Frequency of biologic switching and the outcomes of switching in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a national cohort study

Do the features of juvenile psoriatic arthritis change according to age? A comprehensive evaluation of the PeRA Research Group Registry

OBJECTIVES

To describe the clinical features and treatment outcomes of children with juvenile psoriatic arthritis (JPsA) and compare the distinct patterns of the disease between early-onset and late-onset age groups.

METHODS

Patients with JPsA followed regularly for at least 6 months between 2010 and 2020 in seven paediatric rheumatology centres in Turkey were included in the study. The demographic features, clinical manifestations, treatment strategies and outcomes of the patients were evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS

A total of 87 (46 male/41 female) patients were included in the study. The mean age at diagnosis was 11.9 years (s.d. 4.5). Fifty-seven (65.5%) patients had psoriasis at the time of diagnosis and arthritis preceded psoriasis in 10 (11.5%) patients. Thirty (34.5%) patients had dactylitis, 28 (32.2%) had nail pitting, 36 (41.4%) had involvement of the small joints and 20 (23%) had enthesitis. Sacroiliitis was detected in 11 (12.6%) patients by MRI. ANA was positive in 35 (40.2%) patients. Twelve children (13.8%) were in the early-onset (<5 years) group. Uveitis and ANA positivity were more common in the early-onset group. Active joint counts and activity scores of our patients showed significant improvement at month 6 and at the last control compared with baseline.

CONCLUSION

About one-third of patients with JPsA do not have psoriasis at the time of diagnosis. In some patients, no skin lesion is seen during the course of the disease. Children with PsA seem to display two different phenotypes. Younger children have a female predominance, ANA positivity and uveitis, while older children have more axial involvement.

Comparative Effectiveness of a Second Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Versus a Non-Tumor Necrosis Factor Biologic in the Treatment of Patients With Polyarticular-Course Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a second tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) versus a non-TNFi biologic following discontinuation of a TNFi for patients with polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA).

METHODS

Using the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry, patients with pJIA who started receiving a second biologic following a first TNFi were identified. Patients were required to have no active uveitis on the index date and a visit six months after the index date. Outcome measures included Clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score with a maximum of 10 active joints (cJADAS10), cJADAS10 inactive disease (ID; ≤2.5) and cJADAS10 minimal disease activity (MiDA; ≤5). Multiple imputation was used to account for missing data. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were calculated using propensity score quintiles to compare outcomes at six months following second biologic initiation.

RESULTS

There were 216 patients included, 84% initially received etanercept, and most patients stopped receiving it because of its ineffectiveness (74%). A total of 183 (85%) started receiving a second TNFi, and 33 (15%) started receiving a non-TNFi. Adalimumab was the most common second biologic received (71% overall, 84% of second TNFi), and tocilizumab was the most common non-TNFi second biologic received (9% overall, 58% of non-TNFi). There was no difference between receiving TNFi versus non-TNFi in cJADAS10 ID (29% vs 25%; aOR 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-3.20) or at least MiDA (43% vs 39%; aOR 1.11, 95% CI 0.47-2.62) at six months.

CONCLUSION

Most patients with pJIA started receiving TNFi rather than non-TNFi as their second biologic, and there were no differences in disease activity at six months.

Associations of C reactive protein to albumin ratio, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, platelet to lymphocyte ratio with disease activity in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Recent works in the scientific literature reported the role of C reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as biomarkers of disease activity in rheumatic diseases.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the role of CAR, PLR and NLR as potential markers of disease activity in children with non-systemic JIA (nsJIA) and their correlation with the risk of persistent disease activity of flare during follow up.

METHODS

Our prospective, cross-sectional study involved 130 nsJIA patients (74 with active disease and 56 with inactive disease according to Wallace criteria) and 62 healthy controls. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were collected at baseline (T0) and at 3 (T1), 6 (T2), 12 (T3) and 18 months (T4) during follow up. Disease activity was evaluated through Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS-27).

