Autoantibodies to Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein 4 in Double Seronegative Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review

Refocusing generalized myasthenia gravis: Patient burden, disease profiles, and the role of evolving therapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) continues to present significant challenges for clinical management due to an unpredictable disease course, frequent disease fluctuations, and varying response to therapy. The recent availability of new pharmacologic therapies presents a valuable opportunity to reevaluate how this disease is classified, assessed, and managed and identify new ways to improve the clinical care of patients with gMG.

METHODS

Narrative review was made of publications identified via searches of PubMed and selected congresses (January 2000-September 2022).

RESULTS

New consensus definitions are required to ensure consistency, to better characterize patients, and to identify patients who will benefit from specific drugs and earlier use of these agents. There is a need for more frequent, standardized patient assessment to identify the cause of motor function deficits, provide a clearer picture of the disease burden and its impact on daily living and quality of life (QoL), and better support treatment decision-making. Novel approaches that target different components of the immune system will play a role in more precise treatment of patients with gMG, alongside the development of new algorithms to guide individualized patient management.

CONCLUSIONS

gMG has a physical, mental, and social impact, resulting in a considerable burden of disease and substantially decreased QoL, despite standard treatments. The availability of novel, targeted treatments that influence key pathological mediators of gMG, together with new biomarkers, offers the potential to optimize patient management and ultimately enables a greater number of patients to achieve minimal manifestation status and a reduced burden of disease.

Efficacy of innovative therapies in myasthenia gravis: A systematic review, meta-analysis and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Therapy for myasthenia gravis (MG) is undergoing a profound change, with new treatments being tested. These include complement inhibitors and neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) blockers. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis and network meta-analysis of randomized and placebo-controlled trials of innovative therapies in MG with available efficacy data.

METHODS

We assessed statistical heterogeneity across trials based on the Cochrane Q test and I2 values, and mean differences were pooled using the random-effects model. Treatment efficacy was assessed after 26 weeks of eculizumab and ravulizumab, 28 days of efgartigimod, 43 days of rozanolixizumab, 12 weeks of zilucoplan, and 16, 24 or 52 weeks of rituximab treatment.

RESULTS

We observed an overall mean Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living scale (MG-ADL) score change of -2.17 points (95% confidence interval [CI] -2.67, -1.67; p < 0.001) as compared to placebo. No significant difference emerged between complement inhibitors and anti-FcRn treatment (p = 0.16). The change in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis scale (QMG) score was -3.46 (95% CI -4.53, -2.39; p < 0.001), with a higher reduction with FcRns (-4.78 vs. -2.60; p < 0.001). Rituximab did not significantly improve the MG-ADL (-0.92 [95% CI -2.24, 0.39]; p = 0.17) or QMG scores (-1.9 [95% CI -3.97, 0.18]; p = 0.07). In the network meta-analysis, efgartigimod had the highest probability of being the best treatment, followed by rozanolixizumab.

CONCLUSION

Anti-complement and FcRn treatments both proved to be effective in MG patients, whereas rituximab did not show a significant benefit for patients. Within the limitations of this meta-analysis, including efficacy time points, FcRn treatments showed a greater effect on QMG score in the short term. Real-life studies with long-term measurements are needed to confirm our results.

Cogan's Lid Twitch for Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune condition affecting the neuromuscular junction of skeletal muscles and may be difficult to diagnose. Several clinical signs may have diagnostic utility, including Cogan's lid twitch. This systematic review aims to synthesise the literature on the accuracy of Cogan's lid twitch for diagnosing myasthenia gravis.

METHODS

A systematic search of the databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL was performed from inception to August 2022. Risk of bias analysis and data extraction were performed in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines.

RESULTS

Seven articles satisfied the inclusion criteria. The results showed that for the diagnosis of myasthenia gravis, Cogan's lid twitch has a sensitivity between 50% and 99% and specificity between 75% and 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Cogan's lid twitch is a physical examination finding with moderate diagnostic performance in the diagnosis of myasthenia gravis with ocular involvement. Future studies may seek to evaluate the performance of Cogan's lid twitch in conjunction with other signs of myasthenia gravis with ocular involvements, such as fatigable ptosis or a positive icepack test.

