDMM patients treated in 2005-2020 with novel agent-based triplet/quadruplet IT. Primary endpoints were severe infections, death, or a combination of both. Patients were divided in a training (n = 1333) and three validation cohorts (n = 2367). During IT, 11.8%, 1.8%, and 12.5% of patients in the training cohort experienced severe infections, death, or both, respectively. Four major, baseline risk factors for severe infection/death were identified: low platelet count (<150/nL), ISS III, higher WHO performance status (>1), and age (>60 years). A risk score (1 risk factor=1 point) stratified patients in low (39.5%; 0 points), intermediate (41.9%; 1 point), and high (18.6%; ≥2 points) risk. The risk for severe infection/death increased from 7.7% vs. 11.5% vs. 23.3% in the low- vs. intermediate- vs. high-risk groups (p < 0.001). The risk score was independently validated in three trials incorporating quadruplet IT with an anti-CD38 antibody. Our analyses established a robust and easy-to-use score to identify NDMM patients at risk of severe infection/death, covering the latest quadruplet induction therapies. Trial registrations: HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4: EudraCT No. 2004-000944-26. GMMG-MM5: EudraCT No. 2010-019173-16. GMMG-HD6: NCT02495922. EMN02/HOVON-95: NCT01208766. GMMG-HD7: NCT03617731.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias K Mai
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Thomas Hielscher
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Uta Bertsch
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hans J Salwender
- Tumorzentrum Asklepios Hamburg, AK Altona and AK St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sonja Zweegman
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marc S Raab
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Munder
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Lucia Pantani
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli", Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Katia Mancuso
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli", Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Peter Brossart
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Meral Beksac
- Department of Hematology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Igor W Blau
- Medical Clinic, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jan Dürig
- Department of Hematology, University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Britta Besemer
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Roland Fenk
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter Reimer
- Klinik für Hämatologie, Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Essen-Werden, Essen, Germany
| | - Bronno van der Holt
- HOVON Data Center, Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mathias Hänel
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Klinikum Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Ivana von Metzler
- Medical Clinic II, University Hospital Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Ullrich Graeven
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Hospital Maria Hilf GmbH, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Carsten Müller-Tidow
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mario Boccadoro
- Myeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Christof Scheid
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Meletios A Dimopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Katja C Weisel
- Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Michele Cavo
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli", Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Pieter Sonneveld
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hartmut Goldschmidt
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Trudel S, McCurdy A, Louzada ML, Parkin S, White D, Chu MP, Kotb R, Mian H, Othman I, Su J, Khan A, Gul E, Reece D. Belantamab mafodotin, pomalidomide and dexamethasone in refractory multiple myeloma: a phase 1/2 trial. Nat Med 2024; 30:543-551. [PMID: 38177852 PMCID: PMC10878971 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02703-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
Due to evolving treatment standards for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, many patients will be triple-class exposed after initial relapses and have poor survival. Novel therapies and combinations are therefore required to improve outcomes. B cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted biologics have emerged as an important new area of therapeutics for relapsed multiple myeloma. The two-part ALGONQUIN trial evaluated various doses and schedules of the anti-BCMA antibody-drug conjugate belantamab mafodotin plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone for patients who are lenalidomide refractory and proteosome inhibitor exposed. The primary endpoints, including evaluating dose-limiting toxicities, establishing the recommended Part 2 dose (RP2D) and overall response rate for patients treated at the RP2D, were met. Secondary efficacy endpoints included progression-free survival and overall survival. Patients treated on study (N = 87) had a median of three previous regimens and 55.2% were triple-class refractory. At the RP2D the most common adverse events were decrease in best-corrected visual acuity (71.1%), keratopathy (65.8%), fatigue (57.9%), infection (47.4%; 7.9% grade ≥3), neutropenia (39.5%) and thrombocytopenia (39.5%). For RP2D patients (n = 38), the overall response rate was 85.3%, ≥very good partial response 75.7% and estimated two-year progression-free survival 52.8% (95% confidence interval, 33.9% to 82.4%), at a median follow-up of 13.9 months. The RP2D schedule was associated with manageable antibody-drug conjugate-associated corneal adverse events and improved tolerability without compromising efficacy. Belantamab mafodotin plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone induced durable responses with promising overall survival in relapsed multiple myeloma, the results of which are yet to be confirmed in the phase 3 DREAMM-8 study. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03715478 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne Trudel
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | | | - Stephen Parkin
- Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Darrell White
- Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | | | - Rami Kotb
- CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Hira Mian
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Jiandong Su
- Canadian Myeloma Research Group (CMRG), Vaughan, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aniba Khan
- Canadian Myeloma Research Group (CMRG), Vaughan, Ontario, Canada
| | - Engin Gul
- Canadian Myeloma Research Group (CMRG), Vaughan, Ontario, Canada
| | - Donna Reece
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Zhang CW, Wang YN, Ge XL. Lenalidomide use in multiple myeloma (Review). Mol Clin Oncol 2024; 20:7. [PMID: 38125742 PMCID: PMC10729307 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2023.2705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Lenalidomide is a second-generation new immunomodulatory medication used to treat multiple myeloma (MM). Its mechanism of action involves affecting the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, interleukin-6, cytochrome c, caspase-8, as well as other factors including immunological modulation and the direct killing of cells, among others, rendering it a fundamental medication, useful for the treatment of MM. Combining lenalidomide with other medications such dexamethasone, bortezomib, ixazomib, carfilzomib and daratumumab can markedly alleviate MM. When autologous-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) cannot be utilized to treat newly diagnosed individuals with MM (NDMM), monotherapy maintenance following lenalidomide and dexamethasone may be employed. Following ASCT, single-agent maintenance with lenalidomide can be performed as an additional treatment. The combination of bortezomib and lenalidomide has been demonstrated to be associated with favorable response rates, tolerable toxicity, and therapeutic benefits although caution is warranted to prevent the onset of peripheral neuropathy with its use. A new-generation oral drug with an excellent safety profile, ixazomib, is more practical and therapeutically applicable in relapsed refractory MM. However, the frequent occurrence of cardiovascular events, hematocrit, and infections with it require flexible adjustment in its clinical application. Carfilzomib produces a rapid and profound response in patients with NDMM eligible for transplantation, but its cardiovascular side effects need to be closely monitored. The primary aim of the present review was to examine the pharmacological properties and pharmacokinetics of lenalidomide, as well as the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide-based treatments with reference to data from clinical trials and real-world studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao-Wei Zhang
- Department of Hematology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong 250021, P.R. China
| | - Ya-Nan Wang
- Department of Hematology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong 250021, P.R. China
| | - Xue-Ling Ge
