Biological and radiological responses to oral etidronate and tiludronate in Paget's disease of bone

Bisphosphonates for Paget's disease of bone in adults

BACKGROUND

Bisphosphonates are considered to be the treatment of choice for people with Paget's disease of bone. However, the effects of bisphosphonates on patient-centred outcomes have not been extensively studied. There are insufficient data to determine whether reducing and maintaining biochemical markers of bone turnover to within the normal range improves quality of life and reduces the risk of complications.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of bisphosphonates for adult patients with Paget's disease of bone.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, ISI Web of Knowledge and trials registers up to March 2017. We searched regulatory agency published information for rare adverse events.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of bisphosphonates as treatment for Paget's disease in adults.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened search results, extracted data and assessed studies for risk of bias. We used standard methodological procedures expected by The Cochrane Collaboration.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 20 trials (25 reports, 3168 participants). Of these, 10 trials (801 participants) compared bisphosphonates (etidronate, tiludronate, ibandronate, pamidronate, olpadronate, alendronate, risedronate, zoledronate) versus placebo, seven compared two bisphosphonates (992 participants), one trial compared a bisphosphonates with a bisphosphonate plus calcitonin (44 participants), and two studies, the largest trial (1331 participants) and its interventional extension study (502 participants), compared symptomatic treatment and intensive treatment where the goal was to normalise alkaline phosphatase.Most studies were assessed at low or unclear risk of bias. Six of 10 studies comparing bisphosphonates versus placebo were assessed at high risk of bias, mainly around incomplete outcome data and selective outcome reporting.Participant populations were reasonably homogeneous in terms of age (mean age 66 to 74 years) and sex (51% to 74% male). Most studies included participants who had elevated alkaline phosphatase levels whether or not bone pain was present. Mean follow-up was six months.Bisphosphonates versus placeboBisphosphonates tripled the proportion (31% versus 9%) of participants whose bone pain disappeared (RR 3.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.31 to 8.90; 2 studies, 205 participants; NNT 5, 95% CI 1 to 31; moderate-quality evidence). This result is clinically important. Data were consistent when pain change was measured as any reduction (RR 1.97, 95% CI 1.29 to 3.01; 7 studies, 481 participants).There was uncertainty about differences in incident fractures: 1.4% fractures occurred in the bisphosphonates group and none in the placebo group (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.18 to 4.31; 4 studies, 356 participants; very low-quality evidence).None of the studies reported data on orthopaedic surgery, quality of life or hearing thresholds.Results regarding adverse effects and treatment discontinuation were uncertain. There was a 64% risk of mild gastrointestinal adverse events in intervention group participants and 48% in the control group (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.92; 6 studies, 376 participants; low-quality evidence). The likelihood of study participants discontinuing due to adverse effects was slightly higher in intervention group participants (4.4%) than the control group (4.1%) (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.41 to 2.52; 6 studies, 517 participants; low-quality evidence). Zoledronate was associated with an increased risk of transient fever or fatigue (RR 2.57, 95% CI 1.21 to 5.44; 1 study, 176 participants; moderate-quality evidence).Bisphosphonates versus active comparatorMore participants reported pain relief with zoledronate than pamidronate (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.53; 1 study, 89 participants; NNT 5, 95% CI 3 to 11) or risedronate (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.74; 1 study, 347 participants; NNT 7, 95% CI 4 to 24; very low quality evidence). This result is clinically important.There was insufficient evidence to confirm or exclude differences in adverse effects of bisphosphonates (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.76; 2 studies, 437 participants; low-quality evidence) and treatment discontinuation (2 studies, 437 participants) (RR 2.04, 95% CI 0.43 to 9.59; 2 studies, 437 participants; very low-quality evidence).Intensive versus symptomatic treatmentThere was no consistent evidence of difference to response in bone pain, bodily pain or quality of life in participants who received intensive versus symptomatic treatment.Inconclusive results were observed regarding fractures and orthopaedic procedures for intensive versus symptomatic treatment (intensive treatment for fracture: RR 1.84, 95% CI 0.76 to 4.44; absolute risk 8.1% versus 5.2%; orthopaedic procedures: RR 1.58, 95% CI 0.80 to 3.11; absolute risk 5.6% versus 3.0%; 1 study, 502 participants; low-quality evidence).There was insufficient evidence to confirm or exclude an important difference in adverse effects between intensive and symptomatic treatment (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.41; low-quality evidence).There was insufficient evidence to confirm or exclude an important difference of risk of rare adverse events (including osteonecrosis of the jaw) from the regulatory agencies databases.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found moderate-quality evidence that bisphosphonates improved pain in people with Paget's disease of bone when compared with placebo. We are uncertain about the results of head-to-head studies investigating bisphosphonates. We found insufficient evidence of benefit in terms of pain or quality of life from intensive treatment. Information about adverse effects was limited, but serious side effects were rare, and rate of withdrawals due to side effects was low.

