|
1
|
Rutala WA, Donskey CJ, Weber DJ. Disinfection and sterilization: New technologies. Am J Infect Control 2023; 51:A13-A21. [PMID: 37890943 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2023.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adherence to professional guidelines and/or manufacturer's instructions for use regarding proper disinfection and sterilization of medical devices is crucial to preventing cross transmission of pathogens between patients. Emerging pathogens (e.g., Candida auris) and complex medical devices provide new challenges. METHODS A search for published English articles on new disinfection and sterilization technologies was conducted by Google, Google scholar and PubMed. RESULTS Several new disinfection methods or products (e.g., electrostatic spraying, new sporicides, colorized disinfectants, "no touch" room decontamination, continuous room decontamination) and sterilization technologies (e.g., new sterilization technology for endoscopes) were identified. CONCLUSIONS These technologies should reduce patient risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William A Rutala
- Statewide Program for Infection Control and Epidemiology, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Division of Infectious Diseases, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.
| | - Curtis J Donskey
- Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Care, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH
| | - David J Weber
- Statewide Program for Infection Control and Epidemiology, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Division of Infectious Diseases, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Infection Prevention, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Christenson EC, Cronk R, Atkinson H, Bhatt A, Berdiel E, Cawley M, Cho G, Coleman CK, Harrington C, Heilferty K, Fejfar D, Grant EJ, Grigg K, Joshi T, Mohan S, Pelak G, Shu Y, Bartram J. Evidence Map and Systematic Review of Disinfection Efficacy on Environmental Surfaces in Healthcare Facilities. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:11100. [PMID: 34769620 PMCID: PMC8582915 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182111100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Revised: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) contribute to patient morbidity and mortality with an estimated 1.7 million infections and 99,000 deaths costing USD $28-34 billion annually in the United States alone. There is little understanding as to if current environmental surface disinfection practices reduce pathogen load, and subsequently HAIs, in critical care settings. This evidence map includes a systematic review on the efficacy of disinfecting environmental surfaces in healthcare facilities. We screened 17,064 abstracts, 635 full texts, and included 181 articles for data extraction and study quality assessment. We reviewed ten disinfectant types and compared disinfectants with respect to study design, outcome organism, and fourteen indictors of study quality. We found important areas for improvement and gaps in the research related to study design, implementation, and analysis. Implementation of disinfection, a determinant of disinfection outcomes, was not measured in most studies and few studies assessed fungi or viruses. Assessing and comparing disinfection efficacy was impeded by study heterogeneity; however, we catalogued the outcomes and results for each disinfection type. We concluded that guidelines for disinfectant use are primarily based on laboratory data rather than a systematic review of in situ disinfection efficacy. It is critically important for practitioners and researchers to consider system-level efficacy and not just the efficacy of the disinfectant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth C. Christenson
- The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; (E.C.C.); (R.C.); (H.A.); (A.B.); (E.B.); (G.C.); (C.K.C.); (C.H.); (K.H.); (D.F.); (E.J.G.); (T.J.); (S.M.); (Y.S.)
| | - Ryan Cronk
- The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; (E.C.C.); (R.C.); (H.A.); (A.B.); (E.B.); (G.C.); (C.K.C.); (C.H.); (K.H.); (D.F.); (E.J.G.); (T.J.); (S.M.); (Y.S.)
- ICF, Durham, NC 27713, USA
| | - Helen Atkinson
- The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; (E.C.C.); (R.C.); (H.A.); (A.B.); (E.B.); (G.C.); (C.K.C.); (C.H.); (K.H.); (D.F.); (E.J.G.); (T.J.); (S.M.); (Y.S.)
| | - Aayush Bhatt
- The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; (E.C.C.); (R.C.); (H.A.); (A.B.); (E.B.); (G.C.); (C.K.C.); (C.H.); (K.H.); (D.F.); (E.J.G.); (T.J.); (S.M.); (Y.S.)
| | - Emilio Berdiel
- The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; (E.C.C.); (R.C.); (H.A.); (A.B.); (E.B.); (G.C.); (C.K.C.); (C.H.); (K.H.); (D.F.); (E.J.G.); (T.J.); (S.M.); (Y.S.)
| | - Michelle Cawley
- Health Sciences Library, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; (M.C.); (K.G.); (G.P.)