- Department of Hematology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong 250021, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Leypoldt LB, Tichy D, Besemer B, Hänel M, Raab MS, Mann C, Munder M, Reinhardt HC, Nogai A, Görner M, Ko YD, de Wit M, Salwender H, Scheid C, Graeven U, Peceny R, Staib P, Dieing A, Einsele H, Jauch A, Hundemer M, Zago M, Požek E, Benner A, Bokemeyer C, Goldschmidt H, Weisel KC. Isatuximab, Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for the Treatment of High-Risk Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:26-37. [PMID: 37753960 PMCID: PMC10730063 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The GMMG-CONCEPT trial investigated isatuximab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (Isa-KRd) in transplant-eligible (TE) and transplant-noneligible (TNE) patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) with exclusively high-risk disease for whom prospective trials are limited, aiming to induce minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity. METHODS This academic, investigator-initiated, multicenter, phase II trial enrolled patients with high-risk NDMM (HRNDMM) defined by mandatory International Staging System stage II/III combined with del17p, t(4;14), t(14;16), or more than three 1q21 copies as high-risk cytogenetic aberrations (HRCAs). Patients received Isa-KRd induction/consolidation and Isa-KR maintenance. TE patients received high-dose melphalan. TNE patients received two additional Isa-KRd cycles postinduction. This prespecified interim analysis (IA) reports the primary end point, MRD negativity (<10-5, next-generation flow), at the end of consolidation. The secondary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS Among 125 patients with HRNDMM (TE-intention-to-treat [ITT]-IA, 99; TNE-ITT, 26) of the IA population for the primary end point, the median age was 58 (TE-ITT-IA) and 74 (TNE-ITT) years. Del17p was the most common HRCA (TE, 44.4%; TNE, 42.3%); about one third of evaluable TE/TNE patients presented two or more HRCAs, respectively. The trial met its primary end point with MRD negativity rates after consolidation of 67.7% (TE) and 54.2% (TNE) of patients. Eighty-one of 99 TE-ITT-IA patients reached MRD negativity at any time point (81.8%). MRD negativity was sustained for ≥1 year in 62.6% of patients. With a median follow-up of 44 (TE) and 33 (TNE) months, median PFS was not reached in either arm. CONCLUSION Isa-KRd effectively induces high rates of sustainable MRD negativity in the difficult-to-treat HRNDMM population, regardless of transplant status, translating into a median PFS that was not yet reached after 44/33 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa B. Leypoldt
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation With Section of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Diana Tichy
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Britta Besemer
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Mathias Hänel
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Klinikum Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Marc S. Raab
- Internal Medicine V and National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Mann
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, University Hospital of Gießen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Markus Munder
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Hans Christian Reinhardt
- Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK partner site Essen), Essen, Germany
| | - Axel Nogai
- Department of Internal Medicine, Charité—University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Martin Görner
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Klinikum Bielefeld Mitte, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Yon-Dschun Ko
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, Johanniter Krankenhaus Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Maike de Wit
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hans Salwender
- Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, AK Altona and AK St Georg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christof Scheid
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ullrich Graeven
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Rudolf Peceny
- Department of Oncology, Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Klinikum Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Peter Staib
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, St Antonius Hospital Eschweiler, Eschweiler, Germany
| | - Annette Dieing
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Vivantes Klinikum am Urban, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hermann Einsele
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Anna Jauch
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Hundemer
- Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Manola Zago
- Center for Clinical Trials, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Ema Požek
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Axel Benner
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carsten Bokemeyer
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation With Section of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hartmut Goldschmidt
- Internal Medicine V, GMMG-Studygroup at University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katja C. Weisel
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation With Section of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Mouhieddine TH, Nzerem C, Redd R, Dunford A, Leventhal M, Sklavenitis-Pistofidis R, Tahri S, El-Khoury H, Steensma DP, Ebert BL, Soiffer RJ, Keats JJ, Mehr S, Auclair D, Ghobrial IM, Sperling AS, Stewart C, Getz G. Clinical Outcomes and Evolution of Clonal Hematopoiesis in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma. CANCER RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 2023; 3:2560-2571. [PMID: 38019104 PMCID: PMC10730502 DOI: 10.1158/2767-9764.crc-23-0093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023]
Abstract
Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) at time of autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has been shown to be associated with decreased overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with multiple myeloma not receiving immunomodulatory drugs (IMiD). However, the significance of CH in newly diagnosed patients, including transplant ineligible patients, and its effect on clonal evolution during multiple myeloma therapy in the era of novel agents, has not been well studied. Using our new algorithm to differentiate tumor and germline mutations from CH, we detected CH in approximately 10% of 986 patients with multiple myeloma from the Clinical Outcomes in MM to Personal Assessment of Genetic Profile (CoMMpass) cohort (40/529 transplanted and 59/457 non-transplanted patients). CH was associated with increased age, risk of recurrent bacterial infections and cardiovascular disease. CH at time of multiple myeloma diagnosis was not associated with inferior OS or PFS regardless of undergoing ASCT, and all patients benefited from IMiD-based therapies, irrespective of the presence of CH. Serial sampling of 52 patients revealed the emergence of CH over a median of 3 years of treatment, increasing its prevalence to 25%, mostly with DNMT3A mutations. SIGNIFICANCE Using our algorithm to differentiate tumor and germline mutations from CH mutations, we detected CH in approximately 10% of patients with newly diagnosed myeloma, including both transplant eligible and ineligible patients. Receiving IMiDs improved outcomes irrespective of CH status, but the prevalence of CH significantly rose throughout myeloma-directed therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarek H. Mouhieddine
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Chidimma Nzerem
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robert Redd
- Department of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrew Dunford
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | | | - Romanos Sklavenitis-Pistofidis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Sabrin Tahri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Habib El-Khoury
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - David P. Steensma
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Benjamin L. Ebert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Robert J. Soiffer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jonathan J. Keats
- Integrated Cancer Genomics Division, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Shaadi Mehr
- Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation, Norwalk, Connecticut
| | - Daniel Auclair
- Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation, Norwalk, Connecticut
| | - Irene M. Ghobrial
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Adam S. Sperling
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
- Division of Hematology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Chip Stewart
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Gad Getz
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
- Cancer Center and Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hartley-Brown M. Considerations for next therapy after anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies used as first line. HEMATOLOGY. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY. EDUCATION PROGRAM 2023; 2023:443-449. [PMID: 38066885 PMCID: PMC10727041 DOI: 10.1182/hematology.2023000444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
In the current treatment paradigm, the use of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in frontline has notably increased, for both transplant-ineligible and transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. As a result, patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are frequently exposed to or develop resistance to anti-CD38 mAb therapy during the initial stages of treatment. Here, we review second-line (first relapse) and some third-line (second relapse) therapies for patients with MM with disease progression after exposure to anti-CD38 mAb-based therapy. We discuss therapies including B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted and non-BCMA-targeted therapeutic options in the setting of prior anti-CD38 mAb exposure/refractoriness.