RESULTS

At baseline, CRP and CAR were higher in patients than in controls (p = 0.046), while no differences were found for NLR and PLR. However, there was no positive correlation between CAR, NLR, PLR and JADAS-27 in JIA patients. To better investigate the role of CAR, NLR and PLR as markers of disease activity, we used a generalized estimating equation (GEE) model, applied to all patients either with or without active disease. According to this analysis, CAR and NLR baseline levels were predictive of higher risk of disease activity at 6 months follow up (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

CAR and NLR could indicate persistent disease activity in patients with JIA. Their predictive value could be increased by their combined use and by the observation of their trend during follow up, since increasing CAR values over time could predict a disease flare in the brief time.

Management of refractory disease and persistent symptoms in inflammatory arthritis: qualitative framework analysis of interviews with patients and healthcare professionals

Objectives

This study aims to explore patients' and clinicians' experiences in managing and living with refractory disease (RD) and persistent physical and emotional symptoms (PPES) in patients with RA or polyarticular JIA from their perspectives through interviews and/or focus groups.

Methods

A qualitative exploration with 25 patients and 32 multidisciplinary rheumatology healthcare professionals (HCPs) was conducted to obtain participants respective understanding and experiences of managing RD/PPES and its impact on the patient-professional relationship. A pragmatic epistemology approach with framework analysis was employed.

Results

Four key themes were identified from both patients and professionals in the management of RD/PPES: risk/perpetuating factors/triggers; need for a patient-centred holistic approach to care, diagnosis and treatment; discordance and impact on the patient-practitioner relationship and current problems in managing RD/PPES. These themes covered 22 subthemes, with none being patient specific and seven being HCP specific. Suggestions for potential management strategies were highlighted throughout, such as involving other specialties or a multidisciplinary team, assessing/treating patient-reported outcome measures and psychosocial factors, patient (re)education, need for adjustments/aids or adaptations, checking the diagnosis and further investigations/imaging and optimizing medications.

Conclusion

Management strategies need to be developed that enable appropriate treatment plans for those with RD/PPES that account for wider biopsychosocial factors beyond inflammation and reduce discordance in the patient-practitioner relationship.

Patterns and determinants of response to novel therapies in juvenile and adult-onset polyarthritis

Biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) have revolutionized the management of multiple rheumatic inflammatory conditions. Among these, polyarticular JIA (pJIA) and RA display similarities in terms of disease pathophysiology and response pattern to b/tsDMARDs. Indeed, the therapeutic efficacy of novel targeted drugs is variable among individual patients, in both RA and pJIA. The mechanisms and determinants of this heterogeneous response are diverse and complex, such that the development of true 'precision'-medicine strategies has proven highly challenging. In this review, we will discuss pathophysiological, patient-specific, drug-specific and environmental factors contributing to individual therapeutic response in pJIA in comparison with what is known in RA. Although some biomarkers have been identified that stratify with respect to the likelihood of either therapeutic response or non-response, few have proved useful in clinical practice so far, likely due to the complexity of treatment-response mechanisms. Consequently, we propose a pragmatic, patient-centred and clinically based approach, i.e. personalized instead of biomarker-based precision medicine in JIA.

Management of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases after treatment failure with a first tumour necrosis factor inhibitor: A narrative review

The emergence of biologics with different modes of action (MoAs) and therapeutic targets has changed treatment patterns in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. While tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) are often utilized as the first biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, some patients may not respond adequately (primary failure), fail to sustain response over time (secondary failure), or experience intolerable adverse events. Whether these patients would benefit more from cycling to a different TNFi or switching to a biologic with a different MoA is still unclear. We discuss here treatment outcomes of TNFi cycling versus MoA switching after treatment failure with a first TNFi in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases, focusing specifically on rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, and juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Treatment guidelines for these patients are ambiguous and, at times, contradictory in their recommendations. However, this is due to a lack of high-quality head-to-head data to definitively support cycling between TNFis after failure to a first-line TNFi over switching to a different MoA.