Roles of FcRn in Antigen-Presenting Cells during Autoimmunity and a Clinical Evaluation of Efgartigimod as an FcRn Blocker

The immune system is a complex network of multiple cells, tissues, and organs that protects the body against foreign pathogenic invaders. However, the immune system may mistakenly attack healthy cells and tissues due to the cross-reactivity of anti-pathogen immunity, leading to autoimmunity by autoreactive T cells and/or autoantibody-secreting B cells. Autoantibodies can accumulate, resulting in tissue or organ damage. The neonatal crystallizable fragment receptor (FcRn) is an important factor in immune regulation through controlling the trafficking and recycling of immunoglobulin G (IgG) molecules, the most abundant antibody in humoral immunity. In addition to its role in IgG trafficking and recycling, FcRn is also involved in antigen presentation, which is a crucial step in the activation of the adaptive immune response via directing the internalization and trafficking of antigen-bound IgG immune complexes into compartments of degradation and presentation in antigen-presenting cells. Efgartigimod, an FcRn inhibitor, has shown promise in reducing the levels of autoantibodies and alleviating the autoimmune severity of myasthenia gravis, primary immune thrombocytopenia, and pemphigus vulgaris/foliaceus. This article aims to provide an overview of the importance of FcRn in antigen-presenting cells and its potential as a therapeutic target in autoimmune diseases, using efgartigimod as an example.

Ocular Myasthenia Gravis: A Current Overview

Ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG) is a neuromuscular disease characterized by autoantibody production against post-synaptic proteins in the neuromuscular junction. The pathophysiological auto-immune mechanisms of myasthenia are diverse, and this is governed primarily by the type of autoantibody production. The diagnosis of OMG relies mainly on clinical assessment, the use of serological antibody assays for acetylcholine receptors (AchR), muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MusK), and low-density lipoprotein 4 (LPR4). Other autoantibodies against post-synaptic proteins, such as cortactin and agrin, have been detected; however, their diagnostic value and pathogenic effect are not yet clearly defined. Clinical tests such as the ice test and electrophysiologic tests, particularly single-fiber electromyography, have a valuable role in diagnosis. The treatment of OMG is primarily through cholinesterase inhibitors (pyridostigmine), and steroids are frequently required in cases of ophthalmoplegia. Other immunosuppressive therapies include antimetabolites (azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate) and biological agents such as B-cell depleting agents (Rituximab) and complement inhibitors (eculizumab). Evidence is scarce on the effect of immunosuppressive therapy on altering the natural course of OMG. Clinicians must be vigilant of a myasthenic syndrome in patients using immune-check inhibitors. Reliable and consistent biomarkers are required to assess disease severity and response to therapy to optimize the management of OMG. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current trends and the latest developments in diagnosing and treating OMG.

Development and Application of a Cell-Based Assay for LRP4 Antibody Associated With Myasthenia Gravis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Among patients with double-seronegative myasthenia gravis (dSN-MG) who do not have detectable antibodies against acetylcholine receptor or muscle-specific tyrosine kinase, autoantibodies against low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 (LRP4-Ab) have been detected recently. The purpose of this study was to develop an in-house cell-based assay (CBA) to detect LRP4-Ab and to apply it to samples from patients with MG.

METHODS

The complementary DNA of LRP4 fused into a vector plasmid containing GFP was transfected into human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells. LRP4 expression in the transfected HEK293 cells was assessed using the reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), Western blotting, and immunocytochemistry. The CBA included 252 sera collected from 202 patients with MG and 38 with other neuromuscular diseases, and 12 healthy controls. The transfected HEK293 cells were incubated using sera and antihuman immunoglobulin G antibodies conjugated with Alexa Fluor 594. The presence of LRP4-Ab was determined based on the fluorescence intensity and the localization in fluorescence microscopy.

RESULTS

The expressions of the mRNA and protein of LRP4 in the transfected HEK293 cells were confirmed using RT-PCR and Western blotting, respectively. Immunocytochemistry indicated LPR4 expression on the cell membrane. Among 202 patients with MG including 53 with dSN-MG, LRP4-Ab were positive in 3 patients who were all double seronegative. LRP4-Ab were not detected in the patients with other neuromuscular diseases or the healthy controls.

CONCLUSIONS

A CBA for detecting LRP4-Ab associated with MG has been developed, and was used to find LRP4-Ab in the sera of patients with MG.

Autoantibodies in central nervous system and neuromuscular autoimmune disorders: A narrative review

The discovery of novel autoantibodies in neurological disorders contributes to a better understanding of its pathogenesis, improves the accuracy of diagnosis, and leads to new treatment strategies. Advances in techniques for the screening and detection of autoantibodies have enabled the discovery of new antibodies in the central nervous system (CNS) and neuromuscular diseases. Cell-based assays using live or fixed cells overexpressing target antigens are widely used for autoantibody-based diagnosis in clinical practice. Common pathogenic autoantibodies are unknown in most patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). Novel pathogenic autoantibodies to aquaporin-4 and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) have been identified in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and MOG antibody-associated disease, respectively. These diseases have clinical similarities to MS, but with the discovery of pathogenic autoantibodies, they are now recognized as distinct disease entities. Antibodies to paranodal membrane proteins such as neurofascin-155, contactin‑1, contactin‑associated protein‑1 in CIDP and muscle-specific kinase and low-density lipoprotein receptor–related protein 4 in myasthenia gravis were added to the profiles of autoantibodies in neurological disorders. Despite the relatively low frequency of seropositivity, autoantibody detection is currently essential for the clinical diagnosis of CNS and neuromuscular autoimmune disorders, and differential approaches to seropositive patients will contribute to more personalized medicine. We reviewed recent discoveries of autoantibodies and their clinical implications in CNS and neuromuscular disorders.

