Decreased hospital readmissions after programmatic strengthening of an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) program

Current practices and challenges of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy: a narrative review

Extended hospitalization for infection management increases inpatient care costs and the risk of healthcare-associated adverse events, including infections. The growing global demand for healthcare, the diminishing availability of hospital beds and an increasing patient preference for care within their own home have been the primary drivers of the expansion of hospital-in-the-home programmes. Such programmes include the use of IV antimicrobials in outpatient settings, known as outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT). However, OPAT practices vary globally. This review article aims to describe the current OPAT practices and challenges worldwide. OPAT practice begins with patient evaluation and selection using eligibility criteria, which requires collaboration between the interdisciplinary OPAT team, patients and caregivers. Depending on care requirements, eligible patients may be enrolled to various models of care, receiving medication by healthcare professionals at outpatient infusion centres, hospital clinics, home visits or through self-administration. OPAT can be used for the management of many infections where an effective oral treatment option is lacking. Various classes of parenteral antimicrobials, including β-lactams, aminoglycosides, glycopeptides, fluoroquinolones and antifungals such as echinocandins, are used globally in OPAT practice. Despite its benefits, OPAT has numerous challenges, including complications from medication administration devices, antimicrobial side effects, monitoring requirements, antimicrobial instability, patient non-adherence, patient OPAT rejection, and challenges related to OPAT team structure and administration, all of which impact its outcome. A negative outcome could include unplanned hospital readmission. Future research should focus on mitigating these challenges to enable optimization of the OPAT service and thereby maximize the documented benefits for the healthcare system, patients and healthcare providers.

Barriers and facilitators for the implementation and expansion of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy: a systematic review

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) has been expanding in recent years and serves as a viable solution in reducing the shortage of hospital beds. However, the wider implementation of OPAT faces numerous challenges. This review aimed to assess implementation barriers and facilitators of OPAT services. Studies describing barriers and facilitators of the OPAT service were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science Proceedings, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts and PsycINFO. All types of study designs published in the English language were included. Studies that did not mention any barrier or facilitator, did not differentiate OPAT and inpatient, focused on specific antimicrobials or diseases, and made no distinction between parenteral and other treatments were excluded. Qualitative analysis was performed using the 'best-fit' framework approach and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). The review was PROSPERO registered (CRD42023441083). A total of 8761 studies were screened for eligibility and 147 studies were included. Problems in patient selection, lack of awareness, poor communication and co-ordination, lack of support, lack of structured service and inappropriate prescriptions were identified. OPAT provides safe, effective and efficient treatment while maintaining patients' privacy and comfort, resulting in less daily life disruption, and reducing the risk of infection. Satisfaction and preference for OPAT were very high. Initiatives in strengthening OPAT such as antimicrobial stewardship and telemedicine are beneficial. Challenges to and facilitators of OPAT were identified among patients, health professionals, OPAT service providers and healthcare administrators. Understanding them is crucial to designing targeted initiatives for successful OPAT service implementation.

Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy in a Safety Net Hospital: Opportunities for Improvement

Background

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) is a safe and cost-effective transitional care approach administered via different delivery models. No standards exist for appropriate OPAT program staffing. We examined outcomes of patients receiving OPAT via different care models to identify strategies to improve safety while reducing health care overuse.

Methods

Retrospective demographic, clinical, and outcome data of patients discharged with OPAT were reviewed in 2 periods (April-June 2021 and January-March 2022; ie, when staffing changed) and stratified by care model: self-administered OPAT, health care OPAT, and skilled nursing facility OPAT.

Results

Of 342 patients, 186 (54%) received OPAT in 2021 and 156 (46%) in 2022. Hospital length of stay rose from 12.4 days to 14.3 in 2022. In a Cox proportional hazards regression model, visits to the emergency department (ED) within 30 days of OPAT initiation (hazard ratio, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.13-2.73; P = .01) and readmissions (hazard ratio, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.22-4.49; P = .01) increased in 2022 vs 2021, corresponding to decreases in OPAT team staffing. Higher readmissions in the 2022 cohort were for reasons unrelated to OPAT (P = .01) while readmissions related to OPAT did not increase (P = .08).

Conclusions

In a well-established OPAT program, greater health care utilization-length of stay, ED visits, and readmissions-were seen during periods of higher staff turnover and attrition. Rather than blunt metrics such as ED visits and readmissions, which are influenced by multiple factors besides OPAT, our findings suggest the need to develop OPAT-specific outcome measures as a quality assessment tool and to establish optimal OPAT program staffing ratios.

Antimicrobial stewardship markers and healthcare-associated pneumonia threshold criteria in UK hospitals: analysis of the MicroGuideTm application

Background

To address antimicrobial resistance, antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) principles must be implemented and adhered to. Clinical decision aids such as the MicroGuideTM app are an important part of these efforts. We sought to evaluate the consistency of core AMS information and the diversity of classification thresholds for healthcare-associated pneumonia (HAP) in the MicroGuide app.

Methods

Guidelines in the MicroGuide app were extracted and analysed for content related to AMS and HAP. Guidelines were characterized according to HAP naming classification; community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) classifications were analysed to serve as a comparator group.

Results

In total, 115 trusts (119 hospitals) were included. Nearly all hospitals had developed MicroGuide sections on AMS (n = 112/119, 94%) and sepsis management (n = 117/119, 98%). Other AMS sections were outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (47%), antifungal stewardship (70%), critical care (23%) and IV to oral switch therapy (83%). Only 9% of hospitals included guidance on the maximum six key AMS sections identified. HAP definitions varied widely across hospitals with some classifying by time to onset and some classifying by severity or complexity. The largest proportion of HAP guidelines based classification on severity/complexity (n = 69/119, 58%). By contrast, definitions in CAP guidelines were uniform.