Osteomalacia in a patient with Paget's bone disease treated with long-term etidronate

A 93 year-old woman with Paget's disease of bone had been treated with etidronate without interruption during 20 years. The daily dose was usual (5mg/kg/day) but this prescription had never been stopped by her physicians. Two fractures had already occurred in pagetic (right tibia) and non pagetic bones (right fibula) within the last 2 years, and she presented rib fractures, another right tibia fracture and right femur fracture during hospitalization time. X-rays films showed major osteolysis of left ulna and right tibia. Blood samples and technetium bone scan brought no evidence for sarcoma or lytic evolution of the disease. A transiliac bone biopsy on non pagetic bone site confirmed the diagnosis of osteomalacia (increased osteoid parameters), with secondary hyperparathyroidism (hook resorption). In Paget's disease of bone, continuous treatment by etidronate may induce generalized osteomalacia, and increase the risk of fracture in both pagetic and non-pagetic bones. Whereas physicians and pharmaceutical industry try to improve the observance of those drugs, this striking observation also points out that a prescription always needs to be updated.

Maladie de Paget, exploration et surveillance

Paget's disease is a progressive bone disease, characterized by bone hypertrophy and increased bone resorption. The pain and deformity that characterize its clinical course are not simple to assess, but it has a characteristic radiographic appearance. In most cases, treatment can be monitored through biological markers of bone turnover. Total alkaline phosphatase is the best marker and measurement of collagen breakdown products is useful in difficult cases. The goal of treatment is the normalization of these biological markers, to prevent complications of the disease.

Modern Therapy for Paget??s Disease of Bone

There has been a dramatic change in the therapeutic approach to patients with Paget's disease of bone over the last 40 years. In the 1960s, only symptomatic therapy could be given, with control of pain the main objective. Analgesics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were the most commonly used agents. From 1968 onwards, antiosteoclastic agents became available, including calcitonin, plicamycin (mithramycin) and etidronate (etidronic acid), a first-generation bisphosphonate. Limitations with these agents, including potentially deleterious effects on bone mineralization with etidronate (etidronic acid), has cleared the way for increasingly potent second- and third-generation bisphosphonates, including clodronate (clodronic acid), pamidronate (pamidronic acid), alendronate (alendronic acid) and risedronate (risedronic acid). Even more potent bisphosphonates will become available in the near future. With the newer bisphosphonates, there is some hope for long-term remission (if not definitive healing) of pagetic lesions, as well as prevention of long-term complications in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Thus, indications for therapy have been extended to include younger patients to prevent bone deformity of the limbs and skull, leading to secondary osteoarthritis, facial deformities and potentially to sarcoma transformation; as well as to elderly patients to prevent bone fragility, leading to fracture, and pagetic vascular steal syndromes. The increased potency and longer duration of action of newer bisphosphonates more than compensates for their marginally increased cost compared with older bisphosphonates.

Treatment of bone diseases with bisphosphonates, excluding osteoporosis

The main biologic action of bisphosphonates consists of the inhibition of osteoclastic bone resorption, and, at least, for the drugs introduced after etidronate, without any significant inhibition of bone mineralization. Bisphosphonates therefore play a major role in conditions that are characterized, at least partly, by an increased bone resorption. Primary and secondary osteoporosis by far constitute the most widespread indications for bisphosphonates, mostly because recent published trials have demonstrated their ability to prevent fractures. Potentially crippling conditions such as symptomatic Paget disease of bone remain a major therapeutic challenge for bisphosphonates, but the prevention of the major complications such as sarcoma has still to be proven. The availability of more potent bisphosphonates, less toxic for bones, has certainly widened the therapeutic interventions to asymptomatic patients, bearing in mind the various potential troublesome complications. Fibrous dysplasia resembles, in certain aspects, Paget disease; it is therefore not surprising that bisphosphonate therapy has been proposed in this indication. With the aging of world populations, more and more cancers will be diagnosed. For those with a bone metastatic propensity or malignant hematologic condition, such as multiple myeloma, the most recent generation of more potent bisphosphonates may bring more comfort to crippled patients and even, hopefully, have a direct antitumoral activity, if used synergistically with the armamentarium already available to the clinician. New indications for bisphosphonates include osteogenesis imperfecta both in children and adults. In the future, they might be used in the prevention of erosions in rheumatoid arthritis and of loosening of joint prostheses, as well as possibly in osteoarthritis. Now that the fear of theoretically freezing bone remodeling has been reasonably dismissed, potential uses for bisphosphonates might be considered nearly infinite.

