Intravenous intermittent neridronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis

The Rationale for Using Neridronate in Musculoskeletal Disorders: From Metabolic Bone Diseases to Musculoskeletal Pain

Neridronate or ((6-amino-1-hydroxy-1-phosphonohexyl) phosphonic acid) is an amino-bisphosphonate (BP) synthetized in Italy in 1986. Bisphosphonates are molecules with a P-C-P bond in their structure that allows strong and selectively binding to hydroxyapatite (HAP) as well as osteoclasts inhibition through different mechanisms of action. Neridronate was initially used to treat Paget disease of the bone, demonstrating effectiveness in reducing bone turnover markers as well as pain. The interesting molecular properties of neridronate foster its wide use in several other conditions, such as osteogenesis imperfecta, and osteoporosis. Thanks to the unique safety and efficacy profile, neridronate has been used in secondary osteoporosis due to genetic, rheumatic, and oncological diseases, including in pediatric patients. In the last decade, this drug has also been studied in chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions, such as algodystrophy, demonstrating effectiveness in improving extraskeletal outcomes. This review highlights historical and clinical insights about the use of neridronate for metabolic bone disorders and musculoskeletal pain conditions.

Therapeutic Treatments for Osteoporosis-Which Combination of Pills Is the Best among the Bad?

Osteoporosis is a chronical, systemic skeletal disorder characterized by an increase in bone resorption, which leads to reduced bone density. The reduction in bone mineral density and therefore low bone mass results in an increased risk of fractures. Osteoporosis is caused by an imbalance in the normally strictly regulated bone homeostasis. This imbalance is caused by overactive bone-resorbing osteoclasts, while bone-synthesizing osteoblasts do not compensate for this. In this review, the mechanism is presented, underlined by in vitro and animal models to investigate this imbalance as well as the current status of clinical trials. Furthermore, new therapeutic strategies for osteoporosis are presented, such as anabolic treatments and catabolic treatments and treatments using biomaterials and biomolecules. Another focus is on new combination therapies with multiple drugs which are currently considered more beneficial for the treatment of osteoporosis than monotherapies. Taken together, this review starts with an overview and ends with the newest approaches for osteoporosis therapies and a future perspective not presented so far.

Effect of neridronate in osteopenic patients after heart, liver or lung transplant: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Transplantation (Tx) is an effective therapeutic option in patients with end-stage organ failure and osteoporosis and related fractures are a recognized complication in these patients. Aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of neridronate in patients with reduced bone mass after Tx of the heart, liver or lung.

METHODS

In this multicenter randomized double-blind controlled trial (RCT), 22 patients were treated with neridronate (25 mg i.m./month) and 17 received placebo. All patients received daily oral calcium (500 mg) and vitamin D (400 IU). Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was evaluated at 0, 6 and 12 months and markers of bone turnover at 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients (11 heart Tx, 21 liver Tx, 7 lung Tx), aged 49.3±9.1 years, with a T-score <-2.0 SD at lumbar spine or femoral level were included. In neridronate-treated patients, a significant increase in lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) was observed after 12 months vs. placebo control (0.92±0.13 g/cm² vs. 0.84±0.08 g/cm²; P=0.005). Femur and hip BMD remained unchanged between groups. Total alkaline phosphatase, bone alkaline phosphatase and beta-cross-laps significantly decreased over the 12 months in neridronate-treated patients vs. placebo, respectively (107.4±74 U/L vs. 157.6±107.1 U/L, P=0.002; 5.7±3.3 µg/L vs. 11.7±4.3 µg/L, P<0.001 and 0.25±0.13 ng/mL vs. 0.73±0.57 ng/mL, P<0.001). No difference was observed between neridronate and placebo groups regarding safety profile.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first RCT that demonstrates the efficacy of neridronate in increasing bone density and reducing bone turnover in organ Tx recipients with significant skeletal morbidity.

Monthly Intramuscular Neridronate for the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: Results of a 6-Year Prospective Italian Study

PURPOSE

Oral bisphosphonates (BPs) are the most commonly used medications for osteoporosis (OP), but their poor gastrointestinal (GI) absorption and tolerance hamper compliance. Intramuscular (IM) neridronate (NE), an amino-BP, is an easy-to-administer, effective, and safe alternative to oral BPs. We assessed the 6-year effects of monthly IM NE on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover biomarkers (BMs) in postmenopausal OP.