Conclusions

The high heterogeneity in HAP classification identified suggests inconsistency of practice in identifying thresholds for HAP in the UK. This complicates HAP management and AMS practices. To address HAP in alignment with AMS principles, a comprehensive strategy that prioritizes uniform clinical definitions and thresholds should be developed.

Improving antimicrobial treatment in terms of antimicrobial stewardship and health costs by an OPAT service

PURPOSE

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) is a standard for antimicrobial therapy internationally. With this prospective cohort study, we aimed to assess the impact of an OPAT service as part of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) and evaluate the safety and efficiency of the program while illuminating the financial benefit for the hospital.

METHODS

Socio-demographic data, treatment regimen and outcomes were prospectively recorded for all patients assigned to the program of the OPAT unit of the University Hospital of Zurich between November 2018 and September 2022.

RESULTS

In total, we recorded 303 OPAT assignments of which 260 resulted in effective OPAT episodes. The 260 OPAT episodes were further optimized toward the choice of antimicrobial agent (n = 18) and length of therapy (n = 6). Moreover, OPAT resulted in alteration of patient assessment and care led by AMS strategies in 247 of 260 episodes (95%). While the bed days saved per year increased consistently with time, a total of 3934 in-hospital treatment days were saved amounting to a cost saving of 9,835,000 CHF over 47 months. Adverse events were recorded in 46 cases whilst only two of these have been the reason for readmission during OPAT treatment. Clinical cure was noted in 77% (199/260) and was negatively associated with Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI; OR per 1 unit higher 0.85 (95% CI 0.78-0.93)).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the impact of an OPAT service in the framework of AMS as well as its benefits for the hospital whilst preserving safety and efficacy for the patient's parenteral antimicrobial treatment.

Retrospective evaluation of an intervention bundle on OPAT implementation in a large non-university hospital

OBJECTIVES

Optimization of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) requires interdisciplinarity and an operational algorithm. This report retrospectively assesses the impact of a multimodal quality-enhancement intervention bundle on the implementation rate, efficacy, and safety of a home OPAT program in a Belgian large community-based hospital.

METHODS

OPAT recipients between 1 March 2019 and 30 June 2022 were included. The OPAT trajectories were divided into pre-intervention (from 1 March 2019 to 31 October 2020) and post-intervention (from 1 November 2020 to 30 June 2022) groups. The quality-enhancement intervention bundle consisted of the involvement of an infectious disease specialist, revision and implementation of a state-of-the-art prosthetic joint infection diagnosis and treatment protocol, weekly multidisciplinary discussion of all prosthetic joint infections, revision of the OPAT algorithm, and the introduction of teicoplanin as an OPAT-convenient antimicrobial.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients were included in a total of 96 OPAT trajectories (n = 33 pre-intervention; n = 63 post-intervention). After the intervention, the number of OPAT trajectories nearly doubled. The number of patients with a recurrent infection within 6 months after OPAT completion decreased 15%. The overall 6-month mortality and readmission rates during OPAT treatment decreased 8% and 10%, respectively. Mortality during OPAT treatment did not change. These differences between pre- and post-intervention did not achieve statistical significance, despite the higher risk for complications in the post-intervention group because of increased infection complexity and required treatment duration.

CONCLUSION

Within a Belgian, single, large community-based hospital, a multimodal intervention bundle resulted in increases in OPAT implementation, infection complexity, and required treatment durations without statistically significant differences in outcomes.

Cost evaluation of a nurse coordinated outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) program

A structured, nurse-driven outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) program within an academic healthcare system was associated with reduced odds of 60-day unplanned OPAT readmissions and costs after hospital discharge. These findings may facilitate justifying additional resources for OPAT programs to improve care while decreasing costs.

Antimicrobial Stewardship at Transitions of Care

Antimicrobial stewardship interventions have historically been siloed in different care settings; recently, a need for stewardship interventions at care transitions has arisen as inappropriate prescribing at care transitions may result in patient harm. There are several care areas that should be considered for optimizing antibiotic prescribing. Interventions can be difficult to implement as they often require the efforts of a multidisciplinary team and are resource intensive. Antimicrobial stewardship programs should prioritize interventions at transitions of care to improve prescribing and patient outcomes.

Identifying the potential impact of a multidisciplinary outpatient antimicrobial therapy program in an area of high social vulnerability

Background

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) and complex outpatient antimicrobial therapy (COpAT) are common practice in the management of infectious diseases (IDs). However, providing OPAT/COpAT can pose significant challenges pre- and post-discharge, particularly in vulnerable patient populations.

Objectives

The objective of this study is to assess outpatient complications related to OPAT/COpAT in patients discharged with a home health services referral and to identify pre- and post-discharge intervention opportunities and the associated cost-savings that could be achieved with a multidisciplinary ID team-run OPAT/COpAT program.

Design/methods

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who were discharged with OPAT/COpAT through home health services over a 3-month study period. Data on potential pre-discharge interventions and post-discharge complications were recorded.

Results

Medication-related issues were the most common pre-discharge complications, accounting for more than 50% of identified intervention opportunities. More than half of the included patients experienced at least one documented outpatient complication post-discharge with peripherally inserted central catheter-line-related complication (20.7%) being the most common issue. Using previously published cost-estimates, the implementation of a designated pre- and post-discharge OPAT/COpAT program could have saved over $100,000 over the 3-month study period.

Conclusion

A multidisciplinary OPAT/COpAT program located in a high social vulnerable area can help reduce complications related to a patient's antimicrobial therapy. Medication-related issues represent a major area for potential intervention. Our findings suggest that a multidisciplinary ID team will have ample opportunities to improve the transition of care, at both pre- and post-discharge, for patients requiring antimicrobial therapy.