Short-term therapy with oral olpadronate in active Paget's disease of bone

One of the aims of the treatment of Paget's disease with bisphosphonates should be the normalization of the activity of the disease with the shortest possible exposure to the drug. Olpadronate (OPD) is a new bisphosphonate characterized by the dimethylation of the amino group, its potency is near to alendronate, and more soluble in the digestive media than other aminobisphosphonates. We treated 46 patients (28 men and 18 women, mean age 70 years) with active Paget's disease with oral OPD, 200 mg/day for 12 +/- 2 days, except 2 patients who received 400 mg/day. Eight patients had never been treated before, and 38 had previously received antiosteolytic drugs. The period without treatment prior to OPD was (X +/- 1 SD) 14 +/- 12 months. Baseline bone alkaline phosphatase (BALP) (levels fell from (X +/- 1 SD) 54.0 +/- 62.7 IU/ml (range 22-396) to a lowest mean value of 16.2 +/- 6.4 IU/ml (range 8-45) (normal range 5-21 IU/ml). Forty patients normalized BALP values, in most of the cases within the first 3 months after OPD treatment. Two patients showed partial response (> 50% decrease from baseline), three patients presented poor response (< 50% decrease from baseline), and one patient did not respond at all. Two patients complained of gastric discomfort, and one patient had diarrhea, which disappeared after discontinuation of the drug. Follow-up was carried out on 36 patients; 22 patients are still in remission, with an average length of 9.0 +/- 2.6 months. Fourteen patients experienced relapse after 9 +/- 2 months remission. In conclusion, a 12-day treatment with 200 mg/day of OPD proved to be a very effective and well tolerated therapy of Paget's disease and induced biochemical remissions in the vast majority of patients, even in those with very active disease.

Tiludronate. A new treatment for an old ailment: Paget's disease of bone

Tiludronate ([[(4-chlorophenyl)thio]-methylene]-bis-phosphonate, ClPsMBP, Skelid, Sanofi) is a powerful inhibitor of bone resorption which has been shown to be a highly effective and safe agent for the treatment of Paget's disease of bone. Preclinical studies in vitro and in vivo have demonstrated a dose-dependent inhibitory effect on bone resorption. Unlike other bisphosphonates, tiludronate does not seem to interfere with the differentiation of osteoclasts or with their access to bone mineral. Bone tolerance studies indicate that tiludronate has an excellent therapeutic window. Thus, at the doses which induce a substantial inhibition of bone resorption it neither causes an appreciable effect on mineralisation, nor impairs biomechanical bone resistance. New formulations of tiludronate (tablets) have a bioavailability of 6% (2-11%) when ingested under optimal conditions. The pharmacokinetic profile of tiludronate is linear. Approximately 50% of the absorbed dose is bound to bone and the rate of release from this site is limited by bone turnover. Several open uncontrolled, open randomised, and double-blind, placebo-controlled studies carried out in patients with active Paget's disease have demonstrated that tiludronate reduces bone pain and produces an intense and sustained biochemical response. 3-6 months after starting tiludronate therapy, serum alkaline phosphatase levels fall far more than 50% from baseline values, reaching normal values in a percentage of the cases ranging from 35-70%. At present, tiludronate, together with pamidronate and alendronate, appear to be the drugs of choice for first-line use in the management of relatively young patients at risk of having long-term complications, when long-lasting control of disease activity is required.

Developments in the therapeutic applications of bisphosphonates

The authors review the structural, pharmacologic, and clinical aspects of bisphosphonates, a class of drugs currently used to treat several disorders of bone and calcium metabolism. Pertinent literature on the bisphosphonates was reviewed with the help of a MEDLINE search and several bibliographies, including published clinical trials, monographs, and review articles. The bisphosphonates are analogs of pyrophosphate that, when given orally or intravenously, bind avidly to exposed bone mineral and disrupt bone turnover. These agents comprise three groups or generations, based on their potency and chemical structures. All three generations are effective in treating hypercalcemia, Paget's disease of bone, osteoporosis, and other disorders of accelerated bone turnover. The third-generation agents have the greatest potency and offer the promise of a convenient way to suppress or prevent osseous metastasis in patients with certain malignancies. As a group, these agents are well tolerated and, when administered correctly, rarely cause toxicity. The bisphosphonates are safe and effective agents for the treatment of disorders of accelerated bone turnover.

Coccygeal fracture and Paget's disease presenting as acute cauda equina syndrome

Paget's disease of bone affects a significant percentage of adult and elderly patients. Although generally asymptomatic, the inflammatory changes and hypervascularity of the affected bone is prone to pathologic fracture and resultant hemorrhage. Epidural hematoma is well-described with vertebral fractures and can present as acute cauda equina syndrome. We describe a case in which an elderly female with Paget's disease sustained a minor coccygeal fracture and developed local hemorrhage and edema, which caused a sacral plexopathy that presented identical to acute cauda equina syndrome. A literature review will follow.