Biologic switching patterns among children with non-systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis

BACKGROUND

In juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) clinical remission is unattainable in some patients despite modern biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD) therapy and switching bDMARD is required. The best choice of second-line bDMARD remains unclear. This retrospective observational study aims to describe the pattern, timing, frequency, and reasons for bDMARD switching among children diagnosed with non-systemic JIA.

METHODS

Patients were identified by combining unique personal identification numbers, the International Code of Diagnosis (ICD10) for JIA and biologic therapy. Clinical characteristics were collected retrospectively from the electronic medical records. Included were 200 children diagnosed with non-systemic JIA initiating their first biologic drug between January 1st, 2012, and March 1st, 2021. We compared characteristics of non-switchers vs switchers and early switchers (≤ 6 months) vs late switchers (> 6 months).

RESULTS

The median age at diagnosis was 7.7 years. We found that 37% switched to a different bDMARD after a median age of 6.3 years after diagnosis. In total, and 17.5% of patients switched at least twice, while 6% switched three or more times. The most common reason for switching was inefficacy (57%) followed by injection/infusion reactions (15%) and uveitis (13%). 77% were late switchers, and switched primarily due to inefficacy. All patients started a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) as initial bDMARD (Etanercept (ETN): 49.5%, other TNFis: 50.5%). The patients who started ETN as first-line bDMARD were more likely to be switchers compared to those who started another TNFi.

CONCLUSION

During a median 6.3-year follow-up biologic switching was observed in more than one third, primarily due to inefficacy.

Rheumatology and palliative care: needs and opportunities

Palliative care (PC) has expanded to medical conditions beyond its conventional scope of terminal malignancy and end-stage organ failure. This editorial showed our opinion in care model for the integration of PC into rheumatology and the growing needs of both rheumatology and PC services in view of increasing comorbidities and novel therapies. We anticipate an escalating demand for PC in this special group of patients who have concomitant long-standing systemic rheumatic diseases and age-related comorbidities. In addition, patients with advanced malignancy who develop rheumatological problems and require PC is also an emerging area of service need.

Biological Agent Switching in Patients With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Tertiary Center Experience

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to investigate the causes and outcomes of switching biological agents in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients using biological agents and compare the characteristics of patients whose biological agents are switched and those whose are not.

METHODS

This medical records review study was conducted with 128 patients who were diagnosed with JIA at our clinic between January 2009 and January 2022 and were receiving biologic agents. Factors affecting the biologic agent switching were investigated.

RESULTS

The JIA subtype with the most frequent switching in biological agents was systemic JIA (n = 13, 40.6%). Systemic JIA was followed by rheumatoid factor-negative polyarticular JIA and persistent oligoarticular JIA with 5 patients (15.6%), extended oligoarticular JIA and enthesitis-related JIA with 3 patients (9.3%), rheumatoid factor-positive polyarticular JIA with 2 patients (6.2%), and undifferentiated JIA with 1 patient (3.1%). Among the patients, 32 (25%) patients had their biological agent switched once, and 5 (3.9%) had theirs switched twice. The most frequently used biological agent was etanercept (n = 76, 59.3%), whereas the most frequently observed cases of biological agent switching were from an anti-TNF agent to another anti-TNF agent (40.6%). The reason for switching was unresponsiveness to the agent in 22 patients (68.8%), adverse effects in 6 patients (18.7%), drug intolerance in 1 patient (3.1%), and other reasons in 3 patients (9.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

The most frequently used biological agent was etanercept; the most frequent cases of biological agents switching were from an anti-TNF agent to another anti-TNF agent.