Collapse
|
30
|
Mo CC, Hartley-Brown MA, Midha S, Richardson PG. Upfront or Deferred Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Triplet and Quadruplet Induction and Minimal Residual Disease/Risk-Adapted Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5709. [PMID: 38136255 PMCID: PMC10741557 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
The standards of care for the initial treatment of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who are eligible for high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDM-ASCT) include highly active triplet and quadruplet regimens based on proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and monoclonal antibodies. These regimens are resulting in improved outcomes and increasingly high rates of minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative responses without HDM-ASCT as part of the upfront therapy. Furthermore, recent randomized studies have shown that, while transplant-based approaches as a frontline therapy result in significantly longer progression-free survival compared to non-transplant approaches, this has not translated into an overall survival benefit. Given these developments, and in the context of the treatment burden of undergoing HDM-ASCT, in addition to the acute toxicities and long-term sequelae of HDM, which are associated with the genotoxicity of melphalan, there is an increasing rationale for considering deferring upfront HDM-ASCT in select transplant-eligible patients and saving it as a treatment option for later salvage therapy. Here, we review the latest clinical trial data on upfront or deferred HDM-ASCT and on the activity of quadruplet induction regimens, including rates of MRD-negative responses, and summarize emerging treatment approaches in the upfront setting such as the use of MRD-directed therapy and alternatives to HDM-ASCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Paul G. Richardson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Jerome Lipper Center for Multiple Myeloma Research, Harvard Medical School, 450 Brookline Avenue, Dana 1B02, Boston, MA 02115, USA; (C.C.M.); (M.A.H.-B.); (S.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Dapunt U, Ehret P, Paratte JL, Kuehl RM, Wiskemann J, Jäger D, Müller-Tidow C, Raab MS, Goldschmidt H. A precision-based exercise program for patients with multiple myeloma. Eur J Haematol 2023; 111:930-937. [PMID: 37727991 DOI: 10.1111/ejh.14106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate an interdisciplinary consultation followed by a precision-based exercise program (PEP) for myeloma patients with stable and unstable bone lesions. METHODS Data of myeloma patients (n = 100) who received a PEP according to an orthopedic evaluation were analyzed. Bone stability was assessed by established scoring systems (Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score [SINS], Mirels' score). All patients with stable and unstable osteolyses received a PEP and n = 91 were contacted for a follow-up interview. RESULTS In 60% of patients at least one osteolysis of the spine was considered potentially unstable or unstable. Following consultation, the number of patients performing resistance training could be significantly increased (≥2 sessions/week, 55%). Musculoskeletal pain was reported frequently. At the follow-up interview, 75% of patients who performed PEP stated that painful symptoms could be effectively alleviated by exercise. Moreover, only patients who exercised regularly discontinued pain medication. No injuries were reported in association with PEP. CONCLUSION We were able to demonstrate that individualized resistance training is implementable and safe for myeloma patients. By means of a PEP, patients' self-efficacy in managing musculoskeletal pain was enhanced and pain medication could be reduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrike Dapunt
- GMMG-Study Group, Department of Internal Medicine V, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pauline Ehret
- GMMG-Study Group, Department of Internal Medicine V, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jean-Luc Paratte
- Working Group Exercise Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rea Maria Kuehl
- Working Group Exercise Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Joachim Wiskemann
- Working Group Exercise Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dirk Jäger
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carsten Müller-Tidow
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marc-Steffen Raab
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Heidelberg Myeloma Center, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hartmut Goldschmidt
- GMMG-Study Group, Department of Internal Medicine V, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kauer J, Freundt EP, Schmitt A, Weinhold N, Mai EK, Müller-Tidow C, Goldschmidt H, Raab MS, Kriegsmann K, Sauer S. Stem cell collection after lenalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone plus elotuzumab or isatuximab in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: a single centre experience from the GMMG-HD6 and -HD7 trials. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:1132. [PMID: 37990162 PMCID: PMC10664363 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11507-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While quadruplet induction therapies deepen responses in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients, their impact on peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection remains incompletely understood. This analysis aims to evaluate the effects of prolonged lenalidomide induction and isatuximab- or elotuzumab-containing quadruplet induction therapies on PBSC mobilization and collection. METHODS A total of 179 transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed MM treated at a single academic center were included. The patients were evaluated based on PBSC mobilization and collection parameters, including overall collection results, CD34+ cell levels in peripheral blood, leukapheresis (LP) delays, overall number of LP sessions, and the rate of rescue mobilization with plerixafor. The patients underwent four different induction regimens: Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd, six 21-day cycles, n = 44), isatuximab-RVd (six 21-day cycles, n = 35), RVd (four 21-day cycles, n = 51), or elotuzumab-RVd (four 21-day cycles, n = 49). RESULTS The patients' characteristics were well balanced across the different groups. Collection failures, defined as the inability to collect three sufficient PBSC transplants, were rare (n = 3, 2%), with no occurrences in the isatuximab-RVd and elotuzumab-RVd groups. Intensified induction with six 21-day cycles of RVd did not negatively impact the overall number of collected PBSCs (9.7 × 106/kg bw versus 10.5 × 106/kg bw, p = 0.331) compared to four 21-day cycles of RVd. Plerixafor usage was more common after six cycles of RVd compared to four cycles (16% versus 8%). Addition of elotuzumab to RVd did not adversely affect overall PBSC collection (10.9 × 106/kg bw versus 10.5 × 106/kg bw, p = 0.915). Patients treated with isatuximab-RVd (six cycles) had lower numbers of collected stem cells compared to those receiving RVd (six cycles) induction (8.8 × 106/kg bw versus 9.7 × 106/kg bw, p = 0.801), without experiencing significant delays in LP or increased numbers of LP sessions in a multivariable logistic regression analysis. Plerixafor usage was more common after isatuximab plus RVd compared to RVd alone (34% versus 16%). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that stem cell collection is feasible after prolonged induction with isatuximab-RVd without collection failures and might be further explored as induction therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION Patients were treated within the randomized phase III clinical trials GMMG-HD6 (NCT02495922, 24/06/2015) and GMMG-HD7 (NCT03617731, 24/07/2018). However, during stem cell mobilization and -collection, no study-specific therapeutic intervention was performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Kauer
- Department of Haematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Molecular Medicine Partnership Unit (MMPU), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Emma P Freundt
- Department of Haematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anita Schmitt
- Department of Haematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Niels Weinhold
- Department of Haematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elias K Mai
- Department of Haematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- GMMG Study Group at University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carsten Müller-Tidow
- Department of Haematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Molecular Medicine Partnership Unit (MMPU), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Centre for Tumour Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hartmut Goldschmidt
- Department of Haematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- GMMG Study Group at University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Centre for Tumour Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marc S Raab
- Department of Haematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Centre for Tumour Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katharina Kriegsmann
- Department of Haematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Laborarztpraxis, Laborarztpraxis Rhein-Main MVZ GbR, Limbach Gruppe SE, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - Sandra Sauer
- Department of Haematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Rosiñol L, Hebraud B, Oriol A, Colin AL, Ríos Tamayo R, Hulin C, Blanchard MJ, Caillot D, Sureda A, Hernández MT, Arnulf B, Mateos MV, Macro M, San-Miguel J, Belhadj K, Lahuerta JJ, Garelik MB, Bladé J, Moreau P. Integrated analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating bortezomib + lenalidomide + dexamethasone or bortezomib + thalidomide + dexamethasone induction in transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1197340. [PMID: 38023148 PMCID: PMC10652744 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1197340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Providing the most efficacious frontline treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) is critical for patient outcomes. No direct comparisons have been made between bortezomib + lenalidomide + dexamethasone (VRD) and bortezomib + thalidomide + dexamethasone (VTD) induction regimens in transplant-eligible NDMM. Methods An integrated analysis was performed using patient data from four trials meeting prespecified eligibility criteria: two using VRD (PETHEMA GEM2012 and IFM 2009) and two using VTD (PETHEMA GEM2005 and IFM 2013-04). Results The primary endpoint was met, with VRD demonstrating a noninferior rate of at least very good partial response (≥ VGPR) after induction vs VTD. GEM comparison demonstrated improvement in the ≥ VGPR rate after induction for VRD vs VTD (66.3% vs 51.2%; P = .00281) that increased after transplant (74.4% vs 53.5%). Undetectable minimal residual disease rates post induction (46.7% vs 34.9%) and post transplant (62.4% vs 47.3%) support the benefit of VRD vs VTD. Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to study and/or treatment discontinuation were less frequent with VRD (3%, GEM2012; 6%, IFM 2009) vs VTD (11%, IFM 2013-04). Conclusion These results supported the benefit of VRD over VTD for induction in transplant-eligible patients with NDMM. The trials included are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01916252, NCT01191060, NCT00461747, and NCT01971658).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Rosiñol
- Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic Institut d’investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Benjamin Hebraud
- Hematology Department, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Albert Oriol
- Institut Català d’Oncologia I Institut Josep Carreras, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Anne-Laurène Colin
- Service de Pharmacologie Médicale et Clinique, Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Rafael Ríos Tamayo
- Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Spain
| | - Cyrille Hulin
- Department of Hematology, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Bordeaux Pessac, France
| | | | | | - Anna Sureda
- Institut Català d’Oncologia-Hospitalet i Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Bertrand Arnulf
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Hôpital St-Louis, Paris, France
| | - Maria-Victoria Mateos
- Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Margaret Macro
- Institut d’Hématologie de Basse Normandie, Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire de Caen, Caen, France
| | - Jesús San-Miguel
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra (CUN), Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Karim Belhadj
- Lymphoid Malignancies Unit, Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire Henri Mondor, Creteil, France
| | - Juan José Lahuerta
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra (CUN), Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - Joan Bladé
- Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic Institut d’investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Philippe Moreau
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Mohty M, Avet-Loiseau H, Malard F, Harousseau JL. Potential future direction of measurable residual disease evaluation in multiple myeloma. Blood 2023; 142:1509-1517. [PMID: 37471603 DOI: 10.1182/blood.2023020284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Multiple myeloma remains an incurable disease plagued by high relapse rates. Deeper and more sustainable responses, however, have been consistently shown to improve outcomes and could eventually pave the way to achieving a cure. Our understanding of disease response has surpassed complete response (CR), because the current definitions are suboptimal, and the treatment goal should aim even beyond stringent CR, toward molecular and flow CR, that is, measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity. It has been more than 20 years since the discrepancy in the outcome between patients in CR with and without MRD has been demonstrated, and the field has come a long way from multiparameter flow cytometry to next-generation flow and next-generation sequencing, able to detect up to a limit of detection of a single myeloma cell from 1 million healthy counterparts. This review aims to summarize the current available data regarding MRD but also its potential future use as a coprimary outcome both in clinical and trial settings as a survival surrogate as well as its use to evaluate treatment efficacy and for adaptive response-based and early-rescue therapy. Furthermore, we discuss whether these concepts are applicable in different settings (eg, newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory myeloma, patients who are eligible and ineligible for tansplant, and standard- and high-risk disease).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamad Mohty
- UMRS 938, Saint-Antoine Research Center, INSERM, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
- Clinical Hematology and Cellular Therapy Department, Saint Antoine Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Hervé Avet-Loiseau
- Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM, Myeloma Genomics Lab University Cancer Institute Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France
- Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Florent Malard
- UMRS 938, Saint-Antoine Research Center, INSERM, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
- Clinical Hematology and Cellular Therapy Department, Saint Antoine Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Luc Harousseau
- Centre René Gauducheau, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes-St Herblain, France
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Richter J, Pan D, Salinardi T, Rice MS. Real-world multiple myeloma front-line treatment and outcomes by transplant in the United States. EJHAEM 2023; 4:984-994. [PMID: 38024614 PMCID: PMC10660406 DOI: 10.1002/jha2.739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
Stem cell transplantation (SCT) has been an integral treatment modality for multiple myeloma (MM) for decades. However, as standard-of-care therapies have improved, the benefit of SCT has been repeatedly called into question. This retrospective study evaluated the association between SCT in the first line of therapy (LOT) and outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) in the United States. We included patients from a de-identified electronic health record-derived database who initiated front-line MM therapy between January 1, 2016, and January 31, 2022. Overall, 18.8% (1127 of 5996 patients) received SCT in the first LOT. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models, in which SCT was modeled as time varying, revealed longer real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS; hazard ratio [HR] 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-0.57) and real-world overall survival (rwOS; HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.39-0.56) for patients who received SCT in the first LOT. The degree of rwPFS and rwOS benefit imparted by SCT was consistent across all subgroups examined, including patients aged ≥75 years, women, non-Hispanic Black/African American patients, those with renal impairment, and those with high-risk cytogenetics. Findings from this analysis of real-world patients with NDMM suggest that SCT remains an important standard of care in the era of novel therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Richter
- Tisch Cancer InstituteIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Darren Pan
- Tisch Cancer InstituteIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Taylor Salinardi
- SanofiCambridgeMassachusettsUSA
- Present address:
Azurity PharmaceuticalsWoburnMassachusettsUSA
| | - Megan S. Rice
- SanofiCambridgeMassachusettsUSA
- Present address:
Vertex PharmaceuticalsCambridgeMassachusettsUSA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Bar N, Firestone RS, Usmani SZ. Aiming for the cure in myeloma: Putting our best foot forward. Blood Rev 2023; 62:101116. [PMID: 37596172 DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2023.101116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023]
Abstract
Frontline therapy for multiple myeloma (MM) is evolving to include novel combinations that can achieve unprecedented deep response rates. Several treatment strategies exist, varying in induction regimen composition, use of transplant and or consolidation and maintenance. In this sea of different treatment permutations, the overarching theme is the powerful prognostic factors of disease risk and achievement of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity. MM has significant inter-patient variability that requires treatment to be individualized. Risk-adapted and response-adapted strategies which are increasingly being explored to define the extent and duration of therapy, and eventually aim for functional curability. In addition, with T-cell redirection therapies rapidly revolutionizing myeloma treatments, the current standard of care for myeloma will change. This review analyzes the current relevant literature in upfront therapy for fit myeloma patients and provides suggestions for treatment approach while novel clinical trials are maturing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noffar Bar
- Section of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine University, New Haven, CT, USA.
| | - Ross S Firestone
- Multiple Myeloma Service, Department of medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Saad Z Usmani
- Multiple Myeloma Service, Department of medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Teipel R, Rieprecht S, Trautmann-Grill K, Röllig C, Klötzer C, Zimmer K, Rathaj G, Bach E, Brückner M, Heyn S, Wang SY, Jentzsch M, Schwind S, Kretschmann T, Egger-Heidrich K, Remane Y, Franke GN, von Bonin M, Bornhäuser M, Platzbecker U, Hölig K, Merz M, Vučinić V. Steady-state versus chemotherapy-based hematopoietic cell mobilization after anti-CD38-based induction therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Transfusion 2023; 63:2131-2139. [PMID: 37850414 DOI: 10.1111/trf.17566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 08/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incorporation of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAb) in induction regimens of newly diagnosed transplant-eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients has been established as a new standard. However, the optimal strategy of stem cell mobilization in this context is not yet clear. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS From May 2020 till September 2022, we retrospectively reviewed patients receiving anti-CD38 mAb-based induction therapy followed by stem cell mobilization either in a steady-state protocol (SSM) using 10 μg/kg granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for 5 days or in a chemotherapy-based protocol (CM) using 1-4 g/m2 cyclophosphamide and G-CSF. RESULTS Overall, 85 patients (median age 61 years) were included in the analysis. In total, 90 mobilization attempts were performed, 42 with SSM and 48 with CM. There was no significant difference in the median concentration of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood (PB) prior to apheresis between SSM and CM (61/μL vs. 55.4/μL; p = .60). Cumulative CD34+ yields did not differ between the groups with median of 6.68 and 6.75 × 106 /kg body weight, respectively (p = .35). The target yield (≥4 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg body weight) was reached in 88% (CM) and 86% (SSM), with a high proportion even after a single apheresis session (76% vs. 75%). Plerixafor was found to be more frequently used in SSM (52%) than in CM (23%; p < .01). A total of 83 patients underwent autologous transplantation and all were engrafted. CONCLUSIONS Stem cell collection in patients undergoing anti-CD38-based induction therapy is feasible with either CM or SSM, although SSM more frequently requires plerixafor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphael Teipel
