Effect of 10 years' hormone replacement therapy on bone mineral content in postmenopausal women

Long-term hormone therapy for perimenopausal and postmenopausal women

BACKGROUND: Hormone therapy (HT) is widely provided for control of menopausal symptoms and has been used for the management and prevention of cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis and dementia in older women. This is an updated version of a Cochrane review first published in 2005. OBJECTIVES: To assess effects of long-term HT (at least 1 year's duration) on mortality, cardiovascular outcomes, cancer, gallbladder disease, fracture and cognition in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women during and after cessation of treatment. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following databases to September 2016: Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO. We searched the registers of ongoing trials and reference lists provided in previous studies and systematic reviews. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised double-blinded studies of HT versus placebo, taken for at least 1 year by perimenopausal or postmenopausal women. HT included oestrogens, with or without progestogens, via the oral, transdermal, subcutaneous or intranasal route. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected studies, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous data and mean differences (MDs) for continuous data, along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed the quality of the evidence by using GRADE methods. MAIN RESULTS: We included 22 studies involving 43,637 women. We derived nearly 70% of the data from two well-conducted studies (HERS 1998; WHI 1998). Most participants were postmenopausal American women with at least some degree of comorbidity, and mean participant age in most studies was over 60 years. None of the studies focused on perimenopausal women.In relatively healthy postmenopausal women (i.e. generally fit, without overt disease), combined continuous HT increased the risk of a coronary event (after 1 year's use: from 2 per 1000 to between 3 and 7 per 1000), venous thromboembolism (after 1 year's use: from 2 per 1000 to between 4 and 11 per 1000), stroke (after 3 years' use: from 6 per 1000 to between 6 and 12 per 1000), breast cancer (after 5.6 years' use: from 19 per 1000 to between 20 and 30 per 1000), gallbladder disease (after 5.6 years' use: from 27 per 1000 to between 38 and 60 per 1000) and death from lung cancer (after 5.6 years' use plus 2.4 years' additional follow-up: from 5 per 1000 to between 6 and 13 per 1000).Oestrogen-only HT increased the risk of venous thromboembolism (after 1 to 2 years' use: from 2 per 1000 to 2 to 10 per 1000; after 7 years' use: from 16 per 1000 to 16 to 28 per 1000), stroke (after 7 years' use: from 24 per 1000 to between 25 and 40 per 1000) and gallbladder disease (after 7 years' use: from 27 per 1000 to between 38 and 60 per 1000) but reduced the risk of breast cancer (after 7 years' use: from 25 per 1000 to between 15 and 25 per 1000) and clinical fracture (after 7 years' use: from 141 per 1000 to between 92 and 113 per 1000) and did not increase the risk of coronary events at any follow-up time.Women over 65 years of age who were relatively healthy and taking continuous combined HT showed an increase in the incidence of dementia (after 4 years' use: from 9 per 1000 to 11 to 30 per 1000). Among women with cardiovascular disease, use of combined continuous HT significantly increased the risk of venous thromboembolism (at 1 year's use: from 3 per 1000 to between 3 and 29 per 1000). Women taking HT had a significantly decreased incidence of fracture with long-term use.Risk of fracture was the only outcome for which strong evidence showed clinical benefit derived from HT (after 5.6 years' use of combined HT: from 111 per 1000 to between 79 and 96 per 1000; after 7.1 years' use of oestrogen-only HT: from 141 per 1000 to between 92 and 113 per 1000). Researchers found no strong evidence that HT has a clinically meaningful impact on the incidence of colorectal cancer.One trial analysed subgroups of 2839 relatively healthy women 50 to 59 years of age who were taking combined continuous HT and 1637 who were taking oestrogen-only HT versus similar-sized placebo groups. The only significantly increased risk reported was for venous thromboembolism in women taking combined continuous HT: Their absolute risk remained low, at less than 1/500. However, other differences in risk cannot be excluded, as this study was not designed to have the power to detect differences between groups of women within 10 years of menopause.For most studies, risk of bias was low in most domains. The overall quality of evidence for the main comparisons was moderate. The main limitation in the quality of evidence was that only about 30% of women were 50 to 59 years old at baseline, which is the age at which women are most likely to consider HT for vasomotor symptoms. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Women with intolerable menopausal symptoms may wish to weigh the benefits of symptom relief against the small absolute risk of harm arising from short-term use of low-dose HT, provided they do not have specific contraindications. HT may be unsuitable for some women, including those at increased risk of cardiovascular disease, increased risk of thromboembolic disease (such as those with obesity or a history of venous thrombosis) or increased risk of some types of cancer (such as breast cancer, in women with a uterus). The risk of endometrial cancer among women with a uterus taking oestrogen-only HT is well documented.HT is not indicated for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease or dementia, nor for prevention of deterioration of cognitive function in postmenopausal women. Although HT is considered effective for the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis, it is generally recommended as an option only for women at significant risk for whom non-oestrogen therapies are unsuitable. Data are insufficient for assessment of the risk of long-term HT use in perimenopausal women and in postmenopausal women younger than 50 years of age.

Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) is useful for monitoring bone mineral density of the patients who receive hormone replacement therapy

OBJECTIVE

A forearm fracture (Colles' fracture) is often the first sign of osteoporosis and should alert the patient and physician to the possibility of underlying skeletal fragility. Therefore, the establishment of a more accurate and reliable method for the measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) at the distal radius would be beneficial for the patients who suffer from osteoporosis. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the usefulness of peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) to assess the change of BMD at the distal radius in early postmenopausal women who receive hormone replacement therapy (HRT).

METHODS

Twenty healthy early postmenopausal women who were diagnosed as osteoporosis or osteopenia were randomized to either HRT or placebo treatment. We analyzed BMD of the distal radius by pQCT, lumbar spine by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and the biochemical markers of bone turn over (osteocalcin, deoxypyridinoline) every 6 months.

RESULTS

The placebo group showed a significant decrease from the baseline in the trabecular BMD of the radius at 12 months (7.4+/-2.5%) (p<0.05), whereas the HRT group showed a slight increase (0.7+/-2.2%). The changes in the trabecular BMD of the radius between the HRT and placebo groups were statistically different at 12 months (p<0.05). On the other hand, in the cortical BMD of the radius, no significant differences were seen between the changes of bone densities in the HRT and control groups after 1 year of treatment. pQCT could detect a significant loss of BMD of the radius in early postmenopausal women after 1 year and HRT prevented its loss.

CONCLUSION

Our preliminary clinical trial showed that pQCT might be useful for the early detection of bone loss in early postmenopausal women and for the monitoring BMD of the patients who receive HRT.

Justification for the use of HRT in the long-term prevention of osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a common condition in postmenopausal women and is associated with significant healthcare costs, morbidity and mortality. It is clear that long-term hormone replacement therapy (HRT) has a role to play in preventing osteoporosis by increasing bone mineral density and reducing fracture rate. It is important that these benefits, as well as those on climacteric symptoms, quality of life, colorectal carcinoma and cognition, are not underestimated in the face of the postulated risks with regard to breast cancer and cardiovascular disease. In conclusion, HRT should currently be used only for women with climacteric symptoms or an increased risk of osteoporosis, and it is important that there is an individualised approach to treatment based on each woman's risk profile.

Design and baseline characteristics of a trial on health effects of soy protein with isoflavones in postmenopausal women

This study is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to assess the effects of high amounts of phytoestrogens on bone mineral density, cardiovascular diseases, cognitive function, performance in activities of daily life and well being. Participants were healthy postmenopausal women, aged 60-75 years. Between March and September 2000, 202 women were recruited, and, after completion of the baseline measurements, randomized to either soy protein, containing 99 mg naturally occurring isoflavones or placebo (milk protein) daily for 1 year. Analysis of the endpoints will be based on the difference between baseline measurements and measurements at the end of the intervention period with group allocation as independent variable.