Baricitinib in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: an international, phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, withdrawal, efficacy, and safety trial

BACKGROUND

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis can be refractory to some or all treatment regimens, therefore new medications are needed to treat this population. This trial assessed the efficacy and safety of baricitinib, an oral Janus kinase 1/2-selective inhibitor, versus placebo in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

METHODS

This phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, withdrawal, efficacy, and safety trial was conducted in 75 centres in 20 countries. We enrolled patients (aged 2 to <18 years) with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (positive or negative for rheumatoid factor), extended oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis, enthesitis-related arthritis, or juvenile psoriatic arthritis, and an inadequate response (after ≥12 weeks of treatment) or intolerance to one or more conventional synthetic or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). The trial consisted of a 2-week safety and pharmacokinetic period, a 12-week open-label lead-in period (10 weeks for the safety and pharmacokinetic subcohort), and an up to 32-week placebo-controlled double-blind withdrawal period. After age-based dosing was established in the safety and pharmacokinetic period, patients received a once-daily 4 mg adult-equivalent dose of baricitinib (tablets or suspension) in the open-label lead-in period. Patients meeting Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis-American College of Rheumatology (JIA-ACR) 30 criteria (JIA-ACR30 responders) at the end of the open-label lead-in (week 12) were eligible for random assignment (1:1) to receive placebo or continue receiving baricitinib, and remained in the double-blind withdrawal period until disease flare or up to the end of the double-blind withdrawal period (week 44). Patients and any personnel interacting directly with patients or sites were masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was time to disease flare during the double-blind withdrawal period and was assessed in the intention-to-treat population of all randomly assigned patients. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of baricitinib throughout the three trial periods. For adverse events in the double-blind withdrawal period, exposure-adjusted incidence rates were calculated. The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03773978, and is completed.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 17, 2018 and March 3, 2021, 220 patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of baricitinib (152 [69%] girls and 68 [31%] boys; median age 14·0 years [IQR 12·0-16·0]). 219 patients received baricitinib in the open-label lead-in period, of whom 163 (74%) had at least a JIA-ACR30 response at week 12 and were randomly assigned to placebo (n=81) or baricitinib (n=82) in the double-blind withdrawal period. Time to disease flare was significantly shorter with placebo versus baricitinib (hazard ratio 0·241 [95% CI 0·128-0·453], p<0·0001). Median time to flare was 27·14 weeks (95% CI 15·29-not estimable) in the placebo group, and not evaluable for patients in the baricitinib group (<50% had a flare event). Six (3%) of 220 patients had serious adverse events during the safety and pharmacokinetic period or open-label lead-in period. In the double-blind withdrawal period, serious adverse events were reported in four (5%) of 82 patients (incidence rate [IR] 9·7 [95% CI 2·7-24·9] per 100 patient-years at risk) in the baricitinib group and three (4%) of 81 (IR 10·2 [2·1-29·7]) in the placebo group. Treatment-emergent infections were reported during the safety and pharmacokinetic or open-label lead-in period in 55 (25%) of 220 patients, and during the double-blind withdrawal period in 31 (38%) of 82 (IR 102·1 [95% CI 69·3-144·9]) in the baricitinib group and 15 (19%) of 81 (IR 59·0 [33·0-97·3]) in the placebo group. Pulmonary embolism was reported as a serious adverse event in one patient (1%; IR 2·4 [95% CI 0·1-13·3]) in the baricitinib group in the double-blind withdrawal period, which was judged to be related to study treatment.

INTERPRETATION

Baricitinib was efficacious with an acceptable safety profile in the treatment of polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis, extended oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis, enthesitis-related arthritis, and juvenile psoriatic arthritis, after inadequate response or intolerance to standard therapy.

FUNDING

Eli Lilly and Company under licence from Incyte.

Towards molecular-pathology informed clinical trials in childhood arthritis to achieve precision medicine in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

In childhood arthritis, collectively known as Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), the rapid rise of available licensed biological and targeted small molecule treatments in recent years has led to improved outcomes. However, real-world data from multiple countries and registries show that despite a large number of available drugs, many children and young people continue to suffer flares and experience significant periods of time with active disease for many years. More than 50% of young people with JIA require ongoing immune suppression well into adult life, and they may have to try multiple different treatments in that time. There are currently no validated tools with which to select specific treatments, nor biomarkers of response to assist in such choices, therefore, current management uses essentially a trial-and-error approach. A further consequence of recent progress is a reducing pool of available children or young people who are eligible for new trials. In this review we consider how progress towards a molecular based approach to defining treatment targets and informing trial design in JIA, combined with novel approaches to clinical trials, could provide strategies to maximise discovery and progress, in order to move towards precision medicine for children with arthritis.

