Prevalence of housing needs among inpatients: a 1 year audit of housing needs in the acute mental health unit in Tallaght Hospital

Delayed discharge in inpatient psychiatric care: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Delayed discharge is problematic. It is financially costly and can create barriers to delivering best patient care, by preventing return to usual functioning and delaying admissions of others in need. This systematic review aimed to collate existing evidence on delayed discharge in psychiatric inpatient settings and to develop understanding of factors and outcomes of delays in these services.

METHODS

A search of relevant literature published between 2002 and 2022 was conducted on Pubmed, PsycInfo and Embase. Studies of any design, which published data on delayed discharge from psychiatric inpatient care in high income countries were included. Studies examining child and adolescent, general medical or forensic settings were excluded. A narrative synthesis method was utilised. Quality of research was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).

RESULTS

Eighteen studies from England, Canada, Australia, Ireland, and Norway met the inclusion criteria. Six main reasons for delayed discharge were identified: (1) accommodation needs, (2) challenges securing community or rehabilitation support, (3) funding difficulties, (4) family/carer factors, (5) forensic considerations and (6) person being out of area. Some demographic and clinical factors were also found to relate to delays, such as having a diagnosis of schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder, cognitive impairment, and increased service input prior to admission. Being unemployed and socially isolated were also linked to delays. Only one study commented on consequences of delays for patients, finding they experienced feelings of lack of choice and control. Four studies examined consequences on services, identifying high financial costs.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the findings suggest there are multiple interlinked factors relevant in delayed discharge that should be considered in practice and policy. Suggestions for future research are discussed, including investigating delayed discharge in other high-income countries, examining delayed discharge from child and forensic psychiatric settings, and exploring consequences of delays on patients and staff. We suggest that future research be consistent in terms used to define delayed discharge, to enhance the clarity of the evidence base.

REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER ON PROSPERO

292515.

DATE OF REGISTRATION

9th December 2021.

Predicting Housing Related Delayed Discharge from Mental Health Inpatient Units: A Case Control Study

The aims of this study were to identify factors that a) predict whether people experience housing related discharge delay (HRDD) from a mental health inpatient unit; and b) predict the length of HRDD for people affected. By identifying the groups most affected by HRDD, clinicians and policy makers can prioritise and address barriers to timely discharge at both an individual and systemic level. A case control study using a detailed medical record review was conducted in one Australian mental health service. Demographic, clinical, contextual and systemic variables were collected for patients with HRDD in one calendar year (n = 55) and a random comparison sample (n = 55). Logistical and multiple regression analyses were conducted to identify variables that predict HRDD and length of HRDD. A model that correctly predicted 92% of HRDD and 78% of non-HRDD cases using five variables was developed. These variables were: diagnosis of schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder, physical comorbidity, having a history of violence or aggressive behaviour, being employed and being involved as a defendant in the justice system. The first three variables increased the likelihood of HRDD, while the second two reduced the likelihood of HRDD. For people who experienced HRDD, the only variable that predicted length of delay was staff reported difficulty finding appropriate support services. This model can be used to rapidly identify patients who might be at risk of HRDD and commence coordinated actions to secure appropriate housing and supports to facilitate timely discharge, thereby addressing a current practice gap. These findings highlight the intersection between health, housing and disability services in the lives of people with serious mental illness, and the need for a whole of government approach to investment and integration to address systemic barriers to suitable housing and supports.

Homelessness amongst psychiatric Inpatients: a cross-sectional study in the mid-west of Ireland

BACKGROUND

This cross-sectional study sought to establish the prevalence of homelessness amongst inpatients in two psychiatric units in Ireland and explore the perceived relationship between psychiatric illness and homelessness.

METHODS

The study employed a semi-structured interview format utilising a specifically designed questionnaire which received ethical approval from the Limerick University Hospitals Group ethics committee.

RESULTS

Fifty psychiatric inpatients were interviewed. Fifteen were either "currently" homeless (n = 8) or had experienced "past" homelessness (n = 7). Those who had experienced homelessness were more likely to have a psychotic illness. A majority of those who had experienced homelessness believed that psychiatric illness contributed to their homelessness. Involuntary admission rates were more than double for patients in the homeless group. A number of participants also reported that a lack of accommodation was preventing their discharge.

CONCLUSION

Homelessness affects a significant number of psychiatric patients and can be both a contributory factor to, and consequence of, mental illness. With homelessness at unprecedented levels, there is a need for the development of tailored programmes aimed at supporting these vulnerable groups.

Irish Medical Organisation Doolin Memorial Lecture 2019: rhetoric and reality in mental health-Ireland and the world

This Doolin Memorial Lecture presents six suggestions for positive change in Ireland's mental health services, focused on legislation and rights: (a) revision of the Mental Health Act 2001 in line with existing recommendations, to better protect and promote a broad range of rights, including rights to treatment and liberty (which are related); (b) enhanced forensic mental health care to better protect and promote both treatment and liberty in this population; (c) prompt full implementation of the Public Health (Alcohol) Act 2018 to reduce alcohol-related harm and the opportunity cost of alcohol problems in the health service; (d) implementation of the Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Act 2015 to provide decision-making supports to the 29.4% of medical/surgical inpatients and 52.6% of psychiatry inpatients who lack full decision-making capacity for treatment decisions; (e) judicious medicalisation of our response to individual cannabis use (although legalisation is not advised); and (f) enhanced recognition of the social rights of the mentally ill, especially the right to housing. Attention to these areas would improve the quality of life and quality of liberty of people with mental illness and their families. Progress in these areas needs to be underpinned by enhanced involvement of service-users in planning and provision of care, increased funding of mental health services and particular attention to groups who are currently underserved, including children and adolescents. Enhanced attention to these areas would also help advance Ireland's national mental health policy, "A Vision for Change", which has yet to be implemented in full. That, too, would help.