Dissociation of Spinothalamic Modalities Following Anterolateral Cordotomy

Open Thoracic Cordotomy for Cancer Pain with Intraoperative Neuromonitoring: A Case Series and Critical Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVE

Cordotomy is a viable option for patients with intractable cancer pain and limited survival. Open thoracic cordotomy is offered when patients are not candidates for percutaneous cordotomy. After the open procedure, traditionally performed purely based on anatomic landmarks, up to 22% of patients experience postoperative limb weakness. The objective of this study is to report our experience with neurophysiology-guided open cordotomy along with a critical review of the literature.

METHODS

Between 2019 and 2022, 5 open thoracic cordotomies were performed in our center. Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring was used in all cases to guide the lesion and standard single-level laminectomy or hemilaminectomy was performed for exposure. Outcome measures were retrospectively reviewed focusing on pain control and neurologic status. Existing literature on cordotomy was critically reviewed.

RESULTS

There was satisfactory pain relief with preservation of motor function in all 5 cases. Temperature sensation was preserved in all but 1 patient, who lost it after the previous ipsilateral percutaneous cordotomy (PCC). No procedural complications were experienced. We found that the neurophysiology monitoring lesion was guided anterior compared with what would have been lesioned on an anatomic basis.

CONCLUSIONS

Open thoracic cordotomy is a safe and effective procedure for intractable cancer-related pain. Technical advancements significantly reduced mortality and major morbidity of PCC. Our series suggests that neurophysiology monitoring alters the location of the lesion and may help better targeting of pain fibers within the spinothalamic tract and preserve other long tracts. The safety profile of open cordotomy with neurophysiology compares favorably with the PCC.

Combined Neurophysiologic and Neuroimaging Approach to Reveal the Structure-Function Paradox in Cervical Myelopathy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To explore the so-called structure-function paradox in individuals with focal spinal lesions by means of tract-specific MRI coupled with multimodal evoked potentials and quantitative sensory testing.

METHODS

Individuals with signs and symptoms attributable to cervical myelopathy (i.e., no evidence of competing neurologic diagnoses) were recruited at the Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland, between February 2018 and March 2019. We evaluated the relationship between the extent of structural damage within spinal nociceptive pathways (i.e., dorsal horn, spinothalamic tract, anterior commissure) assessed with atlas-based MRI and (1) the functional integrity of spinal nociceptive pathways measured with contact heat-, cold-, and pinprick-evoked potentials and (2) clinical somatosensory phenotypes assessed with quantitative sensory testing.

RESULTS

Sixteen individuals (mean age 61 years) with either degenerative (n = 13) or posttraumatic (n = 3) cervical myelopathy participated in the study. Most individuals presented with mild myelopathy (modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score >15; n = 13). A total of 71% of individuals presented with structural damage within spinal nociceptive pathways on MRI. However, 50% of these individuals presented with complete functional sparing (i.e., normal contact heat-, cold-, and pinprick-evoked potentials). The extent of structural damage within spinal nociceptive pathways was not associated with functional integrity of thermal (heat: p = 0.57; cold: p = 0.49) and mechano-nociceptive pathways (p = 0.83) or with the clinical somatosensory phenotype (heat: p = 0.16; cold: p = 0.37; mechanical: p = 0.73). The amount of structural damage to the spinothalamic tract did not correlate with spinothalamic conduction velocity (p > 0.05; ρ = -0.11).

DISCUSSION

Our findings provide neurophysiologic evidence to substantiate that structural damage in the spinal cord does not equate to functional somatosensory deficits. This study recognizes the pronounced structure-function paradox in cervical myelopathies and underlines the inevitable need for a multimodal phenotyping approach to reveal the eloquence of lesions within somatosensory pathways.