Myasthenia Gravis and Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome: New Developments in Diagnosis and Treatment

"Myasthenia Gravis is, like it or not, the neurologist's disease!" (Thomas Richards Johns II, MD Seminars in Neurology 1982). The most common disorders in clinical practice involving defective neuromuscular transmission are myasthenia gravis (MG) and Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS). The hallmark of weakness related to malfunction of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) is variability in severity of symptoms from minute to minute and hour to hour. Fatigable weakness and fluctuation in symptoms are common in patients whether the etiology is autoimmune, paraneoplastic, genetic, or toxic. Autoimmune MG is the most common disorder of neuromuscular transmission affecting adults with an estimated prevalence of 1 in 10,000. While LEMS is comparatively rare, the unique clinical presentation, the association with cancer, and evolving treatment strategies require the neurologist to be familiar with its presentation, diagnosis, and management. In this paper we provide a summary of the meaningful recent clinical developments in the diagnosis and treatment of both MG and LEMS.

Heterogeneity in myasthenia gravis: considerations for disease management

Introduction: Myasthenia gravis is a rare disease of the neuromuscular junction and a prototype of B cell-driven immunopathology. Pathogenic antibodies target post-synaptic transmembrane proteins, most commonly the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and the muscle-specific tyrosine kinase, inducing end-plate alterations and neuromuscular transmission impairment. Several clinical subtypes are distinct on the basis of associated antibodies, age at symptom onset, thymus pathology, genetic factors, and weakness distribution. These subtypes have distinct pathogenesis that can account for different responses to treatment. Conventional therapy is based on the use of symptomatic agents, steroids, immunosuppressants and thymectomy. Of late, biologics have emerged as effective therapeutic options.Areas covered: In this review, we will discuss the management of myasthenia gravis in relation to its phenotypic and biological heterogeneity, in the light of recent advances in the disease immunopathology, new diagnostic tools, and results of clinical trialsExpert opinion: Clinical management is shaped on serological subtype, and patient age at onset, lifestyle and comorbidities, balancing therapeutic needs and safety. Although reliable biomarkers predictive of clinical and biologic outcome are still lacking, recent developments promise a more effective and safe treatment. Disease subtyping according to serological testing and immunopathology is crucial to the appropriateness of clinical management.

Neuromuscular junction-specific genes screening by deep RNA-seq analysis

Background

Neuromuscular junctions (NMJs) are chemical synapses formed between motor neurons and skeletal muscle fibers and are essential for controlling muscle contraction. NMJ dysfunction causes motor disorders, muscle wasting, and even breathing difficulties. Increasing evidence suggests that many NMJ disorders are closely related to alterations in specific gene products that are highly concentrated in the synaptic region of the muscle. However, many of these proteins are still undiscovered. Thus, screening for NMJ-specific proteins is essential for studying NMJ and the pathogenesis of NMJ diseases.

Results

In this study, synaptic regions (SRs) and nonsynaptic regions (NSRs) of diaphragm samples from newborn (P0) and adult (3-month-old) mice were used for RNA-seq. A total of 92 and 182 genes were identified as differentially expressed between the SR and NSR in newborn and adult mice, respectively. Meanwhile, a total of 1563 genes were identified as differentially expressed between the newborn SR and adult SR. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analyses, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of the DEGs were performed. Protein–protein interaction (PPI) networks were constructed using STRING and Cytoscape. Further analysis identified some novel proteins and pathways that may be important for NMJ development, maintenance and maturation. Specifically, Sv2b, Ptgir, Gabrb3, P2rx3, Dlgap1 and Rims1 may play roles in NMJ development. Hcn1 may localize to the muscle membrane to regulate NMJ maintenance. Trim63, Fbxo32 and several Asb family proteins may regulate muscle developmental-related processes.

Conclusion

Here, we present a complete dataset describing the spatiotemporal transcriptome changes in synaptic genes and important synaptic pathways. The neuronal projection-related pathway, ion channel activity and neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction pathway are important for NMJ development. The myelination and voltage-gated ion channel activity pathway may be important for NMJ maintenance. These data will facilitate the understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the development and maintenance of NMJ and the pathogenesis of NMJ disorders.