METHODS

This single-center, prospective study enrolled postmenopausal osteoporotic outpatients with gastric intolerance to BPs (based on Tuscany Region's law GRT n. 836 20/10/2008). They received 25 mg IM NE once a month (with vitamin D and calcium if necessary) for 6 years. BMD was evaluated at lumbar spine (L1-L4), femoral neck (FN), and total femur (TF) at baseline (BL) and every 12 months afterwards. At BL, month 3, and every 12 months after BL, total and ionized calcium, vitamin D, parathyroid hormone 1-84, bone alkaline phosphatase (BALP), osteocalcin, and N- and C-terminal telopeptides were assayed.

RESULTS

Overall, 60 women (mean age: 62.3 ± 7.5 years) received monthly IM NE for 6 years, with vitamin D and calcium supplementation in 81.3% of cases. Compared to BL, BMD increased significantly already after 1 year at all sites (4.5 ± 0.9% for L1-L4, 4.5 ± 0.8% for TF, and 2.1 ± 0.6% for FN, P ≤ 0.05), and the changes were maintained over time, whereas FN further improved up to year 3 and remained stable afterwards (P ≤ 0.05). All BMs, except for total calcium and BALP, progressively decreased over time (P ≤ 0.05). No fractures and significant adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

The monthly administration of IM NE represents a manageable and effective option, in terms of BMD and bone BM improvement, for the long-term treatment of postmenopausal OP women with gastric intolerance to BPs. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03699150.

Management of patients with complex regional pain syndrome type I

Complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS-I) includes different conditions characterized by regional pain and sensory, motor, sudomotor, vasomotor, and/or trophic findings, affecting a peripheral limb usually after a noxious event, such as a trauma or surgery. The pathophysiology is still poorly understood. Limited data are available on the incidence of CRPS-I, and the disease is underestimated and under-diagnosed. The disease shows a female preponderance approximately 3:1 with a peak age of incidence around the 5th and 6th decade. The available diagnostic criteria for CRPS-I rely on clinical criteria that are unfortunately focused on the signs and symptoms of the chronic and late disease, while little emphasis is given to the typical imaging (X-rays, bone scintigraphy, MRI) findings of the early phase. Over the last decades, several therapies have been proposed but the few studies available are often too small to be conclusive and rarely evolved to randomized controlled trials (RCTs). On the basis of the results of a few RCTs, only short courses of high bisphosphonate doses appear to provide substantial benefits. The best results are seen in patients in the early phase of the disease, often with the persistent remission or complete healing of the conditions. Since the only accredited mechanism of action of bisphosphonates is the suppression of osteoclastic bone resorption, it is likely the initial dramatic bone loss plays a role in the maintenance and evolution of CRPS-I. Short courses of high doses of bisphosphonates should be considered the treatment of choice for patients with CRPS-I.

Clinical development of neridronate: potential for new applications

Neridronate is an aminobisphosphonate, licensed in Italy for the treatment of osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) and Paget's disease of bone (PDB). A characteristic property of neridronate is that it can be administered both intravenously and intramuscularly, providing a useful system for administration in homecare. In this review, we discuss the latest clinical results of neridronate administration in OI and PDB, as well as in osteoporosis and other conditions. We will focus in particular on the latest evidence of the effect of neridronate on treatment of complex regional pain syndrome type I.