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Susanne Rieprecht
- Department of Hematology, Cellular Therapy, Hemostaseology, and Infectious Diseases, University Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
- Pharmacy, University Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Christoph Röllig
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Christina Klötzer
- Department of Hematology, Cellular Therapy, Hemostaseology, and Infectious Diseases, University Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Kristin Zimmer
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Grit Rathaj
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Enrica Bach
- Department of Hematology, Cellular Therapy, Hemostaseology, and Infectious Diseases, University Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Mandy Brückner
- Department of Hematology, Cellular Therapy, Hemostaseology, and Infectious Diseases, University Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Simone Heyn
- Department of Hematology, Cellular Therapy, Hemostaseology, and Infectious Diseases, University Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Song-Yau Wang
- Department of Hematology, Cellular Therapy, Hemostaseology, and Infectious Diseases, University Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Madlen Jentzsch
- Department of Hematology, Cellular Therapy, Hemostaseology, and Infectious Diseases, University Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Theresa Kretschmann
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Yvonne Remane
- Pharmacy, University Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Georg-Nikolaus Franke
- Department of Hematology, Cellular Therapy, Hemostaseology, and Infectious Diseases, University Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Malte von Bonin
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Martin Bornhäuser
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Dresden, Germany
| | - Uwe Platzbecker
- Department of Hematology, Cellular Therapy, Hemostaseology, and Infectious Diseases, University Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Kristina Hölig
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Maximilian Merz
- Department of Hematology, Cellular Therapy, Hemostaseology, and Infectious Diseases, University Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Vladan Vučinić
- Department of Hematology, Cellular Therapy, Hemostaseology, and Infectious Diseases, University Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Lonial S, Bowser AD, Chari A, Costello C, Krishnan A, Usmani SZ. Expert Consensus on the Incorporation of Anti-CD38 Monoclonal Antibody Therapy Into the Management of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma. CLINICAL LYMPHOMA, MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA 2023; 23:815-824. [PMID: 37516547 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2023.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Multiple myeloma is a hematologic malignancy that is typically associated with recurrent relapses. There are numerous frontline treatment regimens that are highly effective for individual patients. The introduction of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody therapy has shifted treatment decision-making in this setting, with many centers now considering the use of daratumumab as part of initial therapy regardless of patient eligibility for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Daratumumab has demonstrated clinical efficacy and acceptable toxicity in the first and later lines of therapy, increasing complexity in treatment selection and sequencing. Although daratumumab-containing regimens may not be appropriate for every patient, it is increasingly recognized that the most effective regimens should be used upfront, as high rates of attrition mean that many patients in real-world practice may see a limited number of lines of therapy. METHODS A panel of experts in multiple myeloma was convened to consider current evidence and treatment practices to inform a series of consensus statements on the optimal management of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, including not only treatment selection, but the need for infection prophylaxis, route of administration, and mitigation of potential infusion-related reactions, among other clinical challenges. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS The goal of the present review article is to encapsulate these consensus statements and the rationale for their development, which altogether may help inform treatment selection and clinical decision-making in the front line.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sagar Lonial
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
| | | | - Ajai Chari
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029-5674, USA
| | - Caitlin Costello
- Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Amrita Krishnan
- Judy and Bernard Briskin Center for Multiple Myeloma Research, Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | - Saad Z Usmani
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Banerjee R, Cicero KI, Lee SS, Cowan AJ. Definers and drivers of functional high-risk multiple myeloma: insights from genomic, transcriptomic, and immune profiling. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1240966. [PMID: 37849816 PMCID: PMC10577204 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1240966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Traditional prognostic models for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma (MM), including International Staging System criteria and number of high-risk chromosomal abnormalities, are based on disease characteristics at diagnosis. However, the identification of patients at risk of more rapidly progressive MM is inherently a dynamic assessment. In a subset of patients with MM, adverse disease biology only becomes evident after the failure of first-line therapy. We define this entity as functional high-risk MM (FHRMM), encompassing relapse within 18 months of treatment initiation and/or within 12 months of frontline autologous stem cell transplantation. FHRMM is not adequately captured by traditional prognostic models, and there is a need for better understanding of mechanisms or risk factors for early relapse or progression. In this review, we explore potential definitions of FHRMM before delving into its underlying drivers based on genetic, transcriptomic, and immune cell profiling studies. Emerging data suggest that specific features of both myeloma cells and immune cells can enable the FHRMM phenotype. We conclude our review by discussing ongoing and future studies that seek to identify and intervene upon patients with FHRMM preemptively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul Banerjee
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Kara I. Cicero
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Sarah S. Lee
- Division of Myeloma, Department of Hematology & Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope, CA, United States
| | - Andrew J. Cowan
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Sauer S, Hieke L, Brandt J, Müller-Tidow C, Schmitt A, Kauer J, Kriegsmann K. Impact of Clinical Parameters and Induction Regimens on Peripheral Blood Stem-Cell Mobilization and Collection in Multiple Myeloma Patients. Transfus Med Hemother 2023; 50:382-395. [PMID: 37899996 PMCID: PMC10601599 DOI: 10.1159/000530056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by autologous blood stem-cell transplantation (ABSCT) remains the standard consolidation therapy for newly diagnosed eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients. As a prerequisite, peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) must be mobilized and collected by leukapheresis (LP). Many factors can hamper PBSC mobilization/collection. Here, we provide a comprehensive multiparametric assessment of PBSC mobilization/collection outcome parameters in a large cohort. Methods In total, 790 MM patients (471 [60%] male, 319 [40%] female) who underwent PBSC mobilization/collection during first-line treatment were included. Evaluated PBSC mobilization/collection outcome parameters included the prolongation of PBSC mobilization, plerixafor administration, number of LP sessions, and overall PBSC collection goal/result. Results 741 (94%) patients received cyclophosphamide/adriamycin/dexamethasone (CAD) and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilization. Plerixafor was administered in 80 (10%) patients. 489 (62%) patients started LP without delay. 530 (67%) patients reached the PBSC collection goal at the first LP session. The mean overall PBSC collection result was 10.3 (standard deviation [SD] 4.4) × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. In a multiparametric analysis, variables negatively associated with PBSC mobilization/collection outcomes were female gender, age >60 years, an advanced ISS stage, and local radiation pre-/during induction, but not remission status postinduction. Notably, the identified risk factors contributed differently to each PBSC mobilization/collection outcome parameter. In this context, compared to all other induction regimens, lenalidomide-based induction with/without antibodies negatively affected only the number of LP sessions required to reach the collection goal, but no other PBSC mobilization/collection outcome parameters. In contrast, the probability of reaching a high collection goal of ≥6 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg body weight was higher after lenalidomide-based induction compared to VCD/PAD or VAD - taking into account - that a higher G-SCF dosage was given in approximately one-third of patients receiving lenalidomide-based induction with/without antibodies. Conclusion Considering the identified risk factors in the clinical setting can contribute to optimized PBSC mobilization/collection. Moreover, our study demonstrates the necessity for a differentiated evaluation of PBSC mobilization/collection outcome parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Sauer