Dosing Variation at Initiation of Adalimumab and Etanercept and Clinical Outcomes in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry Study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the dose-response relationship of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibition in the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).

METHODS

Participants of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry were eligible for inclusion in the analyses if they started TNF inhibition treatment for JIA. The primary treatment response was determined 3 to 7 months after the start of treatment, based on the JIA American College of Rheumatology Pediatric criteria for improvement, clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score, and persistence of treatment after 6 months. Subsequently, pooled logistic regression models were performed to include long-term follow-up data. The models were adjusted for risk factors associated with poor treatment response. Dosing was expressed by body weight, body surface area, ideal body weight, fat free mass, and lean body mass.

RESULTS

Participants treated with adalimumab (n = 328) and etanercept (n = 437) were included in the analyses (median dose 0.82 mg/kg body weight [interquartile range (IQR) 0.66-1.04] and 0.83 mg/kg body weight [IQR 0.75-0.95], respectively). The majority of analyses did not show a relationship between dose and outcome. Where associations were found, results were conflicting. Alternative dosing characteristics based on ideal body weight, fat free mass, and lean body mass did not result in stronger or more consistent associations.

CONCLUSION

This study was not able to confirm our hypothesis that increased dosing of TNF inhibitors results in improved treatment outcomes. Although adjustment was performed for risk factors of impaired treatment response, residual confounding by indication likely explains the negative associations found in this study.

The Role of Serum Calprotectin in Defining Disease Outcomes in Non-Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Pilot Study

Serum calprotectin (MRP8/14) is currently being studied as a promising biomarker of disease activity and outcome in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) but the data in the literature are conflicting. The aim of our study was to investigate the potential role of serum calprotectin as biomarker of disease activity and flare/remission in a group of nsJIA patients during a follow-up period of 18 months. In this prospective longitudinal study, two groups of patients with ns-JIA (55 active patients and 56 patients in remission according to Wallace's criteria) and a control group (50 children) were recruited at baseline from January 2020 to September 2021. JIA patients were followed for up to 18 months at four timepoints: 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 12 months (T3) and 18 months (T4). At each timepoint, the following were recorded: JADAS27, blood counts, ESR, CRP, albumin, ferritin and serum calprotectin. To illustrate the performance of calprotectin, Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed from baseline to relapse/remission, dichotomizing patients at baseline in positive/negative on the basis progressive calprotectin cut-offs. Associations between baseline factors and relapse were determined using Cox regression models. Multivariate models were constructed to analyze the effect of covariates. Comparing baseline clinical and laboratory data of the three groups (active vs. inactive JIA vs. controls), only serum calprotectin reached statistical significance (active patients vs. inactive (p = 0.0016) and vs. controls (p = 0.0012)). In the inactive group, during the 18 months of follow up, 31 patients (55.3%) had a relapse. Comparing the baseline data of relapsers vs. non-relapsers, serum calprotectin showed higher levels (p = 0.001) in relapsers. In survival analysis, a log rank test showed significant differences of up to 12 ng/mL (p = 0.045). Multivariate Cox regression confirmed that only baseline calprotectin levels were independently associated with disease recurrence. In the active group, in the 12 months of follow-up, 19 patients (38%) entered remission of the disease. In addition, in this group, the only statistical difference at the baseline was the value of MPR8/14 (p = 0.0001). Log rank test showed significant differences up to 10 ng/mL (p = 0.003). In the multivariate Cox regression, serum calprotectin levels at baseline were independently associated with remission. In conclusion, our study would suggest a dual role for calprotectin in predicting future relapse and treatment response in patients with nsJIA, thus influencing therapeutic decisions and management of these patients during follow up.

Efficacy and safety of canakinumab as a second line biologic after tocilizumab treatment failure in children with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: A single-centre cohort study using routinely collected health data

Background

A significant number of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) patients discontinue biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) due to lack of efficacy or safety concerns. Studies of biologic therapy switch regimens in sJIA are required.