Long-term effects of neridronate and its discontinuation in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism

In patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) not suitable for surgical correction, a skeletal protection with bisphosphonates is considered a reasonable option, but the long-term effects after treatment discontinuation are not well known. Sixty postmenopausal women with PHPT were given 400-600 IU vitamin D(3) daily and 100 mg neridronate IV every 2 months for 2 years with 2 additional years of follow-up without antiresorptive therapies. Bone mineral density (BMD) progressively rose by 6.7 ± 7.6% (SD) and by 2.9 ± 4.5% at the spine and femoral neck, respectively. During follow-up, mean BMD progressively fell, but after 2 years it was still 3.9 ± 5.5% higher than baseline values at the spine. Bone alkaline phosphatase and serum C-telopeptide of type I collagen decreased significantly within 6 months (28 and 49% versus baseline, respectively) and rose to baseline values within 6-12 months during follow-up. Serum PTH significantly rose from baseline during treatment, but it remained significantly higher than baseline during follow-up. The PTH changes were significantly correlated with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) levels. In conclusion, in this study we observed that in patients with mild PHPT treatment with bisphosphonates is associated with the expected changes in bone-turnover markers and that the significant increases of both hip and spine BMD are partially maintained for at least 2 years after treatment discontinuation at the vertebral site. The marked increases in serum PTH levels, particularly in subjects with low 25OHD levels, persist after treatment discontinuation and this raises the suspicion that this might reflect a worsening of PHPT.

Current options for the treatment of Paget's disease of the bone

Paget’s disease of bone (PDB) is a chronic bone remodelling disorder characterized by increased osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, with subsequent compensatory increases in new bone formation, resulting in a disorganized mosaic of woven and lamellar bone at affected skeletal sites. This disease is most often asymptomatic but can be associated with bone pain or deformity, fractures, secondary arthritis, neurological complications, deafness, contributing to substantial morbidity and reduced quality of life. Neoplastic degeneration of pagetic bone is a relatively rare event, occurring with an incidence of less than 1%, but has a grave prognosis. Specific therapy for PDB is aimed at decreasing the abnormal bone turnover and bisphosphonates are currently considered the treatment of choice. These treatments are associated with a reduction in plasma alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and an improvement in radiological and scintigraphic appearance and with a reduction in bone pain and bone deformity, Recently, the availability of newer, more potent nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates has improved treatment outcomes, allowing a more effective and convenient management of this debilitating disorder.

Intramuscular neridronate in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density

Compliance to osteoporosis treatment with oral bisphosphonates is very poor. Intermittent intravenous bisphosphonate is a useful alternative, but this route is not readily available. Neridronate, a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate that can be given intramuscularly (IM), was tested in a phase 2 clinical trial in 188 postmenopausal osteoporotic women randomized to IM treatment with 25 mg neridronate every 2 weeks, neridronate 12.5 or 25 mg every 4 weeks, or placebo. All patients received calcium and vitamin D supplements. The patients were treated over 12 months with 2-year posttreatment follow-up. After 12-month treatment, all three doses were associated with significant bone mineral density (BMD) increases at both the total hip and spine. A significant dose-response relationship over the three doses was observed for the BMD changes at the total hip but not at the spine. Bone alkaline phosphatase decreased significantly by 40-55% in neridronate-treated patients, with an insignificant dose-response relationship. Serum type I collagen C-telopeptide decreased by 58-79%, with a significant dose-response relationship (P < 0.05). Two years after treatment discontinuation, BMD declined by 1-2% in each dose group, with values still significantly higher than baseline at both the spine and the total hip. Bone turnover markers progressively increased after treatment discontinuation, and on the second year of follow-up the values were significantly higher than pretreatment baseline. The results of this study indicate that IM neridronate might be of value for patients intolerant to oral bisphosphonates and unwilling or unable to undergo intravenous infusion of bisphosphonates.

Efficacy and safety of risedronate 150 mg once a month in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis

INTRODUCTION

Risedronate has been shown to be effective in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis when given orally in daily or weekly doses or on 2 consecutive days per month. This randomized, double-blind, multi-center study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of a single 150 mg risedronate once-a-month oral dose compared with the 5 mg daily regimen.

METHODS

Women with postmenopausal osteoporosis were randomly assigned to receive risedronate 5 mg daily (n=642) or 150 mg once a month (followed by daily placebo) (n=650) in a double-blind fashion for 2 years. Study drug was taken on an empty stomach at least 30 min before breakfast. Bone mineral density, bone turnover markers, fractures, and adverse events were evaluated. The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean percent change from baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density after 1 year.