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lennart Hieke
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Brandt
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carsten Müller-Tidow
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anita Schmitt
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Joseph Kauer
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katharina Kriegsmann
- Laborarztpraxis Rhein-Main MVZ GbR, Limbach Gruppe SE, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Voorhees PM, Sborov DW, Laubach J, Kaufman JL, Reeves B, Rodriguez C, Chari A, Silbermann R, Costa LJ, Anderson LD, Nathwani N, Shah N, Bumma N, Efebera YA, Holstein SA, Costello C, Jakubowiak A, Wildes TM, Orlowski RZ, Shain KH, Cowan AJ, Dinner S, Pei H, Cortoos A, Patel S, Lin TS, Usmani SZ, Richardson PG. Addition of daratumumab to lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (GRIFFIN): final analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Haematol 2023; 10:e825-e837. [PMID: 37708911 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(23)00217-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Addition of daratumumab to lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (D-RVd) in the GRIFFIN study improved the stringent complete response rate by the end of consolidation in transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Here, we report the findings of the predefined final analysis. METHODS GRIFFIN was an open-label, randomised, active-controlled, phase 2 trial done in 35 research centres in the USA. Patients had newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with measurable disease by M protein or free light chain, were aged 18-70 years, had an ECOG performance score of 0-2, and were eligible for autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to four D-RVd or RVd induction cycles, autologous HSCT, two D-RVd or RVd consolidation cycles, and lenalidomide with or without daratumumab maintenance therapy for 2 years. Patients received 21-day cycles of oral lenalidomide (25 mg on days 1-14), subcutaneous bortezomib (1·3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11), oral dexamethasone (40 mg weekly) with or without intravenous daratumumab (16 mg/kg weekly, cycles 1-4; day 1, cycles 5-6). Maintenance therapy (28-day cycles) was oral lenalidomide (10 mg on days 1-21) with or without daratumumab (16 mg/kg intravenously every 4 or 8 weeks, or 1800 mg subcutaneously monthly). Patients could continue lenalidomide maintenance after study treatment completion. The primary endpoint was stringent complete response rate by the end of consolidation in the response-evaluable population, and has already been reported. Here we report updated stringent complete response rates and secondary outcomes including progression-free survival and overall survival. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02874742) and ended on April 8, 2022. FINDINGS Between Dec 20, 2016, and April 10, 2018, 104 patients were randomly assigned to the D-RVd group and 103 were randomly assigned to the RVd group; most patients were White (85 [82%] in the D-RVd group and 76 [74%] in the RVd group) and male (58 [56%] in the D-RVd group and 60 [58%] in the RVd group). At a median follow-up of 49·6 months (IQR 47·4-52·1), D-RVd improved rates of stringent complete response (67 [67%] of 100] vs 47 [48%] of 98]; odds ratio 2·18 [95% CI 1·22-3·89], p=0·0079), and 4-year progression-free survival was 87·2% (95% CI 77·9-92·8) for D-RVd versus 70·0% (95% CI 55·9-80·3) for RVd, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0·45 (95% CI 0·21-0·95, p=0·032) for risk of disease progression or death with D-RVd. Median overall survival was not reached for either group (HR 0·90 [95% CI 0·31-2·56], p=0·84). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events in the D-RVd versus RVd groups were neutropenia (46 [46%] of 99 vs 23 [23%] of 102), lymphopenia (23 [23%] vs 23 [23%]), leukopenia (17 [17%] vs eight [8%]), thrombocytopenia (16 [16%] vs nine [9%]), pneumonia (12 [12%] vs 14 [14%]), and hypophosphataemia (ten [10%] vs 11 [11%]). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 46 (46%) of 99 patients in the D-RVd group and in 53 (52%) of 102 patients in the RVd group. One patient in each treatment group reported a treatment-emergent adverse event that resulted in death (bronchopneumonia in the D-RVd group; cause unknown in the RVd group); neither was related to study treatment. No new safety concerns occurred with maintenance therapy. INTERPRETATION Addition of daratumumab to RVd improved the depth of response and progression-free survival in transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. These results justify further evaluation in phase 3 studies. FUNDING Janssen Oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter M Voorhees
- Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Charlotte, NC, USA.
| | - Douglas W Sborov
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jacob Laubach
- Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Brandi Reeves
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Ajai Chari
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rebecca Silbermann
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Luciano J Costa
- University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Larry D Anderson
- Myeloma, Waldenstrom's and Amyloidosis Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Nitya Nathwani
- Judy and Bernard Briskin Center for Multiple Myeloma Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Nina Shah
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Naresh Bumma
- Division of Hematology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Sarah A Holstein
- Division of Oncology and Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Caitlin Costello
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | - Tanya M Wildes
- Division of Oncology and Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Robert Z Orlowski
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kenneth H Shain
- Department of Malignant Hematology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Andrew J Cowan
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Shira Dinner
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Huiling Pei
- Janssen Research & Development, Titusville, NJ, USA
| | | | | | | | - Saad Z Usmani
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paul G Richardson
- Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Yassine F, Kharfan-Dabaja MA, Tsalantsanis A, Roy V, Zubair AC, Murthy HS, Ayala E, Iqbal M, Sher T, Ailawadhi S, Parrondo RD. Trends in utilization of stored cryopreserved autologous peripheral hematopoietic cells intended for a second (or beyond) autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma: a single center experience. Bone Marrow Transplant 2023; 58:1130-1136. [PMID: 37479753 PMCID: PMC10555832 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-023-02035-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 06/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023]
Abstract
Due to the advent of effective novel therapies for multiple myeloma (MM), the use of cryopreserved autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic cells (APBHC) for a salvage autologous transplant (auto-HCT) is in decline. We evaluated utilization trends and costs associated with cryopreserved APBHC in patients with MM. We retrospectively evaluated the clinicopathologic data from 440 patients with MM who underwent APBHC mobilization and collection at Mayo Clinic Florida between 2010 and 2019. Based on institution-specific charges as of May 2021, the cost of 1 session of APBHC collection/apheresis was $4,680 and the cost of 1 year of APBHC cryopreservation was $4,790 per patient. Out of 347 patients who had APBHC in cryopreservation, 5 (1.4%) underwent a salvage auto-HCT and 61% of patients had ≥1 excess collection sessions for APBHC that ultimately went unused. The median cost of excess collection sessions was $4,680 per patient (range, $4,680-$32,760) and the median total cost for excess collection sessions plus costs for storage was $23,840 per patient (range, $4,680-$85,450). The sum of costs of excess collection sessions was $2,077,920 and the sum of costs of cryopreservation was $5,812,665. Institutional policies regarding universal APBHC collection and long-term storage should be reevaluated in the era of novel therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farah Yassine
- Division of Hematology-Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Mohamed A Kharfan-Dabaja
- Division of Hematology-Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Athanasios Tsalantsanis
- Program for Comparative Effectiveness Research, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Vivek Roy
- Division of Hematology-Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Abba C Zubair
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Hemant S Murthy
- Division of Hematology-Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Ernesto Ayala
- Division of Hematology-Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Madiha Iqbal
- Division of Hematology-Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Taimur Sher
- Division of Hematology-Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Sikander Ailawadhi
- Division of Hematology-Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Ricardo D Parrondo
- Division of Hematology-Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Bisht K, Fukao T, Chiron M, Richardson P, Atanackovic D, Chini E, Chng WJ, Van De Velde H, Malavasi F. Immunomodulatory properties of CD38 antibodies and their effect on anticancer efficacy in multiple myeloma. Cancer Med 2023; 12:20332-20352. [PMID: 37840445 PMCID: PMC10652336 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND CD38 has been established as an important therapeutic target for multiple myeloma (MM), for which two CD38 antibodies are currently approved-daratumumab and isatuximab. CD38 is an ectoenzyme that degrades NAD and its precursors and is involved in the production of adenosine and other metabolites. AIM Among the various mechanisms by which CD38 antibodies can induce MM cell death is immunomodulation, including multiple pathways for CD38-mediated T-cell activation. Patients who respond to anti-CD38 targeting treatment experience more marked changes in T-cell expansion, activity, and clonality than nonresponders. IMPLICATIONS Resistance mechanisms that undermine the immunomodulatory effects of CD38-targeting therapies can be tumor intrinsic, such as the downregulation of CD38 surface expression and expression of complement inhibitor proteins, and immune microenvironment-related, such as changes to the natural killer (NK) cell numbers and function in the bone marrow niche. There are numerous strategies to overcome this resistance, which include identifying and targeting other therapeutic targets involved in, for example, adenosine production, the activation of NK cells or monocytes through immunomodulatory drugs and their combination with elotuzumab, or with bispecific T-cell engagers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Taro Fukao