Methods

Patients with sJIA who switched from tocilizumab (due to lack of efficacy or safety) to canakinumab (4 mg/kg every 4 weeks) and were hospitalized at the rheumatology department from August 2012 to July 2020 were included. Primary efficacy outcomes were 30% or greater improvement based on the paediatric criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR30), achievement of inactive disease (JADAS-71 = 0) and clinical remission (ACR sJIA clinical inactive disease criteria). Follow-up from time first canakinumab dose administered was 12 months or the closest time point (not less than 6 and not more than 18 months). Data were extracted from electronic outpatient medical records.

Results

During the study period, 46 patients with sJIA switched from tocilizumab to canakinumab. Median age at baseline was 8.2 [interquartile range (IQR) 4.0-12.9] years, with the median sJIA duration being 1.8 (IQR 0.8-5.8) years; 37 (80%) patients received at least one conventional DMARD (cDMARD; oral corticosteroids, methotrexate and/or cyclosporine A). Study outcomes were followed up in 45 patients (one patient did not attend the follow-up for an unknown reason); median follow-up was 359 (IQR 282-404) days. During the follow-up, 1 patient discontinued canakinumab due to tuberculosis detection and the dose was reduced or the injection interval increased in 4 (9%) patients. In total, 27 (60%) patients continued to receive at least one cDMARD. Improvement according to the ACR30 criteria was achieved in 43 patients [96%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 85-99], inactive disease in 42 (93%; 95%CI 82-98), and remission in 37 (82%; 95% CI 69-91); after adjustment for actual time-at-risk, the rates were 83, 85 and 73 events per 100 person-years, respectively. During follow-up, 23 AEs (most frequently infections) were reported in 19/45 (42%) patients; 5/45 (11%) patients developed macrophage activation syndrome, with a favorable outcome in all cases.

Conclusions

One-year canakinumab therapy was found to be potentially effective as second-line biologic therapy after discontinuation of tocilizumab in patients with sJIA.

Real-world data reveals the complexity of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment patterns in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: an observational study

OBJECTIVE

Pharmacological treatment is a cornerstone of care for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). The objective of this study is to evaluate prescription patterns of conventional and biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (c-DMARDs and b-DMARDs) for patients with JIA.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of children diagnosed with JIA at a rheumatology pediatric clinic. Eligibility criteria were defined as children and youth newly diagnosed with enthesis-related arthritis, polyarticular, or oligoarticular JIA between 2011 and 2019, with at least one year of observation. Data on c-DMARDs and b-DMARDs prescriptions were obtained from electronic medical charts. We used descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier survival methods, and Sankey diagrams to describe treatment prescription patterns.

RESULTS

A total of 325 patients with JIA were included, with a median observation time of 3.7 years. The most frequently prescribed c-DMARD and b-DMARD were methotrexate and etanercept, respectively. Within the first year of rheumatology care, 62% and 21% of patients had a c-DMARD and a b-DMARD prescribed, respectively. These proportions varied greatly by JIA subtype. Among the 147 (147/325, 45%) patients that had at least one b-DMARD prescribed, 24% were prescribed a second, and 7% a third-line of b-DMARD. A total of 112 unique treatment sequences were observed, with c-DMARD monotherapy followed by the addition of either a b-DMARD (56%) or another c-DMARD (30%) being the two most prevalent patterns in this cohort.

CONCLUSION

We observed a variety of treatment trajectories, with many patients experiencing multiple treatment lines, illustrating the complexity of the overall JIA treatment path.

Precision Medicine: Towards Individualized Dosing in Pediatric Rheumatology

Despite an increase in the number of available therapeutics, many children with rheumatic disease continue to experience active inflammatory disease and treatment failure. One reason for treatment failure is the lack of dosing paradigms to account for the wide between-patient variability in drug pharmacokinetics because of developmental changes or genetic polymorphisms that effect drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination. This review highlights several strategies to optimize dosing for biologic and nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, including therapeutic drug monitoring, pharmacogenomics, and the use of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling.