RESULTS

538 patients in the daily group (83.8%) and 556 patients in the once-a-month group (85.5%) completed 1 year. The mean percent change in lumbar spine bone mineral density was 3.4% (95% confidence interval, 3.03% to 3.82%) in the daily group and 3.5% (95% confidence interval, 3.15% to 3.93%) in the once-a-month group. The difference between groups was -0.1% (95% confidence interval, -0.51% to 0.27%). The once-a-month regimen was determined to be non-inferior to the daily regimen based on prospectively defined criteria. The mean percent changes in bone mineral density at sites in the hip (total proximal femur, femoral neck, femoral trochanter) were also similar in both dose groups, as were the changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover. The incidence of adverse events, adverse events leading to withdrawal, and upper gastrointestinal tract adverse events were similar in the 2 treatment groups. Both regimens were well tolerated; the percent of patients who withdrew from treatment as a result of an adverse event was 9.5% in the daily group and 8.6% in the once-a-month group.

CONCLUSIONS

Risedronate 150 mg once a month is similar in efficacy and safety to daily dosing and may provide an alternative for patients who prefer once-a-month oral dosing.

Changes in bone remodelling and antifracture efficacy of intermittent bisphosphonate therapy: implications from clinical studies with ibandronate

Bisphosphonates reduce the rate of bone resorption and bone remodelling. Given daily, they decrease the risk of fractures in postmenopausal osteoporosis. When bisphosphonates were given at extended drug-free intervals this antifracture efficacy was generally not seen. This may be due to the different pattern of bone remodelling changes. Data from randomised clinical studies of ibandronate, given orally or intravenously, at different doses and for variable time intervals to women with osteoporosis were examined to explore the relationship between intermittent bisphosphonate therapy, changes in bone resorption and fracture risk. The magnitude of the reduction of the rate of bone resorption at the end of the drug-free interval rather than its fluctuation pattern after bisphosphonate administration determines antifracture efficacy, provided that these fluctuations occur within the premenopausal range. Prolongation of the drug-free interval beyond 2 weeks should be compensated by a dose higher than the cumulative daily dose.

Neridronate and human osteoblasts in normal, osteoporotic and osteoarthritic subjects

The objective of this study was to evaluate the metabolic in vitro effect of the bisphosphonate neridronate on normal and pathological human osteoblasts. Primary human osteoblast cultures were obtained from cancellous bone of osteoarthritic (OA) and osteoporotic (OP) patients and a corresponding healthy control group. Osteocalcin production was evaluated by cultured cells in neridronate 10(-4) M and 10(-6) M, both under basal conditions and after vitamin D3 stimulation. In the absence of neridronate, vitamin D3 increased osteocalcin production in all cell cultures; under the same conditions, and in the absence of vitamin D3, OA osteoblasts showed a significantly higher osteocalcin production whereas OP osteoblasts showed a significantly lower osteocalcin production compared to the normal osteoblasts, respectively. In all cellular populations neridronate at a higher concentration (10(-4) M) induced a reduction in osteocalcin synthesis, but in normal and osteoarthritic osteoblasts did not reduce the stimulatory effect of vitamin D3, whereas it inhibited the vitamin D3-induced increase of osteocalcin synthesis in the osteoporotic cells. In normal and osteoporotic osteoblasts stimulation with the lower neridronate concentration (10(-6) M) significantly increased osteocalcin production, which was further enhanced by vitamin D3 as an additional effect of the combined treatment. In OA osteoblasts, neridronate 10(-6) M did not induce an increase in osteocalcin synthesis and the additional effect of combined treatment with vitamin D3 was not observed. Neridronate can modify the metabolic activity of human osteoblasts by enhancing or decreasing their biosynthetic activity, both in normal and in pathological conditions, depending on compound concentration and on different cell types. These results confirm the validity of using neridronate at doses usually administered in treating osteoporosis, and they suggest using it to treat other diseases which show an altered osteoblast metabolism, such as osteoarthritis.

Preventing Bone Loss During Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Early Experience with Neridronate

OBJECTIVE

Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) is the usual treatment for locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer. Osteoporosis is a common complication of ADT. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of neridronate, a relatively new bisphosphonate to prevent bone loss during androgen ablation.