Ocular myasthenia gravis: updates on an elusive target

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG) is a complex condition with heterogenous phenotypes and ill-defined diagnostic criteria. Understanding concomitant risk factors and autoimmune serology can help inform prognosis for generalization and guide treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although antibodies to acetylcholine receptors or muscle-specific kinase likely increase risk of generalization, they are less frequent in OMG. Patients without either antibody tend to have a milder disease process and often have variable antibodies to other end-plate proteins such as LRP4, agrin, or cortactin. The treatment of OMG begins with pyridostigmine and is supplemented by oral prednisone if treatment-resistant or high risk for generalization. Variable oral prednisone regimens have been used with success and further immunosuppression may be best achieved with mycophenolate mofetil and azathioprine. Checkpoint inhibitor-induced myasthenia gravis is increasingly recognized and likely has high rates of mortality associated with myocarditis.

SUMMARY

Our understanding of OMG and its variable phenotypes continues to evolve. Autoantibody testing increasingly provides valuable diagnostic and prognostic information. Despite these improvements, a lack of quality treatment trials creates significant challenges for evidence-based management guidelines.

Immunopathology of Autoimmune Myasthenia Gravis: Implications for Improved Testing Algorithms and Treatment Strategies

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a heterogeneous condition, characterized by autoantibodies (Abs) that target functionally important structures within neuromuscular junctions (NMJ), thus affecting nerve-to-muscle transmission. MG patients are more often now subgrouped based on the profile of serum autoantibodies, which segregate with clinical presentation, immunopathology, and their response to therapies. The serological testing plays an essential role in confirming MG diagnosis and guiding disease management, although a small percentage of MG patients remain negative for antibodies. With the advancements in new highly effective pathophysiologically-specific immunotherapeutic options, it has become increasingly important to identify the specific Abs responsible for the pathogenicity in individual MG patients. There are several new assays and protocols being developed for the improved detection of Abs in MG patients. This review focuses on the divergent immunopathological mechanisms in MG, and discusses their relevance to improved diagnostic and treatment. We propose a comprehensive "reflex testing," algorithm for the presence of MG autoantibodies, and foresee that in the near future, the convenience and specificity of novel assays will permit the clinicians to consider them into routine systematic testing, thus stimulating laboratories to make these tests available. Moreover, adopting treatment driven testing algorithms will be crucial to identify subgroups of patients potentially benefiting from novel immunotherapies for MG.

Update in the Management of Myasthenia Gravis and Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome

Myasthenia gravis (MG) and Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) are the most common disorders of neuromuscular transmission in clinical practice. Disorders of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) are characterized by fluctuating and fatigable weakness and include autoimmune, toxic, and genetic conditions. Adults with NMJ disorders are most often antibody mediated, with MG being the most common, having a prevalence of approximately 1 in 10,000, and with women being affected about twice as often as men. This article focuses on advances in management of autoimmune MG and LEMS.

A Neurologist's Perspective on Understanding Myasthenia Gravis: Clinical Perspectives of Etiologic Factors, Diagnosis, and Preoperative Treatment

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a disease of neuromuscular transmission caused by antibodies directed toward proteins concentrated at the neuromuscular junction. Mild to life-threatening weakness varies in severity over time and with level of activity. Therefore, clinical diagnosis is often challenging. MG may be categorized by autoantibody type, thymic pathologic condition, and age of onset. Treatments are tailored for each group. A key management concern is severe exacerbation of weakness resulting from infections or exposure to certain medications, including antibiotics, which may be severe enough to produce respiratory decompensation. The article reviews key diagnostic issues and treatment options.

The role of the laboratory in the expanding field of neuroimmunology: Autoantibodies to neural targets

Accelerated identification of autoantibodies associated with previously idiopathic neurological disease has provided insights into disease mechanisms, enhanced understanding of neurological function, and opportunities for improved therapeutic interventions. The role of the laboratory in the expanding field of neuroimmunology is critical as specific autoantibody identification provides guidance to clinicians in diagnosis, prognosis, tumor search strategies, and therapeutic interventions. The number of specific autoantibodies identified continues to increase and newer testing strategies increase efficiencies in the laboratory and availability to clinicians. The need for broadly targeted efficient testing is underscored by the variability in clinical presentation and tumor associations attributable to a specific autoantibody, and conversely the various autoantibody specificities that can be the cause of a given clinical presentation. While many of the antineural antibodies were first recognized in the setting of neoplastic disease, idiopathic autoimmune neurological disease in the absence of underlying tumor is increasingly recognized. Appropriation of therapeutic modalities used to treat autoimmune disease to treat these autoantibody mediated neurological diseases has improved patient outcomes. Interaction between clinicians and laboratorians is critical to our understanding of these diseases and optimization of the clinical benefits of our increasing knowledge in neuroimmunology.