Comparative effectiveness and persistence of TNFi and non-TNFi in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a large paediatric rheumatology centre in the USA

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the persistence and effectiveness of TNF inhibitors (TNFi) vs non-TNFi among newly diagnosed JIA patients after initiation of biologic DMARD (bDMARD).

METHODS

Using longitudinal patient-level data extracted from electronic medical records in a large Midwestern paediatric hospital from 2009 to 2018, we identified JIA patients initiating TNFi and non-TNFi treatment. Treatment effectiveness was assessed based on disease activity. Inverse probability of treatment weighting of propensity score was used to estimate the treatment effectiveness and Kaplan-Meier analyses were conducted to assess persistence.

RESULTS

Of 667 JIA patients, most (92.0%) were prescribed one of the class of TNFi as their initial biologic treatment. Etanercept was the most frequently prescribed (67.1%) treatment, followed by adalimumab (27.5%). Only around 5% of patients were prescribed off-label bDMARDs as their first-course treatment; however, >20% were prescribed off-label biologics as their second-course therapy. Some 7.2% of patients received four or more bDMARDs. The median persistence of the first-course bDMARD is 320 days, with TNFi being significantly longer than the non-TNFi (395 vs 320 days, P = 0.010). The clinical Juvenile Disease Activity Score (cJADAS) reduction of TNFi users (6.6, 95% CI 5.7, 7.5) was significant greater compared with non-TNFi users (3.0, 95% CI 1.5, 4.6, P < 0.0001) at 6-month follow-up visit.

CONCLUSION

Persistence was significantly longer among patients initiating TNFi as their first biologic therapy than those receiving non-TNFi. Patients receiving TNF therapy had significant greater reduction of cJADAS at the 6-month follow-up visit compared with patients in the non-TNF cohort.

Persistence and adherence to biologic therapies in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that often requires biological therapy to control its activity. Medication persistence and adherence are important aspects on which we have scarce information. We performed a longitudinal, retrospective, and observational study based on data from the daily clinical management of JIA patients. We recorded clinical remission at 6 and 12 months. Persistence of biological therapy was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves, and adherence was assessed using the medication possession ratio (MPR). We included 68 patients who received biological therapy. Of these, 11 (16.2%) and 5 (7.4%) required a second and third drug, respectively. The persistence rate for biological therapy at 5 years was 64%, with no differences between the first and second lines. Adherence was high during the first year of treatment (MPR80: 96.3%) and also in the second and third years (MPR80: 85.2% and 91.8%, respectively). Persistence and adherence to biological therapy were remarkably high in our JIA cohort. Adherence to biological treatments could be related to a higher probability of fulfilling the Wallace remission criteria at 6 months, although this was not confirmed at 12 months.

Approach to switching biologics in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a real-life experience

The primary aim of the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is complete remission and minimizing the development of complications. Though biologic agents (BAs) provide better disease control, data related to BA switching patterns in JIA patients are scarce. This study aimed to determine the BA switching patterns in JIA patients. The study included children with JIA that received ≥ 1 BAs. Disease activity was evaluated based on the juvenile arthritis disease activity score 71 (JADAS71). Demographic data, clinical and laboratory findings, BA switching patterns, and the rationales for BA switching were recorded. The study included 177 (82 female and 95 male) JIA patients that received ≥ 1 BAs. Mean age at diagnosis of JIA was 9.1 ± 4.9 years. BAs were prescribed a median of 14 months (range: 3-66 months) after diagnosis. Among the 177 patients, 31 (17.5%) required BA switching a median 10.5 months (range: 3-38 months) after initiation of the first BA. Among all the BAs that were switched to after administration of the first BA, tocilizumab was the most commonly switched (n = 15). The most common reason for BA switching was inadequate response (n = 29). BAs were switched 2 times in 5 patients and 3 times in 1 patient. When patients that switched BAs 1 time were compared to those that switched 2 and 3 times there were not any differences in terms of JIA types, whereas those that switched 2 and 3 times had a higher active joint count and JADAS71 score after 6 months of initiation of the first BA. As some of the JIA patients could not achieve remission despite using the prescribed BA, BA switching was required. Herein, we provide data on both BA switching patterns and requirements, which may improve the management of JIA patients.

