European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) Focus 4 consensus recommendations: molecular imaging and therapy in haematological tumours

2-deoxy-2-[18F]FDG PET Imaging for Therapy Assessment in Hodgkin's and Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas

The 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET/CT) has contributed to outcome improvement of patients with lymphoma. The use of [18F]FDG PET/CT for staging and response assessment is successfully applied both in routine clinical practice and in clinical trials. The challenges lie in enhancing the outcomes of lymphoma patients, particularly those with advanced or refractory/relapsed disease, and to minimize the long-term toxicity associated with treatments, including radiation therapy. The objective of this review article is to present contemporary data on the use of [18F]FDG PET/CT for treatment assessment of aggressive lymphomas.

EANM guidelines on the use of [18F]FDG PET/CT in diagnosis, staging, prognostication, therapy assessment, and restaging of plasma cell disorders

We provide updated guidance and standards for the indication, acquisition, and interpretation of [18F]FDG PET/CT for plasma cell disorders. Procedures and characteristics are reported and different scenarios for the clinical use of [18F]FDG PET/CT are discussed. This document provides clinicians and technicians with the best available evidence to support the implementation of [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging in routine practice and future research.

Prognostic value of baseline metabolic tumor volume (MTV) for forecasting chemotherapy outcome in early-stage unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma: Data from the phase III HD17 trial

OBJECTIVES

The prognostic relevance of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) having recently been demonstrated in patients with early-stage favorable and advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. The current study aimed to assess the potential prognostic value of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in early-stage unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma patients treated within the German Hodgkin Study Group HD17 trial.

METHODS

18 F-FDG PET/CT images were available for MTV analysis in 154 cases. We used three different threshold methods (SUV2.5 , SUV4.0 , and SUV41% ) to calculate MTV. Receiver-operating-characteristic analysis was performed to describe the value of these parameters in predicting an adequate therapy response. Therapy response was evaluated as PET negativity after 2 cycles of eBEACOPP followed by 2 cycles of ABVD.

RESULTS

All three threshold methods analyzed for MTV showed a positive correlation with the PET response after chemotherapy. Areas under the curve (AUC) were 0.70 (95% CI 0.53-0.87) and 0.65 (0.50-0.80) using the fixed thresholds of SUV4.0 and SUV2.5 , respectively, for MTV- calculation. The calculation of MTV using a relative threshold of SUV41% showed an AUC of 0.63 (0.47-0.79).

CONCLUSIONS

MTV does have predictive value after chemotherapy in early-stage unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma, particularly when the fixed threshold of SUV4.0 is used for MTV calculation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01356680.

Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Past, Present, and Future

Responses to treatment have improved over the last decades for patients with multiple myeloma. This is a consequence of the introduction of new drugs that have been successfully combined in different clinical contexts: newly diagnosed, transplant-eligible or ineligible patients, as well as in the relapsed/refractory setting. However, a great proportion of patients continue to relapse, even those achieving complete response, which underlines the need for updated response criteria. In 2014, the international myeloma working group established new levels of response, prompting the evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD) for those patients already in complete or stringent complete response as defined by conventional serological assessments: the absence of tumor plasma cells in 100,000 total cells or more define molecular and immunophenotypic responses by next-generation sequencing and flow cytometry, respectively. In this review, we describe all the potential methods that may be used for MRD detection based on the evidence found in the literature, paying special attention to their advantages and pitfalls from a critical perspective.