- Sanofi OncologyCambridgeMassachusettsUSA
| | | | - Paul Richardson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jerome Lipper Multiple Myeloma CenterDana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Djordje Atanackovic
- University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer CenterBaltimoreMarylandUSA
- Department of MedicineUniversity of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Eduardo Chini
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative MedicineMayo ClinicJacksonvilleFloridaUSA
| | - Wee Joo Chng
- Cancer Science Institute of SingaporeNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
| | | | - Fabio Malavasi
- Department of Medical SciencesUniversity of TurinTorinoItaly
- Fondazione Ricerca MolinetteTorinoItaly
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Sachpekidis C, Enqvist O, Ulén J, Kopp-Schneider A, Pan L, Jauch A, Hajiyianni M, John L, Weinhold N, Sauer S, Goldschmidt H, Edenbrandt L, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A. Application of an artificial intelligence-based tool in [ 18F]FDG PET/CT for the assessment of bone marrow involvement in multiple myeloma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:3697-3708. [PMID: 37493665 PMCID: PMC10547616 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06339-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE [18F]FDG PET/CT is an imaging modality of high performance in multiple myeloma (MM). Nevertheless, the inter-observer reproducibility in PET/CT scan interpretation may be hampered by the different patterns of bone marrow (BM) infiltration in the disease. Although many approaches have been recently developed to address the issue of standardization, none can yet be considered a standard method in the interpretation of PET/CT. We herein aim to validate a novel three-dimensional deep learning-based tool on PET/CT images for automated assessment of the intensity of BM metabolism in MM patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Whole-body [18F]FDG PET/CT scans of 35 consecutive, previously untreated MM patients were studied. All patients were investigated in the context of an open-label, multicenter, randomized, active-controlled, phase 3 trial (GMMG-HD7). Qualitative (visual) analysis classified the PET/CT scans into three groups based on the presence and number of focal [18F]FDG-avid lesions as well as the degree of diffuse [18F]FDG uptake in the BM. The proposed automated method for BM metabolism assessment is based on an initial CT-based segmentation of the skeleton, its transfer to the SUV PET images, the subsequent application of different SUV thresholds, and refinement of the resulting regions using postprocessing. In the present analysis, six different SUV thresholds (Approaches 1-6) were applied for the definition of pathological tracer uptake in the skeleton [Approach 1: liver SUVmedian × 1.1 (axial skeleton), gluteal muscles SUVmedian × 4 (extremities). Approach 2: liver SUVmedian × 1.5 (axial skeleton), gluteal muscles SUVmedian × 4 (extremities). Approach 3: liver SUVmedian × 2 (axial skeleton), gluteal muscles SUVmedian × 4 (extremities). Approach 4: ≥ 2.5. Approach 5: ≥ 2.5 (axial skeleton), ≥ 2.0 (extremities). Approach 6: SUVmax liver]. Using the resulting masks, subsequent calculations of the whole-body metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) in each patient were performed. A correlation analysis was performed between the automated PET values and the results of the visual PET/CT analysis as well as the histopathological, cytogenetical, and clinical data of the patients. RESULTS BM segmentation and calculation of MTV and TLG after the application of the deep learning tool were feasible in all patients. A significant positive correlation (p < 0.05) was observed between the results of the visual analysis of the PET/CT scans for the three patient groups and the MTV and TLG values after the employment of all six [18F]FDG uptake thresholds. In addition, there were significant differences between the three patient groups with regard to their MTV and TLG values for all applied thresholds of pathological tracer uptake. Furthermore, we could demonstrate a significant, moderate, positive correlation of BM plasma cell infiltration and plasma levels of β2-microglobulin with the automated quantitative PET/CT parameters MTV and TLG after utilization of Approaches 1, 2, 4, and 5. CONCLUSIONS The automated, volumetric, whole-body PET/CT assessment of the BM metabolic activity in MM is feasible with the herein applied method and correlates with clinically relevant parameters in the disease. This methodology offers a potentially reliable tool in the direction of optimization and standardization of PET/CT interpretation in MM. Based on the present promising findings, the deep learning-based approach will be further evaluated in future prospective studies with larger patient cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christos Sachpekidis
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69210, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Olof Enqvist
- Eigenvision AB, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | | | - Leyun Pan
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69210, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anna Jauch
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marina Hajiyianni
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lukas John
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Niels Weinhold
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sandra Sauer
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hartmut Goldschmidt
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lars Edenbrandt
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69210, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Burgermeister E. Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase and Nuclear Hormone Receptor Crosstalk in Cancer Immunotherapy. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:13661. [PMID: 37686465 PMCID: PMC10488039 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241713661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The three major MAP-kinase (MAPK) pathways, ERK1/2, p38 and JNK/SAPK, are upstream regulators of the nuclear "hormone" receptor superfamily (NHRSF), with a prime example given by the estrogen receptor in breast cancer. These ligand-activated transcription factors exert non-genomic and genomic functions, where they are either post-translationally modified by phosphorylation or directly interact with components of the MAPK pathways, events that govern their transcriptional activity towards target genes involved in cell differentiation, proliferation, metabolism and host immunity. This molecular crosstalk takes place not only in normal epithelial or tumor cells, but also in a plethora of immune cells from the adaptive and innate immune system in the tumor-stroma tissue microenvironment. Thus, the drugability of both the MAPK and the NHRSF pathways suggests potential for intervention therapies, especially for cancer immunotherapy. This review summarizes the existing literature covering the expression and function of NHRSF subclasses in human tumors, both solid and leukemias, and their effects in combination with current clinically approved therapeutics against immune checkpoint molecules (e.g., PD1).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elke Burgermeister
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, D-68167 Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Paiva B, Manrique I, Rytlewski J, Campbell T, Kazanecki CC, Martin N, Anderson LD, Berdeja JG, Lonial S, Raje NS, Lin Y, Moreau P, San-Miguel JF, Munshi NC, Kaiser SM. Time-Dependent Prognostic Value of Serological and Measurable Residual Disease Assessments after Idecabtagene Vicleucel. Blood Cancer Discov 2023; 4:365-373. [PMID: 37486974 PMCID: PMC10472177 DOI: 10.1158/2643-3230.bcd-23-0044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2023] [Revised: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The role of measurable residual disease (MRD) in multiple myeloma patients treated with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells is uncertain. We analyzed MRD kinetics during the first year after idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) infusion in 125 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients enrolled in KarMMa. At month 1 after ide-cel, there were no differences in progression-free survival (PFS) between patients in less than complete response (CR) versus those in CR; only MRD status was predictive of significantly different PFS at this landmark. In patients with undetectable MRD at 3 months and beyond, PFS was longer in those achieving CR versus SIGNIFICANCE This is one of the first studies evaluating the impact of CR and MRD dynamics after CAR T therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. These data help interpret the prognostic significance of serological and MRD responses at early and late time points after CAR T-cell infusion. See related commentary by Landgren and Kazandjian, p. 346 . This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 337.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Paiva
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra (CUN), Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), CIBER-ONC number CB16/12/00369, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Irene Manrique
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra (CUN), Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), CIBER-ONC number CB16/12/00369, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Larry D. Anderson
- Myeloma, Waldenström's, and Amyloidosis Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Jesús G. Berdeja
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | | | - Yi Lin
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Jesús F. San-Miguel
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra (CUN), Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), CIBER-ONC number CB16/12/00369, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Nikhil C. Munshi