Use of hormone replacement therapy among Danish nurses at increased risk of osteoporosis

Observational studies and recent randomized trials have shown that postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) may reduce the risk of osteoporotic fractures by about 30 to 40%. In this study we used a log linear graphical model to determine whether women with a known increased risk of osteoporosis were more likely to use HRT than other women and to examine whether women at increased risk modified this risk through their lifestyle. Cox regression analysis was used to analyze if women at risk of osteoporosis used HRT longer than women not at risk. Participants were Danish female nurses who, in 1993, were between 50 and 69 years of age (N=14,865). Data were collected from postal questionnaires. We concluded that nurses with a known family history of osteoporosis more often used HRT than nurses without this risk. No other direct associations were found between biological risk factors and ever use of HRT. The presence of biological risk factors of osteoporosis was not consistently modified by a healthier lifestyle. Nurses with a low body mass index (BMI) with a known family history of osteoporosis continued to use HRT longer than nurses without these risk factors.

Effect of 1 year of discontinuation of raloxifene or estrogen therapy on bone mineral density after 5 years of treatment in healthy postmenopausal women

The beneficial effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT), selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), or bisphosphonates in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women have been well established. However, little is known about the effects of discontinuation of treatment on bone mineral density. We investigated the effect of 1 year of discontinuation of the SERM raloxifene (Ral; 60 mg and 150 mg), conjugated equine estrogen (CEE; 0.625 mg), and placebo after 5 years of treatment in a double-blind, randomized study. Thirty-eight of 59 healthy and hysterectomized postmenopausal women (mean age 55 years) completed the treatment and 1 year follow-up period. Lumbar spine and femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) were performed with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, before, during, and at the end of treatment, as well as after 1 year of discontinuation of therapy. One year of discontinuation significantly reduced the mean lumbar spine BMD in the raloxifene- and estrogen-treated women (p < 0.05), whereas mean femoral neck BMD was reduced significantly only in women treated with 60 mg Ral (p < 0.05). The mean percentage change (+/-SD) in lumbar spine BMD was: CEE, -6.2% (+/-3.7%); Ral 60 mg, -2.4% (+/-2.4%); Ral 150 mg, -2.6% (+/-3.1%); and placebo, -1.6% (+/-4.3%). Our results show that 5 years of treatment with either Ral or CEE did not protect against bone loss after 1 year of withdrawal of therapy, and that the rate of bone loss was not significantly different from that of placebo-treated women.

Compliance with 10 years oral hormonal replacement therapy

OBJECTIVE

To study 10 years compliance with oral hormonal replacement therapy (HRT).

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-one early postmenopausal women were initially randomly allocated to three groups in a double blind, 2-year placebo controlled trial. Fifty women received continuous combined therapy, 50 were placed on sequential therapy, while the last 51 women were given placebo for 2 years and after that no therapy. After the trial, the women were followed in an open investigation for a total of 10 years.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-six women (83%) out of 151 came to a 10-year interview, 4% had died and the remaining did not want to participate. None of the women in the combined group had changed to other regimens (42% were still in treatment after 10 years). Twenty-four percent from the original sequential group were still in sequential therapy; another 24% of the group had changed to other HRTs (mainly because the women disliked the monthly bleedings). Fifty-three percent of the women from the placebo group had not received any HRT. Eighteen percent were on HRT. Eighty-seven percent of the women who had taken combined therapy for 8 years were still being treated at the tenth years' visit.

CONCLUSION

Long-term compliance was excellent for continuous combined therapy and better than for sequential after 10 years.

Transdermal delivery of drugs for the treatment of bone diseases

The current status of transdermal drug delivery for the treatment of bone diseases is described in this review. The structure, physiology and function of skin and their importance in determining delivery into and across skin are discussed. Special emphasis has been devoted to a description of the major pathways of transport across the skin and the quite continuing controversy over the importance of the transfollicular route. An overview of anatomic site-dependent drug absorption is also provided and is particularly relevant to determination of transdermal patch location. Brief descriptions of the criteria for selection of transdermal drug candidate, transdermal patch designs and currently marketed transdermal products are also included. Transdermal estradiol delivery systems are examined in more detail for their clinical and biological effects. Finally, the feasibility of delivering drugs such as bisphosphonates across skin is discussed.