Population Based Analysis Ependymoma Patients in Alberta from 1975 to 2007

Do We Need Radiotherapy in Grade II Ependymoma?

Purpose/Objectives

The debate on whether radiotherapy (RT) is an essential part of primary treatment in patients with grade II ependymoma (G2E) is still ongoing, and this study aimed to evaluate its role.

Materials/Methods

A retrospective analysis of all the consecutive patients treated due to G2E in years 1985–2019 was performed. The group consisted of 116 patients with a small predominance of woman (55% vs. 45%) and the location of the tumor in the brain (58% vs. 42%). All had surgery as the primary treatment with 47% R0 resection. Radical RT was applied in 81 patients. In majority of cases (91%), patients received local irradiation.

Results

Median follow-up was 65 months, and during that time, 17 patients died. Five- and 10-year overall survival (OS) of the whole group was 87% and 83%. Radical surgery (R0 vs. R1/2) improved OS (p = 0.004), but the difference was observed only in patients with brain lesions (p = 0.01). Five- and 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 68% and 51%, respectively. Looking at the treatment of recurrence, those who received RT as a part of the treatment of the recurrent tumor had better OS (p = 0.048)—5- and 10-year OS of 85% and 78% vs. 66% and 57%. In the multivariate analysis, radical surgery (R0 vs. R1/2) and the use of RT in the primary treatment improved PFS (p = 0.006 and 0.007). Based on the location of the tumor, the positive influence of RT on PFS was observed only in the case of patients with brain tumors (p = 0.01). Also, comparing R1/2 surgery with R0 resection—the benefit of RT was only observed in R1/2 group (0.02).

Conclusions

RT in the case of patients with G2E is a valuable treatment of the recurrent disease. Patients with brain lesions after nonradical surgery might benefit from the local irradiation in terms of PFS.

Risk factors for the recurrence of world health organization grade Ⅱ ependymomas of spinal cord in adults after microsurgical resections: A retrospective study of 118 patients in a single center

OBJECTIVE

To identify the risk factors for recurrence of World Health Organization (WHO) grade Ⅱ ependymomas of spinal cord in adults after microsurgical resections.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 118 adult patients diagnosed with WHO grade Ⅱ ependymomas of spinal cord at west china hospital from January 2010 to December 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. To identify the risk factors for recurrence, we performed univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression analyses successively.

RESULTS

Twelve patients had a recurrence with a median recurrence time of 30 months [inter-quartile range (IQR) 23.5-75.5 months]. Univariate analysis showed that age (p = 0.030), STR (p < 0.001), index of Ki-67 (p = 0.004), and Vimentin (+, p = 0.004) were associated with postoperative recurrence of ependymomas of spinal cord in adults, while univariate analysis showed that only STR [odds ratio (OR) = 18.838, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 3.068-115.673; p = 0.002], index of Ki-67 (OR = 1.381, 95 % CI: 1.021-1.868; p = 0.036), Vimentin (+; OR = 6.706, 95 % CI: 1.218-36.928; p = 0.029) were independent risk factors for recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The recurrence rate of WHO grade Ⅱ ependymomas of spinal cord in adults was about 13.6 %. Subtotal resection is a critical risk factor for recurrence. A high index of Ki-67 is another independent risk factor for recurrence. Positive Vimentin may also play a role in this process. GTR is very important to prevent recurrence after operation if it is safe to conduct. In cases with higher index Ki-67 and Vimentin (+), close follow-ups are necessary.