Update on the treatment of nonsystemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis including treatment-to-target: is (drug-free) inactive disease already possible?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review concerns the outcome for nonsystemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) with emphasis on treatment-to-target (T2T) and treatment strategies aiming at inactive disease by giving an overview of recent articles.

RECENT FINDINGS

More efficacious therapies and treatment strategies/T2T with inactive disease as target, have improved the outcome for JIA significantly. Recent studies regarding treatment strategies have shown 47-68% inactive disease after 1 year. Moreover, probability of attaining inactive disease at least once in the first year seems even higher in recent cohort-studies, reaching 80%, although these studies included relatively high numbers of oligoarticular JIA patients. However, 26-76% of patients flare upon therapy withdrawal and prediction of flares is still difficult.

SUMMARY

Remission can be achieved and sustained in (some) JIA patients, regardless of initial treatment. Cornerstone principles in the management of nonsystemic JIA treatment are early start of DMARD therapy, striving for inactive disease and T2T by close and repeated monitoring of disease activity. T2T and tight control appear to be more important than a specific drug in JIA. Next to inactive disease, it is important that patients/parents are involved in personal targets, like reduction of pain and fatigue. Future studies should focus on predictors (based on imaging-methods or biomarkers) for sustained drug-free remission and flare.

Biomarkers of Response to Biologic Therapy in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Background: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common chronic inflammatory arthritis of childhood, characterized by various clinical phenotypes associated with variable prognosis. Significant progress has been achieved with the use of biologic treatments, which specifically block pro-inflammatory molecules involved in the disease pathogenesis. The most commonly used biologics in JIA are monoclonal antibodies and recombinant proteins targeting interleukins 1 (IL-1) and 6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α). Several biomarkers have been investigated in JIA. Aims: To assess the level of evidence available regarding the role of biomarkers in JIA related to guiding clinical and therapeutic decisions, providing disease prognostic information, facilitating disease activity monitoring and assessing biologic treatment response in JIA, as well as propose new strategies for biologic therapy-related biomarker use in JIA. Methods: We searched PubMed for relevant literature using predefined key words corresponding to several categories of biomarkers to assess their role in predicting and assessing biologic treatment response and clinical remission in JIA. Results: We reviewed serological, cellular, genetic, transcriptomic and imaging biomarkers, to identify candidates that are both well-established and widely used, as well as newly investigated in JIA on biologic therapy. We evaluated their role in management of JIA as well as identified the unmet needs for new biomarker discovery and better clinical applications. Conclusion: Although there are no ideal biomarkers in JIA, we identified serological biomarkers with potential clinical utility. We propose strategies of combining biomarkers of response to biologics in JIA, as well as routine implementation of clinically acceptable imaging biomarkers for improved disease assessment performance.

Increased Risk of Temporomandibular Joint Disorder in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Longitudinal Follow-Up Study

We evaluated the incidence of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and examined the association between TMD and RA, through longitudinal follow-up. Population data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service-Health Screening Cohort from 2002 to 2015 was used. From 514,866 subjects, 3122 with RA were matched with 12,488 controls in a 1:4 ratio. The crude and adjusted models (for obesity, smoking, alcohol consumption, blood pressure, blood glucose, total cholesterol, and Charlson Comorbidity Index scores) were calculated. Chi-square tests, Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis, and two-tailed analyses were used for statistical analysis. Stratified Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for TMD in the RA group, compared to those in the control group. The adjusted HR for TMD in RA was 2.52 (95% CI = 1.70–3.74), compared to the control group. The results were consistent with the subgroup analyses, according to age and sex, except in men older than 60 years of age. KM analysis showed similar results. Hence, we found that patients with RA have a higher risk of TMD, and should be observed for symptoms of the initial stage of TMD to prevent the risk of aggravation.