- The LeBow Institute for Myeloma Therapeutics and Jerome Lipper Multiple Myeloma Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kraeber-Bodéré F, Jamet B, Bezzi D, Zamagni E, Moreau P, Nanni C. New Developments in Myeloma Treatment and Response Assessment. J Nucl Med 2023; 64:1331-1343. [PMID: 37591548 PMCID: PMC10478822 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent innovative strategies have dramatically redefined the therapeutic landscape for treating multiple myeloma patients. In particular, the development and application of immunotherapy and high-dose therapy have demonstrated high response rates and have prolonged remission duration. Over the past decade, new morphologic or hybrid imaging techniques have gradually replaced conventional skeletal surveys. PET/CT using 18F-FDG is a powerful imaging tool for the workup at diagnosis and for therapeutic evaluation allowing medullary and extramedullary assessment. The independent negative prognostic value for progression-free and overall survival derived from baseline PET-derived parameters such as the presence of extramedullary disease or paramedullary disease, as well as the number of focal bone lesions and SUVmax, has been reported in several large prospective studies. During therapeutic evaluation, 18F-FDG PET/CT is considered the reference imaging technique because it can be performed much earlier than MRI, which lacks specificity. Persistence of significant abnormal 18F-FDG uptake after therapy is an independent negative prognostic factor, and 18F-FDG PET/CT and medullary flow cytometry are complementary tools for detecting minimal residual disease before maintenance therapy. The definition of a PET metabolic complete response has recently been standardized and the interpretation criteria harmonized. The development of advanced PET analysis and radiomics using machine learning, as well as hybrid imaging with PET/MRI, offers new perspectives for multiple myeloma imaging. Most recently, innovative radiopharmaceuticals such as C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4-targeted small molecules and anti-CD38 radiolabeled antibodies have shown promising results for tumor phenotype imaging and as potential theranostics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré
- Médecine nucléaire, CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, Université Angers, INSERM, CNRS, CRCI2NA, F-44000, Nantes, France
| | - Bastien Jamet
- Médecine nucléaire, CHU Nantes, F-44000, Nantes, France
| | - Davide Bezzi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna. Italy
| | - Elena Zamagni
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," Bologna, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Philippe Moreau
- Hématologie, CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, Université Angers, INSERM, CNRS, CRCI2NA, F-44000, Nantes, France; and
| | - Cristina Nanni
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Tang L, Huang Z, Mei H, Hu Y. Immunotherapy in hematologic malignancies: achievements, challenges and future prospects. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2023; 8:306. [PMID: 37591844 PMCID: PMC10435569 DOI: 10.1038/s41392-023-01521-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The immune-cell origin of hematologic malignancies provides a unique avenue for the understanding of both the mechanisms of immune responsiveness and immune escape, which has accelerated the progress of immunotherapy. Several categories of immunotherapies have been developed and are being further evaluated in clinical trials for the treatment of blood cancers, including stem cell transplantation, immune checkpoint inhibitors, antigen-targeted antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, tumor vaccines, and adoptive cell therapies. These immunotherapies have shown the potential to induce long-term remission in refractory or relapsed patients and have led to a paradigm shift in cancer treatment with great clinical success. Different immunotherapeutic approaches have their advantages but also shortcomings that need to be addressed. To provide clinicians with timely information on these revolutionary therapeutic approaches, the comprehensive review provides historical perspectives on the applications and clinical considerations of the immunotherapy. Here, we first outline the recent advances that have been made in the understanding of the various categories of immunotherapies in the treatment of hematologic malignancies. We further discuss the specific mechanisms of action, summarize the clinical trials and outcomes of immunotherapies in hematologic malignancies, as well as the adverse effects and toxicity management and then provide novel insights into challenges and future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu Tang
- Institute of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430022, Wuhan, China
- Hubei Clinical Medical Center of Cell Therapy for Neoplastic Disease, 430022, Wuhan, China
- Key Laboratory of Biological Targeted Therapy, the Ministry of Education, 430022, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhongpei Huang
- Institute of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430022, Wuhan, China
- Hubei Clinical Medical Center of Cell Therapy for Neoplastic Disease, 430022, Wuhan, China
- Key Laboratory of Biological Targeted Therapy, the Ministry of Education, 430022, Wuhan, China
| | - Heng Mei
- Institute of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430022, Wuhan, China.
- Hubei Clinical Medical Center of Cell Therapy for Neoplastic Disease, 430022, Wuhan, China.
- Key Laboratory of Biological Targeted Therapy, the Ministry of Education, 430022, Wuhan, China.
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Biological Targeted Therapy, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430022, Wuhan, China.
| | - Yu Hu
- Institute of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430022, Wuhan, China.
- Hubei Clinical Medical Center of Cell Therapy for Neoplastic Disease, 430022, Wuhan, China.
- Key Laboratory of Biological Targeted Therapy, the Ministry of Education, 430022, Wuhan, China.
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Biological Targeted Therapy, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430022, Wuhan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Oriol A, Abril L, Ibarra G. First-line treatment of multiple myeloma in both transplant and non-transplant candidates. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2023; 23:685-698. [PMID: 37194283 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2023.2213891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The last decade's progress in the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma has relied on the synergistic combination of agents with different mechanisms of action, basically proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, and monoclonal antibodies, in order to achieve the deepest possible response early in the course of treatment. Following induction, several therapeutic strategies aim to improve and maintain response. AREAS COVERED The manuscript reviews available data for the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients with a focus on most recent induction and maintenance combinations and the still important role of autologous stem transplantation. Future perspectives in the light of initial results from ongoing clinical trials are also addressed. EXPERT OPINION Remarkable progress has been made in myeloma treatment due to the integration of immunomodulators, proteasome inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and high dose therapy in the frontline setting. Upfront therapy may be further improved intensifying induction combinations, adapting high dose therapy and consolidation strategies to the patient's profile, improving maintenance in high-risk individuals, or limiting maintenance duration in those with a better prognosis. Evidence needs to be reviewed, taking into account the therapeutic objectives at each treatment stage and patient specific risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert Oriol
- Institut Català d'Oncologia and Institut Josep Carreras. Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Carretera del Canyet, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Abril
- Institut Català d'Oncologia and Institut Josep Carreras. Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Carretera del Canyet, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gladys Ibarra
- Institut Català d'Oncologia and Institut Josep Carreras. Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Carretera del Canyet, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Deng J, Peng DH, Fenyo D, Yuan H, Lopez A, Levin DS, Meynardie M, Quinteros M, Ranieri M, Sahu S, Lau SCM, Shum E, Velcheti V, Punekar SR, Rekhtman N, Dowling CM, Weerasekara V, Xue Y, Ji H, Siu Y, Jones D, Hata AN, Shimamura T, Poirier JT, Rudin CM, Hattori T, Koide S, Papagiannakopoulos T, Neel BG, Bardeesy N, Wong KK. In vivo metabolomics identifies CD38 as an emergent vulnerability in LKB1 -mutant lung cancer. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.04.18.537350. [PMID: 37131623 PMCID: PMC10153147 DOI: 10.1101/2023.04.18.537350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
LKB1/STK11 is a serine/threonine kinase that plays a major role in controlling cell metabolism, resulting in potential therapeutic vulnerabilities in LKB1-mutant cancers. Here, we identify the NAD + degrading ectoenzyme, CD38, as a new target in LKB1-mutant NSCLC. Metabolic profiling of genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) revealed that LKB1 mutant lung cancers have a striking increase in ADP-ribose, a breakdown product of the critical redox co-factor, NAD + . Surprisingly, compared with other genetic subsets, murine and human LKB1-mutant NSCLC show marked overexpression of the NAD+-catabolizing ectoenzyme, CD38 on the surface of tumor cells. Loss of LKB1 or inactivation of Salt-Inducible Kinases (SIKs)-key downstream effectors of LKB1- induces CD38 transcription induction via a CREB binding site in the CD38 promoter. Treatment with the FDA-approved anti-CD38 antibody, daratumumab, inhibited growth of LKB1-mutant NSCLC xenografts. Together, these results reveal CD38 as a promising therapeutic target in patients with LKB1 mutant lung cancer. SIGNIFICANCE Loss-of-function mutations in the LKB1 tumor suppressor of lung adenocarcinoma patients and are associated with resistance to current treatments. Our study identified CD38 as a potential therapeutic target that is highly overexpressed in this specific subtype of cancer, associated with a shift in NAD homeostasis.
Collapse
|