METHODS

Sixty patients with prostate cancer and osteoporosis were enrolled and randomly assigned to 2 different treatment regimes: group A (30 patients) treated with maximum androgenic blockage (MAB), and group B (30 patients) treated with bicalutamide 150 mg. Each group was divided in 2 subgroups A1-A2 and B1-B2. All patients received calcium and cholecalciferol supplements (500 mg of elemental calcium and 400 IU cholecalciferol) daily. The A2 and B2 subgroups were also treated with neridronate (25 mg intramuscular monthly). Lumbar and femoral bone mineral density (BMD) was evaluated by dualenergy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), both at baseline and after one year of treatment. Deoxypyridinoline (DPD) and bone-alkaline phosphatase (B-ALP) were determined at the beginning, midstudy and at the end.

RESULTS

Patients treated only with calcium and cholecalciferol (A1, B1 subgroups) showed a marked bone loss after 6, and 12 months, with increased levels of DPD and BALP, compared to baseline values. Patients treated with neridronate (A2 et B2 subgroups) showed unchanged levels of these markers. After one year of treatment, lumbar and total hip BMD decreased significantly in patients treated only with calcium and cholecalciferol (A1 subgroup: -4.9% and -1.9% respectively). BMD did not change significantly at any site in patients treated also with neridronate (A2 subgroup: +1% and +0.8% respectively). Lumbar and total hip BMD did not change significantly (-1.5% and -1% respectively) in B1 subgroup. In B2 subgroup an important increase in lumbar spine and the total hip BMD was shown (+2.5% and 1.6% respectively). No relevant side effects were recorded during our study.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, neridronate is an effective and safe treatment in preventing bone loss in men receiving ADT for prostate cancer.

Bisfosfonatos intravenosos

Bisphosphonates possess a fundamental role in the treatment of bone metabolic diseases. Yet their main limitations are poor oral absorption and gastrointestinal side effects, mainly esophageal irritation. Indeed, oral administration is unpleasant for many patients, and it is difficult in bed-confined subjects. Therefore, intravenous administration of these agents can be very useful in several clinical scenarios, especially to improve the compliance. Recently, it has been showed that intravenous bisphosphonates are very useful to control hypercalcemia of malignancy, and to prevent bone complications related to metastases. Their use has also been analyzed in the prevention of bone disease after organ transplantation. Thus, their application to control Paget's disease of bone is well-known, and probably they could have an important role as antiresorptive agents in postmenopausal and steroidal osteoporosis. We present here a state of the art of the use of intravenous bisphosphonates for the aforementioned disorders.

Effects of neridronate treatment in elderly women with osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a common disorder, especially among elderly post-menopausal women. Elderly women are often affected by co-morbidities, impaired gastrointestinal function and reduced mobility; therefore, the treatment strategy for their osteoporosis can be difficult. In this randomized pilot study, we have investigated the effects of a 12-month treatment with neridronate on bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover markers and quality of life (QoL). The study included 40 women (age, 65-80 yr; post-menopausal period, >15yr) from a single osteoporosis centre. Twenty women received a monthly im injection of 25 mg of neridronate associated with a daily dose of 500 mg of calcium and 400 U of vitamin D. Twenty women received calcium plus vitamin D supplements alone. Changes in BMD at the lumbar spine and femoral neck were measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Serum type I collagen C-telopeptide (sCTX), urinary free-deoxypyridinoline (ufDPD), bone alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and serum osteocalcin levels were determined. For the QoL assessment, the Italian version of the SF-36 test was administrated. Spine and hip BMD rose by 6.6 +/- 3 and 4.2 +/- 2.3%, respectively (p < 0.05), after 12 months of neridronate treatment. Markers of skeletal turnover significantly fell already after 3 months of neridronate treatment and decreased progressively thereafter within 12 months. The mean decrease at 12 months ranged from 38 +/- 11% for sCTX to 25.2 +/- 15% for ufDPD (p < 0.001, all). The mean improvement in QoL in the treated group was 45.7% for bodily pain, 37.5% for general health perception, 23.1% for vitality, 18% for emotional role functioning and 12% for physical role functioning. The changes observed in BMD, turnover markers and QoL in the untreated group were ns. The intermittent neridronate administration was easily manageable and well tolerated. In conclusion, neridronate currently represents a valid option for the treatment of osteoporosis, since it helps just as much as oral BPs in the improvement of BMD and in particular conditions it can be even more effective.