| | - Grace Cho
- The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; (E.C.C.); (R.C.); (H.A.); (A.B.); (E.B.); (G.C.); (C.K.C.); (C.H.); (K.H.); (D.F.); (E.J.G.); (T.J.); (S.M.); (Y.S.)
| | - Collin Knox Coleman
- The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; (E.C.C.); (R.C.); (H.A.); (A.B.); (E.B.); (G.C.); (C.K.C.); (C.H.); (K.H.); (D.F.); (E.J.G.); (T.J.); (S.M.); (Y.S.)
| | - Cailee Harrington
- The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; (E.C.C.); (R.C.); (H.A.); (A.B.); (E.B.); (G.C.); (C.K.C.); (C.H.); (K.H.); (D.F.); (E.J.G.); (T.J.); (S.M.); (Y.S.)
| | - Kylie Heilferty
- The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; (E.C.C.); (R.C.); (H.A.); (A.B.); (E.B.); (G.C.); (C.K.C.); (C.H.); (K.H.); (D.F.); (E.J.G.); (T.J.); (S.M.); (Y.S.)
| | - Don Fejfar
- The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; (E.C.C.); (R.C.); (H.A.); (A.B.); (E.B.); (G.C.); (C.K.C.); (C.H.); (K.H.); (D.F.); (E.J.G.); (T.J.); (S.M.); (Y.S.)
| | - Emily J. Grant
- The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; (E.C.C.); (R.C.); (H.A.); (A.B.); (E.B.); (G.C.); (C.K.C.); (C.H.); (K.H.); (D.F.); (E.J.G.); (T.J.); (S.M.); (Y.S.)
| | - Karen Grigg
- Health Sciences Library, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; (M.C.); (K.G.); (G.P.)
| | - Tanmay Joshi
- The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; (E.C.C.); (R.C.); (H.A.); (A.B.); (E.B.); (G.C.); (C.K.C.); (C.H.); (K.H.); (D.F.); (E.J.G.); (T.J.); (S.M.); (Y.S.)
| | - Suniti Mohan
- The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; (E.C.C.); (R.C.); (H.A.); (A.B.); (E.B.); (G.C.); (C.K.C.); (C.H.); (K.H.); (D.F.); (E.J.G.); (T.J.); (S.M.); (Y.S.)
| | - Grace Pelak
- Health Sciences Library, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; (M.C.); (K.G.); (G.P.)
| | - Yuhong Shu
- The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; (E.C.C.); (R.C.); (H.A.); (A.B.); (E.B.); (G.C.); (C.K.C.); (C.H.); (K.H.); (D.F.); (E.J.G.); (T.J.); (S.M.); (Y.S.)
| | - Jamie Bartram
- The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; (E.C.C.); (R.C.); (H.A.); (A.B.); (E.B.); (G.C.); (C.K.C.); (C.H.); (K.H.); (D.F.); (E.J.G.); (T.J.); (S.M.); (Y.S.)
- School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9DY, UK
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Boyce JM. A review of wipes used to disinfect hard surfaces in health care facilities. Am J Infect Control 2021; 49:104-114. [PMID: 32569612 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.06.183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2019] [Revised: 06/13/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite a plethora of wipes available for use in health care facilities, there is a paucity of articles describing wipe composition, potential interactions between wipes and disinfectants, the manner in which wipes are used, and their relative efficacy. The purpose of this article is to provide an in-depth review of wipes used for disinfection of hard surfaces in health care settings. METHODS Comprehensive searches of the Pubmed database and Internet were conducted, and articles published from 1953 through September 2019 and pertinent on-line documents were reviewed. Bibliographies of relevant articles were reviewed. RESULTS Wipes vary considerably in their composition, and the disinfectants with which they are used. With reusable dry wipes, the ratio of wipe material to disinfectant and the amount of disinfectant absorbed by the wipe and delivered to surfaces is difficult to standardize, which may affect their efficacy. The manner in which wipes are used by health care personnel is highly variable, due in part to insufficient instructions for use and inadequate education of relevant personnel. CONCLUSIONS Additional research is needed regarding the best practices for using different types of wipes, improved methods for educating staff, and establishing the relative efficacy of wipes in reducing environmental contamination and health care-associated infections.
Collapse
|