Current practices and evaluation of barriers and facilitators to surgical site infection prevention measures in Jimma, Ethiopia

A comprehensive qualitative investigation of the factors that affect surgical site infection prevention in cardiac surgery in England using observations and interviews

BACKGROUND

Interview and questionnaire studies have identified barriers and challenges to preventing surgical site infections (SSIs) by focusing on compliance with recommendations and care bundles using interviews, questionnaires and expert panels. This study proposes a more comprehensive investigation by using observations of clinical practice plus interviews which will enable a wider focus.

AIM

To comprehensively identify the factors which affect SSI prevention using cardiac surgery as an exemplar.

METHODS

The study consisted of 130 h of observed clinical practice followed by individual semi-structured interviews with 16 surgeons, anaesthetists, theatre staff, and nurses at four cardiac centres in England. Data were analysed thematically.

FINDINGS

The factors were complex and existed at the level of the intervention, the individual, the team, the organization, and even the wider society. Factors included: the attributes of the intervention; the relationship between evidence, personal beliefs, and perceived risk; power and hierarchy; leadership and culture; resources; infrastructure; supplies; organization and planning; patient engagement and power; hospital administration; workforce shortages; COVID-19 pandemic; 'Brexit'; and the war in Ukraine.

CONCLUSION

This is one of the first studies to provide a comprehensive overview of the factors affecting SSI prevention. The factors are complex and need to be fully understood when trying to reduce SSIs. A strong evidence base was insufficient to ensure implementation of an intervention.

Application of a Human Factors and Systems Engineering Approach to Explore Care Transitions of Sepsis Survivors From Hospital to Home Health Care

STUDY AIM

This study aims to describe the transition-in-care work process for sepsis survivors going from hospitals to home health care (HHC) and identify facilitators and barriers to enable practice change and safe care transitions using a human factors and systems engineering approach.

BACKGROUND

Despite high readmission risk for sepsis survivors, the transition-in-care work process from hospitals to HHC has not been described.

METHODS

We analyzed semi-structured needs assessment interviews with 24 stakeholders involved in transitioning sepsis survivors from two hospitals and one affiliated HHC agency participating in the parent implementation science study, I-TRANSFER. The qualitative data analysis was guided by the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) framework to describe the work process and identify work system elements.

RESULTS

We identified 31 tasks characterized as decision making, patient education, communication, information, documentation, and scheduling tasks. Technological and organizational facilitators lacked in HHC compared to the hospitals. Person and organization elements in HHC had the most barriers but few facilitators. Additionally, we identified specific task barriers that could hinder sepsis information transfer from hospitals to HHC.

CONCLUSION

This study explored the complex transition-in-care work processes for sepsis survivors going from hospitals to HHC. We identified barriers, facilitators, and critical areas for improvement to enable implementation and ensure safe care transitions. A key finding was the sepsis information transfer deficit, highlighting a critical issue for future study.

APPLICATION

We recommend using the SEIPS framework to explore complex healthcare work processes before the implementation of evidence-based interventions.

Healthcare Cost and Outcomes Associated With Surgical Site Infection and Patient Outcomes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Surgical site infection (SSI) is a growing global concern. The principal explanation for this is its adverse clinical outcomes, such as morbidity and mortality. However, the link between the economic burden of SSIs and patient outcomes needs to be sufficiently characterized. This review aims to describe the financial implications of SSIs on patient outcomes in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Despite the heterogeneity in study designs from multiple LMIC countries, there is a significant correlation between SSI-associated healthcare costs from increased length of stay (LOS), readmissions, reoperations, and adverse patient outcomes. This varies based on the size, degree of infection, or other patient comorbidities. SSIs are much more prevalent in LMICs. The additional financial burden incurred in managing SSIs reinforces the need to prioritize practicing interventions to prevent this complication, which resource-limited health institutions are unequipped to do and consequently have significant adverse patient outcomes.