Neridronate prevents bone loss in patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer

Today, androgen deprivation therapy is a cornerstone of treatment for advanced prostate cancer, although it presents important complications such as osteoporosis. Neridronate, a relatively new bisphosphonate, is able to prevent bone loss in patients with prostate cancer during androgen ablation.

INTRODUCTION

Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) is a cornerstone of treatment for advanced prostate cancer. This therapy has iatrogenic complications, such as osteoporosis. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of neridronate, a relatively new bisphosphonate, to prevent bone loss during androgen ablation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-eight osteoporotic patients with prostate cancer, treated with 3-month depot triptorelina, were enrolled and randomly assigned to two different treatment groups: group A (n = 24) was treated with a daily calcium and cholecalciferol supplement (500 mg of elemental calcium and 400 IU cholecalciferol), and group B (n = 24) received in addition to the same daily calcium and cholecalciferol supplement, 25 mg of neridronate given intramuscularly every month. All patients also received bicalutamide for 4 weeks. Lumbar and femoral BMD was evaluated by DXA at baseline and after 1 year of therapy; moreover, deoxypyridinoline (DPD) and bone alkaline phosphatase (BALP) were determined at the beginning, midway through, and at the end of the study.

RESULTS

After 6 and 12 months, whereas patients treated only with calcium and cholecalciferol (group A) showed a marked bone loss, with increased levels of DPD and BALP compared with baseline values, patients treated also with neridronate (group B) had substantially unchanged levels of these markers. After 1 year of treatment, lumbar and total hip BMD decreased significantly in patients treated only with calcium and cholecalciferol (group A), whereas it did not change significantly at any skeletal site in patients treated also with neridronate (group B). No relevant side effects were recorded during our study.

CONCLUSIONS

Neridronate is an effective treatment in preventing bone loss in the hip and lumbar spine in men receiving ADT for prostate cancer.

Long-term effects of neridronate on human osteoblastic cell cultures

Bisphosphonates (BPs) are widely used in the treatment of a variety of bone-related diseases, particularly where the bone turnover is skewed in favor of osteolysis. The mechanisms by which BPs reduce bone resorption directly acting on osteoclasts are now largely clarified even at molecular level. Researches concerning the BP's effects on osteoblast have instead shown variable results. Many in vitro studies have reported positive effects on osteoblasts proliferation and mineralization for several BPs; however, the observed effects differ, depending on the variety of different model system that has been used.

OBJECTIVES

We have investigated if neridronate, an aminobisphosphonate suitable for pulsatory parenteral administration, could have an effect on human osteoblastic proliferation and differentiation in vitro.

METHODS

We have investigated whether prolonged addition of neridronate (from 10(-3) to 10(-11) M) to different human osteoblasts cultures, obtained from 14 different bone specimens, could affect the cells number, the endogenous cellular alkaline phosphatase (ALKP) activity, and the formation of mineralized nodules.

RESULTS

Our results show that neridronate does not negatively affect in vitro the viability, proliferation, and cellular activity of normal human osteoblasts even after a long period addition of the drug (20 days) at concentrations equal or lower than 10(-5) mol/l (therapeutic dose). In addition, neridronate seems to enhance the differentiation of cultured osteoblasts in mature bone-forming cells. A maximum increase of alkaline phosphatase activity (+50% after 10 days; P < 0.01) and mineralized nodules (+48% after 20 days; P < 0.05) was observed in cultures treated with neridronate 10(-8) M.

CONCLUSIONS

These results encourage the use of neridronate in long-term therapy of demineralizing metabolic bone disorders.

Intravenous bisphosphonate therapy for osteoporosis: where do we stand?

The use of oral bisphosphonates, particularly members of the aminobisphosphonate subclass, is well established for the treatment of osteoporosis. In a number of clinical settings, intravenous administration appears to be advantageous. However, current dosing and efficacy data are limited while definitive, long-term trials with some of these agents are ongoing. In this article, we review the available information and discuss the use of these drugs on that basis.